Mag 6.4 HITS JAPAN & 188 LEY LINE on Exact Date Warned! MAJOR or GREAT QUAKE IMMINENT 3/27 3/29 3/31????

cool!!!

interesting! i shall give it a watch!

so I can follow the Master predictor.

Very cool!!! Great job OP!!!!! Adding this to favs :)

thanks guys

but seriously though... we're in a very dangerous period over the next several days. not to be taken lightly.

please be on high alert and if you have friends or fam in a major quake prone area, tell them to be WARY!

What exactly took place on the ocean floor during the deep dive???

Hmm the earthquake in Japan was not MAJOR or GREAT QUAKE.

Seems you are now claiming 6.0 quakes as a hit. yes it was reported as 6.4 on one site but as you know these get adjusted and it is now being reported as 6


Yep go and claim it is MAJOR. We have 1300+ quakes below 7 every year, so hardly MAJOR. And japan has quakes of around 6 hitting them all the time

Nice call!

What's your feeling on the New Madrid fault?

Thanks :-)

On a more serious note, I predict:

+

x x x

=



PROVE ME WRONG!

Why not 3/27 through 3/31? What is so safe about the 28th?

BUMP

and so I can follow this thread =)

he uses plus minus one day so 28 is covered but 29 and 31 are the key dates.

BTW my post above, sorry I misread what you said. you mean major quakes on 29 and 31. :)

My dream said 3/27 through 4/11.

After 4/11 is when the real trouble start.

Though I do admit -- I coudln't see the 'year' in my dream, only the day & month.

Hey, 188 day cycle guy, attend to this:

pi x phi x 360 x 2 = 3660 -- the periodicity of the 'Destroyer' Nibiru.

Next due: 2012

Search threads here at GLP for strong evidence of the periodicity of the Nibiru/Destroyer effects. Last here about 1648 BC -- the time of the Israelite/Hebrew Exodus from Egypt.

Santorini on the island of Thera blew up -- massive huge explosive volcano. And, hey, it is right on your Ley line intersection... imagine that, eh?

you again? LOL

Why do you LIE?

Where exactly did I say this was a MAJOR quake?

NO WHERE did i say that. So stop lying.

But is this quake considered a large quake?

Yes it is

Did I warn about 3/27 being a date for a large quake?

Yes I did.

Are there conflicting reports about this quake AS USUAL?

Yes there are

Is there a valid reason not to trust or only rely on USGS?

Yes there is.

Could I "claim" this quake as a hit?

Sure. however, thats NOT why i've posted this thread IF YOU actually READ what I've said!

And whats wrong with posting a THREAD like about 20 others today about this who agree this is a VERY SIGNIFICANT and unique quake of this magnitude that contrary to your claim, DOESN'T happen all the time as people like you claim...ESPECIALLY in Japan.

When was the last time a quake of this size struck JAPAN?!

But when coupled with all the BIG quakes and MAJOR UPTICK in seismic activity this week since 3/21, or what I've explained about the 188 cycle, everyone with a brain, can see why this quake is and should be a major concern!

Oh, and San Francisco as well as the entire western coastline of North America should be wary right now from Mexico, LA, Oregon, Vancouver to Alaska

just sayin

Last Edited by MatrixLNIN11 on 03/27/2012 12:29 PM

WELL DONE TANDYM!

Lets take a look at the DAY in REVIEW shall we...

THE 8TH LARGEST QUAKE IN RECORDED HISTORY kicks off the day HITTING SUMATRA ON the EXACT 188 CYCLE FLUCTUATION DATE for 4/11/2012

8.9 2012/04/11 08:38:38 2.348 93.073 33.0 OFF THE WEST COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA
[link to earthquake.usgs.gov]

which I also warned about back on 4/6/12 that a MAJOR 8+ MEGA QUAKE that was about to hit connected to EASTER or +/- 1 day from 4/8/12

Thread: 188 DAY PATTERN of MAJOR QUAKES & ILLUMINATI 322 MARCH 22nd Connected to another date with 223? Webbot Warning, Iran War/Nuke Terrorism? (Page 6)

Sure enough, a MASSIVE 8.9 MEGA-QUAKE HITS Sumatra ON 4/11 which is also STILL 4/10 in another part of the world... or iow, ONE DAY OFF from the TIME FRAME I've been explaining and warning about for MONTHS now (which would be 4/9) for a quote: "LIKELY 8+ MAG"

THEN ANOTHER 8.2 2012/04/11 10:43:09 0.773 92.452 16.4 OFF THE WEST COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA

and ANOTHER

[link to earthquake.usgs.gov]

A MAJOR 7 MAG HITS MEXICO

7.0 2012/04/11 22:55:17 18.390 -102.652 65.6 MICHOACAN, MEXICO

And yet Another in OREGON:

A LARGE 5.9/6.0 for OREGON!
[link to earthquake.usgs.gov]

5.9 2012/04/11 22:41:47 43.593 -127.557 10.2 OFF THE COAST OF OREGON

anyone seeing A PATTERN HERE! ;))

now lets look at something even more interesting if not TRULY AMAZING that MOST probably don't see yet which was about the 188 day cycles FLUCTUATION

For MONTHS I've been explaining and warning about the 188 day patterns FLUCTUATION in approximate increments of 4TH's based on the HELIX CODE of LIFE or the number 8.

Since this latest 188 day Cycle began on 3/21 which is actually considered 3/22 in LEAP YEARS, I've repeatedly warned not to assume the Quake in OAXACA Mexico was the only major quake that could occur during the Cycle!!

In fact since it was downgraded to a 7.4 and there have been questions about its timing let alone that it might have been man-made, I cautioned it may not have been the BIG ONE normally associated with the pattern, and that the FLUCTUATION ie 8, 11 and 15 days ETC, needs to be considered until the 188 DAYS CYCLE WINDOW CONCLUDED which is technically around the 23rd day.

And today it appears what I've been concerned about was DEAD ON CORRECT!

THE PATTERN AND CYCLE WASN'T OVER

Whats the dates that appeared for this 8.9, 8.2 mega quake and the 7,0 and 6.0???

4/10 & 4/11

COUNT approx 19 days from 3/22! (keeping in mind the APPROX FOURTHS INCREMENTS: 4, 8, 11, 15, 19, 23) actually comes to 18.4

ITS APRIL 10/11TH!! OR.....

THE 19TH DAY OF THE 188 CYCLES FLUCTUATION!

anyone want to guess WHERE ALL THESE QUAKES hit AGAIN???

SUMATRA
MEXICO
OREGON

or in other words...

ALL ON THE MAIN LEY LINES OF 188!!



coincidence??

Can you please explain the fluctuation of the 188 day "Theroy"

Like, How many days do we add to 188 days for it still to be valid, and when we find a quake that "Fits" do you start the 188 day count down from there or from the last 188 day.

I simpliy dont understand how 188 days can be greater than 188 days?

First, you need to understand that the cycle only happens twice a year... thats VERY IMPORTANT.

second, humans do not possess the technology to understand the true dynamics involved in celestial mechanics which are connected or apart of the PROCESS encoded into the cycle and ley lines.

third, if mega quakes 8+ only happen one or two times a year, and a pattern appeared over a long period of time in which these types of quakes kept occurring within a specific parameter or WINDOW OVER AND OVER in say a LARGE 50 year cross-section or "control group", then that suggests a PATTERN and causation relationship. The time period is important since only taking a small period of time, wouldn't allow any true "pattern" to be SEEN/FOUND. The more TIME to track or triangulate/test a hypothesis, the better and would yield far more accurate results.


and fourth... below was my response to someone who had the same question as you.... its VERY long, and looks like its more complex than it should be, but JUST READ IT and I think it will HELP give you more insight into something that I know most are having a hard time understanding and accepting.
===========================================

Re: Question about your God Matrix Video

First of all...
With respect to your primary question regarding the fluctuation,
let me first answer by explaining it this way....

and the first question to ask, is will there be a great quake that occurs on the fluctuation dates i've explained??

based on my research, the evidence and data, I strongly believe there COULD BE.

is it possible there won't be??

YES

and I'd say if no unusually MAJOR quakes above 7 mag but most likely over 8 occurs within approx the next 15 days, then to me, the mexico quake and other 2 quakes was probably the ones that should and could ONLY be connected.

if there aren't any OTHER major quakes on the fluctuation dates of the 188 cycle theory, does that invalidate it?

NO WAY... because the 3 major quakes on 3/20 & 3/21 as i said, have already validated the pattern.

The only reason why I believe we need to be cautious and consider that there could be another quake connected to this pattern, is because although MAJOR, the quake in mexico wasn't NECESSARILY or TECHNICALLY a GREAT QUAKE (if we accept USGS' decision to knock it down to a 7.4) and MOST of the dates in the current patterns "CYCLE", have been MEGA QUAKES not to mention during my research, I've found that there APPEARS to be a consistent PATTERN within the 188 day cycle as far back as 200 years in which GREAT QUAKES or unusually LARGE QUAKES around minimum 6.7 magnitude and USUALLY OVER 7 MAG in 80 almost 90% of the cases, occur within 4, 8, 11, 15 and up to 23 days from the 188 day pattern.

And the reason why I believe this fluctuation can also be valid, has mainly to do with the fact this pattern ONLY happens TWICE A YEAR... and thats the KEY to understanding the significance and WHY a 4, 8, 11, and 15 to 19 day window (rarely 23 days), should be a valid and allowable window DURING THESE 188 DAY CYCLE dates ONLY IMO. After this FLUX WINDOW, anything beyond that is unreasonable and definitely manipulating it or falsifying it.

I've tried to keep the window as tight as possible which is why i've said 4, 8, 11, and 15 days up to 19. As to being up to 23 days (which I agree couldn't be used except maybe in certain cases), there could be cases that have to be considered if the months and years have lower seismic data stats and during the 188 day pattern, the only MAJOR 7, 8 or 9 mag in MONTHS, happen to appear and BE THE ONLY MAJOR UNIQUE QUAKE within 23 days of the cycle and pattern because when looked at the CONTEXT of that year or months quake stats which show little or no major quakes at all, one can then understand or SEE how its connected. Of course by itself with out any context, if evidence were regularly based on 23 days, I would agree that shows gross manipulation and cherry-picking.

Or in other words, if the pattern only happens 2 times a year, and we know that unique MAJOR QUAKES or those that are unusually powerful DON'T HAPPEN EVERYDAY or even more than 2 times a month, and great quakes 8+ ONLY HAPPEN a few times a year if that, AND MEGA QUAKES 8.9+ to 9 mags like Japan ARE VERY RARE and sometimes don't happen every year, then the ODDS that such MAJOR quakes occurring or correlating within 15 days of the 188 day pattern which only happens twice a year, has to be factored in and considered.

Now I'm full aware most skeptics claim that such a large variation and quake window, especially past 11 days is too big of a window to claim there's any correlation due to the QUAKE STATISTICS and data that large and major quakes happen regularly... While I do agree and am aware of these STATS... that was something important I knew I had to take into consideration during my research to make sure I wasn't FITTING certain quakes into the pattern and leaving data out that didn't validate the theory (null hypothesis)... which is why i believe this theory has merit and the evidence will ultimately validate it and show this pattern/cycle cannot be coincidence or random and cherry picking because I believe I have enough data and evidence to support not only the 188 day pattern theory, but also my discovery about the ley lines.

Lastly, you ask how I arrive at the 8 and 11 numbers for the variance. Well first, the algorithm (for lack of a better term) seems to increase by approx 4's with a slight variance of .5 or 1/2 a day for some reason which i'll try to explain more.

So the theory on this would be 4.4, 8.4, 11.4, 15.4, & 19.4 days etc but I've just rounded them off to make it more simple to understand. However for all intents and purposes, if the type of quakes in question i've explained above, happen to occur 3 days, 7 days, 10 days or say 14 or 16 days, then the .5 or 1 day off the main fluctuation days above, would to me be irrelevant.

How did I arrive at 8 and 11 etc....

Well, the answer also needs to be more explained with more context, since there are several aspects to consider in order to fully understand it.

