Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 3,100 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,562,017
Pageviews Today: 2,514,785Threads Today: 812Posts Today: 17,552
08:19 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax

 
The Brandon

User ID: 5520651
United States
03/20/2012 07:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
Missed Yankee Coward's bad spelling, did you not?
Or didn't you, and you just pick on me because you couldn't, once again, think of a cogent and coherent rebuttal?
 Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD


Rebuttals are no problem for me, but arguing with a religious zealot has no value for me.

Interesting trivia: if you've ever read up on the psychology of religious zealots and schizophrenics, they are quite alike in many respects. Their own personal narrative has complete internal logical consistency.

This means that unless the person actually allows for the possibility that their narrative may be wrong, they can safely remain within their own psychological bubble for the entirety of their life.

For anyone paying attention, people always eventually reveal themselves to be either those who allow for the possibility that their point of view may be wrong, or religious believers.

In my opinion, it is utterly useless for the former to argue with the latter.

Regardless, sorry about the english correction, I was just being a dick.

Last Edited by Urban on 03/20/2012 07:39 PM
"There wouldn’t be such a thing as counterfeit gold if there were no real gold somewhere."

-–Sufi Proverb
Spittin'Cesium

User ID: 5369266
United Kingdom
03/20/2012 08:00 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
Third-party evidence for Apollo Moon landings (from wikipedia that includes their correspondent references):

[link to en.wikipedia.org]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12415719

cruisecruisecruise
 Quoting: Anonymous OP 8597527

Do you really think an image macro is a cogent and relevant rebuttal?

I would really like you to disproof a single one of those references.
Just give it a try.
Just so we know that you actually know what you are talking about.

Astro, nomuse, Hal et al.: one friendly suggestion: don't waste your precious time with these irrational shills.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12415719

It's not a waste of time when they're getting paid.
 Quoting: Anonymous OP 8597527

So what are you getting out 'participating' here?
book
_____________________________________________________________​___________________

The skin of the spacecraft was 2mm thick aluminum.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1215685

And once again IDW proves he doesn't know a damn thing about areal density or how much shielding the Apollo spacecraft provided.
 Quoting: Astromut

Like so many he doesn't actually seem to know what shielding is.
book
_____________________________________________________________​___________________

The Suns Rays and wieghtlessness just from ISS Orbit can cause Eyesight problems in nearly all Astros,Astro [link to www.bbc.co.uk]
 Quoting: Spittin'Cesium

Can.

Only three letters. And a very common word.
Spittin' doesn't know what it means though.

There's quite a few articles on this from Yesterday and Today..this is why on EV Missions on the Moon the Golden Vizors are a must,Astro.
 Quoting: Spittin'Cesium

Says you.

The glare visor was for the convenience of the astronauts.
They used it as they felt was most convenient.
Like you would use mirror shades in the desert.
Looking into the sun won't make you go blind in only a few minutes.
Not if the layers under it already filter out more then 90% of the UV.

According to NASA for EV Missions the Last Golden Vizor must be worn.
 Quoting: Spittin'Cesium

Where does it say that?
You are just making stuff up so it'll fit your rather flawed understand of reality.
book
_____________________________________________________________​___________________

I come from the place of believing the whole thing to be a lie, so I look at things from a fake perspective, I try to look at them from your perspective,
 Quoting: LD 12458942

If all you have is a hammer...

Less words and more facts, please.
book
_____________________________________________________________​___________________

Why not address Mr. McGowan's points made in his articles,
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12450758

Why won't Mr. McGowan defend his statements?
Why does he hide?

Any place any time, Dave.

If you have a question ask it.
Waving at a 140 minute youtube video or a 40,000 word website, as hoaxies tend to do, won't get you many responses.
Be specific.

without using "appeal to authority" arguments, when the "authorities" are NASA shill-puppets and ignorant, pompous turds?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12450758

And every aerospace engineer, every rocket scientist, every space historian, every geologist, every astronomer, etc., etc, in the world.

Face it, everyone who actually knows what they are talking about disagrees with you.
You wanna debate rocket science?
Learn the basics first.
Until you do you are like the village idiot from Westchester pompously pontificating about the social-economical consequences of the high price of steel in 12th century China.
He doesn't even now where China is.

