Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,381 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 178,310
Pageviews Today: 260,357Threads Today: 69Posts Today: 1,620
02:37 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12512532
United Kingdom
03/22/2012 07:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax


would you refuse $5000 to just tell the truth ????

slap hand on bible , " i walked on moon " , easy $5000

I bet no man would refuse this offer and most would have lied to get the $5000

what if it was a court of law would he take an oath on a bible and state he walked on the moon , I doubt it !!
Spittin'Cesium

User ID: 5369266
United Kingdom
03/22/2012 09:58 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
For anyone paying attention, people always eventually reveal themselves to be either those who allow for the possibility that their point of view may be wrong, or religious believers.
 Quoting: The Brandon

How astute.

Who are the people who deny the vast amounts of evidence?
book
_____________________________________________________________​___________________

While walking on the Moon, Apollo crewmen wore an outer visor assembly over the polycarbonate helmet to shield against eye-damaging ultraviolet radiation, and to maintain head and face thermal comfort.
[link to www.astronautix.com]

Which has two visors.

My point is simply that the outer Golden Vizor should always be employed in Sun-lit EV Missions..
 Quoting: Spittin'Cesium

But you can't actually proof that.

unless you were in the very shaded areas..only then would you allow brief amounts of time with the Vizor ajusted for vision..but in doing so risking heat loss from the face and the risk of eye damage from Solar Radiation.
 Quoting: Spittin'Cesium

Your assumption seem to be that that sort of thing happens instantaneously.
It takes time.

If you stand in the sun with the glare visor up more UV will hit the face.
The question is, how much ?
book
_____________________________________________________________​___________________

Ahhh you gotta love nasa... well here is the proof, and from your beloved nasa no less, that stars are indeed visible from space.. and even on the MOON.. love to see how you are going to explain this now..
 Quoting: LD 12790853

Since Armstrong didn't say it is impossible, why is that relevant?

"Outside my window I can see stars" - Michael Collins.

Science Officer and Flight Engineer Edward T. Lu ISS,wrote this:
"Mars is bright enough that even when we are on the lit side of the Earth, and with all the lights on inside, it is clearly visible against the black background of space"
 Quoting: LD 12790853

Mars is not a star.
Mars can be several thousand times brighter then any star.

this is what the astronauts of Apollo missions SHOULD OF SEEN in the sky around them.. watch the sky above the horizon, you clearly see stars, orions belt is obvious..
[link to apod.nasa.gov]
 Quoting: LD 12790853

Where is the Sun?

That is, rather obviously, a very light sensitive camera.
book
_____________________________________________________________​___________________

I ignore most of your stupid posts, Hal. I missed this gem.


"every aerospace engineer, every rocket scientist, every space historian, every geologist, every astronomer, etc., etc, in the world"

What an ignorant thing to claim.
 Quoting: Anonymous OP 8597527

Then find me some who don't.

And I suppose you're going to tell me the academic world is completely free of any social pressure?

Hell it's not like people can have their academic standing threatened for opposing theories like anthropogenic global warming. Oh wait they can be.

Hell it's not like people can be sent to jail for publishing research on certain subjects like controversial claims of mass killings. Oh wait they can be.
book
 Quoting: Anonymous OP 8597527

Yep, millions of people have been pressured to lie.
With 100% percent effectiveness.

You live in a very strange world.
book
 Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD


Try reading the whole Comments..and perhaps looking at the evidence linked within them.

IBM Dayz.
The thing that hath been,
is That which shall be;
and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun.
Ecclesiastes 9:1
Spittin'Cesium

User ID: 5369266
United Kingdom
03/22/2012 10:00 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
The Golden Vizor prevents Heat Loss and extreme UV.
The thing that hath been,
is That which shall be;
and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun.
Ecclesiastes 9:1
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12976682
United Kingdom
03/22/2012 10:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
1st, you're not Astromut so BUTT OUT. Got that?
 Quoting: Him Again 12305632

No, but I share a lifelong interest in space exploration and have some understanding of the science and engineering involved.
If my replies offend you then contact a mod to have my IP blocked. Till then I will continue to reply to your unhinged claims as I see fit. Got that?

2nd, I'm asking him why he doesn't write a book to save time and aggravation. Can you figure that out?
 Quoting: Him Again 12305632

Why should he? As already posted there are numerous web sites that you can use to correct your mistaken assumptions.

Secondly you are already getting detailed personal replies to your questions from folk on here who are obviously better informed than you are.

