Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,189 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,005,218
Pageviews Today: 1,300,585Threads Today: 235Posts Today: 4,308
09:40 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

SHADOW ARMY : Israel & USA secret sevice intelligence agency Behind "Radical terrorist organization worldwide "

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 853993
United States
03/28/2012 01:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
SHADOW ARMY : Israel & USA secret sevice intelligence agency Behind "Radical terrorist organization worldwide "
WEDNESDAY, MAR 28, 2012 5:31 AM PDT
Guest Op-Ed: MEK and its material supporters in Washington
Why are so many prominent Washington officials supporting a designated Terrorist group?
BY GLENN GREENWALD

AP/Wikipedia
Rudy Giuliani and Maryam Rajavi
Jeremiah Goulka worked as a lawyer in the Bush Justice Department, and then went to work as an analyst with the RAND Corporation, where he was sent to Iraq to analyze, among other things, the Iranian dissident group Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK), publishing an oft-cited study on the group. MEK has been in the news of late because a high-powered bipartisan cast of former Washington officials have established close ties with the group and have been vocally advocating on its behalf, often in exchange for large payments, despite MEK’s having been formally designated by the U.S. Government as a Terrorist organization. That close association on the part of numerous Washington officials with a Terrorist organization has led to a formal federal investigation of those officials. Goulka has written and supplied to me two superb Op-Eds on the MEK controversy — one about the group itself and the other explaining why so many prominent Washington officials are openly providing material support to this designated Terror group — and I’m publishing the two Op-Eds below with his consent (as you read them, remember that paid MEK shill Howard Dean actually called on its leader to be recognized as President of Iran while paid MEK shill Rudy Giuliani has continuously hailed the group’s benevolence).

Before posting those Op-Eds, I want to note one update on this matter: supporters of MEK have filed a lawsuit asking a federal court to force the State Department to decide within 30 days whether to remove MEK from the list of designated Terrorist organizations (State Department officials have previously indicated they are considering doing so). In response, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has told the court that (1) it has no role to play in directing the timing of this decision (“Any interference by a court with the Secretary’s ability to carry out these absolutely critical duties would set a seriously troubling precedent”); and (2) the U.S. Government is currently attempting to force MEK to move from its current base in Camp Ashraf to another location in Iraq (something MEK does not want to do), and whether MEK cooperates with the U.S. Government’s directives will play a large role in determining whether the group is removed from the Terrorist list.

With regard to that second argument: in determining whether MEK belongs on the Terrorist list, what conceivable difference should it make whether MEK is cooperative in moving from Camp Ashraf as the U.S. Government wants? What does their cooperation or lack thereof have to do with whether they are a Terrorist organization? The answer, of course, is that the U.S. list of Terrorist organizations (like its list of state sponsors of Terrorism) has little or nothing to do with who are and are not actually Terrorists; it is, instead, simply an instrument used to reward those who comply with U.S. dictates (you’re no longer a Terrorist) and to punish those who refuse (you are hereby deemed Terrorists). The scholarship of Remi Brulin documents how Terrorism, from its prominent introduction into world affairs, has been manipulated that way. Andrew Exum of the Center for a New American Security yesterday objected to my argument that the field of “Terrorism expertise” is basically fraudulent because the concept of “Terrorism” itself is largely propagandistic and ideological, rather than being some meaningful term with a fixed, coherent definition. His commenters have very effectively addressed his claims, but this game-playing with MEK is yet another example underscoring what I mean.

__________________________________
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 849464
United States
03/28/2012 04:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SHADOW ARMY : Israel & USA secret sevice intelligence agency Behind "Radical terrorist organization worldwide "
WEDNESDAY, MAR 28, 2012 5:31 AM PDT
Guest Op-Ed: MEK and its material supporters in Washington
Why are so many prominent Washington officials supporting a designated Terrorist group?
BY GLENN GREENWALD

AP/Wikipedia
Rudy Giuliani and Maryam Rajavi
Jeremiah Goulka worked as a lawyer in the Bush Justice Department, and then went to work as an analyst with the RAND Corporation, where he was sent to Iraq to analyze, among other things, the Iranian dissident group Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK), publishing an oft-cited study on the group. MEK has been in the news of late because a high-powered bipartisan cast of former Washington officials have established close ties with the group and have been vocally advocating on its behalf, often in exchange for large payments, despite MEK’s having been formally designated by the U.S. Government as a Terrorist organization. That close association on the part of numerous Washington officials with a Terrorist organization has led to a formal federal investigation of those officials. Goulka has written and supplied to me two superb Op-Eds on the MEK controversy — one about the group itself and the other explaining why so many prominent Washington officials are openly providing material support to this designated Terror group — and I’m publishing the two Op-Eds below with his consent (as you read them, remember that paid MEK shill Howard Dean actually called on its leader to be recognized as President of Iran while paid MEK shill Rudy Giuliani has continuously hailed the group’s benevolence).

Before posting those Op-Eds, I want to note one update on this matter: supporters of MEK have filed a lawsuit asking a federal court to force the State Department to decide within 30 days whether to remove MEK from the list of designated Terrorist organizations (State Department officials have previously indicated they are considering doing so). In response, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has told the court that (1) it has no role to play in directing the timing of this decision (“Any interference by a court with the Secretary’s ability to carry out these absolutely critical duties would set a seriously troubling precedent”); and (2) the U.S. Government is currently attempting to force MEK to move from its current base in Camp Ashraf to another location in Iraq (something MEK does not want to do), and whether MEK cooperates with the U.S. Government’s directives will play a large role in determining whether the group is removed from the Terrorist list.

With regard to that second argument: in determining whether MEK belongs on the Terrorist list, what conceivable difference should it make whether MEK is cooperative in moving from Camp Ashraf as the U.S. Government wants? What does their cooperation or lack thereof have to do with whether they are a Terrorist organization? The answer, of course, is that the U.S. list of Terrorist organizations (like its list of state sponsors of Terrorism) has little or nothing to do with who are and are not actually Terrorists; it is, instead, simply an instrument used to reward those who comply with U.S. dictates (you’re no longer a Terrorist) and to punish those who refuse (you are hereby deemed Terrorists). The scholarship of Remi Brulin documents how Terrorism, from its prominent introduction into world affairs, has been manipulated that way. Andrew Exum of the Center for a New American Security yesterday objected to my argument that the field of “Terrorism expertise” is basically fraudulent because the concept of “Terrorism” itself is largely propagandistic and ideological, rather than being some meaningful term with a fixed, coherent definition. His commenters have very effectively addressed his claims, but this game-playing with MEK is yet another example underscoring what I mean.

__________________________________
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 853993
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 13271228
Egypt
03/28/2012 04:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SHADOW ARMY : Israel & USA secret sevice intelligence agency Behind "Radical terrorist organization worldwide "
bump

MEK/MKO was moved to Camp Liberty from Camp Ashraf in the meantime.
Jundullah, Qaeda, whatever you want to use are all operated by intelligence agents, they take orders and payments from them. If just more people would realize that...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 849464
United States
03/28/2012 04:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SHADOW ARMY : Israel & USA secret sevice intelligence agency Behind "Radical terrorist organization worldwide "
bump

MEK/MKO was moved to Camp Liberty from Camp Ashraf in the meantime.
Jundullah, Qaeda, whatever you want to use are all operated by intelligence agents, they take orders and payments from them. If just more people would realize that...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13271228


Yep lots of false flag
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12327867
Canada
03/28/2012 04:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SHADOW ARMY : Israel & USA secret sevice intelligence agency Behind "Radical terrorist organization worldwide "
I knew this since the beginning and if you are an American don't you find that strange that after 9-11 not even one bad terrorist have put fire to a single garbage can?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 13271228
Egypt
03/28/2012 07:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SHADOW ARMY : Israel & USA secret sevice intelligence agency Behind "Radical terrorist organization worldwide "
I knew this since the beginning and if you are an American don't you find that strange that after 9-11 not even one bad terrorist have put fire to a single garbage can?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12327867


bump

News








We're dropping truth bombs like it's the end of days!