Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax

^^^ THIS ^^^^... in spades!!!

Shut the fuck up, douchebag.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6693825

Wow!

Witty retort.

I'd be willing to bet you made mostly d's in school (if you even went).

You sound like a 4th grader who's feelings got hurt.

"Shut the fuck up, douchebag".

Waaaahhhh....

I'm sure the OP's feeling are totally hurt.

You are such a moron.



Last Edited by Mister Shadow on 10/01/2012 06:46 PM

There is one, single, overwhelming, undeniable fact that shows that the Lunar landings were not faked.

NASA might, unlikely as it appears, to have been able to...

-- create a studio with a fake lunarscape
-- launch empty rockets
-- fake the open communications lines
-- fake the landing video
-- fake the development of the Lunar and Command Modules
-- fake thousands of photographs
-- fake hundreds of hours of video

And above all, it is even remotely conceivable that they have been able to keep all of the half a million people who must have been involved in the alleged fakery, quiet for 43 years.

But there is one thing that they would not have been able to fake; not now, not ever...... LUNAR GRAVITY; there is no way to fake lunar gravity.

Simply filming astronauts in a 1G environment and slowing down the playback does not work. It looks so obviously different from the real thing, as illustrated by Mythbusters, who could only get it to work, albeit in a limited space, when they filmed it a few seconds at a time inside the cabin of the vomit-comet operating at 1/6th G

You only have to spend a few minutes watching the horror film "Apollo 18" (with all the high-tech CGI they had at their disposal) to see that even now they cannot get the "look" of a 1/6th G environment right. On top of that, the kind of techniques and raw computing power that can be brought into play now, did not even exist in 1969. You can see what passed for state-of-the-art by watching a few episodes of the original series of Star Trek (which was contemporaneous with the middle years of the Apollo programme) to see how clumsy and unconvincing even the most sophisticated special effects were at that time.

In short the impossibility of faking lunar gravity is "game over" for the Lunar Landing Conspiracy Theory nut-jobs.

Why has all human activity in 'outer space' since Dec. 1972 taken place in the safe zone?
i.e. only about 300 miles up?

In the last 40 years, it appears NASA has had no desire to send humans beyond the safe zone...?
Why?
Outer space seemed 'safe' up until 1972, and now outer space appears really hostile?

Space 'the final frontier' went from being a manageable 'vacuum' to being filled with nasty cosmic forces?

Let me know if the Chinese venture out beyond the safe zone...

selah V

Last Edited by Raphael on 03/09/2013 07:09 PM

Going beyond LEO only makes sense if you are actually going somewhere, the Moon, Mars, the asteroids.

And safe is relative.
LEO is a bit safer then cis-lunar space.
Earth blocks half the sky from meteorites, and the VARBs block some of the charged particle radiation.


NASA has many desires. They would just love to get the kind of funding they got during the late 60s.
They how ever do not call the shots.


Space hasn't changed.
People's priorities have.

Sooner or later an eccentric billionaire will pay the 50 million that a seat on the proposed Russian lunar fly-by costs.


No.
Space has always been nasty.
We can handle most of the nasty.

"We" have lost the will to do it.


That prolly won't happen for at least another decade.
The Chinese have a very methodical step-by-step approach.

Why not just register a space news feed?

u are full of BS answers
>> rehearsed and rebleated often? - obviously
I do ponder why folks volunteer to be NASA stooges?

Can you tell me what the biggest prize of all is regarding the MOON controversy?
Here are the choices as I see them.

1/ Prize given to mortal man for ACTUALLY walking on the MOON arriving via the "SUN God Apollo" Space program?
ta da!! the EAGLE St. John has landed??
hahaha why is the SUN god Apollo mucking around the MOON?
*wink wink nudge nudge*

2/ PRIZE for PRETENDING to go the MOON - putting on a really big show worthy of an Oscar for special effects?

3/ Ultimate PRIZE
My favorite reason for mucking around the MOON would be to eventually help control the weather down here on earth.
The weather, Mother Nature, this is our nemesis since genesis.
To control the weather would be 'god like' and quite the feat.
We share a barycenter with the MOON.
It can affect our ocean tides and also the emotions of 'we the sheeple'....
Esoterically the MOON is associated with our subconscious mind...with the collective unconscious as Herr Jung might remark.

Please do get back to me - I suspect answer #3 raises the stakes regarding the 'Solar Apollo' MOON Landings?
WTF
Too bad 'we the sheeple' are symbol/archetype illiterate.

I would also love to see a HI-RES image of the LUNAR surface showing in great detail the SPACE JUNK left on the lunar surface.
I would love to see an image worthy of 'google maps view' technology showing 40 years of cosmic dust accumulated on the Lunar Rover?
Instead we get fed BS grainy low res images of the Lunar surface?
Another NASA FAIL
They had magnification technology/cameras in the 1960s that could take Hi-Res images from 100 miles up.

It is not what NASA claims they did ... it is what they continue fail to do since that makes things seem suspicious.

#3 might just be the real reason the NASA Never A Straight Answer NAZIS are screwing around with the MOON and keeping 'we the sheeple' in the dark about their motivations.

Have you heard of PROJECT HiVOLT?
>> [link to en.wikipedia.org]

Evidently some wanker scientists think we have no need for the Van Allen belts?
PhDUH we have a bunch of science wankers wanting to drain the Van Allen belts like vampires ...

BUT WAIT!
We have another scientist, Michael Persinger who actually claims the electro-magnetic field of the earth contains ALL THE MEMORIES of ALL the people who had lived in the past and those of us living today.

So maybe Project HiVOLT would be like erasing the hard drive?

cheers,

Last Edited by Raphael on 03/12/2013 10:44 PM

Proof that any of them are not factual.


The truth doesn't chance from one day to the next.


I ponder why you just have believe that people who disagree with you don't actually disagree with you.


Meaningless gibberish.


Apollo XI won a Hugo for Best Moonlanding Ever.


From the Moon?

Face it.
You have absolutely no clue why the Space Race happened.


It has to.

The Moon causes the moon tides by virtue of its mass and ever changing location.
How are you going to manipulate that?


Than look at them.


You'll prolly will have to pay for that.


Wut.
The best LRO images have a resolution of 25 cm/pixel.
You can see the effing footpaths.
That is the highest resolution ever produce by a civilian probe from any planetary surface.

What do you want? Miracles?
They cost extra.


Do you even know what Hi-Res means?
Back in the sixties a couple of metres per pixel was High-Res.
It was the highest resolution they could produce with a space-born camera.
That's why they still had spy planes back then.
Want a better resolution? You have to fly lower.


So what did they fail to do after Nixon and Congress murdered Apollo and slashed NASA's budget.


If you believe in magic.


Yes.


We don't.
We need Earth's magnetic field, the cause of the VARBs.


They don't want the charged particles, they want to make a big chunk of space free of charge particles.
So it would be more useful.


Persinger has a whole bunch of wacko ideas.
Until he actual starts proving them they are just that: wacko ideas.
Classic example of a PhDed crank.

I very much doubt Bob Forward et.al. believe in that shit.
If they are even aware of it. They are physicists.


LOL.

It's rather unclear what you actually believe happened.
And why?


Last Edited by Halcyon Dayz, FCD on 03/13/2013 12:28 AM

LOL
I have the quote regarding the ability to see an area 3", yes 3 INCHES from 100 miles up, available back in the 1960s!
And the documentary goes on to say that the magnification camera technology was so good back then (1960s) that it did not improve that much over the next 40 years.



Well could ya explain why a bunch of smart fellas want to drain the EM field?
PhDUH please explain?





So back in the late 1950s they were ADDING extra 'belts' by detonating atomic bombs between the other 2...and now they want to eliminate them?

So what are 'THEY' really up to?
Adding and Subtracting radiation belts?

LOL
Busted buster...



LOL
He did, you are the ill informed dummy here, again.
By the way what does a crank like you crank up?
The propaganda machine?

Persinger proved using his invention called the God Helmet that he could actually get fellas like you who belong to the tribe called 'we the sheeple' to experience the idea of a 'presence' by using biofeedback methods....by feeding the average sheeple their own thoughts he could make their active imaginations 'active'!

By flipping a switch he could induce an 'epiphany' in fact.

Persinger also worked on Remote Viewing with Ingo Swann.
His theories regarding how the MIND works are far more comforting than the MINDLESS drivel NASA stooges rebleat ad nauseam on these forums.

The shit Persinger has learned about the ASYMMETRICAL MIND, was NOT known by the NASA Nazis back in the 60s and 70s and 80s.

I would believe what an MRI tells me before I believe a NASA Nazi spokesperson.

PhDUH - and that is a no brainer.





big deal dude...biologists, physicists, chemists are all competing egotists who think a TOE revolves around their 'science'.
Science has become like Christianity.
All of the fragmented/divided sects/cults/denominations think they have the inside track on the truth.

As a matter of fact the issue whether the sun is nuclear or electric is now an issue being discussed by 'experts' with PhDUHs on both sides of the issue ... so who do I believe?
Anonymous NASA stooges like you?
OR Tesla who gave us so much who believed we were recieving signals here on earth?
LOL

Maybe I should believe the biologists who toss out 95% of DNA and call it junk because the language is beyond them...?
Do I believe them?

science is on a learning curve...get used to it.
Physicists can be idiots...without getting into how they even arrived to the country via Project Paperclip...

The fact Hans Alfven battled his peers for about 40 years proves physicists can be well paid idiots.

The fact that for nearly 40 years 'evolutionists' believed in the Piltdown man later proved a hoax, (the hoax supporting evolution), proves scientists can be and are in fact idiots who have influence.

The fact that for more than 50+ years Einstein and others had subscribed to a Standard Model since the late 1800s, where the FOUR forces of physics were seen as SYMMETRICAL right up until the day Einstein died in 1955, AND then the following year in 1956 it was proved they were NOT symmetrical, says so much about how science is full of shit.
...and so are you.