It's not the Apollo Nutters who failed to back up their assertions with facts and evidence.
Gremlins didn't steal your croutons. Your croutons are lying there on the table, for everyone to see.
book
_____________________________________________________________​___________________

i PROVED USING THE SCEINTIFIC METHOD AND THE SIMPLEST OF MATHMATICAL CONCEPTS THAT APOLLO WAS A FRAUD
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist. 1356833

[sic]

SEND ME THE BIG DOG JAY WINDLEY,
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicist. 1356833

You had your chance.
[link to www.bautforum.com]

It was first class edutainment.
Of course you ran off like a whimpering dog when the going got tough.
book

schlock2
 Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD


Vizors,quote:

'Apollo space helmets were formed from high-strength polycarbonate and were attached to the spacesuit by a pressure-sealing neck ring. Unlike Mercury and Gemini helmets, which were closely fitted and moved with the crewman's head, the Apollo helmet was fixed and the head was free to move within. While walking on the Moon, Apollo crewmen wore an outer visor assembly over the polycarbonate helmet to shield against eye-damaging ultraviolet radiation, and to maintain head and face thermal comfort. Completing the Moon explorer's ensemble were lunar gloves and boots, both designed for the rigors of exploring, and the gloves for adjusting sensitive instruments'.

[link to www.astronautix.com]
The thing that hath been,
is That which shall be;
and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun.
Ecclesiastes 9:1
Spittin'Cesium

User ID: 5369266
United Kingdom
03/20/2012 08:11 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
My point is simply that the outer Golden Vizor should always be employed in Sun-lit EV Missions..unless you were in the very shaded areas..only then would you allow brief amounts of time with the Vizor ajusted for vision..but in doing so risking heat loss from the face and the risk of eye damage from Solar Radiation.
The thing that hath been,
is That which shall be;
and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun.
Ecclesiastes 9:1
LD
User ID: 12790853
Australia
03/20/2012 09:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax



 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12512532


When I watched this video it was the final piece that confirmed it for me. Not only does his body language and eye movement show he is lying when he is speaking of being no the moon, but to say that even from the Command module the stars were not visible, and that space is just black, confirmed that he is lying.

While I can understand why there are no stars in the pictures, and even understand that at times with the sun shining right in your face on the moon, you couldnt see stars, to suggest that even on the trip from the earth to the moon there are no visible stars is just the most ridiculous thing Ive ever heard...

 Quoting: LD 12790853


Ahhh you gotta love nasa... well here is the proof, and from your beloved nasa no less, that stars are indeed visible from space.. and even on the MOON.. love to see how you are going to explain this now..

[link to helios.gsfc.nasa.gov]


4.Why Can't We See Stars During the Day?

Why can't we see the stars during the daytime?
You can see one star during the day -- the Sun! But because the sky is so bright (due to the Sun being bright), other stars are not visible. On the Moon, if you shield the Sun with your hand and let your eyes dark-adjust, you can see stars during the "day".
Dr. Eric Christian
(August 2000)



5.Can You See Stars in Space?

Q: Is it true that in space a person is not able to see stars all around them like we do here on Earth?

No,(it is not true) I hear that in space the stars look wonderful, bright (although not twinkling) and very clear. What has probably caused some of this confusion is that in the typical photo or video image from space, there aren't any stars. This is because the stars are much dimmer than the astronaut, Moon, space station, or whatever the image is been taken of. It is extremely hard to get the exposure correct to show the stars. Luckily, the human eye handles the different light levels much better than a camera does.

Dr. Eric Christian
(July 2001)


Who is Dr Eric Christian
[link to imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov]
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 8597527
United States
03/20/2012 09:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
There is actually NO proof man stepped on the moon. There is NO actual footage of the event (it was mysteriously lost by NASA) there is no actual blueprint/plans of the amazing 1960 technology that allowed humans to cross through the Van Allen radiation belts. Also amazing is the fact that NASA has stated it would take us another 20 years to DEVELOP the technology to put a man on the moon... but amazingly, it was done in 8 years in the 60's w/primitive technology....also amazingly for the numbnuts talking $$$ and how the equivalent is unaffordable now....wtf??? As is that even figures in the equation. It was all a show, a hoax, and "we the people" have been duped.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 938495

clappa
LD
User ID: 12790853
Australia
03/20/2012 09:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
Oh and in case you need more proof:

Science Officer and Flight Engineer Edward T. Lu ISS,wrote this:

"Mars is bright enough that even when we are on the lit side of the Earth, and with all the lights on inside, it is clearly visible against the black background of space"
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 8597527
United States
03/20/2012 09:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
Interesting trivia: if you've ever read up on the psychology of religious zealots and schizophrenics, they are quite alike in many respects. Their own personal narrative has complete internal logical consistency.

This means that unless the person actually allows for the possibility that their narrative may be wrong, they can safely remain within their own psychological bubble for the entirety of their life.

For anyone paying attention, people always eventually reveal themselves to be either those who allow for the possibility that their point of view may be wrong, or religious believers.
 Quoting: The Brandon


clappa
LD
User ID: 12790853
Australia
03/20/2012 09:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
this is what the astronauts of Apollo missions SHOULD OF SEEN in the sky around them.. watch the sky above the horizon, you clearly see stars, orions belt is obvious..

[link to apod.nasa.gov]

wonder how armstrong and the others can say :

"The sky is a deep black, when viewed from the moon as it is as it is when viewed from the space between the earth and the moon"

and

"The Earth is the only visible object other than the sun that can be seen"

lets explain this too:

He cant see stars but :

"From the moon it looks quite small and quite remote .... and the continents are clearly seen"...

What choo talkin bout willis?
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 8597527
United States
03/20/2012 09:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
without using "appeal to authority" arguments, when the "authorities" are NASA shill-puppets and ignorant, pompous turds?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12450758

And every aerospace engineer, every rocket scientist, every space historian, every geologist, every astronomer, etc., etc, in the world.

Face it, everyone who actually knows what they are talking about disagrees with you.
 Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD


I ignore most of your stupid posts, Hal. I missed this gem.


"every aerospace engineer, every rocket scientist, every space historian, every geologist, every astronomer, etc., etc, in the world"

What an ignorant thing to claim.



Seriously, my tom cruise icons are more intelligent than this joke of a statement.

cruise

You really are a complete fraud.

And I suppose you're going to tell me the academic world is completely free of any social pressure?

Hell it's not like people can have their academic standing threatened for opposing theories like anthropogenic global warming. Oh wait they can be.

Hell it's not like people can be sent to jail for publishing research on certain subjects like controversial claims of mass killings. Oh wait they can be.

book
nomuse (not logged in)
User ID: 2380183
United States
03/20/2012 10:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
Oh and in case you need more proof:

Science Officer and Flight Engineer Edward T. Lu ISS,wrote this:

"Mars is bright enough that even when we are on the lit side of the Earth, and with all the lights on inside, it is clearly visible against the black background of space"
 Quoting: LD 12790853


I'm fairly sure Mars is a planet, not a star.
LD
User ID: 12790853
Australia
03/20/2012 10:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
Oh and in case you need more proof:

Science Officer and Flight Engineer Edward T. Lu ISS,wrote this:

"Mars is bright enough that even when we are on the lit side of the Earth, and with all the lights on inside, it is clearly visible against the black background of space"
 Quoting: LD 12790853


I'm fairly sure Mars is a planet, not a star.
 Quoting: nomuse (not logged in) 2380183


Typical of you nomuse... you are such a waste of time
Halcyon Dayz, FCD
Contrarian's Contrarian

User ID: 11757475
Netherlands
03/21/2012 02:39 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
For anyone paying attention, people always eventually reveal themselves to be either those who allow for the possibility that their point of view may be wrong, or religious believers.
 Quoting: The Brandon

How astute.

Who are the people who deny the vast amounts of evidence?
book
_____________________________________________________________​___________________

While walking on the Moon, Apollo crewmen wore an outer visor assembly over the polycarbonate helmet to shield against eye-damaging ultraviolet radiation, and to maintain head and face thermal comfort.
[link to www.astronautix.com]

Which has two visors.

My point is simply that the outer Golden Vizor should always be employed in Sun-lit EV Missions..
 Quoting: Spittin'Cesium

But you can't actually proof that.

unless you were in the very shaded areas..only then would you allow brief amounts of time with the Vizor ajusted for vision..but in doing so risking heat loss from the face and the risk of eye damage from Solar Radiation.
 Quoting: Spittin'Cesium

Your assumption seem to be that that sort of thing happens instantaneously.
It takes time.

