WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED! | |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 33360181 United States 03/19/2013 11:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Still waiting for an answer: Quoting: Hydra Since the eclipse data from the 1987 book are still correct, and since you claim, the authors plagiarized the info from the Mayan astronomers, please explain, how the Mayans knew, that the moon will be off nowadays? . Because they were far superior astronomers? My goodness -- such cognitive dissonance, with YOURSELF. Now making up tortured Mayan astronomers. Thunderously funny. You claimed the Moon was moving unpredictably, so that telescopes would not track and had to be adjusted and updated all the time. Then you claimed Western science couldn't predict eclipses accurately more than a couple years in advance anyway. Then you claimed the Maya had predicted the Moon's motions super accurately. Then you are presented with books and data showing the Moon is moving predictably, and telescopes tracking accurately, which you ascribe to them getting data from the Maya. So you are left with a classic contradiction. You must be wrong about the unpredictable motion of the Moon in the first place, because it was predicted by the Maya and all that data has been in GOTOs since they were invented, so there is no reason for telescopes to fail to track the Moon. What other possibility is there? Checkmate. |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 33360181 United States 03/19/2013 01:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | As I recall the last transit of Venus WAS NOT successfully predicted by lamestream science. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1189930 Add it to the list of things you're wrong about. [link to img59.imageshack.us] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74444 United States 03/19/2013 07:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | As I recall the last transit of Venus WAS NOT successfully predicted by lamestream science. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1189930 Add it to the list of things you're wrong about. [link to img59.imageshack.us] Great tune in the video. Now, I wonder if IDW/A.A will address those points, as well as mine, above? |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 30047168 United States 03/20/2013 03:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | As I recall the last transit of Venus WAS NOT successfully predicted by lamestream science. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1189930 It wasn't? Present your evidence to support this claim. Oh, and BTW, couldn't you idiots make up just a few more user id's to make it look good? Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1189930 As I stated earlier but you obviously chose to ignore - present your evidence that anyone is posting with more than one ID. Can you? I thought not. Paranoid much? A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 30047168 United States 03/20/2013 04:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There has been a change here. now maybe there will be more open responses. I have a feeling the shills are about to be blown out of the water Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 1189930 Nice to see you admit that we hadn't been blown out of the water in previous debates. But I doubt anything will change. It will still be you that ends up picking yourself up off the floor. A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 30047168 United States 03/20/2013 04:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | BTW, I'm having problems accessing this site today. That must be proof that you're trying to block me and other people from seeing this. A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
Hydra User ID: 36536708 Germany 03/20/2013 04:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Clever Astrophysicist User ID: 36247816 Canada 03/20/2013 07:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I had trouble earlier too. The only logical conclusion is that AA is a disinformation shill, sent to this site to spam it with such ridiculously unintelligent theories that we miss the one accurate theory, posted by an actual astrophysicist, you know, with an actual education, an actual job, and actual respect of his peers? And now he's blocking access to the thread by those who are intellectually superior to him in the interest of preserving his little decoy. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74444 United States 03/20/2013 10:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | IDW/A.A can't be bothered to answer this thread right now. It is much more important to be arguing about "bullies having no right to exist" (despite the fact that he's among the biggest bullies he can be, when one is limited to posting on a message board). It's much more important to be on a thread like *that* when, according to him, 90 percent of the human race is due to be wiped out in less than a year. Hm. His priorities seem... odd. Anyhow, back to the subject at hand, assuming he *does* have the courage to come back to this thread, I'd like him to answer this: IDW/A.A, you claimed the Moon was moving unpredictably, so that telescopes would not track and had to be adjusted and updated all the time. Then you claimed Western science couldn't predict eclipses accurately more than a couple years in advance anyway. Then you claimed the Maya had predicted the Moon's motions super accurately. Then you are presented with books and data showing the Moon is moving predictably, and telescopes tracking accurately, which you ascribe to them getting data from the Maya. So you are left with a classic contradiction. You must be wrong about the unpredictable motion of the Moon in the first place, because it was predicted by the Maya and all that data has been in GOTOs since they were invented, so there is no reason for telescopes to fail to track the Moon. What other possibility is there? Checkmate. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 36577500 United States 03/20/2013 06:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74444 United States 03/21/2013 12:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
#Geomagnetic_Storm# User ID: 36140692 United States 03/21/2013 12:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
#Geomagnetic_Storm# User ID: 36140692 United States 03/21/2013 12:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 30047168 United States 03/21/2013 04:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Clever Astrophysicist User ID: 36247816 Canada 03/21/2013 12:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 14536177 United States 03/21/2013 01:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
