Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,970 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,020,403
Pageviews Today: 1,549,262Threads Today: 418Posts Today: 9,068
01:32 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

UNITED NATIONS: "Your health,your property,your food,your kids,your money,your thoughts..BELONGS TO US"

 
IM ZORRO DAMMIT
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 4146342
United States
03/24/2012 07:35 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
UNITED NATIONS: "Your health,your property,your food,your kids,your money,your thoughts..BELONGS TO US"
[link to axisoflogic.com] Global Empire U.N. Policy Paper Outlines 7 Building Blocks for 'Heavy-Handed' World Government ( 0) By Analysis of Global Corporate Empire

Print This

Activist Post Friday, Mar 23, 2012

The fact that the world is being restructured from decentralized diversity to collectivized hierarchy by an authoritarian regime cloaked in green trappings can hardly be disputed.

The final push toward the next and perhaps final phase may be announced this June at the 2012 U.N. Conference on Sustainable Development in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

A ScientificAmerican editorial by Gary Stix highlights a policy article written by several dozen scientists that appeared online March 15 in the journal Science.

The conclusions reached by the scientists, as well as the editorial from a staff member of ScientificAmerican are incrediblyunscientificand fly in thefaceof the many thousands of independent scientists and researchers who have refuted the theory of man-made global warming. Regardless, this small group pushes ahead with their suggestionsthattheonly way to combat such a global catastrophe is of course to solveitthrough global government. And not just any global government, but one that ScientificAmerican suggests should be "heavy-handed (in its) transnational enforcement powers."

The policy paper entitled, "Navigating the Anthropocene: Improving Earth System Governance" is one of the most blatantly authoritarian among the incrementally more open policy papers that we are witnessing, as global governance continues on its runaway path in the name of saving humanity from itself.

Opening with a summary, the conclusions and solutions are clear:

Science assessments indicate that human activities are moving several of Earth's sub-systems outside the range of natural variability typical for the previous 500,000 years (1, 2). Human societies must now change course and steer away from critical tipping points in the Earth system that might lead to rapid and irreversible change(3). Thisrequiresfundamental reorientation and restructuring of national and international institutions toward more effective Earth system governance and planetary stewardship. (Source)

The full text of the article is available for a fee which we paid for access, and we can tell you that it is centered around the "Building Blocks" that form the foundation for the edifice of a one-world government. These building blocks have been repeated throughout globalist literature, so this is nothing necessarily new, but the fact that they fall within the context of at best a hotly disputed assertion that humans are to blamefor catastrophically altering their environment -- namely through climate change -- indicates that their agenda must move forward, factually based or not. (All section titles are paraphrased.)

Consolidating global agencies -- The globalist framework has been established through agencies like the United Nations, World Trade Organization, World Bank, and their countless tentacles, which have formed a web of incrediblycorruptand inefficient bureaucracy that most thinking people would love to see eradicated. However, as opposed to dismantling these agencies as complete failures, there is a proposal to unify them further under the green umbrella. The suggested organization would becalled the UN Sustainable Development Council.

Integrating 'Sustainable Development' to the local level (Agenda 21) --Once such a council is established, it will efficiently and heavy-handedly dictate down the pyramid of global control until it reaches each and every community. This is the stated objectiveof Agenda21 as a way to transform the 21st century by centralizing power and eradicating individual freedom. When this goal is understood, then it becomes quite clear that when we see similar rules put in place for disparate nations in the areas of food, banking, and the eradication of civil liberties, it is part of this coordinated plan toward planetary governance. Local communities become viewedmerely asoutpostsforresistanceand must be made to complywith the dictates of the pyramid's capstone.

Bringing emerging technologies under global control -- Interestingly,geo-engineering is openly mentioned here, despite it being still considered a fringe conspiracy theory under the name of Chemtrails. Nanotechnology, biotechnology, and other scientific endeavors must also be brought under global control by a worldwide council that presumably will lay claim to this intellectual capital and resource generation. There is discussion about a framework of conventions to theoretically ensure that all participants adhere to an agreed-upon basis for research and implementation.

But has this ever really worked before? We have a convention against the use of biological warfare; a convention against the use of most non-lethal weapons, a convention against torture, etc., and yet our world is seeing only a ramping-up these activities. The conventions merely provide a framework for enabling the control and allocation of whatever it is that they are designed to address --rarely are they a method to prevent and deter abuse.

finish it here to be in compliance with glp's 50% copyright posting rule & link to source
[link to axisoflogic.com]
Additional Resources: Earth System Governance Website: [link to www.earthsystemgovernance.org] Under Pressure (conference March 26-29, London) [link to www.planetunderpressure2012.net]
Source: Activist Post

P

Last Edited by Phennommennonn on 03/24/2012 07:07 PM
IM ZORRO DAMMIT (OP)

User ID: 4146342
United States
03/24/2012 07:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UNITED NATIONS: "Your health,your property,your food,your kids,your money,your thoughts..BELONGS TO US"
IM ZORRO DAMMIT (OP)

User ID: 4146342
United States
03/24/2012 07:40 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UNITED NATIONS: "Your health,your property,your food,your kids,your money,your thoughts..BELONGS TO US"




Last Edited by IM ZORRO DAMMIT on 03/24/2012 07:56 AM
IM ZORRO DAMMIT (OP)

User ID: 4146342
United States
03/24/2012 07:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UNITED NATIONS: "Your health,your property,your food,your kids,your money,your thoughts..BELONGS TO US"
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 13118084
United States
03/24/2012 07:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UNITED NATIONS: "Your health,your property,your food,your kids,your money,your thoughts..BELONGS TO US"
Interesting that Mr. Hussein was President of the UN right after he took the Peace Prize in direct violation of the Constitution once again. 0 news coverage.
xxx
User ID: 12782132
Mexico
03/24/2012 07:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UNITED NATIONS: "Your health,your property,your food,your kids,your money,your thoughts..BELONGS TO US"
yes, they are making their move.
they announced this intention with the attack on
the world trade towers and declaration of a long war.
the internet gives rise to the masses, the common man
is waking to sense of self, . .
they must move now or lose chance for ever.
the "fruit of eternal life" is withing their
grasp. they are seizing it for themselves so they
may walk this earth as god/kings, with the rest
of humanity kept as livestock and slaves.
the moment of history is upon us.
a great line in time is being crossed and
never more shall we return to a former moment
of mankind when dreams of freedom, democracy,
equality were held as ideals to be gained
for all people, everywhere, for all time.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 13118379
Australia
03/24/2012 08:22 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UNITED NATIONS: "Your health,your property,your food,your kids,your money,your thoughts..BELONGS TO US"
Cool, do we get to vote? We need to hurry so the new government can save us from the asteroid!
humanitech
User ID: 13077909
United Kingdom
03/24/2012 08:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UNITED NATIONS: "Your health,your property,your food,your kids,your money,your thoughts..BELONGS TO US"
[link to axisoflogic.com]
Global Empire U.N. Policy Paper Outlines 7 Building Blocks for 'Heavy-Handed' World Government ( 0) By Analysis of Global Corporate Empire

Print This

Activist Post Friday, Mar 23, 2012

The fact that the world is being restructured from decentralized diversity to collectivized hierarchy by an authoritarian regime cloaked in green trappings can hardly be disputed.

The final push toward the next and perhaps final phase may be announced this June at the 2012 U.N. Conference on Sustainable Development in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

A ScientificAmerican editorial by Gary Stix highlights a policy article written by several dozen scientists that appeared online March 15 in the journal Science.

The conclusions reached by the scientists, as well as the editorial from a staff member of ScientificAmerican are incrediblyunscientificand fly in thefaceof the many thousands of independent scientists and researchers who have refuted the theory of man-made global warming. Regardless, this small group pushes ahead with their suggestionsthattheonly way to combat such a global catastrophe is of course to solveitthrough global government. And not just any global government, but one that ScientificAmerican suggests should be "heavy-handed (in its) transnational enforcement powers."

The policy paper entitled, "Navigating the Anthropocene: Improving Earth System Governance" is one of the most blatantly authoritarian among the incrementally more open policy papers that we are witnessing, as global governance continues on its runaway path in the name of saving humanity from itself.

Opening with a summary, the conclusions and solutions are clear:

Science assessments indicate that human activities are moving several of Earth's sub-systems outside the range of natural variability typical for the previous 500,000 years (1, 2). Human societies must now change course and steer away from critical tipping points in the Earth system that might lead to rapid and irreversible change(3). Thisrequiresfundamental reorientation and restructuring of national and international institutions toward more effective Earth system governance and planetary stewardship. (Source)

The full text of the article is available for a fee which we paid for access, and we can tell you that it is centered around the "Building Blocks" that form the foundation for the edifice of a one-world government. These building blocks have been repeated throughout globalist literature, so this is nothing necessarily new, but the fact that they fall within the context of at best a hotly disputed assertion that humans are to blamefor catastrophically altering their environment -- namely through climate change -- indicates that their agenda must move forward, factually based or not. (All section titles are paraphrased.)

Consolidating global agencies -- The globalist framework has been established through agencies like the United Nations, World Trade Organization, World Bank, and their countless tentacles, which have formed a web of incrediblycorruptand inefficient bureaucracy that most thinking people would love to see eradicated. However, as opposed to dismantling these agencies as complete failures, there is a proposal to unify them further under the green umbrella. The suggested organization would becalled the UN Sustainable Development Council.

Integrating 'Sustainable Development' to the local level (Agenda 21) --Once such a council is established, it will efficiently and heavy-handedly dictate down the pyramid of global control until it reaches each and every community. This is the stated objectiveof Agenda21 as a way to transform the 21st century by centralizing power and eradicating individual freedom. When this goal is understood, then it becomes quite clear that when we see similar rules put in place for disparate nations in the areas of food, banking, and the eradication of civil liberties, it is part of this coordinated plan toward planetary governance. Local communities become viewedmerely asoutpostsforresistanceand must be made to complywith the dictates of the pyramid's capstone.

Bringing emerging technologies under global control -- Interestingly,geo-engineering is openly mentioned here, despite it being still considered a fringe conspiracy theory under the name of Chemtrails. Nanotechnology, biotechnology, and other scientific endeavors must also be brought under global control by a worldwide council that presumably will lay claim to this intellectual capital and resource generation. There is discussion about a framework of conventions to theoretically ensure that all participants adhere to an agreed-upon basis for research and implementation.

But has this ever really worked before? We have a convention against the use of biological warfare; a convention against the use of most non-lethal weapons, a convention against torture, etc., and yet our world is seeing only a ramping-up these activities. The conventions merely provide a framework for enabling the control and allocation of whatever it is that they are designed to address --rarely are they a method to prevent and deter abuse.

The creation of a global legal and economic framework -- This is one of the most insidious, as it literally encourages local laws and economic policies to be rewritten with the goal of furthering a global matrix of interconnected bureaucracies that all but eradicate the ability of local communities (or countries) to opt-out of this dictatorialmission. The paper uses the word "discrimination" in a most accurate way to promote only green initiatives. There are no specificsgiven, but we only needto look atthe "green" and "alternative" businesses that have been promoted (and invested in) by government to see that most have been an abject failure, leading to the bankruptcy of several in near-record time. It is much too early for the proposal of the largest government the world has ever known to lay claim asbeing experts in resource management and alternative energy. If this is put into effect on a global scale based on the small-scale examples we have seen so far, we will witness the utter implosion of the global economy, and a mass reduction in the standard of living fortheaverage person, aswellasthe inability for entrepreneurs to circumvent such a system if it should fail. (Source)

Consensus-based decision making becomes majority rule -- This is yet another very dangerous concept, as is the antithesis to a functioning republic. The paper highlights the "efficiency in decision-making" that is the hallmark of majority-based rule, versus that of a consensus. And there is a reason for this -- because every individualhasaninnateright to participatein thevery decisions which will most impacttheir life. Thedecision forglobal governance and sweeping policy changesright down to thelocallevelarethelast decisions that should be made hastily. Just one example was the mass agreement to the validity of man-made global warming,which resulted in a carbon credits market, and other transformative policies, only to be swayed the other direction when evidence of a cover-up knownasClimategaterevealed a distorted picture of the true scientificdata, as well as the hidden political and economic agendas. A free society is indeed a transparent one, but that will never flourish under a panel of experts reporting to select councils and governed by regents, because the independent researcher has no place in such a system.

