'Nuclear bombs' are a hoax - and the consequences | |
GeekOfTheWeek User ID: 8795702 United States 02/19/2012 01:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Could you tell that to those that are still surviving after WW2, in Japan? I love physics. It bonds us eternally, it's what makes our computers work, it's what's in my morning cup of coffee, it's the thing that keeps the universe from vanishing due to lack of belief... |
GeekOfTheWeek User ID: 8795702 United States 02/19/2012 01:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 10755955 France 02/19/2012 01:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8597527 United States 02/19/2012 04:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | These old testing videos are 100% fake. Anyone can see they are miniature sets, unless you feel like bullshitting yourself. I think this lends weight to the argument that Nukes are a hoax. Japan cities could have been heavily carpet bombed. Some of the old photographs show rickety little buildings still standing in the alleged blast zone. Doesn't really make sense. Good topic, OP. This is another one that comes up against extremely heavy opposition, despite some very credible arguments based off empirical evidence. That's usually when you know you're close to a truth. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8597527 United States 02/19/2012 05:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
IRQ_1 User ID: 1157608 United States 02/19/2012 05:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They did have some impressive "fuel air" type bombs in the past but my main problem with this OP is the the temperatures required to flash burn objects at a distance. It would require hundreds of thousands of degrees to ignite objects with heat alone at distance of several miles, something a chemical reaction can't pull off. [link to en.wikipedia.org] In physics, an inverse-square law is any physical law stating that a specified physical quantity or strength is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source of that physical quantity. Last Edited by IRQ_1 on 02/19/2012 05:20 PM Jack of all trades master of none "shall not be infringed." BLUE RIBBON AWARNESS FOR MENS' HEALTH Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. --ISAAC ASIMOV I never 'Ad hominem' I don't need to. The Constitution means everything or nothing. You can't have both. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8597527 United States 02/19/2012 06:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They did have some impressive "fuel air" type bombs in the past but my main problem with this OP is the the temperatures required to flash burn objects at a distance. It would require hundreds of thousands of degrees to ignite objects with heat alone at distance of several miles, something a chemical reaction can't pull off. Quoting: IRQ_1 [link to en.wikipedia.org] In physics, an inverse-square law is any physical law stating that a specified physical quantity or strength is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source of that physical quantity. are you basing these "flash burns" off of video or what? Most of the photographs of damaged urban areas just look conventionally bombed out. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8597527 United States 02/20/2012 08:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Redstorm2000 User ID: 2135289 United States 02/20/2012 09:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They did have some impressive "fuel air" type bombs in the past but my main problem with this OP is the the temperatures required to flash burn objects at a distance. It would require hundreds of thousands of degrees to ignite objects with heat alone at distance of several miles, something a chemical reaction can't pull off. Quoting: IRQ_1 [link to en.wikipedia.org] In physics, an inverse-square law is any physical law stating that a specified physical quantity or strength is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source of that physical quantity. are you basing these "flash burns" off of video or what? Most of the photographs of damaged urban areas just look conventionally bombed out. As much as I would love to believe that nukes don't exist, the sad truth is that they do. Japan wasn't about to to give up without a fight to the death, until 2 bombs destroyed 2 cities. The burn and radiation sickness caused by both attacks was well documented. Ask the city fathers of Hiroshima what they think of this nonsense. The shadows of people were burnt into the ground from the intense light and heat. You people should get involved in something useful, like getting rid of the damn things, rather then pretending they don't exist. |
BRIEF User ID: 381742 United States 02/20/2012 09:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
