Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,353 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,995,349
Pageviews Today: 2,710,428Threads Today: 601Posts Today: 12,040
09:07 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

The real 13 illuminati bloodlines

 
robin

User ID: 276
United States
11/15/2005 09:05 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The real 13 illuminati bloodlines
what makes you think there is no gold stashed underground?
because YOU dont see it?

then it must not be there!
robin

User ID: 276
United States
11/15/2005 09:11 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The real 13 illuminati bloodlines
what are the ramifications of destroying the pyramids?

will it ´close´ the multidimensional doors?
SeeEyeEh? (OP)

User ID: 14
Canada
11/24/2005 11:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The real 13 illuminati bloodlines
ratdance
Kilroy
User ID: 43522
United States
11/26/2005 02:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The real 13 illuminati bloodlines
wasn´t Rothschild a candy bar??
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 14
Canada
12/19/2005 03:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The real 13 illuminati bloodlines
HalfMan: I guess you must be American. British TV documentaries like that one mentioned above with university academic researchers writing the script have much greater credibility than in the ratings-driven, dumbed-down TV of the USA. So the laugh is on you for your mindless knee-jerk reaction."

all british academia are bilderberg/bohemian grove/royal insitute of international affairs/trilateral comission/round table//high level masonic professional liars. You my friend are brainwashed.
Historian
User ID: 54863
United Kingdom
12/19/2005 07:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The real 13 illuminati bloodlines
ID4514: "Ummm...

In defense of the bloodline/reptilian argument, I really don´t think it matters whether the bloodline is "legitimate" (i.e. produced through legally church-sanctioned marriage), or not.. blood is blood, regardless of who was married, and who wasn´t.

The throne may be another matter entirely.. but I´m just sayin´ - does it really matter who was married or who wasn´t, insofar as bloodlines are concerned?

You missed my point! All you swallowers of the Icke bloodline crapola that has the Queen of the United Kingdom turning into tin lizzie every New Moon fail to understand that, if it can be proved that one of the heads of these so-called 'royal bloodlines' does not have a microgram of DNA in his/her genes that can be traced to an ancient royal family, then your house of cards concerning Illuminati families and their unique genetic inheritance falls to the ground. I pointed out in an earlier post that it HAS NOW BEEN PROVED BY ACADEMIC RESEARCH (and the fact is millions of British people now know about this having seen the research documented on Channel 4 TV) that the current monarch has NO genetic link to any ancient royal bloodline - she has descended from bastard children of non-royals, geddit? It is NOT even an issue of whether the bloodline is legitimate because it was sanctioned by marriage - the bloodline simply got broken hundreds of years ago (see my previous post). Now do you geddit? That was the whole point of this new research. So, ID4514, I hope that you NOW understand the point I made, because your comment quoted above certainly proves that you did not.

Please go on feeding on your Ickean fantasies. I know facts never bother you fantasists. The truth, however, for those of you who are willing to update your understanding of the world and break free from the vacuous conspiracy fantasies that grip your minds is that Queen Elizabeth II has about as much DNA inherited from ancient royal bloodline as I or any of you have! See through the power and carefully manipulated image of these people that the media and schooling brainwash you with and acquaint yourselves with the TRUTH for a change. THAT, Zacksavage, is the way to set yourselves free from the Matrix, not believing in false information, however esoteric you dupe yourselves into thinking it is. Instead, all that many of you are doing is to allow yourselves to be fooled by idiots like Icke, for whom fantasy is more important than facts. So you don't like it when someone like me comes along and bursts your reality bubble with awkward truths. So be it. Perhaps it will help some of you wake up from your cosy fantasies.
Historian
User ID: 54863
United Kingdom
12/19/2005 07:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The real 13 illuminati bloodlines
ID14,
No, my friend, you are the brainwashed one, for simply swallowing all the half-truths and fantasies you have read on the internet without bothering to do any original research to see whether what you read stands up. You need to look at yourself and correct how you see things before dismissing ALL academics as tools of the Illuminati, etc merely because they don't agree with YOUR half-baked point of view.
.
User ID: 54540
China
12/19/2005 08:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The real 13 illuminati bloodlines
This is rich, one crafter of opinions as truth calling another a liar, lol.
Simple reality tells us that for historian to have a grasp on reality himself, he shoudnt be quoting as ulitimate authority pap for TV , no matter how good the research, did it list objectors and counter arguments, where they all then cross compared? and so on(that for a start). But then when you realiise that everyone has an agenda, it is useful to work out what is whose, and in this case i would suggest possesion is nine tenths of the law, get over it, just because charles doesnt deserve to sit on the throne, is no good reason to prep people for regicide(imo).
The other thing i see here is Icke seems to be left wing and left field and historian right wing and an apologist for arayanism.
Historian
User ID: 54863
United Kingdom
12/19/2005 08:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The real 13 illuminati bloodlines
ID5450, you are a victim of your prejudices. My father was a Communist and I am so far from the political Right and the Establishment that I make Marx look like a Conservative! The disclosure about the lack of royality of Queen Elizabeth II was made in academic journals long before it was turned into a TV documentary. It is now accepted, as the smoking gun has been found. See for yourself the family tree of Queen Elizabth at [link to www.channel4.com] It is NOT a theory with opposite points of view that we are talking about. What has been established beyond any shadow of doubt is a FACT. You may not be used to facts appearing on TV. But they do crop up from time to time. And you can bet the British Establishment did not have ANYTHING to do with this program!
Left-wing historian (geddit?)
User ID: 54863
United Kingdom
12/19/2005 09:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The real 13 illuminati bloodlines
Britain's Real Monarch

Michael I (Michael Hastings, 14th earl of Loudoun)

1942–

Son of Barbara Hastings, 13th countess of Loudoun and Captain Walter Strickland Lord, Michael is the present earl of Loudoun and – in the alternative royal line – the rightful king of England. However, in 1960, when the present occupant of Buckingham Palace was in the first decade of her reign, the 17-year-old Michael (who then had the title Lord Mauchline) set sail for Australia.

He eventually joined Dennys, Lascelles Ltd (now Dennys Strachan Mercantile Ltd), a stocking station agency that bought and sold properties, sheep, cattle and so on. In 1966, they sent him to Jerilderie, New South Wales, population 1100, where he has lived ever since. However, today he works at the Australian Rice Research Institute, where he is engaged in an ongoing quest to find varieties of rice suitable for an arid landscape, to feed Australia and south-east Asia.

In 1969, he married the red-headed Noelene McCormick, and together they had five children, who in turn have given them five grandchildren (Noelene has since died). When Michael's mother died in October 2000, he inherited the earldom (if not the British throne). His heir is his eldest son Simon, the present Lord Mauchline.

When Tony Robinson* told Michael that, according to the research, he should be the king of England, he accepted the news calmly, then said: 'I believe that Australia should be a republic. I'm not a mad monarchist.'

* The well-known member of the Channel 4 archaeology team.
------------------------------------
I posted this information from [link to www.channel4.com]
just to demonstrate to some of you who mistakenly believe that so-called 'Illuminati' families have descended from ancient royal blood lines just how loony that belief is. What distinguishes these families from the rest of us is their money, power and influence over the generations, nothing else. Certainly not their genes. Sorry to burst the bubble of belief that some of you have long nutured (well, I'm not really sorry), but facts can sometimes hurt.
ibra

User ID: 59308042
Kuwait
06/16/2014 03:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The real 13 illuminati bloodlines
bump


News








We're dropping truth bombs like it's the end of days!