Legitimacy and accountability of stronger intergovernmental institutions -- Here they admit that global governance removes local sovereignty, and try to work their way around the issue by proposing a representative system,no doubtto givetheillusion thatthepeople havea say in what gets decided. "Global governance through UN-type institutions tends to give a larger role to international and domestic bureaucracies, at the cost of national parliamentsand thedirect involvement of citizens."They claim that accountabilityand decision-making will be strengthened "through special rights enshrined in agreements or stronger participation in councils that govern resources and in commissions that hear complaints." They also call for more transparency as an "effective accountability mechanism". Yet, the entire report is based on cherry-picked and unproven science. Finally, this section also discusses accounting for "imbalances in the strength" among different countries, probably to make sure the right countries (the G20) actually have the power, much liketheU.N. SecurityCouncil.

The creation of global financial instruments -- I think we all have learned enough about the inherent toxicity of "financial instruments" such as derivatives and the carbon market scam. The paper alludes to an "emissions market" which will beemployed to ensure that poorer countries receive financial support through a system of "equity and fairness." When hasthis happened even once within any initiative promoted by globalist interests? The World Trade Organization has been an abject failure; the World Health Organization has been a disaster; and the IMF has been perhaps the most blatantly corrupt and predatory of them all. These systems do nothing to empower and support the poor; they are there to create the very terms and compliance that is required to co-opt their resources and productivity and loot sovereign nations. (Source)

To enshrine these building blocks of world governance, it is proposed that there needs to be a "constitutional moment" in the reordering of world politics, similar to what followed WWII. It is disingenuously implied that the international norms set for human rights serve as an example for a similarly standardized approach to counter the destruction of the environment.

It is admitted that the birthplace of Agenda 21, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (1992), will once again seea "test of politcal will"to implement drastic changes. Those changes will continue to radically build upon the reduction in national sovereignty that we have witnessed across the board. They are changes which will no doubt continue to erode individual freedom and contribute to the massive financial hardship we are being subjected to through authoritarian, centralized rule by a fascisticcabalof bankersand politiciansthatcollude to keep humanity from realizing its true potential.

There must be mass outrage to such a degree that even their plan for "majority rule" cannot succeed. A rising tide of protest and civil disobedience can easily smash each one of the building blocks above. TheAchilles Heel of their plan is resistance to any initiativethatwould removethepowerof local communities to support and sustain themselves, and instead force sworn fealty to a group of overlords who admit to their desire to impose a scientific dictatorship to be ruled by councils of experts. It has been these so-called experts, at the behest of governments throughout history, who have led to nothing short of a mass murder machine. We need to keep that in mind as they attempt to guilt trip us into compliancewith their "humanitarian" agenda.

Additional Resources: Earth System Governance Website: [link to www.earthsystemgovernance.org] Under Pressure (conference March 26-29, London) [link to www.planetunderpressure2012.net]

Source: Activist Post

P
 Quoting: IM ZORRO DAMMIT


All man made hierarchies are fake and corrupt..to serve and advantage those who head or maintain them...empires and wars will alway happen because we are dim being who can't see truth from fiction..and prefer the artifice of hierarchal fairytales that justice and equality in the human domain.

Hierarchal thinking has always been THE fundemental flaw in our imbalanced and highly imbalanced and corrupt reality.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 13115257
United Kingdom
03/24/2012 10:10 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UNITED NATIONS: "Your health,your property,your food,your kids,your money,your thoughts..BELONGS TO US"
fuck yeah,

2012 New World Order Doom!

anaanaanaana


suicide

dead3dead3dead3dead3
IM ZORRO DAMMIT (OP)

User ID: 4146342
United States
03/24/2012 10:25 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UNITED NATIONS: "Your health,your property,your food,your kids,your money,your thoughts..BELONGS TO US"
fuck yeah,

2012 New World Order Doom!

anaanaanaana


suicide

dead3dead3dead3dead3
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13115257


No the united nations loves you....remember... its YOUR UNITED NATIONS



YAY

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4705504
United Kingdom
03/24/2012 10:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UNITED NATIONS: "Your health,your property,your food,your kids,your money,your thoughts..BELONGS TO US"
Cool, do we get to vote? ....
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13118379


'don't know that voting is part of the plan though.

Well maybe it is; but you must keep voting until you get the desired outcome, then, having achieved the desired outcome, you don't ever get to vote to change that ever again!

UNDemocracy, maybe where the un in UN comes from?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12533704
United States
03/24/2012 10:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UNITED NATIONS: "Your health,your property,your food,your kids,your money,your thoughts..BELONGS TO US"
I knew it...


"All your Base are belong to us!"

It was prophetic!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1493398
United States
03/24/2012 11:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UNITED NATIONS: "Your health,your property,your food,your kids,your money,your thoughts..BELONGS TO US"
"They" are the 0bama types that reject individual liberty.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1218376
Denmark
03/24/2012 11:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UNITED NATIONS: "Your health,your property,your food,your kids,your money,your thoughts..BELONGS TO US"
So ownership is evil and we should give it up to them, so they can own it!?!?!??!
IM ZORRO DAMMIT (OP)

User ID: 4146342
United States
03/24/2012 11:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UNITED NATIONS: "Your health,your property,your food,your kids,your money,your thoughts..BELONGS TO US"
TruthBWU

User ID: 13126071
United States
03/24/2012 11:33 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UNITED NATIONS: "Your health,your property,your food,your kids,your money,your thoughts..BELONGS TO US"
Why do you think our lying,bi-sexual,Islamic Muslim,Marxist,foreign national, POTUS donated $100 billion (OUR)dollars to this 'scum' organization---He's one of them!
[link to www.aim.org]

And the other Alinsky 'mentor' bitch--Hillary Clinton!

[link to www.discoverthenetworks.org]

Last Edited by TruthBWU on 03/24/2012 11:46 AM
TruthBWU
ClearEyed Thinker
User ID: 1571158
United States
03/24/2012 11:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UNITED NATIONS: "Your health,your property,your food,your kids,your money,your thoughts..BELONGS TO US"
The question should not be whether or not a global system will come into being, because it most assuredly will.

The march of civilization has been increasing interconnectedness between various regions around the Earth. Their eventual unification under a single system of governance was almost inevitable.

The question that we should be asking is what form this system will takes, in what ways will citizens be engaged, and how can it best be used to build a viable, sustainable, productive, and just society in the future.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 13117191
United States
03/24/2012 11:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UNITED NATIONS: "Your health,your property,your food,your kids,your money,your thoughts..BELONGS TO US"
So ownership is evil and we should give it up to them, so they can own it!?!?!??!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1218376


ummm, yes?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 13127593
Brazil
03/24/2012 11:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UNITED NATIONS: "Your health,your property,your food,your kids,your money,your thoughts..BELONGS TO US"
All of your bases are belong to us.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 13117191
United States
03/24/2012 11:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UNITED NATIONS: "Your health,your property,your food,your kids,your money,your thoughts..BELONGS TO US"
The question should not be whether or not a global system will come into being, because it most assuredly will.

The march of civilization has been increasing interconnectedness between various regions around the Earth. Their eventual unification under a single system of governance was almost inevitable.

The question that we should be asking is what form this system will takes, in what ways will citizens be engaged, and how can it best be used to build a viable, sustainable, productive, and just society in the future.
 Quoting: ClearEyed Thinker 1571158


Joe Stalin smiles down upon you, brother.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 6104422
United States
03/24/2012 12:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UNITED NATIONS: "Your health,your property,your food,your kids,your money,your thoughts..BELONGS TO US"
All your Base.....



...Are belong to UN
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 13127040
United States
03/24/2012 12:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UNITED NATIONS: "Your health,your property,your food,your kids,your money,your thoughts..BELONGS TO US"
[link to axisoflogic.com]
Global Empire U.N. Policy Paper Outlines 7 Building Blocks for 'Heavy-Handed' World Government ( 0) By Analysis of Global Corporate Empire

Print This

Activist Post Friday, Mar 23, 2012

The fact that the world is being restructured from decentralized diversity to collectivized hierarchy by an authoritarian regime cloaked in green trappings can hardly be disputed.

The final push toward the next and perhaps final phase may be announced this June at the 2012 U.N. Conference on Sustainable Development in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

A ScientificAmerican editorial by Gary Stix highlights a policy article written by several dozen scientists that appeared online March 15 in the journal Science.

The conclusions reached by the scientists, as well as the editorial from a staff member of ScientificAmerican are incrediblyunscientificand fly in thefaceof the many thousands of independent scientists and researchers who have refuted the theory of man-made global warming. Regardless, this small group pushes ahead with their suggestionsthattheonly way to combat such a global catastrophe is of course to solveitthrough global government. And not just any global government, but one that ScientificAmerican suggests should be "heavy-handed (in its) transnational enforcement powers."

The policy paper entitled, "Navigating the Anthropocene: Improving Earth System Governance" is one of the most blatantly authoritarian among the incrementally more open policy papers that we are witnessing, as global governance continues on its runaway path in the name of saving humanity from itself.

Opening with a summary, the conclusions and solutions are clear:

Science assessments indicate that human activities are moving several of Earth's sub-systems outside the range of natural variability typical for the previous 500,000 years (1, 2). Human societies must now change course and steer away from critical tipping points in the Earth system that might lead to rapid and irreversible change(3). Thisrequiresfundamental reorientation and restructuring of national and international institutions toward more effective Earth system governance and planetary stewardship. (Source)

The full text of the article is available for a fee which we paid for access, and we can tell you that it is centered around the "Building Blocks" that form the foundation for the edifice of a one-world government. These building blocks have been repeated throughout globalist literature, so this is nothing necessarily new, but the fact that they fall within the context of at best a hotly disputed assertion that humans are to blamefor catastrophically altering their environment -- namely through climate change -- indicates that their agenda must move forward, factually based or not. (All section titles are paraphrased.)

Consolidating global agencies -- The globalist framework has been established through agencies like the United Nations, World Trade Organization, World Bank, and their countless tentacles, which have formed a web of incrediblycorruptand inefficient bureaucracy that most thinking people would love to see eradicated. However, as opposed to dismantling these agencies as complete failures, there is a proposal to unify them further under the green umbrella. The suggested organization would becalled the UN Sustainable Development Council.

Integrating 'Sustainable Development' to the local level (Agenda 21) --Once such a council is established, it will efficiently and heavy-handedly dictate down the pyramid of global control until it reaches each and every community. This is the stated objectiveof Agenda21 as a way to transform the 21st century by centralizing power and eradicating individual freedom. When this goal is understood, then it becomes quite clear that when we see similar rules put in place for disparate nations in the areas of food, banking, and the eradication of civil liberties, it is part of this coordinated plan toward planetary governance. Local communities become viewedmerely asoutpostsforresistanceand must be made to complywith the dictates of the pyramid's capstone.

Bringing emerging technologies under global control -- Interestingly,geo-engineering is openly mentioned here, despite it being still considered a fringe conspiracy theory under the name of Chemtrails. Nanotechnology, biotechnology, and other scientific endeavors must also be brought under global control by a worldwide council that presumably will lay claim to this intellectual capital and resource generation. There is discussion about a framework of conventions to theoretically ensure that all participants adhere to an agreed-upon basis for research and implementation.

But has this ever really worked before? We have a convention against the use of biological warfare; a convention against the use of most non-lethal weapons, a convention against torture, etc., and yet our world is seeing only a ramping-up these activities. The conventions merely provide a framework for enabling the control and allocation of whatever it is that they are designed to address --rarely are they a method to prevent and deter abuse.

