I look in on GLP from time to time to see whether the psychos have come up with any new delusions. They never do...but they never drop any of the old ones either.
Quoting: Dr P 11919896 Hi, Doc.
You might also notice that Nibiru is still coming.
Any decade now...
=============================================================
There is something else I havent heard anyone explain... the issue of the dust upon landing..
Quoting: Australian Coward 11802684 Pay attention.
And again, nobody owns you an explanation.
YOU accuse people, then YOU provide the evidence.
"I don't understand" is NOT evidence.
I wonder if Hal realises that it was a Historical Fact that the earth was FLAT... lmao
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11802684 No.
It is an Historical Fact that once upon a time many people thought the world was flat, if they thought about it at all.
It is a Current Fact that every polled person knowledgable of the record and relevant domains considers Apollo landing humans on the Moon an Historical fact.
Also, semantic arguments do not constitute evidence.
You want to proof Napoleon wass 6 feet tall, I mean, Apollo was hoaxed? Then you will have to provide evidence that actually proofs it.
So far you have only provided evidence of a very confused understanding of how the physical world works.
=============================================================
...
That's funny. I see the other one helping him up and the one trying to get up with his left arm on the other.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11398639 The above is a perfect example of the lack of intellectual honesty exhibited by the defenders.
Quoting: BrandonD Nope.
We know what the video shows.
Hoaxies otoh only "know" the fairy tale version concocted by David Percy, whispered into your ears in a seductive British accent.
And then they have the audacity to accuse people who disagree with them of being gullible.
You been lead around by the nose by professional and amateur bullshit artists and didn't even notice it.
Black sheeple are still sheeple, you know?
Bah... Bah...=============================================================
So, if the LM weighed 2500lb on the moon, at touchdown, the rocket nozzle would exert a force of? 2500lb!
Consider the approximate nozzle width of maybe .4 meters. Now consider the lunar dust that is "a few" inches deep.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11796368 The nozzle didn't touch the ground.
Why,when you look at all of the pictures of the LM on the moon, is there no apparent gradient of lunar dust blown out in a circle, with hardpan in the middle and rays out from the center?
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11796368 Why do you pretend to have looked at all the pertinent photographs?
=============================================================
Anyone with a sane mind, can see that guy was on a wire. Do we need anymore evidence at all in fact?
Quoting: ZIPPY And THIS is know as
cognitive bias.
You see what you want to see. Not what is there.
There is no wire visible.
What is visible is a physical manoeuvre that would be pretty much impossible on Earth.
(Prolly even with wires. And don't tell me you also an expert on wire rigging.)
In fact, it is just more evidence for Apollo.
Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD Have anyone else noticed something about this poster here?
Whenever the thread seems to get 'sane' and settle into a general consensus of clearly discussed issues, and we start to agree with each other that the NASA myth is very questionable, this guy...makes his posts extraordinarily long, repeating the process over and over, to bury all and any sane threads back far enough, so that anyone jumping in here will see all his banal, most idiotic remarks, making the thread appear as if it's fool of 'kooks'.
Visitors here unknowingly realising that this guy is the actual 'kook'.
Quoting: ZIPUX IOW, you couldn't formulate a response to my rebuttals, so you just dragged out that old standby the shill gambit.
Lazy, lame, dishonest.
Ignoring my rebuttals won't make them go away.
Either you respond like a rational person with facts and arguments, or you forfeit.
Each and every time you call someone a shill you expose the emptiness of your conviction, and the dearth of your evidence.
Stop being a loser.
AstoNut, said it was lens flare....sheesh, the guy must think we're all idiots.The thing he doesn't get, is that we are not fools, and wont be dismissed from class so easily as he would like.
Quoting: ZIPPY Without a sworn affidavit by a photographic
expert your
opinion that it isn't a lens flare is just that, an uneducated opinion.
A very far cry from anything resembling evidence.
I think it is time to stamp down on this guy HARD, and keep on pushing for intelligent, respectful and honest answers to questions raised, rather than his usual, "I already explained that a million times", etc.
'nomuse' has already proved to be what he his here, and let him show up here again, and try his tactics to dismiss what he has attempted again, and he will get a sharp short thrift as he experienced earlier. AstroNut should be dealt with properly here too.
Quoting: ZIPPY IOW, you want to gather followers and start a witch hunt.
You're a fucking politician, not a truth seeker.
IF you think people make incorrect statements PROOF that these statements are incorrect.
With FACTS and EVIDENCE.
Each and every time you personally attack the people who happen to disagree with you, you unmistakeably and undeniably demonstrate that you DO NOT
HAVE facts and evidence.
Stop being a loser.