Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,159 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 2,337,267
Pageviews Today: 3,126,013Threads Today: 592Posts Today: 12,624
09:55 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

BREAKING- The Planet X COVER-UP

 
Halcyon Dayz, FCD
Contrarian's Contrarian

User ID: 11757475
Netherlands
04/23/2012 04:42 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING- The Planet X COVER-UP
Yes I have just had a neg karma and been called a nasty troll
 Quoting: Tauranga

Welcome to the club.

Thruthseeking is not a popularity contest.
book
Hatred is a cancer upon the world.
It rots the mind and blackens the heart.


Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans.
DUCM900

User ID: 14799142
Italy
04/23/2012 04:42 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING- The Planet X COVER-UP
shill
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 1332648
United States
04/23/2012 06:49 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING- The Planet X COVER-UP
I don't see an answer to my question there.

Repeat: What happened when you imaged the sun with your telescope and camera?
 Quoting: Menow 14777574


I think the answer is obvious - he didn't find anything. That's why he discourages others to use telescopes. It's best to have poor quality and highly questionable photos of lens flares and other imaging artifacts than to have clear images of nothing.

Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 04/23/2012 07:06 AM
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1455469
United States
04/23/2012 07:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING- The Planet X COVER-UP
Bump
Hydra

User ID: 4720248
Germany
04/23/2012 09:20 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING- The Planet X COVER-UP
Apparently the "Führer" of ZataTrolls and Poleshit sends his Volkssturm ( [link to en.wikipedia.org] ) into the Battle of Planet X.




Yes I have just had a neg karma and been called a nasty troll
 Quoting: Tauranga


Welcome to the club.

Thruthseeking is not a popularity contest.
book
 Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD


Tauranga-truth?

lolsign
If the Moon is off, if Earth wobbles or if there is a pole shift
how can things like this, predicted decades ago, happen?

aseindia
Annular Solar Eclipse - January 15, 2010 - Rameshwaram, India
Menow
User ID: 739667
United States
04/23/2012 11:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING- The Planet X COVER-UP
...


I don't believe you did- I watched for a specific answer to that question. I think you just went on about why cheap cameras were better. Refresh my memory, please. What happened when you imaged the sun with your telescope and camera?
 Quoting: Menow 14777574


I no longer believe in using a telescope with very heavy Solar filtering. Much better to use a camera that has a very small aperture, with a lighter filter. This is why you will not see a video of Planet X using a useless amateur scope, and why "Amateur astronomers" are not trying to find it.
 Quoting: Volar 14736585


I don't see an answer to my question there.

Repeat: What happened when you imaged the sun with your telescope and camera?
 Quoting: Menow 14777574


It is not my fault you cannot see it. Have you tried getting a pair of reading glasses? I hear they work really well with people who have impaired vision.
 Quoting: Volar 14736585


Why are you dodging the question?

Repeat: What happened when you imaged the sun with your telescope and camera?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14894027
United States
04/23/2012 12:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING- The Planet X COVER-UP
These videos prove the charged tail of Planet X is affecting Earth by the author predicting EXACTLY when charged particles would hit Earth (cause magnetosphere pressure, auroras, geomagnetic storm) BEFORE any "solar eruption" and BEFORE any forecast from NOAA/NASA twice in a row!
Can't BLAME the SUN when the author predicts when Earth would get hit before any solar activity.. that's because Planet X is sending influx of particles at Earth.

Solar Flare DISINFO EXPOSED! Planet X blasting Earth with charged particles.. Documented PROOF!


NICT Space Weather Simulation DOWN.. EXPOSED! SUN Disinfo lies royally EXPOSED again!


Zetatalk has said Planet X DOES cause magnetosphere pressure and auroras!

"That a wafting of the tail of Planet X occurred, Planet X hosing its charged tail from its magnetic N Pole in the direction of Earth, is clear from the graphs on the Magnetic Simulator during the aurora display on the night of October 24-25, 2011. The warping of the Earth's magnetic field is nothing new, as it has been going on since the Fall of 2009 and has been well documented to not be in synch with activity in the Sun. What does cause the warping of the Earth's magnetic field is the near presence of Planet X, which is a giant magnet.... Since this dance comes and goes, Earthlings may have such aurora displays more frequently, and they are likely to be red!"

[link to zetatalk.com]

"effects of electrical outages, something the charged tail of Planet X is expected to bring to the Earth during the hour of the pole shift, and increasingly as we approach the pole shift. "
"NASA intends to have the electromagnetic bombardment from the tail of Planet X blamed on the Sun, is this article relating this effect to 2012"

[link to www.zetatalk.com]

Shills are gonna wallwallwall because the author made predictions BEFORE NASA AND NOAA.. plus before Solar eruptions AND gave credit to Nancy and Zetatalk!