Why don't you write a book about your uphill struggle to convince people to agree with your laughable and outlandish claims? You could call it "My struggle".
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 6329841
United States
03/22/2012 10:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax


would you refuse $5000 to just tell the truth ????

slap hand on bible , " i walked on moon " , easy $5000

I bet no man would refuse this offer and most would have lied to get the $5000

what if it was a court of law would he take an oath on a bible and state he walked on the moon , I doubt it !!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12512532


Sibrel is a known fraud. He ADMITTED in court that he would call the astrunauts liars whether they swore on the Bible or not. Why bother to play along with someone you know is a snake and will twist your words either way?

By the way, some astronauts DID swear on the Bible. Notice Sibrel doesn't show you those.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 6329841
United States
03/22/2012 10:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
The Golden Vizor prevents Heat Loss and extreme UV.
 Quoting: Spittin'Cesium


But nowhere does it say it is necessary to use all the time.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 8597527
United States
03/22/2012 06:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
Try reading the whole Comments..and perhaps looking at the evidence linked within them.

IBM Dayz.
 Quoting: Spittin'Cesium


Hal is laying low for a couple pages I think.
Him Again
User ID: 12305632
United States
03/22/2012 09:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
Look how many time the "Stars Problem" comes up for instance. Same point(s) raised, same debunking every time.
 Quoting: Him Again 12305632


Hey genius, why would the truth have to change each time it is stated? A valid factual answer/explaination to a query will always remain the same however many times that question is asked.

Example:
Q: What colour is grass?
A: Green.

Q: Tell me what colour grass is?
A: Doh! Er..Green.

Q: Do you know what colour grass is?
A: FFS! It still is green!

That is the way reality works, at least to sane people who are not interdimensional warriors with an IQ higher than Einstein.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12953981


OK, JerkyBoy. Try reading my post.

1st, you're not Astromut so BUTT OUT. Got that?
2nd, I'm asking him why he doesn't write a book to save time and aggravation. Can you figure that out?

If your IQ was higher than your belt size you'd get that.
 Quoting: Him Again 12305632

If your IQ managed to get into 3 digits you'd realise this is a public forum where anyone can answer any post they choose to.

You'd also realise that no matter how many books, e-books, web sites, or even direct explanations are given, idiots like you who have a religious belief like this are never going to change their minds.

You've been asked many times, but never answered - what evidence or argument would change your mind, or even make you doubt your belief?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12966808


Which 'belief' do you refer to? I just have a bunch of unanswered questions. As for the jerk above, he didn't even answer the question. Just a rant. At least when I bring up a topic I don't just rant about it. Even the stuff I posted on this silly thread has some thought behind it, including some numbers. It's not like I just sit here calling people 'tards'. My cooling question got answered after a fashion, now all we have to do is handle the one about the debris on the pads.
Him Again
User ID: 12305632
United States
03/22/2012 10:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
1st, you're not Astromut so BUTT OUT. Got that?
 Quoting: Him Again 12305632

No, but I share a lifelong interest in space exploration and have some understanding of the science and engineering involved.
If my replies offend you then contact a mod to have my IP blocked. Till then I will continue to reply to your unhinged claims as I see fit. Got that?

2nd, I'm asking him why he doesn't write a book to save time and aggravation. Can you figure that out?
 Quoting: Him Again 12305632

Why should he? As already posted there are numerous web sites that you can use to correct your mistaken assumptions.

Secondly you are already getting detailed personal replies to your questions from folk on here who are obviously better informed than you are.

Why don't you write a book about your uphill struggle to convince people to agree with your laughable and outlandish claims? You could call it "My struggle".
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12976682


I don't play the blocking game. That's for wussies who can't make a sentence. I'm not here to try to convince anybody of anything, that's just a waste of time. I got one of my two points answered by noname which is better than I got at Baut (thanks noname). Not even a pointer over there, just a bunch of people trying to show who has the calculator with the most precision.

Since this is a public forum I can address any question I like to anyone I like just like anyone can jump in and talk about frogs on a JFK thread. OK with you?

I'm not telling him to write a book. I just asked why he didn't. That isn't even slightly insulting, unlike your quoted post here.
ATOM
User ID: 10863890
United States
03/22/2012 10:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
there is no moon landing hoax. stop spreading this bs.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11302339

Hey everyone, this dude from Germany says there's no hoax, so there must not be. Move along now, nothing to see here.