I could just end by giving you the SHORT answer and say its JUST A THEORY and simply refer to all I've explained above as evidence for it which to me actually still is logical and reasonable in respect to the STATS of Great Quakes occurring 15 days near a cycle that only happens 2 times a year goes way beyond mere coincidence.

The long answer though, if you want me to elaborate on the many anomalies and specific data which I've used to arrive at the 4 day increments, I'll have to explain some past history about this pattern and the progression of the data that evolved in which the 8 and 11 etc came out of.

If you still want me to continue trying to answer this part of your question, then as i said, you need to familiarize yourself with some of the history.

While I don't agree with many of the ideas and some data of TERRAL (one of the original discoverers and researchers of the cycle) and some of his conclusions have turned out to be wrong (and I was among one of those who warned him that he would be wrong), there is alot of his research that is important or useful and has been correct that should be analyzed and considered by anyone with a serious interest in fully understanding the 188 cycle in totality and context. With that said, I recommend this link to start if you haven't seen it, which gives a very good basic synopsis, insight and background essential for any investigation or serious analysis..

[link to terral03.com]

I know my reply here has been long, so if you'd like some links, let me know.

So let me conclude for now, by giving you what I think is the second short answer to your question and more closely answers it

-------------------
"The next event following the March 22, 2012 nearside alignment will take place in September 26, 2012 on the same day last year that Elenin had a 0.0 declination on the celestial plane with our planet. Looking at the diagram we notice that December 18, 2011 is three days before the winter solstice with our primary 2012 event taking place on the day after the spring equinox. These events and key points in the timeline just happen to straddle the solstice and equinox dates that divide Earth orbit into four equal parts that move around to the left by about 5.75 days for every 188 days, or about 11.5 days each year. Keep your eyes focused on March 22, 2012 for these events that our research has recognized in a pattern allowing us to create predictive models with some degree of accuracy."
================================


So with that said...

I leave you with a final thought that tomorrow is the last day of the fluctuation even though I feel it may have been fulfilled with the 19 days from 3/22.

In either case its 4/12 now and about to hit 4/13 in another part of the world, so the final day of the flux is technically in effect with the 13th being the
hub date.

will any major quakes hit? we shall see. but whatever does or doesn't, is irrelevant to proving or disproving the cycle and has no bearing on the validity of it since 3/21 and 4/11 more than satisfy what was EXPECTED!

Last Edited by MatrixLNIN11 on 04/12/2012 04:59 AM

INTERESTING M8

hmmm

Thread: The 212 NIN3 11 SYZYGY SUPER QUAKE, TSUNAMI WARNING MEGA-THREAD (Page 18)
Wow!

I don't think anyone noticed TANDYM NAILED a pretty close warning about 4/11/12 back on 3/27 in one of my past threads... I wonder if even he remembers himself! LOL

So I think TANDYM deserves a little SPOTLIGHT attention today for this prediction...

anyone else want to help push this around glp and bump it from here?

===============================================
Thread: Mag 6.4 HITS JAPAN & 188 LEY LINE on Exact Date Warned! MAJOR or GREAT QUAKE IMMINENT 3/27 3/29 3/31????


My dream said 3/27 through 4/11.

After 4/11 is when the real trouble start.

Though I do admit -- I coudln't see the 'year' in my dream, only the day & month.

interesting

Damn this 188 day shit is gay .. and wastes valuable GLP space and time.

207 is the new 188

NO, trolls like you do, who make claims about how somethings Bullshit, but NEVER present any evidence or argument to support it.

clearly you have nothing of SUBSTANCE to offer. So please stop trolling and spamming this thread pretending to be intelligent because you might look like an idiot.

oooooooooops

too late

Very dangerous seismic period over the next 48 hours

1 of the main concerns around the LEY LINES running up along the Western Coastal Region of North America

CHILE to SACRAMENTO LINE which extends up thru OREGON/SEATTLE area, Vancouver & Alaska

San Francisco
Los Angeles Area

7+ mag to 8+

----------------------------------------------------
2nd Ley Line concern ... the Japan to DC Line

Japan, Tokyo
New Zealand & Fiji
Spain & Italy
Iran & Turkey

Last Edited by MatrixLNIN11 on 04/12/2012 12:50 AM