Bbye shills!

byekitty
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7931720


bumpbumpbump
Menow
User ID: 739667
United States
04/23/2012 03:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING- The Planet X COVER-UP
So where is PX?

[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 2143478
United States
04/23/2012 08:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING- The Planet X COVER-UP
 Quoting: Menow 739667


It's called "photoshop"
WindyMind

User ID: 7244814
United States
04/23/2012 08:31 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING- The Planet X COVER-UP
If you can't see it then it isn't real except for radiation but ir seems from the above that the solar flares cause the same thing as Planet X causes so part of the solar flare effect might actually be the Planet X effect also. I got all that from the above post. It's great. Since the flares are getting worse there is no way to tell if X is closer. I have Niburu back on my curiosity list. More posts please.
Menow
User ID: 14777574
United States
04/23/2012 09:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING- The Planet X COVER-UP
 Quoting: Menow 739667


It's called "photoshop"
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2143478


It was a LIVE feed, dunce.
Menow
User ID: 14777574
United States
04/23/2012 09:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING- The Planet X COVER-UP
If you can't see it then it isn't real except for radiation but ir seems from the above that the solar flares cause the same thing as Planet X causes so part of the solar flare effect might actually be the Planet X effect also. I got all that from the above post. It's great. Since the flares are getting worse there is no way to tell if X is closer. I have Niburu back on my curiosity list. More posts please.
 Quoting: WindyMind


You think Nibiru has some magical properties which make it not reflect normal sunlight like every other planet?
AstromutModerator
Forum Moderator

User ID: 922113
United States
04/23/2012 09:14 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING- The Planet X COVER-UP
 Quoting: Menow 739667


It's called "photoshop"
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2143478


It was a LIVE feed, dunce.
 Quoting: Menow 14777574


I think he's saying you would have needed to use photoshop to paint planet X in there, not sure though. Impossible to tell around here anymore, Poe's law and all.
astrobanner2
Mordier L'eft

User ID: 13691144
Canada
04/23/2012 09:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING- The Planet X COVER-UP


all i can say about this one is, YES there are lens flares, and they are rather obvious, and move with the motion of the camera.

that being said....What is this?
--"In this era of great big brains anything that can happen will. So hunker down." -- Kurt Vonnegut, JR. -- Galapagos.
Menow
User ID: 14777574
United States
04/23/2012 09:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING- The Planet X COVER-UP


all i can say about this one is, YES there are lens flares, and they are rather obvious, and move with the motion of the camera.

that being said....What is this?
 Quoting: Mordier L'eft


They don't ALWAYS move with the camera. It depends on how they are being produced. Nancy has just ignored the test for lens flares on her own ning. Their test says that if the "object" appears in front of an object here on Earth, IT'S A FLARE... Except when Nancy goofs and declares a "hit" before she sees that it appears in front of a building. Then she has to invent some new "science" to "explain" it to her flock... and they BELIEVE IT!!!!!!!!
Mordier L'eft

User ID: 13691144
Canada
04/23/2012 09:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING- The Planet X COVER-UP


all i can say about this one is, YES there are lens flares, and they are rather obvious, and move with the motion of the camera.

that being said....What is this?
 Quoting: Mordier L'eft


They don't ALWAYS move with the camera. It depends on how they are being produced. Nancy has just ignored the test for lens flares on her own ning. Their test says that if the "object" appears in front of an object here on Earth, IT'S A FLARE... Except when Nancy goofs and declares a "hit" before she sees that it appears in front of a building. Then she has to invent some new "science" to "explain" it to her flock... and they BELIEVE IT!!!!!!!!
 Quoting: Menow 14777574


like i've said, i don't care about what nancy says. never met the guy.

the flares in the video have a translucent quality to them, while this object seems solid, and luminous.

i'm not calling Nibiru on this, this is someone else's video. but it is.......curious.
--"In this era of great big brains anything that can happen will. So hunker down." -- Kurt Vonnegut, JR. -- Galapagos.
AstromutModerator
Forum Moderator

User ID: 922113
United States
04/23/2012 09:25 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING- The Planet X COVER-UP


all i can say about this one is, YES there are lens flares, and they are rather obvious, and move with the motion of the camera.

that being said....What is this?
 Quoting: Mordier L'eft


Another flare, most likely a filter flare.
The same thing is seen with a floppy disk filter:
[link to www.youtube.com]
Yet, there's nothing actually there, it's just a filter flare:
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Notice, you never see anyone obscure JUST the sun in the video (though if you watch carefully at 52 seconds in the video I posted above, you'll notice the building partially obscures the sun, should not obscure the flare, yet the flare dims at the same time that the windows of the building partially attenuate the sun's light), if you did, you'd see the flare vanish as well.

