GRAPHIC - Military Dog Attack - BUT DID YOU SEE THE INVISIBLE MAN?? (DE-BUNKED)

FFS

Leaves...

this is the real deal....

FF to 3:28, you can't debunk that shit

run it through three different video programs then tell me it's a invisible man? yes, the technology is here. But not in this video. It's created by the out of focus branches and pixelisation of the poor quality video. It's your brain playing tricks

Hey weirdos...
It's a compression artifact caused by the high detail and rapid movement of leaves.
GET A LIFE

I had to watch it through to see the other trees..

Like I said. Its strange what the mind can make you see.

Leaves. Compression glitches.

Both bullshit.

At exactly 1:01 in the first video I posted, you can see the "invisible man" arrive from the right.

The area in the footage/screen he covers is nowhere near a tree. There are no leaves there before or after he arrrives. Also, you can see the same shimmering effect on the ground from nearly at his feet (out of the picture) to the base of the tree in the background, as well as on the leaves there too.

BEFORE he arrives, you can momentarily see the leaves and they aren't shimmering.

Leaves...pffft...give me something real for debunking it. Its the WHOLE RIGHT HAND SIDE OF THE VIDEO that shimmers when he arrives, not just an isolated branch...

Compression artifact? Fast moving objects (leaves) causing this shimmering effect?


Look seriously, I opened that video expecting to see a dog mauling a man. Who would be thinking of wanting to see an invisible man in that video??

All 3 arguments (leaves, artifact, wanting to see something) are, although not entirely the artifacts, baseless.

In regards to the artifacts, I cant see it anywhere else in the video. Some have said it does happen, but without a time frame, where to look? Honestly I cant see it except for that one time. Also, the overall quality of the video is not that bad. And you said it was "compression artifacts because of fast moving leaves"... Well, the shimmering image is NOT just where the leaves are. See above. Its on the grass and ground also.

If you cant see it thats ok, but to say its any of the 3 things above is just delusional.

Anyway, its not of personal importance to me if you think I'm taking drugs (which I dont) or eating too many frogs legs (possible), you dont have to accept what you're seeing.

Last Edited by Harry82 on 03/19/2012 09:14 AM

I think you should look up MPEG4 or AVC videos, any with action in them and moving parts like sports. Then you will see how h.264 works and how it uses deblocking filters to smooth things out and produce what you are seeing.

Any other arguement you have is baseless and irrational. Look at all the people that are pausing it and filtering it and studying it. You think they are all just being assholes? We are trying to help you and explain the effect on the damn screen.

Grow up and accept criticism. Damn frenchies are so stubborn.. no wonder you're like that in Quebec!

You really are strange.

You think I havent slowed it down myself already? You think I havent watched enough digital video's of all sorts in my lifetime to recognise artifacts when I see them? You dont even know me so please dont insult me.

IF it was some fast moving objects causing the artifacts as you say, then why does it not happen all through the video? There are PLENTY of fast moving images in there. But no. The ONE time it happens, that looks like a man wearing an invisible suit that in fact are currently being developed (ie; i didnt make this shit up) by the military, you say its artifacts and fast moving objects.

Right.

Anyway, I'm done here. It wasnt my intention to convince anyone of anything, BUT, I will argue strongly against anyone that does the same in favour of leaves or artifacts for an explanation.

First i was like "Wow, it's a f*cking Predator!", then i looked closer and *BAM* leaves

What video did you watch? Certainly not the one above your reply.

Its a fucking tree. It comes back into view at 2:20.

Good lord!

yepp leaves "waving" and due to the compression artifacts it looks odd and blurred...

Wow you really don't want to accept reality, do you?

Also, you do not know anything about video compression obviously. I have done video editing for a long time and I can tell you that there IS ARTIFACTING all through the damn video!

Look at the grass. Know why you only see patches of solid green and not blades of grass like in a photograph? Because of the compression artifacts! The video is low quality and probably had a low bitrate. The compression codec tries to cover up the blocky artifacts due to this by blurring the edges/area of the blocks. It literally smoothes out the picture and you see patches like in the video instead of lines of grass.

The whole thing is a mess of bad quality, low bitrate, and heavy deblocking in order to try hide the immense macroblocks. The whole thing is blurred and smoothed to hell.

What is happening with you is, your eyes caught the edge with the leaves and your brain quickly interpreted it and thought "holy shit predator from the movies" and for some reason, you are ignoring reality and not letting that go.

It is the same thing that happens with shadows. You think you see a dark spot that your brain interprets as a person out of the corner of your eye, but when you look and see more detail, you see it is just your jackets hanging on the wall. For some reason however, you refuse to accept this normal human eye trait, which sees movement first, shadows/silhouettes after that, and detail last.

The video has a tree with leaves again at 2:40. You can see that since there is too much movement for the bitrate of the video to accurately display all of the detail, the whole tree gets that predator effect. LOOK AT IT Blurred to hell. It does not "only happen at that one spot". Hell, the words on the screen have bad effects around them the whole time.

I doubt you will try anything that takes effort, but do this: make a video, a slow pan of a tree or something complex and maybe even see-through. Then make a video panning really fast, shake the shit out of the camera. Then compress both videos with high bitrate and low bitrate and play with the Deblocking filter (h264/avc). You will see for your own french eyes the blurring and deblocking effects.

After this explanation, I can only assume you are a troll. Or a moron. One or the other.

^^ I didn't want to 'see the tree' but I couldn't help it.

That does look like a cloaking device to me. From a distance you wouldn't see anything but up close you'd see some disturbance so you could tell something was there I think. Of course, they would be working on making this more seamless, but I hope they don't quite master it because the thought of true invisibility scares me. It just shouldn't be possible.

these "predators" are everywhere this is the reason tptb switched TV from analog to digital so people will say its just interference when you catch them on camera. remember predator in the movie liked to hang out in trees because they can blend in easier

Welcome to GLP...

Its a fucking tree limb, you looking for something in nothing PoS. And you folks wonder why they call GLP folks nuts. Almost every other post has told you it was a tree limb with leaves. Your one of those folks who puts toast on ebay with "faces" arent ya?

yeah, remember predator was at least 7 feet tall. these are giants from the bible they have been here all along using cloaking technology from atlantis

trees, follows the tree line, just the frames per a second of the camera used not keeping up with the movement on it. watched it first time and thought woah wtf, total of 5 times and it was clearly trees. as cool as it would be its not. lets leaf this one now its been debunked.



onto the more serious current comings.

I think here's maybe an example of people from ALL OVER THE WORLD - with different stages of the THIRD EYE..

ITS ALL VIBRATIONZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

I agree ...it is a small tree branch being brushed up against.

After reading this post I actually went back and had a look for the millionth time.

And yep...sure enough... I can now see the tree. Literally had to watch it another 23 times to see it.

And by the way, thankfully some of you on here are able to argue facts without resorting to abuse and racism.

All in all, I'm glad now I can sleep at night.

Thank fuck I "WAS" seeing things!!

glp has got to be home to the dumbest fucking people on the planet.

it was a small shrub/tree

Yes, thank goodness you understand now, many many people were really trying hard to help you.

By the way, if you think a few typed words on a screen are "abuse and racism", perhaps you should stay off the internet, where that kind of thing is the norm. Also, don't go out into the real world. You'll get eaten alive, young one.