| Users Online Now: 1,150 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 123,018 | |
| Pageviews Today: 209,589 | Threads Today: 76 | Posts Today: 1,049 |
| 02:05 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,150 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 123,018 | |
| Pageviews Today: 209,589 | Threads Today: 76 | Posts Today: 1,049 |
| 02:05 AM | ||
WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED! | |
| Anonymous astrophysicist User ID: 41565497  United States06/12/2013 01:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wen I first started monitoring internet based solar and space weather data 13 years ago, we had a real time feed refreshed every minute with some data and every 5 minutes wit most, and there was no censorship. Since WE paid for the equipment that is aquiring this data, WE are entitled to it in an uncensored and as near real time format as possible. Aren't we?.how can we do independent studies without this capability? ? |
| Anonymous astrophysicist User ID: 41565497 United States06/12/2013 01:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I have used this comment many times before because I find it to be so revealing and so undeniable that it really puts the jew science shills in a tizzy. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 41528755 When I was a junior in high school I made a striking discovery. It seemed that students were being tested for who was really awake and who just committed what they were taught without questioning it, and when such an individual who thought independently and was awake was discovered, he (or in rare cases she) was singled out by jewish "teachers" for all sorts of "special treatment". They were there to poison the futures of the 'gentiles' who showed promise. As an example, I ad a question tat no one as yet been able to answer yet, and to my knowledge no one as ever attempted to answer it. When balancing equations in chemistry, electromagnetic energy released during an exothermic reaction was clearly defined and labeled in the equation as electrons, and by analyzing the sructure of the compounds being formed and accounting for all of the electrons in the balancing process,, ti was easy to see there were extra electrons, and were they came from. SO I asked the chemistry teacher why we were taught one thing in Chemistry and then next period in Physics we were taught another, that is that electromagnetic energy was composed of photons.. I asked how could both be correct. he said, and I quote verbatim "because Einstein wasn't a chemist". The guy"s name was Leedom, and he was one of the best teachers I ever had in public school, because he clearly did not resent potential beyond his own as most teachers and professors do. I knew at that point that there was a fundamental problem with quantum physics as it was being taught, that it did not logically correlate with other subjects nor scientific empiricism. It seemed to me that it was exactly as the real father of physics Nicola Tesla claimed, a complex mathematical fiction fabricated by an idiot savant given cookies to create formulas that made no real sense. |
| Anonymous astrophysicist User ID: 41565497 United States06/12/2013 01:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think it is relevant to mention considering the thread subject that the original premise has been proved beyond not just a reasonable doubt, but beyond ALL doubt, that is solar data is in fact being censored and fabricated. The evidence is so incontrovertible and so abundant that denying it marks one as a liar at this point. Wen I first started monitoring internet based solar and space weather data 13 years ago, we had a real time feed refreshed every minute with some data and every 5 minutes wit most, and there was no censorship. Since WE paid for the equipment that is aquiring this data, WE are entitled to it in an uncensored and as near real time format as possible. Aren't we?.how can we do independent studies without this capability? ? |
Elemental  User ID: 41475518  United Kingdom06/12/2013 01:20 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why are you repeating the list that was answered three pages ago? Quoting: 74444 here is a sort list of correct predictions made years in advance of their occurrence by myself . I am only listing the most important and then only a few of them Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 Uh huh. 1)holes or voids in the magnetosphere would be discovered Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction. 2) global warming would eventually be properly linked to solar changes and human caused global warming exposed as a fraud Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 You can, of course, cite evidence for this. Where has this been exposed? Ah, yes. Your claim that we've lost 67,000 species in the last year, and your inability to name any of them. 4)The purpose of 'chemtrails" would finally be firmly established as a geo engineering project to mitigate global warming Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 I admit I know little about the chemtrail debate, but given your track record on so many other subjects, I will remain doubtful of your position. 5) the effects of solar radiation storms would be magnified by the presence of an increasing density of non solar wind related plasma. Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. 6)the magnetic field of Earth would become increasingly unstable and unpredictable Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction. 