The moment you suggested taking control of the Moon is a NON-issue in regards to affecting the weather on earth I knew I had ewe penned in.


go back to shleep NASA stooge.
We now have 5 stooges and counting.
Curly, Larry, Moe, Shemp, and Halcyon Daze the chimp who thinks he is a champ.

Clearly U R an idiot stooge, too bad you are not an idiot savant.
Then at least you would have a gift to share.

cheers,

Thread: bomb the moon: what's the real reason (Page 5)


Last Edited by Raphael on 03/28/2013 06:08 AM

OH GOD ITS BACK.

Heh. One of my favorite old threads.

ah the good old moon hoax.

If you believe this happened then you are a sheep. Look at the time period the USA started this agenda. They were way behind the Russians and yet apparently won the race. Even the russians say that the technology wasn't there.

Besides there is no way they could give a live broadcast of the landing, whether you believe it or not. The tech wasn't there. Even now ask any TV producer and while you could do it now, it would be a huge project including satellite relays.

I believe the US made it to the moon, but not when they said. That was a huge hollywood blockbuster by Stanley Kubrick to Give the world the illusion that they beat the Russians.

Use your brain and common sense or ask any TV producer or any film maker not associated with Hollywood

plus The Moon is 350-400,000km away from Earth, that is 1.25-1.4 Light Seconds.
Yet the Communications Between Earth & The "Moon" have no Perceivable Delay. If they were really on the Moon there would have been a delay of 2.5-2.8 seconds between Ground Control and the Astronauts on the Surface of the Moon.

Debunk that???? A live broadcast from the moon with no delay. You can't edit a LIVE brodcast

I'm sorry did I just hurt your feelings?

The laser beam is 4 miles wide by the time it reaches the Moon from Earth. The largest reflector was around 3 feet wide. Since the moon's surface is reflective, there was no real need for the reflectors.

Last Edited by Gimme Some Truth on 07/26/2013 10:02 PM

500 degree difference in temp from the dark to the light side of the moon. They simply didn't have the ability to withstand those kinds of temp swings with the equiptment they had.

Same magnitude of temperature swing they experience on the exterior of ISS between the daytime and night time side. The temperature of their spacesuits is independent of the temperature of the skin of ISS, however. The vacuum of space is a great insulator, no heat convection from an atmosphere. The suit assumes the temperature it was designed to assume. Direct transfer of heat from the lunar surface (which was always in the "morning hours" of the moon before it had fully warmed) was quite minimal; the soles of their boots had the most contact and heavy insulation to go with it.

There was a delay, it's clearly audible in feedback in the astronauts mics. You hear mission control respond without a delay because that is the side on which the conversation is being recorded. In fact, when the transmission from mission control would echo in the astronauts' microphones it allowed for measurement of the earth-moon distance and over the course of the longer missions you could even measure the eccentricity of the moon's orbit. Even high school students can figure that out.
[link to arxiv.org]
Congratulations, you were just bested by high school students.

please can somebody tell me (astromut?) why cant they just point a telescope or satellite at the moon, zoom in to the flag and snap a photo? that's all any1 has to do to dispel any doubts of either side..i honestly cant believe we don't have any instruments that can see the flag if it is in fact there???

nope? didn't think so..ive asked this question to a hundred people n not 1 logical answer to date..so they take a photo so detailed they can tell your eye colour from space but they cant photograph a flag..ok that makes sense

True

I found it! a recent photo clearly showing the American flag..surely theres no doubt now?

[link to www.bbc.co.uk]

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Astro run away quick..no answers for that simple question? cant use your mumbo jumbo words to answer simple logic yeh, doesn't much matter because China know it was a hoax and are not far from proving it :)

Dawes' limit. LRO is the only satellite with enough resolution (due to its close proximity in lunar orbit and sizeable 8" telescope) to directly resolve the equipment at the landing sites at all.


You would demand images of what is about the smallest piece of equipment left there. Nice arbitrary goalpost, but here you go:
[link to blogs.discovermagazine.com]
There. It saw the flag. Barely, but it saw it. Your goalpost has been met.

You flatter yourself. I've answered that same question countless times on GLP. You're not clever at all. I'm preoccupied with astronomy tonight, you get my attention when and if I have some downtime. Otherwise, well, go find something more "clever" to do with yourself.

that's classic haha..that's the only proof u have of a flag? after all these years? sorry but this could be anything and is not evidence of anything..they can take a photo of a 20 cent coin on earth from space but not a flag on the moon, that nonsense..makes no sense at all sorry

if u believe then fine but u cant expect some1 to see that photo and say yes that's an American flag

Show me a picture of a 20 cent coin on earth taken from space.

e for starters I don't have access to that technology so I cant just show u a photo, its not my claim anyway

quick google search I got this which isn't far off, and I think u'll agree its a lot higher resolution then any photos u have of the flag? and I would think its easier to photogragh the moon since theres no atmosphere or pollution, maybe i'm wrong but

[link to aerometrex.com.au]