If you stand in the sun with the glare visor up more UV will hit the face.
The question is, how much ?
book
_____________________________________________________________​___________________

Ahhh you gotta love nasa... well here is the proof, and from your beloved nasa no less, that stars are indeed visible from space.. and even on the MOON.. love to see how you are going to explain this now..
 Quoting: LD 12790853

Since Armstrong didn't say it is impossible, why is that relevant?

"Outside my window I can see stars" - Michael Collins.

Science Officer and Flight Engineer Edward T. Lu ISS,wrote this:
"Mars is bright enough that even when we are on the lit side of the Earth, and with all the lights on inside, it is clearly visible against the black background of space"
 Quoting: LD 12790853

Mars is not a star.
Mars can be several thousand times brighter then any star.

this is what the astronauts of Apollo missions SHOULD OF SEEN in the sky around them.. watch the sky above the horizon, you clearly see stars, orions belt is obvious..
[link to apod.nasa.gov]
 Quoting: LD 12790853

Where is the Sun?

That is, rather obviously, a very light sensitive camera.
book
_____________________________________________________________​___________________

I ignore most of your stupid posts, Hal. I missed this gem.


"every aerospace engineer, every rocket scientist, every space historian, every geologist, every astronomer, etc., etc, in the world"

What an ignorant thing to claim.
 Quoting: Anonymous OP 8597527

Then find me some who don't.

And I suppose you're going to tell me the academic world is completely free of any social pressure?

Hell it's not like people can have their academic standing threatened for opposing theories like anthropogenic global warming. Oh wait they can be.

Hell it's not like people can be sent to jail for publishing research on certain subjects like controversial claims of mass killings. Oh wait they can be.
book
 Quoting: Anonymous OP 8597527

Yep, millions of people have been pressured to lie.
With 100% percent effectiveness.

You live in a very strange world.
book
Hatred is a cancer upon the world.
It rots the mind and blackens the heart.


Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12512532
United Kingdom
03/21/2012 07:45 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax



 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12512532


When I watched this video it was the final piece that confirmed it for me. Not only does his body language and eye movement show he is lying when he is speaking of being no the moon, but to say that even from the Command module the stars were not visible, and that space is just black, confirmed that he is lying.
 Quoting: LD 12790853

As someone who's studied body language, I have to disagree. I've seen many interviews with Armstrong and he's not a naturally comfortable speaker, displaying signs of nervousness. He has never been entirely comfortable in front of the camera, even before Apollo.

If you actually knew anything about body language, you'd know that it's almost impossible to tell when someone is lying. There's a great deal of myth about it, but there are very few useable signs, and none of them are reliable.


Body language is used consistantly in the legal field because it is a valid science, and while some extreme con men can get around most of the body's tells, the majority of people can not.
 Quoting: LD 12790853

Rubbish! Anyone trying to use body language as a justification for claiming someone in court is lying would likely find their case in serious trouble. It is not a "science", it's much more of an art, and one which doesn't claim to be foolproof or highly accurate. No judge would, I sincerely hope, take it as evidence, and anyone convicted using it would likely get off on appeal.

It's about as scientific as using a person's horoscope to determine their guilt. And I say that as someone who has learned a lot about body language, having been taught by an expert, the author of several books. I can pull a lot of tricks, read a lot of things about people, often get my way when I want to, but one thing I'd never do was to claim someone was lying purely on the basis of body language.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12793337


its quite easy to google and find out this poster is lying , body language is well known and every human can understand it , it's part of being human.

if you watch the interview he constantly looks down and to the right , looking down is sign of guilt and deception and looking down and right is sign of emotional problems , probably due to the lies he is spouting.

it's easy to research and every single human can do it.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12512532
United Kingdom
03/21/2012 07:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
[link to www.blifaloo.com]

[link to www.ehow.com]

This is why law enforcement personnel are trained extensively in how to detect when suspects are lying by using the suspect's body language to provide the answer.

extensive training for the police ???? I thought it was a myth ????
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 8597527
United States
03/21/2012 08:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
I ignore most of your stupid posts, Hal. I missed this gem.