The creation of a global legal and economic framework -- This is one of the most insidious, as it literally encourages local laws and economic policies to be rewritten with the goal of furthering a global matrix of interconnected bureaucracies that all but eradicate the ability of local communities (or countries) to opt-out of this dictatorialmission. The paper uses the word "discrimination" in a most accurate way to promote only green initiatives. There are no specificsgiven, but we only needto look atthe "green" and "alternative" businesses that have been promoted (and invested in) by government to see that most have been an abject failure, leading to the bankruptcy of several in near-record time. It is much too early for the proposal of the largest government the world has ever known to lay claim asbeing experts in resource management and alternative energy. If this is put into effect on a global scale based on the small-scale examples we have seen so far, we will witness the utter implosion of the global economy, and a mass reduction in the standard of living fortheaverage person, aswellasthe inability for entrepreneurs to circumvent such a system if it should fail. (Source)

Consensus-based decision making becomes majority rule -- This is yet another very dangerous concept, as is the antithesis to a functioning republic. The paper highlights the "efficiency in decision-making" that is the hallmark of majority-based rule, versus that of a consensus. And there is a reason for this -- because every individualhasaninnateright to participatein thevery decisions which will most impacttheir life. Thedecision forglobal governance and sweeping policy changesright down to thelocallevelarethelast decisions that should be made hastily. Just one example was the mass agreement to the validity of man-made global warming,which resulted in a carbon credits market, and other transformative policies, only to be swayed the other direction when evidence of a cover-up knownasClimategaterevealed a distorted picture of the true scientificdata, as well as the hidden political and economic agendas. A free society is indeed a transparent one, but that will never flourish under a panel of experts reporting to select councils and governed by regents, because the independent researcher has no place in such a system.

Legitimacy and accountability of stronger intergovernmental institutions -- Here they admit that global governance removes local sovereignty, and try to work their way around the issue by proposing a representative system,no doubtto givetheillusion thatthepeople havea say in what gets decided. "Global governance through UN-type institutions tends to give a larger role to international and domestic bureaucracies, at the cost of national parliamentsand thedirect involvement of citizens."They claim that accountabilityand decision-making will be strengthened "through special rights enshrined in agreements or stronger participation in councils that govern resources and in commissions that hear complaints." They also call for more transparency as an "effective accountability mechanism". Yet, the entire report is based on cherry-picked and unproven science. Finally, this section also discusses accounting for "imbalances in the strength" among different countries, probably to make sure the right countries (the G20) actually have the power, much liketheU.N. SecurityCouncil.

The creation of global financial instruments -- I think we all have learned enough about the inherent toxicity of "financial instruments" such as derivatives and the carbon market scam. The paper alludes to an "emissions market" which will beemployed to ensure that poorer countries receive financial support through a system of "equity and fairness." When hasthis happened even once within any initiative promoted by globalist interests? The World Trade Organization has been an abject failure; the World Health Organization has been a disaster; and the IMF has been perhaps the most blatantly corrupt and predatory of them all. These systems do nothing to empower and support the poor; they are there to create the very terms and compliance that is required to co-opt their resources and productivity and loot sovereign nations. (Source)

To enshrine these building blocks of world governance, it is proposed that there needs to be a "constitutional moment" in the reordering of world politics, similar to what followed WWII. It is disingenuously implied that the international norms set for human rights serve as an example for a similarly standardized approach to counter the destruction of the environment.

It is admitted that the birthplace of Agenda 21, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (1992), will once again seea "test of politcal will"to implement drastic changes. Those changes will continue to radically build upon the reduction in national sovereignty that we have witnessed across the board. They are changes which will no doubt continue to erode individual freedom and contribute to the massive financial hardship we are being subjected to through authoritarian, centralized rule by a fascisticcabalof bankersand politiciansthatcollude to keep humanity from realizing its true potential.

There must be mass outrage to such a degree that even their plan for "majority rule" cannot succeed. A rising tide of protest and civil disobedience can easily smash each one of the building blocks above. TheAchilles Heel of their plan is resistance to any initiativethatwould removethepowerof local communities to support and sustain themselves, and instead force sworn fealty to a group of overlords who admit to their desire to impose a scientific dictatorship to be ruled by councils of experts. It has been these so-called experts, at the behest of governments throughout history, who have led to nothing short of a mass murder machine. We need to keep that in mind as they attempt to guilt trip us into compliancewith their "humanitarian" agenda.

Additional Resources: Earth System Governance Website: [link to www.earthsystemgovernance.org] Under Pressure (conference March 26-29, London) [link to www.planetunderpressure2012.net]

Source: Activist Post

P
 Quoting: IM ZORRO DAMMIT


The United States Constitution rights include...

full enjoyment of one's property.

How am I going to enjoy my property with all these regulations and AGENDA 21?
ClearEyed Thinker
User ID: 1571158
United States
03/24/2012 12:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UNITED NATIONS: "Your health,your property,your food,your kids,your money,your thoughts..BELONGS TO US"
The question should not be whether or not a global system will come into being, because it most assuredly will.

The march of civilization has been increasing interconnectedness between various regions around the Earth. Their eventual unification under a single system of governance was almost inevitable.

The question that we should be asking is what form this system will takes, in what ways will citizens be engaged, and how can it best be used to build a viable, sustainable, productive, and just society in the future.
 Quoting: ClearEyed Thinker 1571158


Joe Stalin smiles down upon you, brother.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13117191


ugh... that old saw again...

Look, believing that a just global government can be created does not automatically make one a communist.

It simply means that I recognize that continuing to persist with a system of competing nation-states that go to war over resources is wasteful, damaging, and downright cruel.

The path is forward, not backward.
IM ZORRO DAMMIT (OP)

User ID: 4146342
United States
03/24/2012 12:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UNITED NATIONS: "Your health,your property,your food,your kids,your money,your thoughts..BELONGS TO US"

Free Planet
User ID: 12328428
United Kingdom
03/24/2012 12:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UNITED NATIONS: "Your health,your property,your food,your kids,your money,your thoughts..BELONGS TO US"
FREE PLANET -- seriously, get rid of the sick, twisted amoral MONEY GAME and you've cracked all the Earth's problems.

All of them; see it.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1012969
United States
03/24/2012 12:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UNITED NATIONS: "Your health,your property,your food,your kids,your money,your thoughts..BELONGS TO US"
cruise

looks like the pedophiles are still in denial. Yeah, they repeated forget about the AMERICANS.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1012969
United States
03/24/2012 12:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UNITED NATIONS: "Your health,your property,your food,your kids,your money,your thoughts..BELONGS TO US"
FREE PLANET -- seriously, get rid of the sick, twisted amoral MONEY GAME and you've cracked all the Earth's problems.

All of them; see it.
 Quoting: Free Planet 12328428


Makes much more sense to continue on our path allowing the fall of British banksters. Second by second they destroy themselves while we get stronger.
Hagmann

User ID: 1677938
United States
03/24/2012 12:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UNITED NATIONS: "Your health,your property,your food,your kids,your money,your thoughts..BELONGS TO US"
bump
Lester
User ID: 13047957
United States
03/24/2012 12:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UNITED NATIONS: "Your health,your property,your food,your kids,your money,your thoughts..BELONGS TO US"
Fuck all these un-elected, un-authorized, and un-humane globalist motherfuckers.

The retribution coming will make Pol Pot's Year Zero look like a tiddly-wink party...


Scientific American magazine at one time restricted its purview to hard science, but now they're touting social engineering and revisionism as a "science"?


Mel Brooks has this down in Young Frankenstein: "He's a Frankenstein! They're all alike! These scientists say they want to help you, but what they really want is to Rule The World!"

Goddam right! These fucks will climb on our bones to get the world they "envision". Motherfuckers are simply inhuman and sociopathic.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1450706
United States
03/24/2012 01:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UNITED NATIONS: "Your health,your property,your food,your kids,your money,your thoughts..BELONGS TO US"
We follow the USA Constitution not the UN bankster globalist Trash bushfingbushfingbushfing
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 5737296
United States
03/24/2012 01:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UNITED NATIONS: "Your health,your property,your food,your kids,your money,your thoughts..BELONGS TO US"
HAHAHAHAHAH!

Believe what you want ~You can have your land, your chemical manmade food, my house made of Chinese cardboard, they can even have my paper money....


BUT THE UN WILL NEVER HAVE MY SOUL

On the end The MEEK shall inherit the Earth

News