Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,184 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 625,726
Pageviews Today: 873,337Threads Today: 258Posts Today: 4,861
08:16 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject Welcome to the beginning of the end
Poster Handle Baldrick
Post Content
However, what has been lost in the shuffle is the fact that Iran is already producing chemical and biological weapons. These are weapons of mass destruction - and American policy is very clear: If attacked by chemical or biological weapons, the United States will respond with nuclear weapons. Iran's major chemical weapons production facility is based at Damghan, about 300 kilometers east of Tehran. American intelligence agencies estimate that Iran is producing 1,000 tons of chemical weapons a year, including mustard gas, phosgene, and various cyanide agents. These agents are older technology than the sarin nerve gas used in the 1995 Tokyo subway attack, but they can still kill.



Iran is also working on biological weapons as well. Intelligence agencies suspect Iran is working on smallpox, which officially has been eradicated save for samples being kept in the United States and Russia. Smallpox incubates for about 12 days, is highly contagious, and kills anywhere from 20 to 40 percent of its victims. Survivors are often left blind in at least one eye. Its nastiness is compounded by the fact that the last known case was in 1978, and there are very few, if any, physicians who have experience treating the disease.



Iran's other projects in the biological realm are biotoxins. Unlike biological weapons, they do not rely on having the initial victims infect more people. They are more accurately described as delayed-action chemical weapons. Iran is reportedly working on two types of biotoxins: Mycotoxins (fungi) and ricin. The mycotoxins would likely be used against food supplies - often to cause economic disruption. Ricin, which was used to lace a letter sent to Senator Bill Frist's office in 2004, is intended to kill victims directly - its most famous use being the assassination of Gregory Markov in London in 1978.

[link to www.strategypage.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2057478

 Quoting: Baldrick


IF Iran successfully can claim they had no direct involvement, (actually the regime really does not) and that the attacks were from unaffiliated terrorist groups and rogue Islamic extremists then nuking Iran would be more difficult... Then again, perhaps Iran's more radical leadership places their fate in a higher power and can accept martyrdom if it can bring about the defeat of the "great Satan"?

Iran's independent groups are not even based in Iran, and can be more easily tied to Syria, Yemen and even Al Qaeda in Pakistan.... Among other places.

Regardless, they have cells in the USA, literally there are thousands of them...

Someone asked me so I will answer here...

I was asked if I am crazy, or if this is for real...

I am, crazy, ... Crazy is the only cover and protection I have from who I really am... No, more specifically from who I was. It is who I was that made it all possible. And yes this is very real, I would not be posting about any of it here if there was any real hope at stopping it now.

The questions you should be asking are:

What if he is right?

What if it can't be stopped?

What have I got to lose?

Good luck.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15223118


If it gets to that point, countries with troops in the ME will have to implement plans to secure strategic reserves at home from a paniced populace.

No food, no water, no electricity as refineries are disabled in a multi tiered strategic attack to completely destroy any capability to advance into Iran for any extended period.

Most countries have only a few months strategic reserves to support COG whilst Iran has gone on record stating it has enough for 3 years to ensure COG.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting: