Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,361 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 215,475
Pageviews Today: 288,926Threads Today: 87Posts Today: 1,297
02:27 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject <<Advancing Bird Flu-H5N1...Now following MERS and Ebola approaching PANDEMICS>>>
Poster Handle arkay
Post Content
With all the talk of influenzas and coronaviruses, its probably a good time to revisit the topic of surgical masks and their effectiveness.

Here is a study that was recently done to evaluate their effectiveness.

Effectiveness of surgical masks against influenza bioaerosols.
Makison Booth C, Clayton M, Crook B, Gawn JM.
SourceHealth & Safety Laboratory (HSL), Buxton, Derbyshire, UK. Electronic address: [email protected].

Abstract
BACKGROUND: Most surgical masks are not certified for use as respiratory protective devices (RPDs). In the event of an influenza pandemic, logistical and practical implications such as storage and fit testing will restrict the use of RPDs to certain high-risk procedures that are likely to generate large amounts of infectious bioaerosols. Studies have shown that in such circumstances increased numbers of surgical masks are worn, but the protection afforded to the wearer by a surgical mask against infectious aerosols is not well understood.

AIM: To develop and apply a method for assessing the protection afforded by surgical masks against a bioaerosol challenge.

METHODS: A dummy test head attached to a breathing simulator was used to test the performance of surgical masks against a viral challenge. Several designs of surgical masks commonly used in the UK healthcare sector were evaluated by measuring levels of inert particles and live aerosolised influenza virus in the air, from in front of and behind each mask.

FINDINGS: Live influenza virus was measurable from the air behind all surgical masks tested. The data indicate that a surgical mask will reduce exposure to aerosolised infectious influenza virus; reductions ranged from 1.1- to 55-fold (average 6-fold), depending on the design of the mask.

CONCLUSION: We describe a workable method to evaluate the protective efficacy of surgical masks and RPDs against a relevant aerosolised biological challenge. The results demonstrated limitations of surgical masks in this context, although they are to some extent protective.


Link here...

[link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:







GLP