"every aerospace engineer, every rocket scientist, every space historian, every geologist, every astronomer, etc., etc, in the world"

What an ignorant thing to claim.
 Quoting: Anonymous OP 8597527

Then find me some who don't.
 Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD


Ok, Hal. You've claimed that every one of these specialists IN THE WORLD have gone public in support of the alleged Apollo moon-landings. Or maybe you've just personally spoken with every single one?

1rof1

Yep, here's our intellectual, folks. All facts with Hal!

cruise




And I suppose you're going to tell me the academic world is completely free of any social pressure?

Hell it's not like people can have their academic standing threatened for opposing theories like anthropogenic global warming. Oh wait they can be.

Hell it's not like people can be sent to jail for publishing research on certain subjects like controversial claims of mass killings. Oh wait they can be.
book
 Quoting: Anonymous OP 8597527

Yep, millions of people have been pressured to lie.
 Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD



Who said anything about lying, idiot?

You are such a fraud.

book
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 8597527
United States
03/21/2012 08:26 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
[link to www.blifaloo.com]

[link to www.ehow.com]

This is why law enforcement personnel are trained extensively in how to detect when suspects are lying by using the suspect's body language to provide the answer.

extensive training for the police ???? I thought it was a myth ????
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12512532


clappa

Better get on the horn and warn them that their research is worthless!

cruise
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12851429
Malaysia
03/21/2012 09:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
its very clear that neil armstrong one of the living legends... is a liar!!!! i mean seriously he is a legend!! the first human being that supposedly set foot on the moon!! he should be the number one
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12512532
United Kingdom
03/21/2012 09:59 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
its very clear that neil armstrong one of the living legends... is a liar!!!! i mean seriously he is a legend!! the first human being that supposedly set foot on the moon!! he should be the number one
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12851429


exactly right he was the first man on the moon a hero to all men. he knew what the job entailed and would be in the public eye forever but instead we get a recluse who is never seen and when he does open his mouth riddles come out.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12512532
United Kingdom
03/21/2012 10:48 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax


wonder why letterman never got an armstrong interview ????
The Brandon

User ID: 1610735
United States
03/21/2012 05:47 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
exactly right he was the first man on the moon a hero to all men. he knew what the job entailed and would be in the public eye forever but instead we get a recluse who is never seen and when he does open his mouth riddles come out.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12512532


Yes. "Truth's protective layers?!" It's certainly obvious that he's alluding to something in his speeches that he cannot openly speak about.
"There wouldn’t be such a thing as counterfeit gold if there were no real gold somewhere."

-–Sufi Proverb
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 5040935
United States
03/21/2012 06:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
People acting in good faith don't do really suspicious, weird, irrational things. I'm surprised nobody's focusing on the weird television practices, the subsequent pressuring of individuals, etc. Arguing science with the self-appointed experts seems pretty fruitless.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 8597527
United States
03/21/2012 07:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
dance
Him Again
User ID: 12305632
United States
03/21/2012 09:47 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
I've gotta question for Astromut.

Since you've got so many answers for what must be repeating questions/arguments, and since you've been doing this for years (here and at Baut), why don't you just gather up all this, categorize it and make an eBook about it. Then instead of name calling and all the rest you could just refer people to the book and basically refuse to take on any debunking until the people have read your book.

Certainly you must get tired of handling the same arguments over and over, that is, unless you LIKE name calling and the rest. Surely you don't have such an overinflated ego that you NEED people to call 'stupid'.

Look how many time the "Stars Problem" comes up for instance. Same point(s) raised, same debunking every time. It must get tiresome.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12916547
Spain
03/21/2012 10:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
I've gotta question for Astromut.

Since you've got so many answers for what must be repeating questions/arguments, and since you've been doing this for years (here and at Baut), why don't you just gather up all this, categorize it and make an eBook about it. Then instead of name calling and all the rest you could just refer people to the book and basically refuse to take on any debunking until the people have read your book.

Certainly you must get tired of handling the same arguments over and over, that is, unless you LIKE name calling and the rest. Surely you don't have such an overinflated ego that you NEED people to call 'stupid'.

