Yes, I noticed a fair amount of female bashing on the femaleilluminatiforum.

Obviously, if a small number of women in ancient days (and Michael states that it was likely a small minority) betrayed their fellow humans, they had to be psychopaths. We know there are male and female psychopaths; people who will do anything for self interest. That's not really new information. I think the vast majority of humans, men and women, are decent people who try to be good most of the time. So, does it matter that it was a few female psychopaths who sold us out to the invaders? What if it had been males? I can't see how gender matters; it's the sickness, evilness of psychopathy that is the problem.

Where are these women who run the world? According to Michael, the powerful sisterhood members mostly work behind the scenes. Although, he didn't name names in the interview, some likely candidates came up such as QE II and Madonna. I got the impression that, like the male Illuminati, the highest female members are not in the public eye. Michael mentioned that some powerful women we do see, such as in the entertainment industry, are lower members of the sisterhood, not monarch mind-controlled victims.

Michael's DVD and book on the subject would be interesting; the interview left a lot of unanswered questions.