Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,046 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,071,845
Pageviews Today: 1,492,880Threads Today: 316Posts Today: 8,321
03:17 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress

 
CrazyJarhead
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 10367362
United States
03/11/2012 03:06 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress
Let the president be duly warned.

Rep. Walter B. Jones Jr., R-N.C., has introduced a resolution declaring that should the president use offensive military force without authorization of an act of Congress, “it is the sense of Congress” that such an act would be “an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor.”

Specifically, Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution reserves for Congress alone the power to declare war, a restriction that has been sorely tested in recent years, including Obama’s authorization of military force in Libya.

In an exclusive WND column, former U.S. Rep. Tom Tancredo claims that Jones introduced his House Concurrent Resolution 107 in response to startling recent comments from Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta.

[link to www.wnd.com]
Pearl Harbor was an inside job.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 313311
United States
03/11/2012 03:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress
osuper
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11145700
United States
03/11/2012 03:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress
Nothing will come of this.
Chas

User ID: 1376646
United States
03/11/2012 03:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress
They must be feeling the pressure...
Chas
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1037929
United States
03/11/2012 03:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress
Nothing will come of this.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11145700


clappa

[link to thomas.loc.gov]

Cosponsors (None)

bills get introduced everyday with few ever even making it out of committee.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12320983
United Kingdom
03/11/2012 03:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress
Let the president be duly warned.

Rep. Walter B. Jones Jr., R-N.C., has introduced a resolution declaring that should the president use offensive military force without authorization of an act of Congress, “it is the sense of Congress” that such an act would be “an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor.”

Specifically, Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution reserves for Congress alone the power to declare war, a restriction that has been sorely tested in recent years, including Obama’s authorization of military force in Libya.

In an exclusive WND column, former U.S. Rep. Tom Tancredo claims that Jones introduced his House Concurrent Resolution 107 in response to startling recent comments from Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta.

[link to www.wnd.com]
 Quoting: CrazyJarhead


Wait a Goddamn minute here, CJ!

Barry-Bari Hussein Harrison J Bounel Soetoro X is a Constitutional Lawyer!

So he knows the Constitution better than you, and all members of Congress!

cruise
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11145700
United States
03/11/2012 03:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress
Nothing will come of this.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11145700


clappa

[link to thomas.loc.gov]

Cosponsors (None)

bills get introduced everyday with few ever even making it out of committee.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1037929


Exactly

The only way anything will change is if the whole congress is thrown on the street.
ISLANDIA

User ID: 8828100
United States
03/11/2012 03:13 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress
1. The restriction on our right to protest
2. Allowed a poltical body the president the right to assinate American citizens - abroad maybe on our soil.

I always thought these leftys for for our freeedoms


who can add to this list please do so
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12216650
United States
03/11/2012 03:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress
Let the president be duly warned.

Rep. Walter B. Jones Jr., R-N.C., has introduced a resolution declaring that should the president use offensive military force without authorization of an act of Congress, “it is the sense of Congress” that such an act would be “an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor.”

Specifically, Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution reserves for Congress alone the power to declare war, a restriction that has been sorely tested in recent years, including Obama’s authorization of military force in Libya.

In an exclusive WND column, former U.S. Rep. Tom Tancredo claims that Jones introduced his House Concurrent Resolution 107 in response to startling recent comments from Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta.

[link to www.wnd.com]
 Quoting: CrazyJarhead


so? you really still think it matters who hold the title of Pres?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12058702
United States
03/11/2012 03:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress
the only thing that can stop the antichrist is Christ himself.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 176914
03/11/2012 03:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress
Let the president be duly warned.

Rep. Walter B. Jones Jr., R-N.C., has introduced a resolution declaring that should the president use offensive military force without authorization of an act of Congress, “it is the sense of Congress” that such an act would be “an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor.”

Specifically, Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution reserves for Congress alone the power to declare war, a restriction that has been sorely tested in recent years, including Obama’s authorization of military force in Libya.

In an exclusive WND column, former U.S. Rep. Tom Tancredo claims that Jones introduced his House Concurrent Resolution 107 in response to startling recent comments from Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta.