Look how many time the "Stars Problem" comes up for instance. Same point(s) raised, same debunking every time. It must get tiresome.
 Quoting: Him Again 12305632


Cause no thing, no feel, no dream, no live. I feel, I enjoy, I masturbate with U. What a F trouble, of course I dream....
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12916547
Spain
03/21/2012 10:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
Retard....
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12916547
Spain
03/21/2012 10:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
I've got a child who is pinhead.... What can do with my pupil? I tell U: out my lecture. U fill your mind. Fine, but U fill bad- U conflate, I don't care. I've got a W. I love her.

banana2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12953981
United Kingdom
03/22/2012 12:05 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
Look how many time the "Stars Problem" comes up for instance. Same point(s) raised, same debunking every time.
 Quoting: Him Again 12305632


Hey genius, why would the truth have to change each time it is stated? A valid factual answer/explaination to a query will always remain the same however many times that question is asked.

Example:
Q: What colour is grass?
A: Green.

Q: Tell me what colour grass is?
A: Doh! Er..Green.

Q: Do you know what colour grass is?
A: FFS! It still is green!

That is the way reality works, at least to sane people who are not interdimensional warriors with an IQ higher than Einstein.
Him Again
User ID: 12305632
United States
03/22/2012 02:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
Look how many time the "Stars Problem" comes up for instance. Same point(s) raised, same debunking every time.
 Quoting: Him Again 12305632


Hey genius, why would the truth have to change each time it is stated? A valid factual answer/explaination to a query will always remain the same however many times that question is asked.

Example:
Q: What colour is grass?
A: Green.

Q: Tell me what colour grass is?
A: Doh! Er..Green.

Q: Do you know what colour grass is?
A: FFS! It still is green!

That is the way reality works, at least to sane people who are not interdimensional warriors with an IQ higher than Einstein.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12953981


OK, JerkyBoy. Try reading my post.

1st, you're not Astromut so BUTT OUT. Got that?
2nd, I'm asking him why he doesn't write a book to save time and aggravation. Can you figure that out?

If your IQ was higher than your belt size you'd get that.
nomuse (not logged in)
User ID: 2380183
United States
03/22/2012 03:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
Look how many time the "Stars Problem" comes up for instance. Same point(s) raised, same debunking every time.
 Quoting: Him Again 12305632


Hey genius, why would the truth have to change each time it is stated? A valid factual answer/explaination to a query will always remain the same however many times that question is asked.

Example:
Q: What colour is grass?
A: Green.

Q: Tell me what colour grass is?
A: Doh! Er..Green.

Q: Do you know what colour grass is?
A: FFS! It still is green!

That is the way reality works, at least to sane people who are not interdimensional warriors with an IQ higher than Einstein.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12953981


OK, JerkyBoy. Try reading my post.

1st, you're not Astromut so BUTT OUT. Got that?
2nd, I'm asking him why he doesn't write a book to save time and aggravation. Can you figure that out?

If your IQ was higher than your belt size you'd get that.
 Quoting: Him Again 12305632


There are several "books."

Clavius, for one.

Bad Astronomy, the book.

I think there's a bit in Sagan's Demon-Haunted World, too.

But they aren't looking for answers. They are looking to make questions.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12966808
United Kingdom
03/22/2012 04:16 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
Look how many time the "Stars Problem" comes up for instance. Same point(s) raised, same debunking every time.
 Quoting: Him Again 12305632


Hey genius, why would the truth have to change each time it is stated? A valid factual answer/explaination to a query will always remain the same however many times that question is asked.

Example:
Q: What colour is grass?
A: Green.

Q: Tell me what colour grass is?
A: Doh! Er..Green.

Q: Do you know what colour grass is?
A: FFS! It still is green!

That is the way reality works, at least to sane people who are not interdimensional warriors with an IQ higher than Einstein.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12953981


OK, JerkyBoy. Try reading my post.

1st, you're not Astromut so BUTT OUT. Got that?
2nd, I'm asking him why he doesn't write a book to save time and aggravation. Can you figure that out?

If your IQ was higher than your belt size you'd get that.
 Quoting: Him Again 12305632

If your IQ managed to get into 3 digits you'd realise this is a public forum where anyone can answer any post they choose to.

You'd also realise that no matter how many books, e-books, web sites, or even direct explanations are given, idiots like you who have a religious belief like this are never going to change their minds.

You've been asked many times, but never answered - what evidence or argument would change your mind, or even make you doubt your belief?

News