BS Smeller User ID: 7127676 United States 03/21/2013 05:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | As an educated AC poster, let me offer this little bit of insight. OP of this thread is not who he says he is. In fact, he is in cohoots with this forum despite his vehement protests to the contrary. His purported bans are BS to lure you into believing his contrived story. This thread is a joke as it in no way provides concrete data to substantiate the claims made in the threads title. It's a frigging ruse people. Given the numerous threads deleted on this forum that may possess a kernel of truth, this one, however, continues on ad infinitum. You must ask yourself why. The answer, because nothing truely revealing or relevant is ever exposed by OP in this thread. It's all a sham, and those behind it are rolling on the floor laughing their asses off at the constant barrage of posters who ask sniveling questions about the latest (nonexistent) solar developments. BTW, my IQ is triple OP's. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21570007 AC who's enlightened to the truth. This poster may be on to something. IDK BKK ----------------------- "A God of the Gaps is assigned responsibility for what we do not yet understand." Carl Sagan |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 35358791 United Kingdom 03/22/2013 01:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | As an educated AC poster, let me offer this little bit of insight. OP of this thread is not who he says he is. In fact, he is in cohoots with this forum despite his vehement protests to the contrary. His purported bans are BS to lure you into believing his contrived story. This thread is a joke as it in no way provides concrete data to substantiate the claims made in the threads title. It's a frigging ruse people. Given the numerous threads deleted on this forum that may possess a kernel of truth, this one, however, continues on ad infinitum. You must ask yourself why. The answer, because nothing truely revealing or relevant is ever exposed by OP in this thread. It's all a sham, and those behind it are rolling on the floor laughing their asses off at the constant barrage of posters who ask sniveling questions about the latest (nonexistent) solar developments. BTW, my IQ is triple OP's. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21570007 AC who's enlightened to the truth. This poster may be on to something. IDK Maybe? Is. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1015670 United States 03/22/2013 02:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | IDW continues on a DIFFERENT thread. Thread: Scientist confirms extinction event asteroid will NOT hit earth (Page 18) Too scared to come back to this one........ |
ehecatl User ID: 36852988 Mexico 03/26/2013 07:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hi Folks! Damn, GLP looks boring today with my morning coffee. What else has been going on? Anonymous Astrophysicist has been busy kidnapping Dr. Raymond Brown, using his Harley in England, Thread: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED! (Page 307) Thread: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED! (Page 311) [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] ...farmer Henry Brown was attacked by Killer Tomatoes, ...Tlaloc says that he will soon arrive and bring the rain, Thread: Few weeks ago, I asked Andromedan contactee Tolec; he told me open contact may start April 2013 [link to art.ngfiles.com] ...that we should cook our eggs sunny side up in remembrance Andromeda. ...and my lead chicken announced "The Sky is Falling", but was assasinated by the Illuminati using a GMO tortilla and a diet Coke. Last Edited by ehecatl on 03/26/2013 08:23 AM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 36920273 United Kingdom 03/27/2013 08:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74444 United States 03/27/2013 09:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Now that IDW/A.A's unhealthy Raymond addiction has been settled (hint: It didn't happen, and in fact was a hoax that he fell for utterly), maybe we can get back to his claims of an unpredictably moving Moon. IDW/A.A, you claimed the Moon was moving unpredictably, so that telescopes would not track and had to be adjusted and updated all the time. Then you claimed Western science couldn't predict eclipses accurately more than a couple years in advance anyway. Then you claimed the Maya had predicted the Moon's motions super accurately. Then you are presented with books and data showing the Moon is moving predictably, and telescopes tracking accurately, which you ascribe to them getting data from the Maya. So you are left with a classic contradiction. You must be wrong about the unpredictable motion of the Moon in the first place, because it was predicted by the Maya and all that data has been in GOTOs since they were invented, so there is no reason for telescopes to fail to track the Moon. What other possibility is there? Checkmate. |
BS Smeller User ID: 36900483 United States 03/28/2013 10:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Now that IDW/A.A's unhealthy Raymond addiction has been settled (hint: It didn't happen, and in fact was a hoax that he fell for utterly), maybe we can get back to his claims of an unpredictably moving Moon. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444 IDW/A.A, you claimed the Moon was moving unpredictably, so that telescopes would not track and had to be adjusted and updated all the time. Then you claimed Western science couldn't predict eclipses accurately more than a couple years in advance anyway. Then you claimed the Maya had predicted the Moon's motions super accurately. Then you are presented with books and data showing the Moon is moving predictably, and telescopes tracking accurately, which you ascribe to them getting data from the Maya. So you are left with a classic contradiction. You must be wrong about the unpredictable motion of the Moon in the first place, because it was predicted by the Maya and all that data has been in GOTOs since they were invented, so there is no reason for telescopes to fail to track the Moon. What other possibility is there? Checkmate. I'll go out on limb and make a prediction: More obfuscation forthcoming from AA/IDW. BKK ----------------------- "A God of the Gaps is assigned responsibility for what we do not yet understand." Carl Sagan |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 30047168 United States 03/28/2013 04:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
BS Smeller User ID: 7127676 United States 03/28/2013 05:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 37146879 United Kingdom 03/31/2013 02:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74444 United States 04/02/2013 12:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Now that IDW/A.A's unhealthy Raymond addiction has been settled (hint: It didn't happen, and in fact was a hoax that he fell for utterly), maybe we can get back to his claims of an unpredictably moving Moon. He will, of course, refuse to answer this horrible internal conflict of his own design, excusing himself by saying this thread is 'locked' or somesuch excuse. That's fine: his inability to logically address this failure, among others, speaks loudly enough. IDW/A.A, you claimed the Moon was moving unpredictably, so that telescopes would not track and had to be adjusted and updated all the time. Then you claimed Western science couldn't predict eclipses accurately more than a couple years in advance anyway. Then you claimed the Maya had predicted the Moon's motions super accurately. Then you are presented with books and data showing the Moon is moving predictably, and telescopes tracking accurately, which you ascribe to them getting data from the Maya. So you are left with a classic contradiction. You must be wrong about the unpredictable motion of the Moon in the first place, because it was predicted by the Maya and all that data has been in GOTOs since they were invented, so there is no reason for telescopes to fail to track the Moon. What other possibility is there? Checkmate. |
Little Baby Jesus User ID: 7127676 United States 04/02/2013 05:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
ehecatl User ID: 37242106 Mexico 04/03/2013 07:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Little Baby Jesus User ID: 36900483 United States 04/03/2013 07:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | He's gone? Cool!!! Quoting: ehecatl That means we can party down in his living room, uh, I mean "bunker", and smoke his weed and drink his beer! Nah. He's probably already plundered all his resources, plus the place is likely booby-trapped. BKK ----------------------- "A God of the Gaps is assigned responsibility for what we do not yet understand." Carl Sagan |