rerevisionist (OP) User ID: 11151021 United Kingdom 02/20/2012 10:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thanks for your comments (even though most of them are laughable). I know you have problems, I realise your personas are dependent on your beliefs, I understand you have sound reasons for avoiding facts. But look at [link to www.nukelies.com] - it's arranged much more readably than most forums. Look at the home page, spend a few minutes - the layout makes perfect sense - all the topics are arranged as efficiently as possible. (The weakest section is on checking supposed nuclear test sites, which we're working on). If some topic doesn't fit very clearly, there are offtopic sections - one for people, and one for ideas. Feel free to register and comment. BUT ONLY if you have something to say which isn't quoted from the mass media! Last Edited by rerevisionist on 02/20/2012 10:04 AM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 11143987 Turkey 02/20/2012 10:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1738368 Germany 02/20/2012 10:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | As someone that works in the industry per se, I can say without a doubt that there is nothing fake about the destructive properties of offensive nuclear devices. It seems to me the OP is just here to pimp his forum that seems to be mostly his own rambling on this topic. Go buy a science book or go back to school. It's a pretty simple concept once you actually know what you're talking about. |
Searchalot User ID: 1289575 Netherlands 02/20/2012 10:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thread: What's the fuss about "Nuclear Weapons"? I'm not your enemy, you are... © 2004, Maus E. Only your thoughts create your world. © 2015 Maus E. Learning is knowing you learn nothing when you know. © 2016 Maus E. |
Searchalot User ID: 1289575 Netherlands 02/20/2012 10:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | BTW, I don't doubt there are nuclear weapons, I doubt the quantity we're being told. FYI. I'm not your enemy, you are... © 2004, Maus E. Only your thoughts create your world. © 2015 Maus E. Learning is knowing you learn nothing when you know. © 2016 Maus E. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 11150715 United States 02/20/2012 11:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | BTW, I don't doubt there are nuclear weapons, I doubt the quantity we're being told. Quoting: Searchalot FYI. agreed. along with doubting their reliability especially considering half life of materials vs the life of the units btw, nice link to a new source of info there are some very good arguments against their existance dr |
rerevisionist (OP) User ID: 11151021 United Kingdom 02/20/2012 06:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thanks, everyone. It's always amusing to read posts from people who pop up claiming to have worked in some 'industry' or other, but who manage to have no evidence whatever to back their assertions. Anyway -- [link to www.nukelies.com] though it deals with other big lies too. Feel free to register and post. BUT ONLY IF YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY. We don't encourage silly graphics, parrot-like repetitions, people who spam, people who refuse to anser questions, people who post irrelevant youtubes, people who can't concentrate, people who lie, etc .... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1379944 United States 02/20/2012 07:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
DrKnow User ID: 11158618 Mexico 02/20/2012 07:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
rerevisionist (OP) User ID: 11151021 United Kingdom 02/21/2012 02:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 11203160 United States 02/21/2012 02:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Desert Fox User ID: 8786935 United States 02/21/2012 02:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nuclear bombs are harmless. My uncle told me so. Last Edited by Desert Fox on 02/21/2012 02:20 PM :TOMABANEFOX: It's more humane this way ya know, or burn on totem pole. Choice is yours. |
Redstorm2000 User ID: 2135289 United States 02/24/2012 09:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thanks, everyone. It's always amusing to read posts from people who pop up claiming to have worked in some 'industry' or other, but who manage to have no evidence whatever to back their assertions. Quoting: rerevisionist Anyway -- [link to www.nukelies.com] though it deals with other big lies too. Feel free to register and post. BUT ONLY IF YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY. We don't encourage silly graphics, parrot-like repetitions, people who spam, people who refuse to anser questions, people who post irrelevant youtubes, people who can't concentrate, people who lie, etc .... In other words, no comments wanted from folks who REALLY disagree with your beliefs. |
rerevisionist (OP) User ID: 11371422 United Kingdom 02/24/2012 12:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
The Chosen One User ID: 2724788 United States 02/24/2012 12:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
rerevisionist (OP) User ID: 11645851 United Kingdom 02/29/2012 10:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The leading theory about nuclear power is that it doesn't work, and never worked. The so-called 'power stations' are likely to be dumploads - they waste electricity to even out peaks in demand. (Suppose 10 million people make coffee in a TV break - that's megawatts - whole power station loads. Normally MORE electricity is generated than is needed; the surplus goes to boil water). Nuclear power doubts - Dumpload idea [link to nukelies.com] Inventing properties of 'atom bombs' [link to nukelies.com] Inventing properties of 'H bombs' [link to nukelies.com] Vanunu as plant to pretend Israel has 'nukes' [link to nukelies.com] Hiroshima was NOT 'atom bombed' [link to nukelies.com] No submarines are nuclear-powered? [link to nukelies.com] Nukes and Iran - revisionist discussion [link to nukelies.com] Last Edited by rerevisionist on 02/29/2012 10:25 AM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 48643929 United Kingdom 10/17/2022 10:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |