WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!

Excellent: an experiment! So, based on your claim, if a GOTO telescope is aligned ONLY with the stars, and tracks those fine, if you tell the GOTO to slew to the Moon, it will FAIL.

Easy enough test. Do you agree with the premise? Any criticisms of the experiment?



Then why are you so *bad* at it? Never mind.

Even if what you are claiming were true, it's *irrelevant.* Better yet, you don't understand why!

And the process of aligning a scope is *not* mapping.



You are *hopelessly* misunderstanding the references. Try reading them again. Slowly.




Please show evidence of this remarkable assertion. Do you have any links to back you up on this?



Of *course* it indicates they are in their proper places. If they are moving in 'improper' ways, the telescope cannot predict them. Why don't you understand this horribly simple concept?

GOTOs make four basic assumptions. If *any* of them are wrong, the telescope will fail.

The assumptions are: Earth moves at a predictable rate around the Sun, Earth rotates on its axis at a predictable rate, Earth's axis is fixed (at least as measured in years or centuries), and objects within the solar system move predictably according to Newton's Laws.

Other than that, all a GOTO has is a set map in it's little electronic brain -- and that map has *no way* to predict or adapt to *any* unpredictableness in any of those assumptions.

So, any criticisms of the GOTO experiment outlined above?

Your stupid yourself for posting bullshit. Stop accusing others about stuff that isn't true. You sir need to learn a thing or two Bout how telescopes work. Other than that, stop posting stupid nonsense.

Then prove it. Answer my questions. Why am I able to accurately predict the moon's current position to within at least an arcminute using a book that was published 22 years ago, a decade before you were involved in the hobby?

Oh, back on that unable to access thread BS because more people here disagree with you than agree with you? You do not speak for the people reading and participating in this thread. Most of them agree with me that you're the one who's full of it. They see that you're running away from my questions and they do not accept your pathetic excuses for doing so. Whereas you are unable to make these calculations, I have done so and I have presented them for everyone to see and use for themselves.

I did. You are lying. I posted photographic and video proof as well a thread proving that you're a liar as well.


You think you're terribly clever and can get away with lying. You think the ends justify the means, so you need to scare people into thinking something is "off" with the moon so that they'll "prepare." Part of doing that involves trying to discredit me, so you invent lies like this. The thing is, you're not clever, and there is proof right here of your lies:



Wrong. You latched onto that "mapping" term because of the quote I quoted from the paramount manual. Which clearly says it saves the alignment session to session with no additional synchronization. You don't even know what mapping is, you just latched onto the term because I used it.

This goes back to that part where you think you're clever. You're not. You're not even slightly intelligent. Your lies have now been exposed for all to see.

That is my work. Ask Trinity. Ask SHR. They'll verify that. SHR himself saw me take and process those photos in person.

One astronomer. Me. An amateur astronomer.

Liar.


You're projecting your own insecurities. Those on GLP who are dimwitted enough to think I'm a "bullshit artist" do so because of the defamatory lies of people like you. They're not even clever though because the info to expose them is right at hand. It's all right there, which is why anyone who has two brain cells to rub together can easily see that you are the liar here, not me.

Anxiously awaiting a response to this post from IDW...

Another experiment: If the Moon is moving unpredictably, then the annular solar eclipse, visible from Australia and the Pacific on May 10th should utterly fail to occur.

[link to eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov]

Likewise, just 15 days later, there will be a penumbral Lunar eclipse as well, visible to the entire continental United States. Again, if the Moon were moving in the ways you are claiming, that should also utterly fail to occur.

[link to eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov]

What say you to *that* experiment, IDW/A.A? You wisely rejected my wager about December 21st. Would you care to wager on these two eclipses occurring in May?

Still waiting for an answer on this burning question...

He can't access the thread I.E: frantically Googling and trying to think up an answer that makes him look clever.

Astro, the only thing I can provisionally conclude is that IDW/A.A didn't *understand* the video.

Which, in itself, is mind-blowing. No pun intended.

So we are currently have Dr Astro @ 107 proven facts to Anonymous Astrophysicist 0 Its apparent to those late to the party who is he liar here.

Why don't we do a real experiment, one that will reveal just how full of shit you and the bullshit 'science' you represent really is. No astronomer worth his weight in manure would deny that the Mayans predicted the timing of solar and lunar eclipses with greater accuracy than modern astronomers are capable of ten years in advance by calculation over 800 years ago.

In fact they use the Mayan calender to predict them to this day. Show us any reference that predates , oh ,let's say 1975 that predicts a lunar eclipse on May 10th visible from Australia and show the calculations involved that predict it.

Failure to do so is admitting it is not calculations being used to predict these eclipses, but the Mayan calender. Just because you are unwilling to admit it means nothing.

Say hello to everyone out at pine gap for me

Dr. Asshole hasn't posted a single verifiable fact other than posting references to facts that say exactly what I did. He has absolutely no independent input of any kind. His record is total failure in astronomy, and he has proved it by destroying or rendering useless perfectly good equipment wheras if I had been involved i could have at least set up the equipment where it would work..

This thread has obviously gone to the trolls, stalkers and .gov bullshit artists, there's not a single real person posting besides myself.

Look at page one through 75.

Who do you think you are fooling?

You think your t stock psychology works on me?

Has it ever?

The more you pester me the more firmly convinced I am on the right track. My latest theory was the moon has moved into an orbit much closer than 5 degrees inclination to the ecliptic. I must be right to have this many man hours spent on me when there is not a single real individual who is able to post to or access the thread without being instabanned(now send in the fake 'support)

Thread: Siberian permafrost thaw warning sparked by cave data

Still no answer...

Lack of reading comprehension?


Thus you are telling us the Mayans knew some thousand years ago, that the moon would start moving unpredictable in 2010?

You just shot yourself in the foot.


.

Yep...and you're the eye of the shit storm.

Can you give us a hint as to what excuse you'll be using when he's still here a year from now?

Yep, he beats us at being stupid. And we fail to look stupid. Thanks for clearing that up for all of us.

Even funnier that he refuses to do it. He keeps making grand claims but refuses, repeatedly, to present any supporting evidence. As an "astrophysicist" he should know how the scientific method works - and yet he chooses to abandon it. The only reason I can think of that he would do that is because to follow it would end up proving him wrong.

Checking to see if I can post....

Yep...

No instaban....

I suppose you're right - and right now you're the fool that can't win because you won't back up your claims, you won't provide evidence and you won't answer questions. All we get is obfuscation.


You're the only one who hasn't said anything. But, by all means, continue saying nothing.

BTW, I noticed you've taken to calling people names - another sure sign you're losing the debate.

In other words - you don't understand anything he said.


Where? Provide the link again.

And there we have it - when losing an argument claim the other party works for the government.

It must suck having your ass handed to you time and time again.

Prove it has never worked. I'm willing to bet Trinity can verify these photos. And if he does - will you say then?

Translation: You can't do it so you won't even try.

PROVE he's lying! Put up or shut up. Thus far, you've done neither.


LOL! The irony and hypocrisy.


You'll have to pardon me and, from what it looks like, pretty much everyone else, if we take everything YOU write as total manure. Dr. Astro has backed up his claims time and time again. What have you provided? Oh, that's right - NOTHING but unsupported claims.


Prove what you said is true. Have Trinity come on here and back up your claim. Again - put up or shut up.


Funny how the exact opposite is proving to be true.