EXCEPT FOR RODNEY!!!norespect
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12512532
United Kingdom
03/23/2012 02:59 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
Distance to moon = 238857 miles

Time for apollo to reach moon = 70 hours

Average speed for apollo on way to moon = 3412.24 mph

but

To reach orbit the space shuttle reaches 18000 mph.

The ISS travels around earth at 17500 mph.

question 1: if the saturn IV had to get close to 18000 mph to reach orbit , why did they slow down to just 3400 mph for the journey across space ??

question 2: how did apollo get out of orbit at 3412 mph ?? if this was possible the ISS would have flown out into space long ago travelling at 17500 mph ??

question 3: why did it take apollo approx. 3 days to reach the moon , in the space shuttle it would only take about 13.5 hours to reach the moon ??
ToSeek

User ID: 1194295
United States
03/23/2012 11:39 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
Distance to moon = 238857 miles

Time for apollo to reach moon = 70 hours

Average speed for apollo on way to moon = 3412.24 mph

but

To reach orbit the space shuttle reaches 18000 mph.

The ISS travels around earth at 17500 mph.

question 1: if the saturn IV had to get close to 18000 mph to reach orbit , why did they slow down to just 3400 mph for the journey across space ??

question 2: how did apollo get out of orbit at 3412 mph ?? if this was possible the ISS would have flown out into space long ago travelling at 17500 mph ??

question 3: why did it take apollo approx. 3 days to reach the moon , in the space shuttle it would only take about 13.5 hours to reach the moon ??
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12512532


Apollo first got into Earth orbit with a speed of 18000 mph. Then they fired the third-stage rocket again to achieve a speed of 25000 mph, enough to break out of Earth orbit and head for the Moon. But all the time they're climbing out of Earth's gravity well and therefore slowing down.

By the time the spacecraft is to the point where the Moon's gravity is stronger than the Earth's, they're only traveling a thousand miles an hour or so. Then they speed up a bit while approaching the Moon and have to fire the service module's main engine in order to slow down enough to go into lunar orbit.
Astromut
Voice Chat Moderator

User ID: 6908403
United Kingdom
03/24/2012 06:43 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
I've gotta question for Astromut.

Since you've got so many answers for what must be repeating questions/arguments, and since you've been doing this for years (here and at Baut),
 Quoting: Him Again 12305632

Just who do you think I am at Baut? I'm not the astronut from Baut, by the way. I'm not the first person to think of that screen name.
why don't you just gather up all this, categorize it and make an eBook about it.
 Quoting: Him

I don't want to make money off of it. Doing so would introduce a monetary motivation in my posts and I'm serious when I say I'm not paid to post. If I ever decide to write a book on the subject I will no longer actively "debunk" - I will not post if there's a conflict of interest, even though the same people who would point that monetary motivation out don't care that their own Lucus blatantly used his posts to generate interest in his 20 and 30 dollar DVDs until he sold out of them.
Then instead of name calling
 Quoting: Him

What "names" have I called you? Shall I list the various names I get called? No, because I really don't care. I don't care what names you or anyone else calls me, I don't care what you or anyone else thinks of me personally. It's utterly irrelevant. At the same time, I do not call people names, but I do tell it as it is and sometimes that's unpleasant in and of itself. If you display ignorance I will state it as such, but I will not simply call you a "fucking idiot" or a "dipshit" or a "fucking tool" etc.
and all the rest you could just refer people to the book and basically refuse to take on any debunking until the people have read your book.
 Quoting: Him

That's what scam artists like Lucus do in order to generate sales. I am not a scam artist. If I need to I do refer people to my previous posts. I'm very good at finding my own posts, and fortunately the forum allowing searching within threads makes that process even easier and faster.
Surely you don't have such an overinflated ego that you NEED people to call 'stupid'.
 Quoting: Him

Liar. That is a statement of fact, not "name calling," by the way. I haven't called anyone "stupid." Like I just said, the forum allows for searching within threads. I have not called anyone stupid here. Anyone can search the thread for the word stupid and see for themselves that I did not anyone here stupid.
Look how many time the "Stars Problem" comes up for instance. Same point(s) raised, same debunking every time. It must get tiresome.
 Quoting: Him

The truth is always the same. It's easily debunked too.
astrobanner2
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 8597527
United States
03/25/2012 02:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
dance
Spittin'Cesium

User ID: 5369266
United Kingdom
03/27/2012 03:14 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
The Golden Vizor prevents Heat Loss and extreme UV.
 Quoting: Spittin'Cesium


But nowhere does it say it is necessary to use all the time.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6329841


The Golden Vizor should always be in use for EV Missions in Sun-Lit areas..only when the Astro was in a heavily shaded area could they adjust it as needed for vision purposes but this would increase the amount of Heat Loss and enhance the possibilty of Radiation Damage to the Eyes and Skin if allowed for too long.
The thing that hath been,
is That which shall be;
and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun.
Ecclesiastes 9:1
Astromut
Voice Chat Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
03/27/2012 05:04 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
The Golden Vizor prevents Heat Loss and extreme UV.
 Quoting: Spittin'Cesium


But nowhere does it say it is necessary to use all the time.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6329841


The Golden Vizor should always be in use for EV Missions in Sun-Lit areas..only when the Astro was in a heavily shaded area could they adjust it as needed for vision purposes but this would increase the amount of Heat Loss and enhance the possibilty of Radiation Damage to the Eyes and Skin if allowed for too long.
 Quoting: Spittin'Cesium


"All I need to know about space walking I learned from watching deep impact" hoaxie is back I see.
[link to i.dailymail.co.uk]
[link to jamesmcgillis.com]
[link to www.atlas.ch]
[link to img.dailymail.co.uk]
[link to a57.foxnews.com]
If you were intellectually honest you'd have to claim that ISS/shuttle was fake too.
astrobanner2
Raphael

User ID: 7438325
Canada
03/27/2012 06:42 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax

By the way, some astronauts DID swear on the Bible. Notice Sibrel doesn't show you those.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward


Actually he did show Alan Bean swear on the bible but that does not count. The original mr. bean did NOT know he had to pass through the Van Allen Belts to get to the Moon.
ROFL

Btw the Son of God never walked on water here on earth and Man the Son of a Bitch never walked on the Moon.

And why have the NASA NAZIs been too chicken to go beyond the safe zone of about 400 miles since 1973?

Everything Never A Straight Answer says they did using astro-NOTS could have been done using robotics.
that is a fact.

Last Edited by Raphael on 03/27/2012 06:46 PM
The swastika is an inherent part of Intelligent Design.

[link to at37.wordpress.com]

“A theory is more impressive the greater is the simplicity of its premise, the more different are the kinds of things it relates and the more extended its range of applicability…”
-Einstein
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1395091
Australia
03/27/2012 07:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
YOU claimed it was proven Apollo was hoaxed.
YOU failed to deliver.

In fact you failed to proof a single thing.
 Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD


Sorry, Hal. I am not the claimant.
 Quoting: Anonymous OP 8597527

YES. YOU. ARE!

The accuser ALWAYS has the burden of proof.
 Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD


1rof1

Here is your silly mantra again.

"The accuser always has the burden of proof?" Says who? In all cases, regardless of circumstance? If a wild claim is being made void of accusation, this somehow liberates the claim from the same standards as accusations?

You are such a parroting simpleton.

If you can't prove something then you just hide behind courtroom style legalese.


"You, Anonymous OP 8597527, are a child-molester, a drug peddler, and a jaywalker. Proof me wrong!"
Do you really think that is how it works?

 Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD


Yawn.

Hal, I can bend spoons with my mind. Fact!

Don't believe me? YOU are the accuser. PrOOf me wrong! (I even recorded it on video, but I lost it, sorry. )



Hal, Your arguments are such a joke.

You are the silliest intellectual-wannabe I've ever had the pleasure to watch spin his wheels.

cruise
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8597527


I'm just going to give shit to these retards. I honestly couldn't care whether this thing was faked or not.

These things work both ways. The evidence used to insinuate fakery has been debunked. Hoax believers need to find more evidence. Instead all I see is bitching & people taking offense because they can't come up with shit.

It's funny how people throughout this entire thread get so defensive towards proven FACTS. The above post is just one example, & it's hillarious. & in their deffensive posts, they trip over their own words & spout hypocritical statements. Lol.

Maybe you people shouting "HOAX" need to get out of your moms basements & actually do something with your lives. You don't live in a fantasy world of lies - & getting so defensive once your fantastic reality is threatened is evidence that you base your existence around such claims. It's not healthy. Your words on this forum aren't going to change the world.

You people carry on like fucking children for christs sake. There are more important things to worry about in todays day & age than whether the moon landing was faked or not. If it was, cool story bro. If it wasn't, suck shit for wasting so much of your will & effort on such an insignificant thing.

Life achievments: PROVED THE MOON LANDING WAS FAKE. Yeah, thats gonna put food on the table for your family. Oh wait, you're still in moms basement. Whoops..
Astromut
Voice Chat Moderator

User ID: 922113
United States
03/27/2012 08:04 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax

By the way, some astronauts DID swear on the Bible. Notice Sibrel doesn't show you those.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward


Actually he did show Alan Bean swear on the bible but that does not count.
 Quoting: Raphael

Do you even listen to yourself? Amazing, just amazing.
Btw the Son of God never walked on water here on earth and Man the Son of a Bitch never walked on the Moon.
 Quoting: Raphael

Just wondering, have you ever been forcibly institutionalized?
And why have the NASA NAZIs been too chicken to go beyond the safe zone of about 400 miles since 1973?
 Quoting: Raphael

The space shuttle did not have the delta-V to go beyond LEO, nor was its ceramic tile heat shield and wings designed to withstand trans-lunar velocity re-entries. It was designed for LEO only as a sort of space truck for building space stations and servicing LEO satellites.
astrobanner2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4584682
United States
03/27/2012 08:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
The Golden Vizor prevents Heat Loss and extreme UV.
 Quoting: Spittin'Cesium


But nowhere does it say it is necessary to use all the time.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6329841


The Golden Vizor should always be in use for EV Missions in Sun-Lit areas..only when the Astro was in a heavily shaded area could they adjust it as needed for vision purposes but this would increase the amount of Heat Loss and enhance the possibilty of Radiation Damage to the Eyes and Skin if allowed for too long.
 Quoting: Spittin'Cesium


that's good for your opinion but you still don't have a reference saying it absolutely required.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4584682
United States
03/27/2012 08:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax

By the way, some astronauts DID swear on the Bible. Notice Sibrel doesn't show you those.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward


Actually he did show Alan Bean swear on the bible but that does not count. The original mr. bean did NOT know he had to pass through the Van Allen Belts to get to the Moon.
ROFL
 Quoting: Raphael


Does he have to know or remember them to travel on the preplanned course? if you were on a cross country flight would you have to know if you flew over a particular city?

Besides, they went AROUND the majority of the belts. They only skimmed the outer edge.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 5040935
United States
03/28/2012 09:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
still waiting for a response on:

- weird nature of moon landing video streaming at the time

- awkward press conferences and evasive behavior by astronauts after the fact

- presence of "moon landing hoax" on government lists of people to be suspected of domestic terrorism
ToSeek

User ID: 9653749
United States
03/28/2012 10:31 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
still waiting for a response on:

- weird nature of moon landing video streaming at the time
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5040935


What are you referring to?

- awkward press conferences and evasive behavior by astronauts after the fact
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5040935


It's been pointed out repeatedly that these astronauts just came out of several weeks inside an isolation ward the size of a mobile home. How many of us would be chipper under those circumstances?

- presence of "moon landing hoax" on government lists of people to be suspected of domestic terrorism
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5040935


You have any actual evidence of this?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 5040935
United States
03/30/2012 03:33 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
still waiting for a response on:

- weird nature of moon landing video streaming at the time
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5040935


What are you referring to?

- awkward press conferences and evasive behavior by astronauts after the fact
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5040935


It's been pointed out repeatedly that these astronauts just came out of several weeks inside an isolation ward the size of a mobile home. How many of us would be chipper under those circumstances?

- presence of "moon landing hoax" on government lists of people to be suspected of domestic terrorism
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5040935


You have any actual evidence of this?
 Quoting: ToSeek


Fair enough about the astronauts, although Armstrong's later (and very rare) public appearances, especially at the white house with the young science students raise questions for me.

Isn't it accepted that the media in '68 was made to film a 3rd hand projected image of the live video stream on a wall which accounts for the crappy (even by 60's standards) video quality?

The MIAC report has references to moon landing hoax although it's in the same paragraphs as Bob Barr voters, environmental extremists and a dozen other unrelated groups so make what you want of government paranoia and bungling.
nomuse (not logged in)
User ID: 2380183
United States
03/30/2012 06:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
Isn't it accepted that the media in '68 was made to film a 3rd hand projected image of the live video stream on a wall which accounts for the crappy (even by 60's standards) video quality?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5040935


No. The media was given the highest possible format conversion in the standard method practiced at the time -- essentially the same method used to archive live television shows by the broadcast media themselves, and the method used to distribute shows originally broadcast in NTSC to other markets using PAL or similar.

The actual lunar broadcast was not NTSC. Big metropolitan stations of the period were broadcasting several MEGAwatts, and their subscribers were expected to be within thirty miles. By any standards, the Apollo broadcasts were extremely low-power, limited-bandwidth. They broadcast in a slow-scan format, black and white for Apollo 11 and color-sequential for the later missions.