7) the magnetosphere would be discovered to be powered by the solar wind Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 Has this been discovered? You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction. 8) It would be acknowledged that electrical currents are transmitted through space by magnetic fields Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 Um... it's been called the electromagnetic force for quite some time. 9) the effects of global warming would occur far faster than predicted by lamestream science Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 You very well may have correctly predicted that Global Warming would occur faster than expected -- while citing no sources and giving no way to test your theory. That certainly sounds like something you'd do. So I'll give you that one. Stopped clock, twice daily. 10) The Earth would be found to be heating internally causing a radical increase in geological instability and severe earthquakes. Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction. Also I have yet to see any data pointing toward your claimed radical increase -- indeed, in the one link you have made prior in attempting to support your claim, the link itself said the rate of severe earthquakes has remained roughly static. 11) [geological activity would be linked to solar radiation storms] Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 You can, of course, cite evidence for this claimed link of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. 12)the heliosphere would continue to shrink despite the onset of a solar maximum Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction. 13) General relativity and special relativity would be disproved by empirical observation Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Where was this disproved? What was the experiment that did it? Why are relativistic formula still used today, including on things as mundane as the GPS system? What about Gravity B, and other experiments still proving the weirder predictions of relativity? 14) Phil Plait would be laughed off the air (just thought I'd add that for a kick in the nuts) Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 Alas, I cannot help but notice that he still seems to find a lot more airtime than you do. Must be a kick in the ass that he is so much better known (see how pointless those quips are?) and respected. 15) Magnetic impulses would be discover to be instantaneous across any distance Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 You can, of course, cite evidence for this. Where has this been discovered? What was the experiment confirming this remarkable finding? 16) Gamma ray bursts would increase in duration an intensity as the solar syatem neared the galactic plane Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction. I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction. Oh, and why were there two #16s? 17) unprecedented weather systems never before seen would begin to develop Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 To what weather systems are you referring? Be specific. Also, mainstream science has been predicting such weather "worsening" for decades. 18) Ocean currents would be disrupted far faster than predicted by the mainstream scientists Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction. 19) humans would experience mental and physical problems that were previously unobserved at the rate they are currently occurring due to the effects of radiation on the brain and body. Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. 20) lamestream physics would make no real advancement despite the input of many billions of dollars into research. No consensus on results would be reached Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 Sure. Quantum Hall effect, cosmic inflation, Bose–Einstein condensate found by Wolfgang Ketterle, the Top quark found, the accelerating expansion of universe found, Slow light experimentally demonstrated by Lene Vestergaard Hau, the Tau neutrino found, WMAP observations of Cosmic microwave background radiation, the Higgs Boson found... Sure has been a slow decade or two. You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Strangely your concrete prediction confirming this idea proved to be utterly false -- leading you to not make such concrete predictions anymore. A strange choice, but given your predilections, perhaps not so strange. 22) strange unexplained events would occur at an exponentially increasing rate (such as the sounds people are reporting worldwide) Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction. And you can please cite sources where such happenings are increasing 'exponentially.' 23) I would be set up and falsely persecuted, and finally exonerated Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 The only persecution I have seen is people disagreeing with you on a conspiracy message board (since it seems to be the only place you can air your ideas without *totally* being laughed out of the room), and making outlandish demands, such as evidence from other sources. How *terrible.* You'll be exonerated if 90 percent of the population is wiped out before the end of the current Solar Max. You'll forgive me for not rooting for you. 24) My critics would continue to engage me despite their insistence that there is no point in doing so Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 Your old double standard again. If no one criticizes your ideas, you must be right! If anyone criticizes your idea, you must be right! The evidence, and your specific predictions failing, demonstrates you are wrong quite often. Your solution? You stop making specific predictions. The height of intellectual dishonesty. 25) MY critics would be found to be all working together, that is I have no legitimate critics or hecklers relying on honest debate tactics and real information. ( this is not to say I do not have skeptics who honestly question my conclusions, only that the entourage of unintelligent and uneducated disinformation operatives who engage me on a day to day basis are not honest nor do they believe what they are saying) Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 You can, of course, cite evidence for this. Where has this been found, other than your accusations? And your accusations are not evidence. 26) A general consensus amongst mainstream scientists would be reached that the human race and the Earth itself is on the verge of a catastrophic event that will effect every living thing on the planet, and it would be veiled from the public eye Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Where's this consensus? My List of your failures is *quite* a lot longer. You can argue about their origin or claim I didn't make them all you like Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 Because there are a bunch where this is the case... (Just did!) True. The only person who can correct their ideas in the light of better evidence or failed experimentation is you. But you just don't *do* that, do you IDW/A.A? energy cannot be destroyed, it can only be transformed. Nothing is so potent as the silent influence of a good example. Illegitimi non carborundum Alea iacta est. Dum vivimus vivamus |
| Anonymous astrophysicist User ID: 41565497 United States06/12/2013 01:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous astrophysicist User ID: 41565497 United States06/12/2013 01:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1)holes or voids in the magnetosphere would be discovered 2) global warming would eventually be properly linked to solar changes and human caused global warming exposed as a fraud 3) A mass extinction event would commence 4)The purpose of 'chemtrails" would finally be firmly established as a geo engineering project to mitigate global warming 5) the effects of solar radiation storms would be magnified by the presence of an increasing density of non solar wind related plasma. 6)the magnetic field of Earth would become increasingly unstable and unpredictable 7) the magnetosphere would be discovered to be powered by the solar wind 8) It would be acknowledged that electrical currents are transmitted through space by magnetic fields 9) the effects of global warming would occur far faster than predicted by lamestream science 10) The Earth would be found to be heating internally causing a radical increase in geological instability and severe earthquakes. 11) [geological activity would be linked to solar radiation storms] 12)the heliosphere would continue to shrink despite the onset of a solar maximum 13) General relativity and special relativity would be disproved by empirical observation 14) Phil Plait would be laughed off the air (just thought I'd add that for a kick in the nuts) 15) Magnetic impulses would be discover to be instantaneous across any distance 16) Gamma ray bursts would increase in duration an intensity as the solar syatem neared the galactic plane 16) The solar maximum would be delayed 17) unprecedented weather systems never before seen would begin to develop 18) Ocean currents would be disrupted far faster than predicted by the mainstream scientists 19) humans would experience mental and physical problems that were previously unobserved at the rate they are currently occurring due to the effects of radiation on the brain and body. 20) lamestream physics would make no real advancement despite the input of many billions of dollars into research. No consensus on results would be reached 21)Increase in objects entering the Earths atmosphere 22) strange unexplained events would occur at an exponentially increasing rate (such as the sounds people are reporting worldwide) 23) I would be set up and falsely persecuted, and finally exonerated 24) My critics would continue to engage me despite their insistence that there is no point in doing so 25) MY critics would be found to be all working together, that is I have no legitimate critics or hecklers relying on honest debate tactics and real information. ( this is not to say I do not have skeptics who honestly question my conclusions, only that the entourage of unintelligent and uneducated disinformation operatives who engage me on a day to day basis are not honest nor do they believe what they are saying) 26) A general consensus amongst mainstream scientists would be reached that the human race and the Earth itself is on the verge of a catastrophic event that will effect every living thing on the planet, and it would be veiled from the public eye This is a very sort list of correct predictions. You can argue about their origin or claim I didn't make them all you like, or you can even deny they're correct (please do!), but one thing you CANNOT do is change any of it. |
