Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,512 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,635,397
Pageviews Today: 2,129,933Threads Today: 466Posts Today: 8,412
02:30 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

2012 is about a new birth. - David Wilcock

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8621157
United States
02/26/2012 06:24 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
2012 is about a new birth. - David Wilcock
When I first set out to write this post about David Wilcock, I was optimistic, even excited. I thought, here's a big name in 2012 apocalypticism. Here's a guy who's going to give me some real meat to chew on. He has a following.

He has a slick website where he sells books and magazines. I thought, surely this guy will prove a worthier adversary than the scattered cranks who just sit around plagiarizing each other all day. Surely this guy will be above flaunting his own ignorance as brazenly as the other True Believers do. We're going to really get some good analysis of what is going on, I told myself.

So I pressed play on Wilcock's video. And within five minutes, my eyes had glazed over with tears. I wept, dear reader. I wept for the beleaguered state of rational discourse in the 21st century. I shed tears of darkest despair when I looked mad David Wilcock's image on my laptop square in the eye, and thought: this is the best they can do?

Or maybe those were tears of laughter. I can't remember exactly.

Yes, suffice it to say, David Wilcock is no different from the numerous schizoaffective pencil-peddlers (the link is just one example) who dominate the 2012 / New Age cultural milieu. I expected an intellectual sparring partner; I got a guy who looks for hidden messages in movie posters.

I wanted somebody who would put up a fight; I got a guy who uses a book that he read when he was seven years old as evidence for ESP. I wanted a challenge, and I got a guy who is very, very seriously challenged.

But please, do not think me merely dismissive. Watch his "science" yourself. If you can go more than three minutes without squirming, weeping, laughing uncontrollably, or vomiting, you will have proven yourself more restrained than I.



Then, after you are finished, I double-dog-dare you look me in the eye and say, "I take David Wilcock very, very seriously."

Here I will not give you an exhaustive list of everything that Wilcock does wrong, because such a list would take longer to read than the movie would take to watch. I will instead explain why Wilcock is such a disappointment- because he is just like all the others. His grasp of logic is so terrible, his fundamental research skills are nonexistent, and his willingness to draw ridiculous overarching conclusions from tiny, specific amounts of (often unverifiable or simply flat-out incorrect) 'evidence ' all conspire towards an unmistakable conclusion: David Wilcock is just not worth the time it would take to explain every single mistake he makes. Instead, we can tell him that his very thought processes themselves, the very way he evaluates evidence and arguments, is completely broken.

David Wilcock genuinely disappointed me, but at least he will be a helpful textbook for how not to get yourself a place at the table.

Wilcock's "research" is a wandering, meandering, unfocused whirligig complete guided tour through every single piece of bunkum, flim-flammery, hocus-pocus, nonsense, fluff, prattle, bullshit, and chicanery that exists in the established canon of 2012 apocalypticism. We get psychics. We get reincarnation. We get energy crystals. We get quantum this-and-that. Aliens. Ancient Mayans. Wormholes. Screenshots from the movie "Contact." It's all there. But if you asked me what "wilcock's science" was about exactly, I wouldn't be able to tell you, even though I've watched it a dozen times right now. It's just an aimless rant that tries to squeeze as much disconnected nonsense into a semicoherent narrative as possible.



And if you asked me about Wilcock himself...

There are certain modes of behavior or tendencies that people have that should make us suspicious straight from the outset. People who routinely make casual errors that could be corrected by even token amounts of research typically are people who have not done the research and who have no interest in doing the research. People who make sweeping generalizations about complicated topics in physics or mathematics (but who do not even once get into specific details about those topics) are probably trying to cover up the fact that they don't know what they're talking about; they speak quickly and casually to make it seem like what they're saying is totally obvious and very simple, even if it is total crap. People who habitually cite crappy, discredited research without explaining why are people who are ideologically committed to an "everything we know is wrong" mentality. They want you to believe without question that "the Establishment," meaning usually accepted solid science, is hiding something serious from you and that only the crank in question has The Truth.

And when they start telling you that they're the reincarnation of Edgar Cayce, you know that you will never even be on the same planet, much less the same playing field. And if you've watched "Enigma," you know just what Wilcock thinks about himself vis-a-vis Edgar Cayce. It ain't pretty.



David Wilcock seems to think that he is the reincarnation of Edgar Cayce. Why does he think this? Well, because they look sort of like each other and some of Cayce's friends look sort of like Wilcock's friends. I am not kidding and this is not a simplification of the matter. Watch the movie from 3:32-4:15 and tell me that I'm being unfair here. He literally shows slide after slide of people from his life who look like people from Edgar Cayce's life and expects us to believe it.

That Wilcock is either massively self-deluded or a deliberate scam artist is apparent in his selection of the photos he has used for comparison. Notice for example that he used this photo (Cayce is on the left, Wilcock is on the right) and not, say, this one. The photo Wilcock used is black and white, so we can't compare eye color, hair color, or even skin color. They are just photos of the face, so we can't compare height or build. They are also both pictures where they both happen to be looking in the same direction with their mouths open the same amount. He even picked one where Cayce is wearing a hat so we can't compare what their hairstyles or hairlines are like.

The same is true for every other photo on this point that he shows. What's even funnier is that some of his pictures genuinely do not look similar.



But the worst part of this whole, agonizing segment is what it says about Wilcock as a person. His grandeur is so profound that, of the six billion or so people that world-renowned fraudulent huckster Edgar Cayce could have been reborn as, he had to choose David Wilcock. Forget that Wilcock's only evidence is that he thinks that certain, perfectly-angled photos look like each other. Just think of what kind of rocks it takes to say, with a completely straight face and full confidence, that one of your subculture's heroes lives inside your brain

The point I am trying to establish here is that David Wilcock is practically inviting us not to take him seriously. How am I supposed to engage rationally with someone who thinks that his dad is Edgar Cayce's dad (apparently your facial hair choices are preserved in the reincarnation process)? What kind of calm dialectical process can I work through with a guy who thinks that his college friend was Edgar Cayce's principal investor?

A callow disregard for even very basic detail is bad enough. He insults your intelligence by trying to summarize the theology of all major religions in a single sentence. He is assuming that you are as gullible as he is when he shows you that Edgar Cayce reincarnation crap (a point that, by the way, he never does anything with). Just being straight-up wrong is also a bad sign.

Daivid wilcock is a charlatan for the feeble minded and spiritually materialistic and corrupt. His ego is warning enough for many, but many get sucked in, until they figure out Wilcock's no refund policy.

buyer be warned, don't get "cocked" by Wilcock
about:blank
Yeah...yeah and thrice yeah

User ID: 4405761
United States
02/26/2012 06:29 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2012 is about a new birth. - David Wilcock
Amazing. It took you so long to figure that out?
union

The chariots of God are tens of thousands, and thousands of thousands.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 8621157
United States
02/26/2012 06:30 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2012 is about a new birth. - David Wilcock
Amazing. It took you so long to figure that out?
 Quoting: about:blank


David Wilcock is a psuedo guru, charlatan and rampant fucking idiot. This dude claims to be Edgar Cayce, Shakespeare and Pythagoras amongst many, many others. Noteably only famous people though lol. He puts out a bunch of 2012 bullshit on the web and basically takes you for a nice confusing, long winded ride, at your expense.

Here is just a sample of mr Wilcock heads drivel that I took from his website, he tries to pass himself off as this crusader for truth guided by mystical forces.., showing us what is really going on, for free!

~ Is The "Sleeping Prophet" Back? An Interview With David Wilcock8/17/99 RICK MARTIN ~ Wilcock: The whole reason why everything that I've published is free is so that as many people can get it as possible. That's what I was instructed to do by these Forces.

But then the story slips and we get an insight as to what David is really about, marketing.. Selling 'truth' like it's a commodity, calling spirituality and the truth an 'industry'. He shows his true colours, a metaphysical used car salesman, he's a salesman! Snake oil anyone?

[link to theshamansspiral.blogspot.com]

All of this has been taken from David Wilcocks own site. He can’t even keep his own story straight. I'm not even going to bother debunking his pathetic theories as he can't even prove them, and many others have done that very well. Google David Wilcock fraud scam. It's all there. Research your gurus people.

David Wilcock the "enlightened" guru wannabe, fake and fucking carnie claims he is Edgar Cayce (amongst a plethora of others) reincarnated. Here is Edgar Cayce himself on his next incarnation, enjoy.

Edgar Cayce on his next incarnation:

[link to theshamansspiral.blogspot.com]

Oh and Wilcock predicted that on October 14th 2008 a massive armada of UFO's would be seen worldwide in the skies lol, and that the US government would fully disclose all UFO information by the end of 2009. Obviously none of these things have happened, pretty good for the guy who claims 100% accuracy. There you have it, Wilcock is a joke.



This is a hard-hitting name-naming program that asks
the questions: why all the hysteria, why all the lies?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1759756
Germany
02/26/2012 11:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2012 is about a new birth. - David Wilcock
Well at one time, it was a new birth. Wilcock has changed his tune about 2012 - and not offering any explanations on why - from a single event to gradual. Probably because this way it will extend his career past dec 21, 2012
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 982390
United States
02/26/2012 11:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2012 is about a new birth. - David Wilcock
You started yet another thread about your hatred for David Wilcock?

Dude - what is wrong with you? Seriously, why all this hatred?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8955328
United States
02/26/2012 11:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2012 is about a new birth. - David Wilcock
You started yet another thread about your hatred for David Wilcock?

Dude - what is wrong with you? Seriously, why all this hatred?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 982390


yep, makes ya wonder
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1649936
United States
02/26/2012 11:22 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2012 is about a new birth. - David Wilcock
I hear Wilcock is offering the Brooklyn Bridge for sale. He also peddles swampland in Florida. Oh, and he has a side gig selling aluminum siding too.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 8621157
United States
02/26/2012 11:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2012 is about a new birth. - David Wilcock
I hear Wilcock is offering the Brooklyn Bridge for sale. He also peddles swampland in Florida. Oh, and he has a side gig selling aluminum siding too.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1649936


*** (no refunds)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11482044
Turkey
02/26/2012 11:27 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2012 is about a new birth. - David Wilcock
You started yet another thread about your hatred for David Wilcock?

Dude - what is wrong with you? Seriously, why all this hatred?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 982390


yep, makes ya wonder
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8955328


He probably not re funded chuckle
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 8621157
United States
02/26/2012 11:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2012 is about a new birth. - David Wilcock
You started yet another thread about your hatred for David Wilcock?

Dude - what is wrong with you? Seriously, why all this hatred?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 982390


yep, makes ya wonder
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8955328


He probably not re funded chuckle
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11482044


when people fnd out about Wilcock's no refunds policy, they get mad at the messenger

lol, next time try not to get cocked
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11534038
Australia
02/27/2012 11:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2012 is about a new birth. - David Wilcock
You started yet another thread about your hatred for David Wilcock?

Dude - what is wrong with you? Seriously, why all this hatred?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 982390


He's a shill. You expose them, then they have to start
another thread.
antibs
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11534038
Australia
02/27/2012 11:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2012 is about a new birth. - David Wilcock
You started yet another thread about your hatred for David Wilcock?

Dude - what is wrong with you? Seriously, why all this hatred?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 982390


He's a shill. You expose them, then they have to start
another thread.
antibs
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11534038


You got cocked OP. Stop the copy paste shit too. You look like a fucking retard.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1364770
United States
02/27/2012 11:24 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2012 is about a new birth. - David Wilcock
You started yet another thread about your hatred for David Wilcock?

Dude - what is wrong with you? Seriously, why all this hatred?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 982390


yep, makes ya wonder
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8955328


makes me wonder when strongly disagreeing with someone and voicing your opinion on it became "hatred"
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11534038
Australia
02/27/2012 11:32 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2012 is about a new birth. - David Wilcock
You started yet another thread about your hatred for David Wilcock?

Dude - what is wrong with you? Seriously, why all this hatred?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 982390


yep, makes ya wonder
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8955328


makes me wonder when strongly disagreeing with someone and voicing your opinion on it became "hatred"
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1364770


10 or more threads a day with hundreds of stupid posts is obvious shills and haters.

The "Ra" video this idiot posted is not even David.

Complete fucking fail.

[link to divinecosmos.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1230294
Netherlands
02/27/2012 11:33 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2012 is about a new birth. - David Wilcock
david wil cock suck you
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1364770
United States
02/27/2012 11:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2012 is about a new birth. - David Wilcock
You started yet another thread about your hatred for David Wilcock?

Dude - what is wrong with you? Seriously, why all this hatred?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 982390


yep, makes ya wonder
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8955328


makes me wonder when strongly disagreeing with someone and voicing your opinion on it became "hatred"
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1364770


10 or more threads a day with hundreds of stupid posts is obvious shills and haters.

The "Ra" video this idiot posted is not even David.

Complete fucking fail.

[link to divinecosmos.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11534038


i'm sure he appreicates the hits
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 10417993
United States
02/27/2012 12:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2012 is about a new birth. - David Wilcock
WOOOHOO!!!

