Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,754 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 900,336
Pageviews Today: 1,144,562Threads Today: 265Posts Today: 4,941
10:21 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!
Poster Handle Anonymous Astrophysicist
Post Content
So, at this particular point, in figuring out exactly what IDW/A.A is claiming I remain hopelessly mixed up.

Circular Reasoning -- see Reasoning, Circular

He is claiming that un-updated GOTOs can't track the Moon, because it is moving unpredictably.

But he is also claiming that the Moon is moving unpredictably, except the Mayans predicted it.

Then he has claimed that the Mayans predicted it, but only with eclipses.

He then adds eclipses are occurring as predicted, but only if the predictions are *recent.*

But then he also claims that old books' predictions of lunar and solar eclipses should be off, since the eclipses and lunar motions have recently become unpredictable.

Which brings us back to claiming that un-updated GOTOs can't track the Moon, because it is moving unpredictably.

Reasoning, circular -- see Circular Reasoning.

Instead of Schrodinger's Cat, we seem to have IDW's eclipse. It is both predictable and unpredictable!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


You never did show those calculations made in the 70's predicting the eclipse in Australia recently. Because you can't. Why can't you? Why can't astroturd?

I have said it repeatedly and I cannot imagine given the way the Gregorian calender is so obviously grossly inaccurate with continuous adjustments that must be made that any intelligent person would attempt to disagree, but it is simply not possible to time an event 37 years in the future when a critical part of the input data cannot be relied upon to be accurate.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:



News