Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,072 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,072,590
Pageviews Today: 1,933,892Threads Today: 845Posts Today: 14,857
09:51 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject The monsters wakes up ! Katla Hekla Iceland Dead Zone and rift as uniform system ! A lot of others worldwide !
Poster Handle Anonymous Coward
Post Content
The melting of the Greenland ice continues to accelerate, not good for the Icelandic ridge and volcanic activity is not a promise, make conclusions themselves...

[link to earthobservatory.nasa.gov]
Ted Scambos, lead scientist at the U.S. National Snow and Ice Data Center, noted that this calving event marks a retreat of the Petermann Glacier “farther back than historical calving fronts.” A comparison of this event to the 2010 event shows that this iceberg broke off the glacier tongue farther upstream. The crack along the southern margin of this new iceberg, however, has been visible in satellite imagery for several years. That rift was first identified in 2001.
[link to eoimages.gsfc.nasa.gov]
[link to eoimages.gsfc.nasa.gov]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13134022

strange times... white noise around microchanges in tremor spikes etc somewhere and cover of deep silence concerning huge marks likely started already countdown..
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13134022


[link to volcans.blogs-de-voyage.fr]
"...The first graph shows the frequency of disasters between 1980 and 201O The brown color refers to the geological events (earthquakes, tsunamis, volcanic eruptions). The green color means the meteorological disasters such as storms. The dark gray represents the original hydrological events (floods, for example). The orange color is reserved for climate-induced events (extreme temperatures, drought, forest fires ...). Note that the trend is steadily rising.
The following curves - keeping the same colors as before - show the number of natural disasters that occurred between 1980 and 2010. We quickly realized that extreme weather events and their consequences marked a sharp increase, while their counterparts are stable geological.
[link to volcans.blogs-de-voyage.fr]
[link to volcans.blogs-de-voyage.fr]
People often feel as earthquakes and eruptions are becoming more frequent. This is false! This impression comes from the fact that information flows more quickly and we know almost in real time what happens to the other side of the world
Without falling into catastrophism, we must recognize that the situation is worrying and that the Earth's climate is experiencing major imbalances which inevitably have economic consequences..."


Good article, but there are some logical errors.
The fact that the geological consequences of 30 years has not had time to manifest itself, does not mean that they will not, and in the near future.
The fact that the climatic consequences ahead of them quite naturally - air and water are much more mobile environment than the earth crust, where the voltage unbalance can accumulate quite a long time before starting to appear everywhere. In addition if we consider the increase in the number of events, we should do it separately for a short period of time - not for 30 years, and over the past 10 years, when the process began to change greatly accelerated. Also clearly would not hurt to include consideration of the 2011 with the Japanese and other events - the year already acknowledged by specialists as an absolutely extreme climatic indicators)
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 20419972


LoL A few days later, it all finally noticed here and at once opened a lot of new threads on this topic
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:







GLP