| Anonymous astrophysicist User ID: 41565497 United States06/12/2013 01:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think it is relevant to mention considering the thread subject that the original premise has been proved beyond not just a reasonable doubt, but beyond ALL doubt, that is solar data is in fact being censored and fabricated. The evidence is so incontrovertible and so abundant that denying it marks one as a liar at this point. Wen I first started monitoring internet based solar and space weather data 13 years ago, we had a real time feed refreshed every minute with some data and every 5 minutes wit most, and there was no censorship. Since WE paid for the equipment that is aquiring this data, WE are entitled to it in an uncensored and as near real time format as possible. Aren't we?.how can we do independent studies without this capability? ? -aggravating , isn't it shillbot |
| Anonymous astrophysicist User ID: 41565497 United States06/12/2013 01:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I have used this comment many times before because I find it to be so revealing and so undeniable that it really puts the jew science shills in a tizzy. When I was a junior in high school I made a striking discovery. It seemed that students were being tested for who was really awake and who just committed what they were taught without questioning it, and when such an individual who thought independently and was awake was discovered, he (or in rare cases she) was singled out by jewish "teachers" for all sorts of "special treatment". They were there to poison the futures of the 'gentiles' who showed promise. As an example, I ad a question tat no one as yet been able to answer yet, and to my knowledge no one as ever attempted to answer it. When balancing equations in chemistry, electromagnetic energy released during an exothermic reaction was clearly defined and labeled in the equation as electrons, and by analyzing the sructure of the compounds being formed and accounting for all of the electrons in the balancing process,, ti was easy to see there were extra electrons, and were they came from. SO I asked the chemistry teacher why we were taught one thing in Chemistry and then next period in Physics we were taught another, that is that electromagnetic energy was composed of photons.. I asked how could both be correct. he said, and I quote verbatim "because Einstein wasn't a chemist". The guy"s name was Leedom, and he was one of the best teachers I ever had in public school, because he clearly did not resent potential beyond his own as most teachers and professors do. I knew at that point that there was a fundamental problem with quantum physics as it was being taught, that it did not logically correlate with other subjects nor scientific empiricism. It seemed to me that it was exactly as the real father of physics Nicola Tesla claimed, a complex mathematical fiction fabricated by an idiot savant given cookies to create formulas that made no real sense. |
| Anonymous astrophysicist User ID: 41565497 United States06/12/2013 01:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 41263444 United States06/12/2013 01:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous astrophysicist User ID: 41565497 United States06/12/2013 01:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous astrophysicist User ID: 41565497 United States06/12/2013 01:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Elemental User ID: 41475518 United Kingdom06/12/2013 01:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why are you repeating the list that was answered three pages ago? Quoting: 74444 here is a sort list of correct predictions made years in advance of their occurrence by myself . I am only listing the most important and then only a few of them Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 Uh huh. 1)holes or voids in the magnetosphere would be discovered Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction. 2) global warming would eventually be properly linked to solar changes and human caused global warming exposed as a fraud Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 You can, of course, cite evidence for this. Where has this been exposed? Ah, yes. Your claim that we've lost 67,000 species in the last year, and your inability to name any of them. 4)The purpose of 'chemtrails" would finally be firmly established as a geo engineering project to mitigate global warming Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 I admit I know little about the chemtrail debate, but given your track record on so many other subjects, I will remain doubtful of your position. 5) the effects of solar radiation storms would be magnified by the presence of an increasing density of non solar wind related plasma. Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. 6)the magnetic field of Earth would become increasingly unstable and unpredictable Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction. 7) the magnetosphere would be discovered to be powered by the solar wind Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 Has this been discovered? You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction. 8) It would be acknowledged that electrical currents are transmitted through space by magnetic fields Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 Um... it's been called the electromagnetic force for quite some time. 9) the effects of global warming would occur far faster than predicted by lamestream science Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 You very well may have correctly predicted that Global Warming would occur faster than expected -- while citing no sources and giving no way to test your theory. That certainly sounds like something you'd do. So I'll give you that one. Stopped clock, twice daily. 10) The Earth would be found to be heating internally causing a radical increase in geological instability and severe earthquakes. Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction. Also I have yet to see any data pointing toward your claimed radical increase -- indeed, in the one link you have made prior in attempting to support your claim, the link itself said the rate of severe earthquakes has remained roughly static. 11) [geological activity would be linked to solar radiation storms] Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 You can, of course, cite evidence for this claimed link of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. 12)the heliosphere would continue to shrink despite the onset of a solar maximum Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction. 13) General relativity and special relativity would be disproved by empirical observation Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Where was this disproved? What was the experiment that did it? Why are relativistic formula still used today, including on things as mundane as the GPS system? What about Gravity B, and other experiments still proving the weirder predictions of relativity? 14) Phil Plait would be laughed off the air (just thought I'd add that for a kick in the nuts) Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 Alas, I cannot help but notice that he still seems to find a lot more airtime than you do. Must be a kick in the ass that he is so much better known (see how pointless those quips are?) and respected. 15) Magnetic impulses would be discover to be instantaneous across any distance Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 You can, of course, cite evidence for this. Where has this been discovered? What was the experiment confirming this remarkable finding? 16) Gamma ray bursts would increase in duration an intensity as the solar syatem neared the galactic plane Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction. I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction. Oh, and why were there two #16s? 17) unprecedented weather systems never before seen would begin to develop Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 To what weather systems are you referring? Be specific. Also, mainstream science has been predicting such weather "worsening" for decades. 18) Ocean currents would be disrupted far faster than predicted by the mainstream scientists Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Also, I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction. 19) humans would experience mental and physical problems that were previously unobserved at the rate they are currently occurring due to the effects of radiation on the brain and body. Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. 20) lamestream physics would make no real advancement despite the input of many billions of dollars into research. No consensus on results would be reached Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 Sure. Quantum Hall effect, cosmic inflation, Bose–Einstein condensate found by Wolfgang Ketterle, the Top quark found, the accelerating expansion of universe found, Slow light experimentally demonstrated by Lene Vestergaard Hau, the Tau neutrino found, WMAP observations of Cosmic microwave background radiation, the Higgs Boson found... Sure has been a slow decade or two. You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Strangely your concrete prediction confirming this idea proved to be utterly false -- leading you to not make such concrete predictions anymore. A strange choice, but given your predilections, perhaps not so strange. 22) strange unexplained events would occur at an exponentially increasing rate (such as the sounds people are reporting worldwide) Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 I see no evidence that this was predicted by you, and think it more likely that this is a post hoc prediction. And you can please cite sources where such happenings are increasing 'exponentially.' 23) I would be set up and falsely persecuted, and finally exonerated Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 The only persecution I have seen is people disagreeing with you on a conspiracy message board (since it seems to be the only place you can air your ideas without *totally* being laughed out of the room), and making outlandish demands, such as evidence from other sources. How *terrible.* You'll be exonerated if 90 percent of the population is wiped out before the end of the current Solar Max. You'll forgive me for not rooting for you. 24) My critics would continue to engage me despite their insistence that there is no point in doing so Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 Your old double standard again. If no one criticizes your ideas, you must be right! If anyone criticizes your idea, you must be right! The evidence, and your specific predictions failing, demonstrates you are wrong quite often. Your solution? You stop making specific predictions. The height of intellectual dishonesty. 25) MY critics would be found to be all working together, that is I have no legitimate critics or hecklers relying on honest debate tactics and real information. ( this is not to say I do not have skeptics who honestly question my conclusions, only that the entourage of unintelligent and uneducated disinformation operatives who engage me on a day to day basis are not honest nor do they believe what they are saying) Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 You can, of course, cite evidence for this. Where has this been found, other than your accusations? And your accusations are not evidence. 26) A general consensus amongst mainstream scientists would be reached that the human race and the Earth itself is on the verge of a catastrophic event that will effect every living thing on the planet, and it would be veiled from the public eye Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 You can, of course, cite evidence for this claim of yours. After all, I do not believe what I am told without proof. Where's this consensus? My List of your failures is *quite* a lot longer. You can argue about their origin or claim I didn't make them all you like Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist 41469415 Because there are a bunch where this is the case... (Just did!) True. The only person who can correct their ideas in the light of better evidence or failed experimentation is you. But you just don't *do* that, do you IDW/A.A? energy cannot be destroyed, it can only be transformed. Nothing is so potent as the silent influence of a good example. Illegitimi non carborundum Alea iacta est. Dum vivimus vivamus |
| Anonymous astrophysicist User ID: 41565497 United States06/12/2013 01:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous astrophysicist User ID: 41565497 United States06/12/2013 01:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous astrophysicist User ID: 41565497 United States06/12/2013 01:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous astrophysicist User ID: 41565497 United States06/12/2013 01:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I have used this comment many times before because I find it to be so revealing and so undeniable that it really puts the jew science shills in a tizzy. When I was a junior in high school I made a striking discovery. It seemed that students were being tested for who was really awake and who just committed what they were taught without questioning it, and when such an individual who thought independently and was awake was discovered, he (or in rare cases she) was singled out by jewish "teachers" for all sorts of "special treatment". They were there to poison the futures of the 'gentiles' who showed promise. As an example, I ad a question tat no one as yet been able to answer yet, and to my knowledge no one as ever attempted to answer it. When balancing equations in chemistry, electromagnetic energy released during an exothermic reaction was clearly defined and labeled in the equation as electrons, and by analyzing the sructure of the compounds being formed and accounting for all of the electrons in the balancing process,, ti was easy to see there were extra electrons, and were they came from. SO I asked the chemistry teacher why we were taught one thing in Chemistry and then next period in Physics we were taught another, that is that electromagnetic energy was composed of photons.. I asked how could both be correct. he said, and I quote verbatim "because Einstein wasn't a chemist". The guy"s name was Leedom, and he was one of the best teachers I ever had in public school, because he clearly did not resent potential beyond his own as most teachers and professors do. I knew at that point that there was a fundamental problem with quantum physics as it was being taught, that it did not logically correlate with other subjects nor scientific empiricism. It seemed to me that it was exactly as the real father of physics Nicola Tesla claimed, a complex mathematical fiction fabricated by an idiot savant given cookies to create formulas that made no real sense. |
| Anonymous astrophysicist User ID: 41565497 United States06/12/2013 01:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | here is a short list of correct predictions made years in advance of their occurrence by myself . I am only listing the most important and then only a few of them 1)holes or voids in the magnetosphere would be discovered 2) global warming would eventually be properly linked to solar changes and human caused global warming exposed as a fraud 3) A mass extinction event would commence 4)The purpose of 'chemtrails" would finally be firmly established as a geo engineering project to mitigate global warming 5) the effects of solar radiation storms would be magnified by the presence of an increasing density of non solar wind related plasma. 6)the magnetic field of Earth would become increasingly unstable and unpredictable 7) the magnetosphere would be discovered to be powered by the solar wind 8) It would be acknowledged that electrical currents are transmitted through space by magnetic fields 9) the effects of global warming would occur far faster than predicted by lamestream science 10) The Earth would be found to be heating internally causing a radical increase in geological instability and severe earthquakes. 11) [geological activity would be linked to solar radiation storms] 12)the heliosphere would continue to shrink despite the onset of a solar maximum 13) General relativity and special relativity would be disproved by empirical observation 14) Phil Plait would be laughed off the air (just thought I'd add that for a kick in the nuts) 15) Magnetic impulses would be discover to be instantaneous across any distance 16) Gamma ray bursts would increase in duration an intensity as the solar syatem neared the galactic plane 16) The solar maximum would be delayed 17) unprecedented weather systems never before seen would begin to develop 18) Ocean currents would be disrupted far faster than predicted by the mainstream scientists 19) humans would experience mental and physical problems that were previously unobserved at the rate they are currently occurring due to the effects of radiation on the brain and body. 20) lamestream physics would make no real advancement despite the input of many billions of dollars into research. No consensus on results would be reached 21)Increase in objects entering the Earths atmosphere 22) strange unexplained events would occur at an exponentially increasing rate (such as the sounds people are reporting worldwide) 23) I would be set up and falsely persecuted, and finally exonerated 24) My critics would continue to engage me despite their insistence that there is no point in doing so 25) MY critics would be found to be all working together, that is I have no legitimate critics or hecklers relying on honest debate tactics and real information. ( this is not to say I do not have skeptics who honestly question my conclusions, only that the entourage of unintelligent and uneducated disinformation operatives who engage me on a day to day basis are not honest nor do they believe what they are saying) 26) A general consensus amongst mainstream scientists would be reached that the human race and the Earth itself is on the verge of a catastrophic event that will effect every living thing on the planet, and it would be veiled from the public eye This is a very sort list of correct predictions. You can argue about their origin or claim I didn't make them all you like, or you can even deny they're correct (please do!), but one thing you CANNOT do is change any of it. |
| #Geomagnetic_Storm# User ID: 41550513 United States06/12/2013 01:38 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Is that the best you can come up with? |
| Anonymous astrophysicist User ID: 41565497 United States06/12/2013 01:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think it is relevant to mention considering the thread subject that the original premise has been proved beyond not just a reasonable doubt, but beyond ALL doubt, that is solar data is in fact being censored and fabricated. The evidence is so incontrovertible and so abundant that denying it marks one as a liar at this point. Wen I first started monitoring internet based solar and space weather data 13 years ago, we had a real time feed refreshed every minute with some data and every 5 minutes wit most, and there was no censorship. Since WE paid for the equipment that is aquiring this data, WE are entitled to it in an uncensored and as near real time format as possible. Aren't we?.how can we do independent studies without this capability? ? |
| Anonymous astrophysicist User ID: 41565497 United States06/12/2013 01:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 41263444 United States06/12/2013 01:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You know the biggest problem with you electron theory? Electrons have no problem going through heavy paper but those more energetic photons (faster electrons in your theory) do not go through the paper. That is using your own simple empirical evidence method. |
| SerenaSeesAll User ID: 27488955 United States06/12/2013 01:55 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | and an ugly jew troll is what you are Quoting: Anonymous Coward If I doubted you were an Astrophysicist before, now it is insanely clear that you are not. I doubt you will you ever get any closer to it than you are now. You don't have the dignity or self control to succeed in a field such as Astrophysics. You have some intelligence. It's a pity though, that you are not able to express it in a viable manner. ============================================================= Noticing Miracles Is My Hobby The Bible - When you carry the Bible, Satan has a headache, when you open it, he collapses, when he sees you reading it, he loses his strength, AND when you stand on the Word of God, Satan can't hurt you! |
| #Geomagnetic_Storm# User ID: 41550513 United States06/12/2013 02:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think it's bad enough, don't you? After all' jew is a "racial slur (or is it religious, i get confused), isn't it? it's a base insult, isn't it? IT DOES STICK IN YOUR CRAW, DOESN'T IT No it actually doesn't. |
| 74444 User ID: 74444 United States06/12/2013 02:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous astrophysicist User ID: 41568480 United States06/12/2013 02:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Inability to address my criticisms noted, along with failures to provide supporting evidence when asked. Quoting: 74444 How unsurprisingly droll, and terribly predictable. As many others have pointed out, you don't have any valid criticisms and you know absolutely noting about the subject. Your lame rebuttals prove your ignorance. |
| Anonymous astrophysicist User ID: 41568480 United States06/12/2013 02:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You know the biggest problem with you electron theory? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 41263444 Electrons have no problem going through heavy paper but those more energetic photons (faster electrons in your theory) do not go through the paper. That is using your own simple empirical evidence method.  I have news for you in case you are not aware, both electrons in the unexcited state and electromagnetic radiation (electrons vibrating passively to an oscillating magnetic field) can penetrate not only paper, but all other materials and elements as well. You are apparently not up to the task of the job you have been assigned. You are going to be an embarrassment to your profession if you continue to debate sconce with me. I suggest you stick to :clap: |
| Anonymous astrophysicist User ID: 41568480 United States06/12/2013 03:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If I doubted you were an Astrophysicist before, now it is insanely clear that you are not. I doubt you will you ever get any closer to it than you are now. You don't have the dignity or self control to succeed in a field such as Astrophysics. You have some intelligence. It's a pity though, that you are not able to express it in a viable manner. Quoting: SerenaSeesAll Insanely clear,as in clear to the pathologically insane? AN astrophysicist is one who studies astrophysics, not sucks a jews ass. I am in good company with every other physicist and scientist who has made real advancements in my disdain for these subhuman parasites. They may be minding the gates of academic promotion, but their alleged intellectual superiority is SELF PROMOTION and a deception. Te only thing they truly excel in is lying and well organized deceptions and conspiracies against humanity, and they have a long well established history of it.The only way the human race will ever live in peace, universal prosperity and health is if it shakes off the jews like a anemic horse shaking off biting flies, and I am going to do everything in my power possible to fight for what is right no matter who approves.. |
| Anonymous astrophysicist User ID: 41568480 United States06/12/2013 03:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think it is relevant to mention considering the thread subject that the original premise has been proved beyond not just a reasonable doubt, but beyond ALL doubt, that is solar data is in fact being censored and fabricated. The evidence is so incontrovertible and so abundant that denying it marks one as a liar at this point. Wen I first started monitoring internet based solar and space weather data 13 years ago, we had a real time feed refreshed every minute with some data and every 5 minutes wit most, and there was no censorship. Since WE paid for the equipment that is aquiring this data, WE are entitled to it in an uncensored and as near real time format as possible. Aren't we?.how can we do independent studies without this capability? ? |
| Anonymous astrophysicist User ID: 41568480 United States06/12/2013 03:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | here is a short list of correct predictions made years in advance of their occurrence by myself . I am only listing the most important and then only a few of them 1)holes or voids in the magnetosphere would be discovered 2) global warming would eventually be properly linked to solar changes and human caused global warming exposed as a fraud 3) A mass extinction event would commence 4)The purpose of 'chemtrails" would finally be firmly established as a geo engineering project to mitigate global warming 5) the effects of solar radiation storms would be magnified by the presence of an increasing density of non solar wind related plasma. 6)the magnetic field of Earth would become increasingly unstable and unpredictable 7) the magnetosphere would be discovered to be powered by the solar wind 8) It would be acknowledged that electrical currents are transmitted through space by magnetic fields 9) the effects of global warming would occur far faster than predicted by lamestream science 10) The Earth would be found to be heating internally causing a radical increase in geological instability and severe earthquakes. 11) [geological activity would be linked to solar radiation storms] 12)the heliosphere would continue to shrink despite the onset of a solar maximum 13) General relativity and special relativity would be disproved by empirical observation 14) Phil Plait would be laughed off the air (just thought I'd add that for a kick in the nuts) 15) Magnetic impulses would be discover to be instantaneous across any distance 16) Gamma ray bursts would increase in duration an intensity as the solar syatem neared the galactic plane 16) The solar maximum would be delayed 17) unprecedented weather systems never before seen would begin to develop 18) Ocean currents would be disrupted far faster than predicted by the mainstream scientists 19) humans would experience mental and physical problems that were previously unobserved at the rate they are currently occurring due to the effects of radiation on the brain and body. 20) lamestream physics would make no real advancement despite the input of many billions of dollars into research. No consensus on results would be reached 21)Increase in objects entering the Earths atmosphere 22) strange unexplained events would occur at an exponentially increasing rate (such as the sounds people are reporting worldwide) 23) I would be set up and falsely persecuted, and finally exonerated 24) My critics would continue to engage me despite their insistence that there is no point in doing so 25) MY critics would be found to be all working together, that is I have no legitimate critics or hecklers relying on honest debate tactics and real information. ( this is not to say I do not have skeptics who honestly question my conclusions, only that the entourage of unintelligent and uneducated disinformation operatives who engage me on a day to day basis are not honest nor do they believe what they are saying) 26) A general consensus amongst mainstream scientists would be reached that the human race and the Earth itself is on the verge of a catastrophic event that will effect every living thing on the planet, and it would be veiled from the public eye This is a very sort list of correct predictions. You can argue about their origin or claim I didn't make them all you like, or you can even deny they're correct (please do!), but one thing you CANNOT do is change any of it. |
