WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED! | |
Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 47658180 United States 09/30/2013 10:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's about to get real. There is one way you can determine with nearly 100% confidence that the thread title is accurate, and that is the amount of money spent casting doubt on it. Look at the man hours logged on this thread alone by persons known to be NASA shills. Look at how they attack on a personal level, trying to create the bandwagon illusion that because so many of them think I'm wrong, I must be. What is really interesting is the level of emotional involvement. I'm not just a problem to them, I'm a problem they despise No one involved in this area of science can claim 100% accuracy. No one involved in this area of science can claim any level of accuracy even approaching my own. I'm bumping this thread because at the present time there is ample evidence to prove te tread's basic assertion with gross inconsistencies in space weather data being presented on te 'net. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 39792702 Canada 09/30/2013 10:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Don't be so hasty Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 47658180 It's about to get real. There is one way you can determine with nearly 100% confidence that the thread title is accurate, and that is the amount of money spent casting doubt on it. Look at the man hours logged on this thread alone by persons known to be NASA shills. Look at how they attack on a personal level, trying to create the bandwagon illusion that because so many of them think I'm wrong, I must be. What is really interesting is the level of emotional involvement. I'm not just a problem to them, I'm a problem they despise No one involved in this area of science can claim 100% accuracy. No one involved in this area of science can claim any level of accuracy even approaching my own. I'm bumping this thread because at the present time there is ample evidence to prove te tread's basic assertion with gross inconsistencies in space weather data being presented on te 'net. Look at how the NSA is hacking AAs h key |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 39792702 Canada 09/30/2013 10:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And witness how AA can kill a thread faster than any other tard on the planet. Thread: ‘Rowdy’ Roddy Piper confesses: ‘They Live’ was a documentary |
Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 47658180 United States 09/30/2013 10:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And witness how AA can kill a thread faster than any other tard on the planet. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 39792702 Thread: ‘Rowdy’ Roddy Piper confesses: ‘They Live’ was a documentary You mean of course how quickly the truth can get a thread unpinned? Wow, surprise, huh? |
Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 47658180 United States 09/30/2013 10:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 39792702 Canada 09/30/2013 10:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 47658180 United States 09/30/2013 10:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 39792702 Canada 09/30/2013 10:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 39792702 Canada 09/30/2013 10:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 47658180 United States 09/30/2013 11:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Identifying a Paid disinformation operative 101 1) Individual will have exact same opinion about everything as others working with him in a co coordinated attack. It will almost seem as if it is the same person posting under many avatars or ID's 2) Identities carefully concealed. 3) Individual will never admit when he of she is proved wrong. The subject will be derailed and the facts ignored but never acknowledged 4) Individual will present opinions on a wide variety of controversial subjects identical to his comrades (see # 1) examples: Manned mooonlandings were real, jews are 'good' people, just misunderstood, 911 OS narrative is true, chemtrails are contrails 5) A pattern of attempting to establishing logical fallacies will present itself. ie, bandwagon fallacy 6) The shill will repeatedly attempt to change the subject from the subject matter to the one presenting it. 7) When the ascertains cannot be discounted, the shill will ignore them 8) heavily relies on fabricated references, ie , Wikipedia and references from the agency employing the shill 9) Any space science related thread will have homosexual shills prevalent, since their director is a homosexual and favors homosexuals in his organization 10) All shills will always defend the mainstream ideas vehemently. For instance if you claim relativity is false, ALL shills will claim the opposite. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 39792702 Canada 09/30/2013 11:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Identifying a Paid disinformation operative 101 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 47658180 1) Individual will have exact same opinion about everything as others working with him in a co coordinated attack. It will almost seem as if it is the same person posting under many avatars or ID's 2) Identities carefully concealed. 3) Individual will never admit when he of she is proved wrong. The subject will be derailed and the facts ignored but never acknowledged 4) Individual will present opinions on a wide variety of controversial subjects identical to his comrades (see # 1) examples: Manned mooonlandings were real, jews are 'good' people, just misunderstood, 911 OS narrative is true, chemtrails are contrails 5) A pattern of attempting to establishing logical fallacies will present itself. ie, bandwagon fallacy 6) The shill will repeatedly attempt to change the subject from the subject matter to the one presenting it. 7) When the ascertains cannot be discounted, the shill will ignore them 8) heavily relies on fabricated references, ie , Wikipedia and references from the agency employing the shill 9) Any space science related thread will have homosexual shills prevalent, since their director is a homosexual and favors homosexuals in his organization 10) All shills will always defend the mainstream ideas vehemently. For instance if you claim relativity is false, ALL shills will claim the opposite. I think this belongs more in the Mainstream Science thread there bub |
Anonymous Astrophysicist User ID: 47658180 United States 09/30/2013 11:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Identifying a Paid disinformation operative 101 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 47658180 1) Individual will have exact same opinion about everything as others working with him in a co coordinated attack. It will almost seem as if it is the same person posting under many avatars or ID's 2) Identities carefully concealed. 3) Individual will never admit when he of she is proved wrong. The subject will be derailed and the facts ignored but never acknowledged 4) Individual will present opinions on a wide variety of controversial subjects identical to his comrades (see # 1) examples: Manned mooonlandings were real, jews are 'good' people, just misunderstood, 911 OS narrative is true, chemtrails are contrails 5) A pattern of attempting to establishing logical fallacies will present itself. ie, bandwagon fallacy 6) The shill will repeatedly attempt to change the subject from the subject matter to the one presenting it. 7) When the ascertains cannot be discounted, the shill will ignore them 8) heavily relies on fabricated references, ie , Wikipedia and references from the agency employing the shill 9) Any space science related thread will have homosexual shills prevalent, since their director is a homosexual and favors homosexuals in his organization 10) All shills will always defend the mainstream ideas vehemently. For instance if you claim relativity is false, ALL shills will claim the opposite. I think this belongs more in the Mainstream Science thread there bub It belongs wherever I decide to put it. I am going to refine it to the point were all shills cannot operate without detection. An opinion that is bought and paid for is useless and not an opinion at all, it's disinformation. |
74444 User ID: 74444 United States 09/30/2013 01:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You've been claiming that since 2005. Doom any minute now. There is one way you can determine with nearly 100% confidence that the thread title is accurate, and that is the amount of money spent casting doubt on it. Look at the man hours logged on this thread alone by persons known to be NASA shills. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 47658180 Ad hominem noted. I do not get paid to post counter to your ideas, and I do not work for NASA, and my track record disagreeing with your predictions has proven far more accurate than you, yourself. Look at how they attack on a personal level, trying to create the bandwagon illusion that because so many of them think I'm wrong, I must be. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 47658180 Physician, heal thyself. Where have my attacks been personal? The first one to start calling names and ad hominems in nearly all of your threads has been you, yourself. What is really interesting is the level of emotional involvement. I'm not just a problem to them, I'm a problem they despise Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 47658180 You misread my emotions entirely. You *amuse.* No one involved in this area of science can claim 100% accuracy. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 47658180 Yet you've often claimed such, or 98.5%, or 97.5%, or whatever ridiculously high percentage you choose to pull out of your butt *this* week. No one involved in this area of science can claim any level of accuracy even approaching my own. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 47658180 Well, the difference between your claimed accuracy and actual accuracy is clear on this very thread. And your actual accuracy has proven to be an easy mark to exceed, since its been terribly low this year. December 2012, threads at GLP 'hidden,' tunguska-like events all over the world, 90% of the population wiped out, internet not working -- you've made a lot of doozies in the last year. I'm bumping this thread because at the present time there is ample evidence to prove te tread's basic assertion with gross inconsistencies in space weather data being presented on te 'net. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 47658180 That wasn't the thread's basic assertion. The thread's basic assertion, as it is with nearly all threads you get terrifically involved in remains: "Look how much smarter/in the know IDW/A.A is than all the rest of you peons!" However, the threads never *result* in showing that, now, do they? And neither does reality. |
