I think it is relevant to mention considering the thread subject that the original premise has been proved beyond not just a reasonable doubt, but beyond ALL doubt, that is solar data is in fact being censored and fabricated. The evidence is so incontrovertible and so abundant that denying it marks one as a liar at this point.

When I first started monitoring internet based solar and space weather data 13 years ago, we had a real time feed refreshed every minute with some data and every 5 minutes wit most, and there was no censorship. Since WE paid for the equipment that is acquiring this data, WE are entitled to it in an uncensored and as near real time format as possible.
Aren't we?.how can we do independent studies without this capability?
?


______________________________________________________________


​


here is a short list of correct predictions made years in advance of their occurrence by myself . I am only listing the most important and then only a few of them

1)holes or voids in the magnetosphere would be discovered

2) global warming would eventually be properly linked to solar changes and human caused global warming exposed as a fraud

3) A mass extinction event would commence

4)The purpose of 'chemtrails" would finally be firmly established as a geo engineering project to mitigate global warming

5) the effects of solar radiation storms would be magnified by the presence of an increasing density of non solar wind related plasma.

6)the magnetic field of Earth would become increasingly unstable and unpredictable

7) the magnetosphere would be discovered to be powered by the solar wind

8) It would be acknowledged that electrical currents are transmitted through space by magnetic fields

9) the effects of global warming would occur far faster than predicted by lamestream science

10) The Earth would be found to be heating internally causing a radical increase in geological instability and severe earthquakes.

11) [geological activity would be linked to solar radiation storms]

12)the heliosphere would continue to shrink despite the onset of a solar maximum

13) General relativity and special relativity would be disproved by empirical observation

14) Phil Plait would be laughed off the air (just thought I'd add that for a kick in the nuts)

15) Magnetic impulses would be discover to be instantaneous across any distance

16) Gamma ray bursts would increase in duration an intensity as the solar syatem neared the galactic plane

17) The solar maximum would be delayed

18) unprecedented weather systems never before seen would begin to develop

19) Ocean currents would be disrupted far faster than predicted by the mainstream scientists

20) humans would experience mental and physical problems that were previously unobserved at the rate they are currently occurring due to the effects of radiation on the brain and body.

21) lamestream physics would make no real advancement despite the input of many billions of dollars into research. No consensus on results would be reached

22)Increase in objects entering the Earths atmosphere

23) strange unexplained events would occur at an exponentially increasing rate (such as the sounds people are reporting worldwide)

24) I would be set up and falsely persecuted, and finally exonerated

25) My critics would continue to engage me despite their insistence that there is no point in doing so

26) MY critics would be found to be all working together, that is I have no legitimate critics or hecklers relying on honest debate tactics and real information. ( this is not to say I do not have skeptics who honestly question my conclusions, only that the entourage of unintelligent and uneducated disinformation operatives who engage me on a day to day basis are not honest nor do they believe what they are saying)

27) A general consensus amongst mainstream scientists would be reached that the human race and the Earth itself is on the verge of a catastrophic event that will effect every living thing on the planet, and it would be veiled from the public eye

This is a very short list of correct predictions. You can argue about their origin or claim I didn't make them all you like, or you can even deny they're correct (please do!), but one thing you CANNOT do is change any of it.


---------------------------------------------------------------



I have used this comment many times before because I find it to be so revealing and so undeniable that it really puts the jew science shills in a tizzy.

When I was a junior in high school I made a striking discovery. It seemed that students were being tested for who was really awake and who just committed what they were taught without questioning it, and when such an individual who thought independently and was awake was discovered, he (or in rare cases she) was singled out by jewish "teachers" for all sorts of "special treatment".

They were there to poison the futures of the 'gentiles' who showed promise.

As an example, I had a question that no one as yet been able to answer yet, and to my knowledge no one has ever attempted to answer it. When balancing equations in chemistry, electromagnetic energy released during an exothermic reaction was clearly defined and labeled in the equation as electrons, and by analyzing the sructure of the compounds and the various bonds being formed and accounting for all of the electrons in the balancing process,, it was easy to see there were extra electrons, and were they came from.

SO I asked the chemistry teacher why we were taught one thing in Chemistry and then next period in Physics we were taught another, that is that electromagnetic energy was composed of photons.. I asked how could both be correct.

he said, and I quote verbatim "because Einstein wasn't a chemist". The guy"s name was Leedom, and he was one of the best teachers I ever had in public school, because he clearly did not resent potential beyond his own as most teachers and professors do. and e recognized and admitted tat what was in the text books was not the law of God.

I knew at that point that there was a fundamental problem with quantum physics as it was being taught, that it did not logically correlate with other subjects nor scientific empiricism.

It seemed to me that it was exactly as the real father of physics Nicola Tesla claimed, a complex mathematical fiction fabricated by an idiot savant given cookies to create formulas that made no real sense.

[EVERY TIME YOU POST NONSENSE DISTRACTIONS AND ShUCK AND JIVE SPIN TO ThIS ThREAD I AM SIMPLY GOING TO REPOST ThE ABOVE MATERIAL AND SCROLL YOU OFF ThE PAGE.