Breaking News – Judge Dismisses Conspiracy Case Against Hutaree Militia | |
Andrew Jackson User ID: 13091835 United States 03/30/2012 01:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Regulating the Militia is neither a State or Federal function. In its original context "Regulated" simply means Trained and Disciplined. Training, Organizing & Arming has always been a "We the People" responsibility. This is not to say the State can't provide Arms or Money for the Militia if it is called into Actual Service but the proper role of State Government is too Call the Militia into Actual Service. It doesn't actually regulate its existence. I think we both agree on the above. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1061562 The Dick Act is not unconstitutional in that it did not do away with the citizen Militia or its original intent. We're still here, nothing has changed for the average citizen. By creating the National Guard, the States and Federal Government have simply created another arm of the US Military that is under State & Federal Control. In doing so, if it had gotten rid of the citizen Militia or disarmed its members, than it would be unconstitutional. But it hasn't. This is why a person can't be jailed for belonging to a Militia and why Anti-Militia laws are meaningless. So, in effect, if a person says they belong to a Hunting Club instead of a Militia, they have no more or less Constitutional protections than if they admitted to belonging to a Militia. Otherwise, there would be thousands of arrests every year. But their aren't. That all just goes agents what was actually done from the Years 178x's-1865. The States Regulated, armed, and supported the Militia. Tho there was no law requiring that they Arm them, many of the Kentucky Militia that marched to New Orleans with General Jackson had no Rifle, most of them had no shoes. A State is free to Pay, Arm, Equip, or any other means do whatever it likes with the Militia. An unregulated, untrained group of Anti-Government can Not be a Militia under the Constitution. The only Constitutional Militia is called to Arms by the States. Otherwise they are not "Well Regulated". “Wash yourselves, make yourselves clean; Remove the evil of your deeds from My sight. Cease to do evil, Learn to do good;Seek justice, Reprove the ruthless,Defend the orphan,Plead for the widow. Your Governance is puppet whore of the Banks, it is not a real boy. Stop pretending it can move on it's own. |
DILKe User ID: 2053427 United States 03/30/2012 01:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Marxism is the true enemy of our civilization. What is Cultural Marxism: [link to www.bitchute.com (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 4596203 United States 03/30/2012 02:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5040935 United States 03/30/2012 02:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Amen Quoting: DooM<>MooD 2968981 "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Well, that's the problem, this Militia was not well regulated. Note the the Word State is Capitalized, meaning each of the many States are a sovereign power, enrolled in a Union of Laws know as United States. Each State is supposed to maintain " A well Regulated Militia" to ensure "The Security of a Free State". All should know the State "National Guard" is supposed to be the State Militia, they were Nationalized under LBJ. While the Constitution gives provisions for the Militia to be called under Federal Power, to put down Rebellions, Intersections, and Invasions. No such previsions exists to Nationalize the Militia in times of Peace. Furthermore, no provision exists for a "Standing Federal Army" for a period of longer than two years. No prevision exists for an "Air Force". No prevision exists for a "Marine Corps ". No Prevision exists for a "Coast Guard" "The Department of Fatherland/Homeland Security" is a direct violation of the first stanza of 2ND Amendment. A Well Regulated State Militia made up of Citizens of that State is necessary for defending the Security of that State, not Federalist Lincolnite Nazi Pigs( DHS ). The Army, sense we are not in a declared War, should be disbanded, they are a threat to Liberty. All Bases should be returned to State Militia control, the command returned to the State Governor to appoint an Adjutant General of the State Militia( Colonel Andrew Jackson of the Tennessee State Militia, an elected Office ). The Coast Guard, Air Force, and Marine Corps should be put back under the command of the Navy. The DHS should be disbanded, and it's officers, and all those who Voted for it, should be charged with High Treason, and Publicly Summarily Executed for Conspiracy to overthrow the Peoples Government, in direct violation of the letter of the Law. Also, the Federal Government has no Authority to "Regulate Arms". All federal laws regarding Arms of any type are Void, from the two that hang off our bodies, or any Armament from a Sling Shot to a Nuclear weapon can only be regulated by the State "Well Regulated Militia". Article 1, section 8 also gives the national Congress power to "provide for the common defense". The power to raise a national army, and especially a standing one, was controversial at the constitutional conventions but it was eventually included. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1061562 United States 03/30/2012 02:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Regulating the Militia is neither a State or Federal function. In its original context "Regulated" simply means Trained and Disciplined. Training, Organizing & Arming has always been a "We the People" responsibility. This is not to say the State can't provide Arms or Money for the Militia if it is called into Actual Service but the proper role of State Government is too Call the Militia into Actual Service. It doesn't actually regulate its existence. I think we both agree on the above. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1061562 The Dick Act is not unconstitutional in that it did not do away with the citizen Militia or its original intent. We're still here, nothing has changed for the average citizen. By creating the National Guard, the States and Federal Government have simply created another arm of the US Military that is under State & Federal Control. In doing so, if it had gotten rid of the citizen Militia or disarmed its members, than it would be unconstitutional. But it hasn't. This is why a person can't be jailed for belonging to a Militia and why Anti-Militia laws are meaningless. So, in effect, if a person says they belong to a Hunting Club instead of a Militia, they have no more or less Constitutional protections than if they admitted to belonging to a Militia. Otherwise, there would be thousands of arrests every year. But their aren't. That all just goes agents what was actually done from the Years 178x's-1865. The States Regulated, armed, and supported the Militia. Tho there was no law requiring that they Arm them, many of the Kentucky Militia that marched to New Orleans with General Jackson had no Rifle, most of them had no shoes. A State is free to Pay, Arm, Equip, or any other means do whatever it likes with the Militia. An unregulated, untrained group of Anti-Government can Not be a Militia under the Constitution. The only Constitutional Militia is called to Arms by the States. Otherwise they are not "Well Regulated". The Militia Act of 1792 created a set of Standards for organizing up to a division level but at the same time emphasized the need for the individual citizen to maintain their own arms and equipment to support that weapon. It also left training standards up to individual Militias. So, on one hand the Act may have provided for and created a frame work for Militia Structure, but it left all training and implementation of standards up to the Militias themselves. This is why some Militias of old had a higher state of readiness while others were as poor as the men who served. So, if they didn't have shoes or Arms, that was their problem. They were still required to serve. Because of they inability of Government to maintain a set of strict standards and combat readiness, the Dick Act was passed which created the National Guard. The National Guard of course being directly under the thumb of Federal and State Control and Direction. Hope this helps to clear up the issue. As far as Anti-Government extremist being a Constitutional Militia, please remember that all of us are considered members of the unorganized militia by default. Its not something that's granted or taken away. Its just our Natural Right as Citizens of the United States. |
Éireann User ID: 10882650 United States 03/30/2012 03:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yay!! The People finally win one!! Eireann~ I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me. - Galatians 2:20 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5769488 United States 03/30/2012 04:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 13524127 United States 03/30/2012 06:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 14103438 United States 05/01/2012 02:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 877618 United States 05/01/2012 02:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |