Don't be so hasty
It's about to get real.

There is one way you can determine with nearly 100% confidence that the thread title is accurate, and that is the amount of money spent casting doubt on it. Look at the man hours logged on this thread alone by persons known to be NASA shills. Look at how they attack on a personal level, trying to create the bandwagon illusion that because so many of them think I'm wrong, I must be.

What is really interesting is the level of emotional involvement. I'm not just a problem to them, I'm a problem they despise

No one involved in this area of science can claim 100% accuracy.

No one involved in this area of science can claim any level of accuracy even approaching my own.

I'm bumping this thread because at the present time there is ample evidence to prove te tread's basic assertion with gross inconsistencies in space weather data being presented on te 'net.