LOL, found your "well presented" video.
[link to www.youtube.com]
They start off interviewing Bill Kaysing
[link to www.clavius.org]
He mentions among other bullshit reasons of why we couldn't land on the moon, micrometeoroid threats. Oh really bill? How in the hell did we ever overcome the EVA wall on ISS construction if that was a problem on the lunar surface where half the sky is blocked from presenting a micrometeroid threat and the total time spent performing EVAs is orders of magnitude shorter?

Oh and there's your "deadly radiation":
[link to i319.photobucket.com]
Yeah, between .3 and .4 REMs, real frickin deadly. Yet that's the dose you would receive on the trajectory the Apollo spacecraft (which was rated at between 7-8gm/cm^2 areal density) took through the van allen belts to the moon, under stormy geomagnetic conditions.

So then they play video of the flag waving AS THEY MANHANDLE IT. Yes, vibrations will still travel through a flag pole and cause a flag to sway in a vacuum. In fact, it'll sway more and longer in a vacuum because there's no air resistance to slow it down.

So now we come to Percy. The only mission that had to be converted from slow scan to broadcast format using a camera filming the screen showing the slow scan image was Apollo 11. Now, as for his "discontinuity," you can clearly see the flap flapping in the video. The flap is on the astronaut's side of the PLSS, not the top, but nontheless you CAN see the top of that flap in the video and it is anything but motionless. Last, but not least, Persy outright lies when he says it was the top flap you see in the picture. It's the front flap just behind the astronaut's head.
[link to www.hq.nasa.gov]
Whoopsie, Percy's a little liar... and you bought it.

So then he shows the zoomed in view of the earth... and you see the edge of the window as they shoot it. So what? Talk about utterly meaningless. That doesn't mean they aren't near the window, and it sure as hell doesn't fit with Sibrel's claim that they were using a "cutout" while orbiting in LEO. For one thing, if you attempted to use a "cutout," the features of earth would not look correct and would be constantly changing. For another, you wouldn't see the edge of the window if the camera moved to the left, you'd simply see the "cutout earth" move to the right in the frame. In fact the earth itself doesn't move much, but the window starts to intrude. Know what that means? The window is very close to the camera, the earth is far away, and the astronaut drifted a bit too far to the left for a moment. Furthermore, the earth is sharply in focus, the window's edge is fuzzy, further proving that he's close to the window and far from the earth. Then he jump cuts to a later scene showing the camera farther from the window. This was AFTER the astronauts reported moving back from the window (at houston's request), so yes now it's from further back in the capsule.

034:10:36 Armstrong: Unfortunately, we only have one window that has a view of the Earth and it's filled up with the TV camera, so your view now is probably better than ours is.

034:10:47 Duke: Roger. We copy.

034:10:51 Duke: 11, Houston. If you could comply, we'd like to see little smiling faces up there, if you could give us some interior views. I'm sure everybody would like to see you. Over.

034:11:06 Armstrong: Okay. We'll reconfigure the TV for that.
...
034:12:31 Duke: Apollo 11, Houston. It appears to us that we're seeing a view from outside plus a little of the inside. It appears you've taken the camera away from the left window now. Over.

034:12:45 Armstrong: That's correct. We're moving it back and reconfiguring for interior lighting.

Here's a picture sequence that really takes the pants off Sibrel's claims being repeated here by Percy the Liar:
[link to apollo-history-and-hoax.com]
Oh, and is that a "large earth" in the window, no, that's glare:
[link to apollo-history-and-hoax.com]
The windows naturally fogged up a bit after launch as the gaskets between the panes of glass outgassed a bit with the same type of chemical that you find in new cars. With new cars you can simply wipe off the interior of the window as it builds up, but that's not an option here since the interior panes are not "user accessible."

I'll do more later if I feel like it, that's already 17 minutes of video watching that I want back. I could spend several days debunking every single point in the whole 4 hour video. It's all the same crap I've already heard before.