[link to www.wnd.com]
 Quoting: CrazyJarhead


the bill laso covers obama invading libya

so that has to be implimented and the implmentation of this bill
doesnt require anymore militairy acts
for the libya one is enough
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 10975479
United Kingdom
03/11/2012 03:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress
Dos'nt matter one way or another, he served his purpose.
Northman

User ID: 1138631
United States
03/11/2012 03:20 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress
Congress has proved beyond a doubt that 10% of the population are mentally retarded.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12336754
United States
03/11/2012 03:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress
Only the Senate can impeach, and it will never happen with Reid running the Senate.
Lime Flavoured Redux

User ID: 11836936
United Kingdom
03/11/2012 03:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress
This isn't actually an impeachment bill though is it? From the article it seems like it's a house resolution that doesn't do anything but state an opinion.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12332071
United States
03/11/2012 03:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress
Now watch Walter B. Jones lose his job or resign suddenly. lol!
calin

User ID: 1651600
United States
03/11/2012 03:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress
The Resolution is in the House Judiciary Committee. Thread: Status: Concurrent Resolution H. CON. RES. 107 referred to the Committee on the Judiciary (Obama Impeachment)

This is a political process. Nothing may come of it regarding impeachment processes. it is more like a stand against future actions by the President to seek Congressional approvals.


The committee is a majority of republicans, but has strong Reps like Maxine Waters.

This is for anything going forward... my guess. Nothing in the past. I don't think it is retroactive as it applies to Libya.

It is a response to the Panetta and FBI head's remarks in hearings.

If the Congressional members make themselves "ceremonious only" regarding our military actions, they have done it to themselves by not standing unanimously with the Resolution.
calin

User ID: 1651600
United States
03/11/2012 03:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress
Only the Senate can impeach, and it will never happen with Reid running the Senate.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12336754

If Reid doesn't stand with this Resolution he has shot Congress in the foot. They no longer have any power.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 284061
United States
03/11/2012 03:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress
Finally.

5a
Mt.Mama
User ID: 12182008
United States
03/11/2012 03:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress
How much you wanna bet REP. Jones takes a missin! Yep, don't mess with Obammy!LOL!
Éireann
Eisteacht le gra!

User ID: 12183964
United States
03/11/2012 03:30 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress
Unfortunately, this isn't a bill - it's a resolution which carries no weight :(

There is a thread that is keeping tabs on the progress of the resolution that Calin started a few days ago. The resolution has currently been assigned to the Judiciary Committee for the House... I believe?

Thread: Status: Concurrent Resolution H. CON. RES. 107 referred to the Committee on the Judiciary (Obama Impeachment)
Éireann~

Eisteacht le gra! ~ArunaLuna (Translation from Gaelic: "Listen to Love!")

"And I sincerely believe, with you, that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies; and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale." - Thomas Jefferson, from a Letter to John Taylor written in 1816

"Unfortunately, it is in the nature of man to tinker - even with immutable truth. Thus, we must be ever vigilant... - James Munford

“It is a sad fate for a man to die too well known to everybody else, and still unknown to himself.” - Francis Bacon

"Better the illusions that exalt us than ten thousand truths" - Aleksander Pushkin
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
I do not give negative Karma. I believe that all opinions are worthy of debate and discussion. Free speech is essential to the growth and advancement of each individual and all of Humankind.
Éireann
Eisteacht le gra!

User ID: 12183964
United States
03/11/2012 03:31 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress
How much you wanna bet REP. Jones takes a missin! Yep, don't mess with Obammy!LOL!
 Quoting: Mt.Mama 12182008

No. He's fine.

He voted Yea to having your First Amendment rights squashed.

Thread: List of 388 Who Voted To End Your First Amendment Right To Assemble To Petition The Government
Éireann~

Eisteacht le gra! ~ArunaLuna (Translation from Gaelic: "Listen to Love!")

"And I sincerely believe, with you, that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies; and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale." - Thomas Jefferson, from a Letter to John Taylor written in 1816

"Unfortunately, it is in the nature of man to tinker - even with immutable truth. Thus, we must be ever vigilant... - James Munford

“It is a sad fate for a man to die too well known to everybody else, and still unknown to himself.” - Francis Bacon

"Better the illusions that exalt us than ten thousand truths" - Aleksander Pushkin
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
I do not give negative Karma. I believe that all opinions are worthy of debate and discussion. Free speech is essential to the growth and advancement of each individual and all of Humankind.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1282278
United States
03/11/2012 03:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress
yoda
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12335583
United States
03/11/2012 03:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress
So NOW they care about the constitution.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11525624
United States
03/11/2012 03:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress
If they do remove him, watch Jeb come on the scene out of the blue.
Éireann
Eisteacht le gra!

User ID: 12183964
United States
03/11/2012 03:33 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress
Only the Senate can impeach, and it will never happen with Reid running the Senate.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12336754

If Reid doesn't stand with this Resolution he has shot Congress in the foot. They no longer have any power.
 Quoting: calin

It's a complete mess up there! Not that it hasn't been for a while, but with the glaring treasonous actions taking place the MSM is amazingly quiet as if right on queue.
Éireann~

Eisteacht le gra! ~ArunaLuna (Translation from Gaelic: "Listen to Love!")

"And I sincerely believe, with you, that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies; and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale." - Thomas Jefferson, from a Letter to John Taylor written in 1816

"Unfortunately, it is in the nature of man to tinker - even with immutable truth. Thus, we must be ever vigilant... - James Munford

“It is a sad fate for a man to die too well known to everybody else, and still unknown to himself.” - Francis Bacon

"Better the illusions that exalt us than ten thousand truths" - Aleksander Pushkin
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
I do not give negative Karma. I believe that all opinions are worthy of debate and discussion. Free speech is essential to the growth and advancement of each individual and all of Humankind.
Ron W
User ID: 812854
United States
03/11/2012 03:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress
I agree with Rep. Walter Jones, but every war since WWII has been an unconstitutional and therefore illegal war and he should ahve brought up the same article of impeachment against Bush too.

The more specifically impeachable offense by Obama is another of the same one for which Bush should have been impeached,which is that Obama has continued the policy of refusing to "protect the States against invasion" (Article IV, Section 4) and even went after Arizona's attempts to protect itself, even when parts of its territory is UNDER OCCUPATION. Allowing the invasion of the country is "giving aid and comfort to their (the States') enemies" which is the precise definition of "treason" according to Article III, Section 3; definitely a "high crime".

All of this and more demonstrates clearly that the U.S. government has long since been hi-jacked by a ccriminal oligarchy.
calin

User ID: 1651600
United States
03/11/2012 03:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress
I'd say that it is putting govt officials like Panetta and Obama on warning. If the Senate and House support this Resolution, they can start impeachment proceedings for future actions. IMO
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1565497
United States
03/11/2012 03:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress
This is the ONLY way for the Dems to win the election

With Hillary at the helm!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 2267205
United States
03/11/2012 03:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress
Let the president be duly warned.

Rep. Walter B. Jones Jr., R-N.C., has introduced a resolution declaring that should the president use offensive military force without authorization of an act of Congress, “it is the sense of Congress” that such an act would be “an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor.”

Specifically, Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution reserves for Congress alone the power to declare war, a restriction that has been sorely tested in recent years, including Obama’s authorization of military force in Libya.

In an exclusive WND column, former U.S. Rep. Tom Tancredo claims that Jones introduced his House Concurrent Resolution 107 in response to startling recent comments from Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta.

[link to www.wnd.com]
 Quoting: CrazyJarhead


He's gotten away with not showing proof he is an American citizen, what makes you think he'll follow this law? The powers to be are protecting him and he isn't gonna go anywhere anytime soon.

BTW, he declared Martial Law to congress and so many people don't have a clue. That in itself voids the above said information.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 2267205
United States
03/11/2012 03:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress
The Resolution is in the House Judiciary Committee. Thread: Status: Concurrent Resolution H. CON. RES. 107 referred to the Committee on the Judiciary (Obama Impeachment)

This is a political process. Nothing may come of it regarding impeachment processes. it is more like a stand against future actions by the President to seek Congressional approvals.


The committee is a majority of republicans, but has strong Reps like Maxine Waters.

This is for anything going forward... my guess. Nothing in the past. I don't think it is retroactive as it applies to Libya.

It is a response to the Panetta and FBI head's remarks in hearings.

If the Congressional members make themselves "ceremonious only" regarding our military actions, they have done it to themselves by not standing unanimously with the Resolution.
 Quoting: calin


The President got away with Libya through the UN. The UN doesn't need US permission to invade a country.

News








Proud Member Of The Angry Mob