WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!

Dr. Asshole hasn't posted a single verifiable fact other than posting references to facts that say exactly what I did. He has absolutely no independent input of any kind. His record is total failure in astronomy, and he has proved it by destroying or rendering useless perfectly good equipment wheras if I had been involved i could have at least set up the equipment where it would work..

This thread has obviously gone to the trolls, stalkers and .gov bullshit artists, there's not a single real person posting besides myself.

The more you pester me the more firmly convinced I am on the right track.

I don't recall claiming a properly set up telescope will track the moon properly, it won't. Two years ago it would, almost.

Almost no normal amateur astronomer has a permanent fixed mount for his telescope, meaning an alignment has to be done by a process known as mapping with each use. I went thorough this process every single night I set up my own telescope while I was involved in the hobby less than 12 years ago.

Even telescopes fixed in solid bedrock need to be mapped nightly to obtain accurate auto location. This is because being a one hundred thousandth of a degree off will result in total failure, and the timekeeping system in use is not accurate enough to obtain accuracy to this degree, as has already been shown to you through professional references. Without nightly mapping the telescope will locate the Celestia object through the spotter scope then the main telescope must be fine adjusted. THIS IS WHY ALL MAJOR OBSERVATORIES WITH COMPETENT PEOPLE AT THE COM DO A NIGHTLY MAPPING RUN, WHICH TAKES UP TO AN HOUR DEPENDING ON HOW FAST THE TELESCOPE IS.

The computer can then track or find celestial obejcts after several objects are mapped. This does not in any wa indicate they are in the 'proper' places. noly that thye have not moved realtive to each other or in the case of the planets in an unexpected trajectory

I asked you to show evidence proving that the "anomaly" you want someone to explain actually took place. That's my simple and obvious point. What is there to "explain" if you don't show wtf you are even talking about?



Yes, apparently I did miss that link. Kindly provide the link again showing a "perfectly horizontal terminator on a rising moon".

This reminds me of the scene in the movies where the monster is chased by the villagers through the countryside.. with pitchforks and scythes..

but they can't quite catch up.

If you support AA's contentions, then maybe you can do a better job of proving them. Go right ahead and demonstrate that the moon or any other objects in the sky are visibly out of place.

I'm not trying.. nor do I feel the need..
to prove anything to anyone.
Observation is enough for me.

Don't worry.. most people will not take the time to
learn enough about orbital mechanics to understand the physics.

Unless they do.. it's a game of 'whom do you believe?'

My comment was merely an observation.
Read into it what you will..
That's what you do.

This reminds me of the scene in the movies where the monster is chased by the villagers through the countryside.. with pitchforks and scythes..

but they can't quite catch up.

Actually, the better analogy is the Monty Python one where the fallen knight never admits he is hopelessly beaten.

This reminds me of the scene in the movies where the monster is chased by the villagers through the countryside.. with pitchforks and scythes..

but they can't quite catch up.

This reminds me of the scene in the movies where the monster is chased by the villagers through the countryside.. with pitchforks and scythes..

but they can't quite catch up.

This reminds me of the scene in the movies where the monster is chased by the villagers through the countryside.. with pitchforks and scythes..

but they can't quite catch up.

This reminds me of the scene in the movies where the monster is chased by the villagers through the countryside.. with pitchforks and scythes..

but they can't quite catch up.

This reminds me of the scene in the movies where the monster is chased by the villagers through the countryside.. with pitchforks and scythes..

but they can't quite catch up.

Ah, yes.. the noble quest.. against all odds.
Never submitting to defeat.

To a degree, it is that game, but it comes down to who believes all the uber-paranoid conspiracy stories that all astronomers are in on some incredibly vast coverup of the truth.

Why don't we do a real experiment, one that will reveal just how full of shit you and the bullshit 'science' you represent really is. No astronomer worth his weight in manure would deny that the Mayans predicted the timing of solar and lunar eclipses with greater accuracy than modern astronomers are capable of ten years in advance by calculation over 800 years ago.

In fact they use the Mayan calender to predict them to this day. Show us any reference that predates , oh ,let's say 1975 that predicts a lunar eclipse on May 10th visible from Australia and show the calculations involved that predict it.

Failure to do so is admitting it is not calculations being used to predict these eclipses, but the Mayan calender. Just because you are unwilling to admit it means nothing.

Ah, yes.. the noble quest.. against all odds.
Never submitting to defeat.

Why don't we do a real experiment, one that will reveal just how full of shit you and the bullshit 'science' you represent really is. No astronomer worth his weight in manure would deny that the Mayans predicted the timing of solar and lunar eclipses with greater accuracy than modern astronomers are capable of ten years in advance by calculation over 800 years ago.

In fact they use the Mayan calender to predict them to this day.

Show us any reference that predates , oh ,let's say 1975 that predicts a lunar eclipse on May 10th visible from Australia and show the calculations involved that predict it.

Failure to do so is admitting it is not calculations being used to predict these eclipses, but the Mayan calender. Just because you are unwilling to admit it means nothing.

When one understands the true nature of the difference between what science is defined as in the 'fictionary' and what it actually is, it is not so hard to believe.

Look at how many astronomers have met with untimely deaths in the past several years and then listen to Phil Plait talk about astrophysics and ask yourself, does he sound like he actually knows what he is talking about?

Yes, astronomers with the clout to be heard and the desire to blow the whistle could be convinced to keep quiet, and I am sure they are.

The way this thread has been sequestered and set upon by so many known disinformation operatives working in mass and in concert is circumstance evidence that the truth is being covered up, as is the smooth tongued onslaught of obvious lies. How complicated is it actually to calculate the maximum angle from vertical the terminator can portend at any given latitude and does it take any 'complex calculations', or is more likely those complex calculation are being used to hide the facts, as with the Goretard human caused global warming advocates?

Open the thread to all posters and see how you do. Every one of you posting here with the exception of a few anonymous posters who are undoubtedly socks of some of you is known and well established as such SHILL stalker.

If someone who claims to be an astronomer, has his avatar stating astrophysicist, starts a thread with outrageous claims with no evidence to back them up then I think others calling upon that proof to be shown and his claims to be verified are entitled to do so.

Not once has evidence been presented by him.

Quit blowing your own horn, you have lost a ten on one battle royal. How is that for a metaphor?

Why don't we do a real experiment, one that will reveal just how full of shit you and the bullshit 'science' you represent really is. No astronomer worth his weight in manure would deny that the Mayans predicted the timing of solar and lunar eclipses with greater accuracy than modern astronomers are capable of ten years in advance by calculation over 800 years ago.

In fact they use the Mayan calender to predict them to this day.

Show us any reference that predates , oh ,let's say 1975 that predicts a lunar eclipse on May 10th visible from Australia and show the calculations involved that predict it.

Failure to do so is admitting it is not calculations being used to predict these eclipses, but the Mayan calender. Just because you are unwilling to admit it means nothing.