WHY IS THERE MORE THREADS DEVOTED BY THE SAME GROUP OF PEOPLE TO DAVID, THAN TO ANYTHING ELSE???


WHOOO !

WHOOO
!

WOOOWHOOWOOWHOWOHWHOW@!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11534038
Australia
02/27/2012 12:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2012 is about a new birth. - David Wilcock
WOOOHOO!!!

WHY IS THERE MORE THREADS DEVOTED BY THE SAME GROUP OF PEOPLE TO DAVID, THAN TO ANYTHING ELSE???


WHOOO !

WHOOO
!

WOOOWHOOWOOWHOWOHWHOW@!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 10417993


it's thepropoganda
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4804493
Australia
02/27/2012 08:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2012 is about a new birth. - David Wilcock
You started yet another thread about your hatred for David Wilcock?

Dude - what is wrong with you? Seriously, why all this hatred?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 982390


yep, makes ya wonder
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8955328


makes me wonder when strongly disagreeing with someone and voicing your opinion on it became "hatred"
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1364770


10 or more threads a day with hundreds of stupid posts is obvious shills and haters.

The "Ra" video this idiot posted is not even David.

Complete fucking fail.

[link to divinecosmos.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11534038


bump
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 8621157
United States
02/27/2012 08:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2012 is about a new birth. - David Wilcock
Anyone who's followed wilcock for long knows all about his "ascension 2000" fail and how none of the Y2K meltdown occured that Wilcock predicted. That shut him up for a while because just before that he had moved to Virginia Beach trying his claim to fame by riding the coat-tails of the Edgar Cayce foundation until they kicked him out.

Then he moved up to Kentucky where Carla Rueckert was channeling Ra and the "Law of One" books, ( [link to www.scribd.com] and decided he could channel Ra, too. Never mind the fact that the original Ra channelings said specifically that RA could NEVER speak through anyone but Carla. Then Carla threw him out and I thought we'd seen the last of him, but he just keeps popping up like a bad hair day.

So he wrote a couple of books, but no publisher would touch them, and he finally just put them on his site. Then he hooked up with Wynn Free and convinced him he was Edgar Cayce, because he knew that Wynn could get published. After that book flopped he started doing "dream readings" thru his website. Only problem was, he was so bad at it that everybody was asking for a refund; that's why he now has a strict no-refund policy. So after that nobody would pay him for his terrible work and he had to quit.

Then he hooked up with ET researcher and author Scott Mandelker; toured with him a bit; did some shows with Art Bell and Wilcock thought he'd made the big time. Trouble is that Scott got wise to Wilcock and kicked him to the curb...

And so it goes... everyone he's ever worked with has thrown him out, but he keeps trying to con new people, and unfortunately people who are searching are too easily conned, and DW has discovered and exploited this.
nexuseditor

User ID: 11228305
Australia
02/27/2012 08:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2012 is about a new birth. - David Wilcock
You started yet another thread about your hatred for David Wilcock?

Dude - what is wrong with you? Seriously, why all this hatred?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 982390


yep, makes ya wonder
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8955328


makes me wonder when strongly disagreeing with someone and voicing your opinion on it became "hatred"
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1364770


10 or more threads a day with hundreds of stupid posts is obvious shills and haters.

The "Ra" video this idiot posted is not even David.

Complete fucking fail.

[link to divinecosmos.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11534038



Dude you are wrong - Wilcock DID indeed attempt to channel 'Ra' and that IS his voice on those tapes.

The Ra material became VERY popular in the new age channelling movement, it is where those phrases - "service to self" and "service to others" came from. These phrases became popularised as ways to judge people, ie you are either STS (ie BAD) or STO (ie good).

Wilcock lost a LOT of followers by claiming to be an authorised channel for Ra - because when you listened to him doing the 'channelling' - it was obvious as dog's balls that it was nothing like Ra at all.

But get over it - Wilcock's voice is that on those tapes and youtube clips.
"The nature of the universe is such that ends can never justify the means. On the contrary, the means always determine the end."
(Aldous Huxley)
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 8621157
United States
02/27/2012 08:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2012 is about a new birth. - David Wilcock
...


yep, makes ya wonder
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8955328


makes me wonder when strongly disagreeing with someone and voicing your opinion on it became "hatred"
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1364770


10 or more threads a day with hundreds of stupid posts is obvious shills and haters.

The "Ra" video this idiot posted is not even David.

Complete fucking fail.

[link to divinecosmos.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11534038



Dude you are wrong - Wilcock DID indeed attempt to channel 'Ra' and that IS his voice on those tapes.

The Ra material became VERY popular in the new age channelling movement, it is where those phrases - "service to self" and "service to others" came from. These phrases became popularised as ways to judge people, ie you are either STS (ie BAD) or STO (ie good).

Wilcock lost a LOT of followers by claiming to be an authorised channel for Ra - because when you listened to him doing the 'channelling' - it was obvious as dog's balls that it was nothing like Ra at all.

But get over it - Wilcock's voice is that on those tapes and youtube clips.
 Quoting: nexuseditor


Wilcock is the BIGGEST Fraud I ever seen, seriously
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1619558
United States
03/13/2012 05:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2012 is about a new birth. - David Wilcock
When I first set out to write this post about David Wilcock, I was optimistic, even excited. I thought, here's a big name in 2012 apocalypticism. Here's a guy who's going to give me some real meat to chew on. He has a following.

He has a slick website where he sells books and magazines. I thought, surely this guy will prove a worthier adversary than the scattered cranks who just sit around plagiarizing each other all day. Surely this guy will be above flaunting his own ignorance as brazenly as the other True Believers do. We're going to really get some good analysis of what is going on, I told myself.

So I pressed play on Wilcock's video. And within five minutes, my eyes had glazed over with tears. I wept, dear reader. I wept for the beleaguered state of rational discourse in the 21st century. I shed tears of darkest despair when I looked mad David Wilcock's image on my laptop square in the eye, and thought: this is the best they can do?

Or maybe those were tears of laughter. I can't remember exactly.

Yes, suffice it to say, David Wilcock is no different from the numerous schizoaffective pencil-peddlers (the link is just one example) who dominate the 2012 / New Age cultural milieu. I expected an intellectual sparring partner; I got a guy who looks for hidden messages in movie posters.

I wanted somebody who would put up a fight; I got a guy who uses a book that he read when he was seven years old as evidence for ESP. I wanted a challenge, and I got a guy who is very, very seriously challenged.

But please, do not think me merely dismissive. Watch his "science" yourself. If you can go more than three minutes without squirming, weeping, laughing uncontrollably, or vomiting, you will have proven yourself more restrained than I.



Then, after you are finished, I double-dog-dare you look me in the eye and say, "I take David Wilcock very, very seriously."

Here I will not give you an exhaustive list of everything that Wilcock does wrong, because such a list would take longer to read than the movie would take to watch. I will instead explain why Wilcock is such a disappointment- because he is just like all the others. His grasp of logic is so terrible, his fundamental research skills are nonexistent, and his willingness to draw ridiculous overarching conclusions from tiny, specific amounts of (often unverifiable or simply flat-out incorrect) 'evidence ' all conspire towards an unmistakable conclusion: David Wilcock is just not worth the time it would take to explain every single mistake he makes. Instead, we can tell him that his very thought processes themselves, the very way he evaluates evidence and arguments, is completely broken.

David Wilcock genuinely disappointed me, but at least he will be a helpful textbook for how not to get yourself a place at the table.

Wilcock's "research" is a wandering, meandering, unfocused whirligig complete guided tour through every single piece of bunkum, flim-flammery, hocus-pocus, nonsense, fluff, prattle, bullshit, and chicanery that exists in the established canon of 2012 apocalypticism. We get psychics. We get reincarnation. We get energy crystals. We get quantum this-and-that. Aliens. Ancient Mayans. Wormholes. Screenshots from the movie "Contact." It's all there. But if you asked me what "wilcock's science" was about exactly, I wouldn't be able to tell you, even though I've watched it a dozen times right now. It's just an aimless rant that tries to squeeze as much disconnected nonsense into a semicoherent narrative as possible.



And if you asked me about Wilcock himself...

There are certain modes of behavior or tendencies that people have that should make us suspicious straight from the outset. People who routinely make casual errors that could be corrected by even token amounts of research typically are people who have not done the research and who have no interest in doing the research. People who make sweeping generalizations about complicated topics in physics or mathematics (but who do not even once get into specific details about those topics) are probably trying to cover up the fact that they don't know what they're talking about; they speak quickly and casually to make it seem like what they're saying is totally obvious and very simple, even if it is total crap. People who habitually cite crappy, discredited research without explaining why are people who are ideologically committed to an "everything we know is wrong" mentality. They want you to believe without question that "the Establishment," meaning usually accepted solid science, is hiding something serious from you and that only the crank in question has The Truth.

And when they start telling you that they're the reincarnation of Edgar Cayce, you know that you will never even be on the same planet, much less the same playing field. And if you've watched "Enigma," you know just what Wilcock thinks about himself vis-a-vis Edgar Cayce. It ain't pretty.



David Wilcock seems to think that he is the reincarnation of Edgar Cayce. Why does he think this? Well, because they look sort of like each other and some of Cayce's friends look sort of like Wilcock's friends. I am not kidding and this is not a simplification of the matter. Watch the movie from 3:32-4:15 and tell me that I'm being unfair here. He literally shows slide after slide of people from his life who look like people from Edgar Cayce's life and expects us to believe it.

That Wilcock is either massively self-deluded or a deliberate scam artist is apparent in his selection of the photos he has used for comparison. Notice for example that he used this photo (Cayce is on the left, Wilcock is on the right) and not, say, this one. The photo Wilcock used is black and white, so we can't compare eye color, hair color, or even skin color. They are just photos of the face, so we can't compare height or build. They are also both pictures where they both happen to be looking in the same direction with their mouths open the same amount. He even picked one where Cayce is wearing a hat so we can't compare what their hairstyles or hairlines are like.

The same is true for every other photo on this point that he shows. What's even funnier is that some of his pictures genuinely do not look similar.



But the worst part of this whole, agonizing segment is what it says about Wilcock as a person. His grandeur is so profound that, of the six billion or so people that world-renowned fraudulent huckster Edgar Cayce could have been reborn as, he had to choose David Wilcock. Forget that Wilcock's only evidence is that he thinks that certain, perfectly-angled photos look like each other. Just think of what kind of rocks it takes to say, with a completely straight face and full confidence, that one of your subculture's heroes lives inside your brain

The point I am trying to establish here is that David Wilcock is practically inviting us not to take him seriously. How am I supposed to engage rationally with someone who thinks that his dad is Edgar Cayce's dad (apparently your facial hair choices are preserved in the reincarnation process)? What kind of calm dialectical process can I work through with a guy who thinks that his college friend was Edgar Cayce's principal investor?

A callow disregard for even very basic detail is bad enough. He insults your intelligence by trying to summarize the theology of all major religions in a single sentence. He is assuming that you are as gullible as he is when he shows you that Edgar Cayce reincarnation crap (a point that, by the way, he never does anything with). Just being straight-up wrong is also a bad sign.

Daivid wilcock is a charlatan for the feeble minded and spiritually materialistic and corrupt. His ego is warning enough for many, but many get sucked in, until they figure out Wilcock's no refund policy.

buyer be warned, don't get "cocked" by Wilcock
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8621157


I always knew he was full of it
Jebus

User ID: 1339737
United States
03/13/2012 05:28 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2012 is about a new birth. - David Wilcock
Next year Wilcock will have to get a real job.

rofl
Peak Oil, Peak Civilization, Peak EVERYTHING
People who don't believe in peak oil fall into 3 categories:
Uninformed.
In denial.
Too stupid to understand it.
Which one are you?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1689623
Netherlands
03/13/2012 06:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2012 is about a new birth. - David Wilcock
Next year Wilcock will have to get a real job.

rofl
 Quoting: Jebus


Nah, he'll just change his name to Davide Wilcocque, dye his hair red and change the name of his website to Ascension2030.com...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1689623
Netherlands
03/14/2012 07:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2012 is about a new birth. - David Wilcock
I am Ra. As an enchanted pussycat, enwrapped in a Pop-Tart, flies through space while farting out a rainbow, I am here to announce that I do not give refunds m'kay?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1619558
United States
03/14/2012 06:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2012 is about a new birth. - David Wilcock
I am Ra. As an enchanted pussycat, enwrapped in a Pop-Tart, flies through space while farting out a rainbow, I am here to announce that I do not give refunds m'kay?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1689623


no refunds?

don't pull a wilcock
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8046554
Canada
05/03/2012 11:35 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2012 is about a new birth. - David Wilcock
I am Ra. As an enchanted pussycat, enwrapped in a Pop-Tart, flies through space while farting out a rainbow, I am here to announce that I do not give refunds m'kay?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1689623


no refunds?

don't pull a wilcock
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1619558


Wilcock should retire already

News








We're dropping truth bombs like it's the end of days!