This next article reports on an American study undertaken on reports of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) developing after vaccinations.

In the conclusions it clearly states.."Although the nonnormal distribution of post-vaccination GBS suggests that some cases may be triggered by vaccination".

But then goes on to RECOMMEND first line protection remains vaccination!

I cannot believe that these people would make such a recommendation in light of the results of their studies.

And another thing too.

Did their study look at the cumulative affects of regular annual vaccinations, they should have as mercury to name one common ingredient accumulates in the human body, so the TOTAL number of vaccinations over an entire life must be taken into account for the study to be meaningful.

This might be an over simplistic view, but are these people doing this work actually totally independant, or is there some awareness or presence of big pharmacy somewhere in this picture that isnt being made known?

J Clin Neuromuscul Dis. 2012 Dec;14(2):66-71. doi: 10.1097/CND.0b013e31824db14e.
Guillain-Barré Syndrome After Influenza Vaccination in the United States, A Report From the CDC/FDA Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (1990-2009).
Souayah N, Yacoub HA, Khan HM, Farhad K, Mehyar LS, Maybodi L, Menkes DL, Qureshi AI.
Source*Department of Neurology, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, NJ †Department of Biostatistics, Robert Stempel College of Public Health & Social Work, Florida International University, Miami, FL ‡Department of Neurology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT §Zeenat Qureshi Stroke Research Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

Abstract
OBJECTIVES: : To determine the rate of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) after administration of influenza vaccine in the United States and to provide further information about the characteristics and temporal profile of these incidents.

METHODS: : Data were acquired from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, supplemented by data from the Center for Biologics and Research under the Freedom of Information Act between 1990 and 2009.

RESULTS: : There were 802 cases (mean age, 54.72 ± 18.4 years) of GBS reported after influenza vaccination in the United States between 1990 and 2009. Among the 802 vaccinated patients with available data, 624 (77.8%) developed GBS within 6 weeks and 78 (9.7%) after 6 weeks, whereas these data were unavailable for the remaining 100 patients (13%). The reporting rate of post-influenza vaccine GBS was within the range expected in the general population or approximately 0.46 cases per million vaccinations. A non-Gaussian distribution of GBS within the first 6 weeks post-vaccination was noted, given that the peak incidence occurred in the second week.

CONCLUSIONS: : The incidence of post-influenza vaccine GBS is similar to the incidence of idiopathic GBS in the general population. Although the nonnormal distribution of post-vaccination GBS suggests that some cases may be triggered by vaccination, the greater risk of complications from influenza virus infections makes vaccination the first-line strategy for infection prevention and support the current guidelines on vaccination.

Link here...

[link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]