74444 User ID: 74444 United States 09/30/2013 01:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Identifying a Paid disinformation operative 101 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 47658180 1) Individual will have exact same opinion about everything as others working with him in a co coordinated attack. It will almost seem as if it is the same person posting under many avatars or ID's 2) Identities carefully concealed. 3) Individual will never admit when he of she is proved wrong. The subject will be derailed and the facts ignored but never acknowledged 4) Individual will present opinions on a wide variety of controversial subjects identical to his comrades (see # 1) examples: Manned mooonlandings were real, jews are 'good' people, just misunderstood, 911 OS narrative is true, chemtrails are contrails 5) A pattern of attempting to establishing logical fallacies will present itself. ie, bandwagon fallacy 6) The shill will repeatedly attempt to change the subject from the subject matter to the one presenting it. 7) When the ascertains cannot be discounted, the shill will ignore them 8) heavily relies on fabricated references, ie , Wikipedia and references from the agency employing the shill 9) Any space science related thread will have homosexual shills prevalent, since their director is a homosexual and favors homosexuals in his organization 10) All shills will always defend the mainstream ideas vehemently. For instance if you claim relativity is false, ALL shills will claim the opposite. Hey, IDW/A.A started his own list! Mine's bigger. |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 30047168 United States 10/01/2013 06:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Don't be so hasty Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 47658180 It's about to get real. There is one way you can determine with nearly 100% confidence that the thread title is accurate, and that is the amount of money spent casting doubt on it. What money? And who needs to spend money casting doubt on anything you say? You haven't gotten anything right yet so your record speaks for itself. Look at the man hours logged on this thread alone by persons known to be NASA shills. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 47658180 Known by who? You? I seem to recall you've been asked NUMEROUS times to provide evidence supporting your claim that people are paid to discredit you. Time and time again you have failed to do so. So, here's your big chance - put up or shut up. PROVE that anyone is paid to be here. I predict that you'll come up with some excuse as to why you can't and then disappear for awhile. It's what you do. Look at how they attack on a personal level, trying to create the bandwagon illusion that because so many of them think I'm wrong, I must be. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 47658180 LOL! All one has to do is go through this thread to see that the ONLY one doing personal attacks is you. Your hypocrisy knows no bounds. What is really interesting is the level of emotional involvement. I'm not just a problem to them, I'm a problem they despise Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 47658180 You think you're a problem? No - you're a joke. No one involved in this area of science can claim 100% accuracy. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 47658180 And yet you do...or at least you try. Unfortunately, your record of past failures keeps getting in the way. No one involved in this area of science can claim any level of accuracy even approaching my own. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 47658180 And there it is. Let me ask - why would anyone WANT to approach your level of accuracy? You've proven that you're 100% wrong, 100% of the time. I'm bumping this thread because at the present time there is ample evidence to prove te tread's basic assertion with gross inconsistencies in space weather data being presented on te 'net. Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 47658180 Ample evidence? Then present it. Again, I predict you won't. Prove me wrong. A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 30047168 United States 10/01/2013 06:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Identifying a Paid disinformation operative 101 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 47658180 1) Individual will have exact same opinion about everything as others working with him in a co coordinated attack. It will almost seem as if it is the same person posting under many avatars or ID's 2) Identities carefully concealed. 3) Individual will never admit when he of she is proved wrong. The subject will be derailed and the facts ignored but never acknowledged 4) Individual will present opinions on a wide variety of controversial subjects identical to his comrades (see # 1) examples: Manned mooonlandings were real, jews are 'good' people, just misunderstood, 911 OS narrative is true, chemtrails are contrails 5) A pattern of attempting to establishing logical fallacies will present itself. ie, bandwagon fallacy 6) The shill will repeatedly attempt to change the subject from the subject matter to the one presenting it. 7) When the ascertains cannot be discounted, the shill will ignore them 8) heavily relies on fabricated references, ie , Wikipedia and references from the agency employing the shill 9) Any space science related thread will have homosexual shills prevalent, since their director is a homosexual and favors homosexuals in his organization 10) All shills will always defend the mainstream ideas vehemently. For instance if you claim relativity is false, ALL shills will claim the opposite. Wow - you meet every one of those criteria. That means only one thing - you just outed yourself as the true shill. Congratulations. Of course, I and others here already knew this. A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
Elemental User ID: 13461811 United Kingdom 10/02/2013 11:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Identifying a Paid disinformation operative 101 Quoting: Anonymous Astrophysicist 47658180 1) Individual will have exact same opinion about everything as others working with him in a co coordinated attack. It will almost seem as if it is the same person posting under many avatars or ID's 2) Identities carefully concealed. 3) Individual will never admit when he of she is proved wrong. The subject will be derailed and the facts ignored but never acknowledged 4) Individual will present opinions on a wide variety of controversial subjects identical to his comrades (see # 1) examples: Manned mooonlandings were real, jews are 'good' people, just misunderstood, 911 OS narrative is true, chemtrails are contrails 5) A pattern of attempting to establishing logical fallacies will present itself. ie, bandwagon fallacy 6) The shill will repeatedly attempt to change the subject from the subject matter to the one presenting it. 7) When the ascertains cannot be discounted, the shill will ignore them 8) heavily relies on fabricated references, ie , Wikipedia and references from the agency employing the shill 9) Any space science related thread will have homosexual shills prevalent, since their director is a homosexual and favors homosexuals in his organization 10) All shills will always defend the mainstream ideas vehemently. For instance if you claim relativity is false, ALL shills will claim the opposite. Hey, IDW/A.A started his own list! Mine's bigger. His appears to be based on homosexuals, projection much? energy cannot be destroyed, it can only be transformed. Nothing is so potent as the silent influence of a good example. Illegitimi non carborundum Alea iacta est. Dum vivimus vivamus |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 39792702 Canada 10/02/2013 11:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Elemental User ID: 13461811 United Kingdom 10/02/2013 12:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 47762072 United States 10/02/2013 12:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Wispa User ID: 43279032 United Kingdom 10/02/2013 01:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
74444 User ID: 74444 United States 10/02/2013 01:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So, the Circuit Breaker shill is still on duty, as are all of the other .gov shills. Either they are considered an "essential service", or they are paid by the secret shadow government. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 47762072 Or, of course, the possibility that none work for the .gov at all, nor are paid to post on the internet. It's funny how that possibility always gets overlooked. Particularly since its true. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 47765476 United States 10/02/2013 01:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So, the Circuit Breaker shill is still on duty, as are all of the other .gov shills. Either they are considered an "essential service", or they are paid by the secret shadow government. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 47762072 Or, of course, the possibility that none work for the .gov at all, nor are paid to post on the internet. It's funny how that possibility always gets overlooked. Particularly since its true. Alice Springs is nice this time of year though........ |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 47765476 United States 10/02/2013 02:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
74444 User ID: 74444 United States 10/02/2013 09:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
anonymous astrophysicist User ID: 47787663 United States 10/03/2013 02:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 47801670 United States 10/03/2013 02:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 47801670 United States 10/03/2013 02:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 30047168 United States 10/03/2013 07:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So, the Circuit Breaker shill is still on duty, as are all of the other .gov shills. Either they are considered an "essential service", or they are paid by the secret shadow government. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 47762072 Where's the evidence that anyone is paid to be here? You've been asked numerous times but fail to present it. Why is that? Could it be that you have no evidence to support your claim? Which makes it nothing more than a personal belief...which also means it's basically worthless. Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 10/03/2013 07:22 AM A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 30047168 United States 10/03/2013 07:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The fact that you are a paid poster is indicative of a broke dick fascist government desperate to keep control. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 47801670 Based on the fact? What fact? Present it - prove that I or anyone is paid to be here. Can you? Yeah, I thought not. Since you have been asked to present evidence and fail to do so, I guess you have no facts at all. 17 trillion dollars in debt, not even able to pay the intrest on what it owes, and the government hires a dickstick like you and at least 7 others to lie, protect phil plaits reputation from one man. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 47801670 Wow, interesting you should say that considering I loathe our current administration - I feel it has done more to create racial tension and divide the country. But you go ahead and continue living in your little fantasy that we're paid. You have no proof nor do you even have any evidence to support the claim so it means nothing. The only thing it does prove is that you're a paranoid delusional jerk. Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 10/03/2013 07:24 AM A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |