Completey Fool Carbon 14 Dating Methods, Anything/Everything Can Be Made 2 Appear Ancient

If carbon dating is so excact then why is not all the salt in the ocean from the same time period, cause as you say things have moved around for millenia and deposited these isitope for carbon dating to be able to find any time period= what is the point is that like always they are pulling a fast one who believes there b.s..

That all depends on who he is and is he worth it? Has this guy changed since you last saw him and if he has changed how do you know it will last sis?

the subject ,try to disprove the topix..

It was just a joke I couldn't resist.. I don't think I'll ever hear from him again, so sadly I won't be able to use that joke on him.

Soak him in salt water for a few months

ocean beachfront? are you a female and would you like a handsome debt-less roommate,lol.

To me, carbon dating mean.. dating with the hopes of a diamond engagement ring.



(Actually I don't care about the diamond part, it's a concept.)

...at my age, an engagement ring is always ready,lol..

You must be a distinguished, mature gentleman.

:9teen: The Earth is 6,000 Years Old.

It's a sad thing that many Christians have an appalling lack of biblical understanding, that at times enables our enemies to run rings around us. To take one example: You often see or read of mockers in the media saying words to the effect that: "The bible is inaccurate because it says that the earth is only 6,000 years old."

But the bible also says...2Pe 3:8 But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day [is] with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.

You can easily work out for yourself that if you multiply 360 days (lunar years) x 6,000 x 1,000 that you get a figure of well over 2 billion years. Which also leaves plenty of room for quite a few 1,000 year periods to pass as single days.

No doubt some carping evolutionist will start whingeing that "the bible is still inaccurate because the earth is 6 billion (or whatever) years old. And I've got two good answers to that one.

Firstly: Just because you have blind faith in (a) the inherent accuracy of their scientific instruments. (b) The true scientific integrity of those doing the laboratory work. (c) That they cannot be fooled by false readings and/or assumptions. Pleeeeeeeeze do not expect me to take your shaky assumptions at face value. I know for a fact that false science is being used to bamboozle everyone into believing what they say about 'global warming', so why should I give you the benefit of the doubt.

Secondly: Try and explain this one away. We are told in the story of creation that the earth was formed from the small stuff that was left over after the creation of the universe. Therefore it should be quite reasonable to expect that for instance one group of about 500 million cubic miles of rock that outcrops on the earth's surface is perhaps 6 billion or so years old. Another outcrop of perhaps 200 million cubic miles could be 3 or 4 billion years old. And so on.

To sum up. If the material that was used to make the earth was in existence before the earth was formed, then obviously it is older than the earth.

So if in the future you hear some idiot spouting off about "the bible being inaccurate because it says that the earth is only 6,000 years old," you can correct them.

Now I'm going to sound like the shill here, but this is impossible. Radioactive decay occurs at a set rate for each element. This is governed by the "weak" force.

The only way to change the rate of decay is under extremely high gravity, such as what occurs in a black hole.