|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous astrophysicist |
|
Post Content
|
...
No. but I could probably learn how to with available materials, but it wouldn't be inexpensive. What is the need?
Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1276485 I'm pretty sure that with enough publicity and a tachyon detector we could receive a message from the future. The publicity is necessary so that those in the future will know that we're waiting on them, where, and when we'll be looking. Tachyons suppestedly can travel backwards in time. If those in the future wished to, they could communicate with the past by sending a message in binary through transmitted tachyons. This presumes, of course, that there is a future for humanity. I'm thinking we could ask them. Probably crazy, but the logic seems sound to me. Thanks for answering me. BTW, I'm the one who offered to help you get your work published. So, keep thinking about it. My offer will remain as long as its possible to publish stuff. I respectfully decline your offer, simply because I have no idea who i am dealing with but find it highly unlikely the intent is good considering. As for constancy moving into the past, we can detect a particle defied as a tachyon but have no idea what we are really detecting (I think it is s differing manifestation of an already identified theoretical particle)and as for receiving messages from the past by affecting a theoretical particle and coding and decoding messages sent with it, I find that project a bit too much to wrap my mind around at the time with just trying to live at the forefront of my mind.. BTW I got banned by making a comment about the guy from India being a fake again, instantly There you go in all your googling glory not realizing that tachyons cannot be detected because they are only a hypothetical "particle" yet you said you could learn to build one but it wouldn't be cheap. You are if nothing else entertaining  I think I made it quite clear that I did not believe there was a unique particle "tachyon" and that attempts to detect it were actually detecting an already discovered particle. There should be no trouble detecting these. You are an idiot and have the reading comprehension ability of a third grader, and you are in the wrong fucking business.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