So there is simply nothing that anyone of the period other than a few special-built displays could do with the original broadcast stream. It HAD to be converted to something that could be beamed to ordinary subscribers.




The MIAC report has references to moon landing hoax although it's in the same paragraphs as Bob Barr voters, environmental extremists and a dozen other unrelated groups so make what you want of government paranoia and bungling.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5040935
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 10905376
Portugal
04/04/2012 03:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
dance
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8597527

lol
they will never give up op.
peace
Raphael

User ID: 7438325
Canada
04/09/2012 12:47 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
dance
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8597527

lol
they will never give up op.
peace
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 10905376


Nor should we...for three reasons.

1/ FACT is everything the NASA NAZIs accomplished that they claimed astroNOTs did, could have been done by using ROBOTS and much cheaper.

2/ why has NOBODY sent a human beyond what appears to be a 400 mile safe zone since 1972?

The NASA NAZIs respond it is too expensive to recreate a trip back to the MOON.
Maybe that is because it never happened in the first place.

Been 40 years since.
Get with the program.

Here is the real reason the entire charade is smoke and mirrors...IMHO...the stakes are much much higher.
It is the ultimate tool perhaps in man's battle with the elements and mother nature.

3/ what is more important really? pretending to land a man on the moon, landing a man on the moon, OR controlling the weather on earth using the MOON?

NASA NAZIs are a FAIL when viewed in the bigger picture.

They pretended flying through the vacuum of space was a cake-walk, only needing to get past the Van Allen belts and all was clear ... well today we know that reality is plain and simple bsflag

Since those BS missions took place between 1969-72 we have learned that space is far more hostile than the NASA space cowboys let on.

namaste

RaphaEL

Last Edited by Raphael on 04/09/2012 01:01 PM
The swastika is an inherent part of Intelligent Design.

[link to at37.wordpress.com]

“A theory is more impressive the greater is the simplicity of its premise, the more different are the kinds of things it relates and the more extended its range of applicability…”
-Einstein
DUCM900

User ID: 13991733
04/09/2012 01:00 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
Here is the real reason the entire charade is smoke and mirrors...IMHO...the stakes are much much higher.
It is the ultimate tool perhaps in man's battle with the elements and mother nature.

3/ what is more important really? pretending to land a man on the moon, landing a man on the moon, OR controlling the weather on earth using the MOON?



namaste

RaphaEL
 Quoting: Raphael


Interesting about the moon.
To live is to believe in the power of dreams.
To dream is to believe in the power of love.
To love is to believe in yourself.

Luca 21:28 "Ma quando queste cose cominceranno ad accadere, guardate in alto e alzate i vostri sguardi, perché la vostra liberazione è vicina".
Raphael

User ID: 7438325
Canada
04/09/2012 01:02 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
Here is the real reason the entire charade is smoke and mirrors...IMHO...the stakes are much much higher.
It is the ultimate tool perhaps in man's battle with the elements and mother nature.

3/ what is more important really? pretending to land a man on the moon, landing a man on the moon, OR controlling the weather on earth using the MOON?



namaste

RaphaEL
 Quoting: Raphael


Interesting about the moon.
 Quoting: DUCM900


we share a center of gravity or barycenter with the moon...give me a lever long enough and I can move mountains dude.

yoda

namaste
The swastika is an inherent part of Intelligent Design.

[link to at37.wordpress.com]

“A theory is more impressive the greater is the simplicity of its premise, the more different are the kinds of things it relates and the more extended its range of applicability…”
-Einstein
Menow
User ID: 14092435
United States
04/09/2012 11:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
It's worth pointing out that social scientists, lawyers, or other professionals whose work involves critically thinking about new and unexplored situations and ideas may actually do better at finding the important issues and inherent contradictions in play in a complex situation.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5040935


Yes, Im seeing that Astro seems to think that only those with the suitable training can address these issues. He fails to remember however, that alot scientific discoveries and alot of jumps in technology and in life in general, were made by people very much less than the perfect education, training or background.. so many wonderful firsts were mostly made by people who didnt even complete the 12th grade..
 Quoting: LD 12622466


It's truly amazing how you hoaxies think that anyone with "common sense" can assess complex scientific issues simply because they have the desire. This is not to even mention the obvious bias they couple with their rank ignorance. It is to laugh.

News








Proud Member Of The Angry Mob