I'm a big fan of Paul, but I don't think this argument really holds water.

If the vast majority of the wealthiest people have acquired that wealth through immoral or deceptive means - which is most certainly the case - then it is not immoral whatsoever to redistribute that wealth to the poor. The richest people in the country contribute the absolute LEAST to the health and prosperity of the nation, so I see no reason to make the bold statement that they have "earned" their vast wealth.

If Ron Paul were to win, I think the most moral and honest thing would be to redistribute the wealth of the nation and then start over.