What makes people who believe in the Chemtrail conspiracy tick. . ?. .

Great photo showing, for anyone with a brain the demarcation of a frontal boundry. To the south the atmospheric conditions are perfect for the formation of persistant contrails, to the north of the boundry the conditions are not. Simple really.

Hey George good thread..You know my thoughts on Chemtrails..They are real..Contrails that persist=Chemtrails..Garry Owen!!..

Hey George, I think you know my opinion. HAhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!

You can tell all that from an Infrared Enhanced Space Photo from NASA from Feb 2004. . . .Hmmmmm you are Good . . . so you had the atmospheric data and soundings for that day . . . ?

Last Edited by George B on 03/09/2012 08:58 PM

Nice to see You Hammer. . . Keep'm flying . . .

You have as much right to your opinion as anyone else. . . I laugh at your antics as well. . . .

Ok Chemtard

Yeah, George it really is just that simple. You do know what a frontal boundry is.....

I can't cite you the definition (I could if I Googled it) but I can assume the probable meaning of the concept. . .

Spending your time to counting Jorgie's posts in a chemtrail thread?

I have been wondering about snakeys sentence, the perfect gun over a blue glass and just realized he is talking about HAARP. Is it a weapon?
Are chemtrails facilitating HAARP to weaponize space? Say it ain't so.

Stumbling thoughts and then I go out to look at the sky and what do I see? My first night chemtrail being laid down. The plane was high enough not to be heard. It is near (lower than) the glowing moon, which made it visible. Ima figure outer, I'll stumble my way to the truth and probably wish I had not typed about it.

Yes, he is a very busy maple tree sap tapper . . .

Those questions are not going to be answered anytime soon if ever I am afraid . . .

Maybe not by me but I will look into it I will.

Best of luck . . . there is a lot of disinformation and misinformation out there . . .

And then there is being completely ignorant too. I choose to have an opinion even if it is wrong, I can change my mind.

Wrong knowing is being sure you are right when you are in fact wrong. It is the kind of ignorance that is really hard to end.

I could back off on the HAARP being a weapon because I don't know. If you throw it out there sometimes you get information. mis or dis or true or not I like to gather the ideas, not that anyone is sharing!

I don't know but for my entertainment I will entertain the probable and improbable and I am open to really fun stupid ideas too.

Good night all, time to get some rest . . . thanks for all your participation . . . it has been very good so far . . .

[link to earthobservatory.nasa.gov]

Arrows and line added by myself . . .

:Frontal Boundry:

Spending your time hanging on my every action that takes less than a minute...

Maybe this:

[link to mnhopkins.blogspot.com]

Or censorship like this.

[link to mnhopkins.blogspot.com]

Do you think there is a difference in how people think . . . don't know if right brain/left brain is a sound theory but it seems to make some sense at a practical level . . . [link to www.web-us.com]

Left Side

RationalResponds to verbal instructions

Problem solves by logically and sequentially looking at the parts of things

Looks at differences

Is planned and structured

Prefers established, certain information

Prefers talking and writing

Prefers multiple choice tests

Controls feelings

Prefers ranked authority structures

Right Side


IntuitiveResponds to demonstrated instructions

Problem solves with hunches, looking for patterns and configurations

Looks at similarities

Is fluid and spontaneous

Prefers elusive, uncertain information

Prefers drawing and manipulating objects

Prefers open ended questions

Free with feelings

Prefers collegial authority structures

Last Edited by George B on 03/10/2012 10:45 AM

Thanks for all your votes . . .




POLL: What makes people who believe in the Chemtrail conspiracy tick. . ?.


2) They have a proper view of reality and understand the truth 24.4% (20)

11) They*have no concept of atmospheric science and contrail formation principles 17.1% (14)


6) They have collected adequate evidence to support their belief 11.0% (9)

12) They understand enough science to make an informed and valued decision on what they believe . . . 9.8% (8)

8) They combine logic with intuition to form the closest match with reality 7.3% (6)

9) They are conspiracy junkies . . . believe almost anything
7.3% (6)

10) They understand deceit and human behavior and some conspiracies are real 7.3% (6)

3) They distrust the government and other authorities 6.1% (5)

5) They are easily mislead by rumor and supposition 6.1% (5)

1) They are primarily intuitive thinkers not concrete thinkers 3.7% (3)

4) They understand history and know similar acts have happened and will happen again 0% (0)

7) They lack critical thinking skills 0% (0)


Blank (View Results)(17)

Non-Blank Votes: 82

ge george i thought you were all done a page ago..

what a surprise your're still shitting.

You underestimate me . . .

From the album: Wall Photos
By Clouds In My Coffee

pic didn't load

so here it is the quote/joke



There are 2 kinds of people

Those that can extrapolate from an idea and.....

I am sick of the intuitive vs academic idea.

One is not better than the other, people are just different.