Last Edited by Dr. Astro on 04/23/2012 09:28 PM
astrobanner2
Menow
User ID: 14777574
United States
04/23/2012 09:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING- The Planet X COVER-UP


all i can say about this one is, YES there are lens flares, and they are rather obvious, and move with the motion of the camera.

that being said....What is this?
 Quoting: Mordier L'eft


Why would an object like that not be visible ANYTIME to ANYONE WHO GLANCED AT THE SUN or ANY TELESCOPE with a normal solar filter? Answer: IT'S NOT A REAL OBJECT!
Menow
User ID: 14777574
United States
04/23/2012 09:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING- The Planet X COVER-UP


all i can say about this one is, YES there are lens flares, and they are rather obvious, and move with the motion of the camera.

that being said....What is this?
 Quoting: Mordier L'eft


They don't ALWAYS move with the camera. It depends on how they are being produced. Nancy has just ignored the test for lens flares on her own ning. Their test says that if the "object" appears in front of an object here on Earth, IT'S A FLARE... Except when Nancy goofs and declares a "hit" before she sees that it appears in front of a building. Then she has to invent some new "science" to "explain" it to her flock... and they BELIEVE IT!!!!!!!!
 Quoting: Menow 14777574


like i've said, i don't care about what nancy says. never met the guy.

the flares in the video have a translucent quality to them, while this object seems solid, and luminous.

i'm not calling Nibiru on this, this is someone else's video. but it is.......curious.
 Quoting: Mordier L'eft


Ti doesn't matter that you "haven't met the guy". Who do you think originated the idea that PX is hiding near the sun? NANCY LIEDER! You have been HAD!
Mordier L'eft

User ID: 13691144
Canada
04/23/2012 09:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING- The Planet X COVER-UP


all i can say about this one is, YES there are lens flares, and they are rather obvious, and move with the motion of the camera.

that being said....What is this?
 Quoting: Mordier L'eft


They don't ALWAYS move with the camera. It depends on how they are being produced. Nancy has just ignored the test for lens flares on her own ning. Their test says that if the "object" appears in front of an object here on Earth, IT'S A FLARE... Except when Nancy goofs and declares a "hit" before she sees that it appears in front of a building. Then she has to invent some new "science" to "explain" it to her flock... and they BELIEVE IT!!!!!!!!
 Quoting: Menow 14777574


like i've said, i don't care about what nancy says. never met the guy.

the flares in the video have a translucent quality to them, while this object seems solid, and luminous.

i'm not calling Nibiru on this, this is someone else's video. but it is.......curious.
 Quoting: Mordier L'eft


Ti doesn't matter that you "haven't met the guy". Who do you think originated the idea that PX is hiding near the sun? NANCY LIEDER! You have been HAD!
 Quoting: Menow 14777574


so this nancy guy was posting these things on his site back in the 60's? cuz that talk had entered popular belief in occult circles, even long before then.
--"In this era of great big brains anything that can happen will. So hunker down." -- Kurt Vonnegut, JR. -- Galapagos.
Mordier L'eft

User ID: 13691144
Canada
04/23/2012 09:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING- The Planet X COVER-UP


all i can say about this one is, YES there are lens flares, and they are rather obvious, and move with the motion of the camera.

that being said....What is this?
 Quoting: Mordier L'eft


Another flare, most likely a filter flare.
The same thing is seen with a floppy disk filter:
[link to www.youtube.com]
Yet, there's nothing actually there, it's just a filter flare:
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Notice, you never see anyone obscure JUST the sun in the video (though if you watch carefully at 52 seconds in the video I posted above, you'll notice the building partially obscures the sun, should not obscure the flare, yet the flare dims at the same time that the windows of the building partially attenuate the sun's light), if you did, you'd see the flare vanish as well.
 Quoting: Astromut


it's nice when someone has actual information to rebut with.

thank you
--"In this era of great big brains anything that can happen will. So hunker down." -- Kurt Vonnegut, JR. -- Galapagos.
Menow
User ID: 14947171
United States
04/23/2012 10:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING- The Planet X COVER-UP
...


They don't ALWAYS move with the camera. It depends on how they are being produced. Nancy has just ignored the test for lens flares on her own ning. Their test says that if the "object" appears in front of an object here on Earth, IT'S A FLARE... Except when Nancy goofs and declares a "hit" before she sees that it appears in front of a building. Then she has to invent some new "science" to "explain" it to her flock... and they BELIEVE IT!!!!!!!!
 Quoting: Menow 14777574


like i've said, i don't care about what nancy says. never met the guy.

the flares in the video have a translucent quality to them, while this object seems solid, and luminous.

i'm not calling Nibiru on this, this is someone else's video. but it is.......curious.
 Quoting: Mordier L'eft


Ti doesn't matter that you "haven't met the guy". Who do you think originated the idea that PX is hiding near the sun? NANCY LIEDER! You have been HAD!
 Quoting: Menow 14777574


so this nancy guy was posting these things on his site back in the 60's? cuz that talk had entered popular belief in occult circles, even long before then.
 Quoting: Mordier L'eft



What "talk", that there is a rogue planet hiding near the sun? Nancy says it has been there since about 2004. YOU say it's been there since the 60s or before??? How rational or likely is that? There certainly have been movies and stories about such things back then, but they were SCIENCE FICTION, you know?
Menow
User ID: 14947171
United States
04/23/2012 10:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING- The Planet X COVER-UP


all i can say about this one is, YES there are lens flares, and they are rather obvious, and move with the motion of the camera.

that being said....What is this?
 Quoting: Mordier L'eft


Another flare, most likely a filter flare.
The same thing is seen with a floppy disk filter:
[link to www.youtube.com]
Yet, there's nothing actually there, it's just a filter flare:
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Notice, you never see anyone obscure JUST the sun in the video (though if you watch carefully at 52 seconds in the video I posted above, you'll notice the building partially obscures the sun, should not obscure the flare, yet the flare dims at the same time that the windows of the building partially attenuate the sun's light), if you did, you'd see the flare vanish as well.
 Quoting: Astromut


it's nice when someone has actual information to rebut with.

thank you
 Quoting: Mordier L'eft


Any particular reason you didn't respond to this:

Why would an object like that not be visible ANYTIME to ANYONE WHO GLANCED AT THE SUN or ANY TELESCOPE with a normal solar filter? Answer: IT'S NOT A REAL OBJECT!

It really says it all. The only thing you can say get around that issue is to start endowing this alleged planet with magical properties.
WindyMind

User ID: 7244814
United States
04/24/2012 12:11 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING- The Planet X COVER-UP
Niburu magical planet only seen by some unknown Nancy. Fun

Of course I still think it might be real because I am a magical thinker.

LOCUTUS - UNPLUGGED

User ID: 14955569
United States
04/24/2012 01:49 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING- The Planet X COVER-UP
Wouldn't the mass of said object create gravitational lensing and distort almost everything we see in that 'direction'? Mass like that 'proposed' cannot simply float by with simply some geographical effects. It would distort orbits, revolutions and distance lensed vision.... No?

I am no Astromut...but makes sense.

LO-UP

Last Edited by LOCUTUS - UNPLUGGED on 04/24/2012 01:51 AM
If you placed yourself inside a knot it wouldn't be a knot anymore ~ only strands in seemingly ordered placement (or) you might view them as random depending on your state-of-mind.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8314124
South Africa
04/24/2012 02:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING- The Planet X COVER-UP
Man planet-x tards are stupid.

They belief in something when no physical proof of its existence exists, yet they all seem to have a problem believing in God.

hahahahaha
Volar
User ID: 14736585
United States
04/24/2012 10:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING- The Planet X COVER-UP
Man planet-x tards are stupid.

They belief in something when no physical proof of its existence exists, yet they all seem to have a problem believing in God.

hahahahaha
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8314124


It all depends on what you mean by "belief in God". For example, "murder" exists, however, I do not believe in murder. The same could be said with a god. If this god of your choice has "unconditional" love, then why would he in comparison "hold a gun to hour head" by saying, "If you do not love me, you are going to hell." Could you say that to any one in your family?....Of course you couldn't.

The whole idea of a "god" is very silly, and unreasonable.
Menow
User ID: 8548727
United States
04/24/2012 10:24 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING- The Planet X COVER-UP
Wouldn't the mass of said object create gravitational lensing and distort almost everything we see in that 'direction'? Mass like that 'proposed' cannot simply float by with simply some geographical effects. It would distort orbits, revolutions and distance lensed vision.... No?

I am no Astromut...but makes sense.

LO-UP
 Quoting: LOCUTUS - UNPLUGGED


That has been pointed out about a billion times, but is ignored. Zetatards don't believe that anyone knows how to figure normal planetary orbits(since they cab't).
Menow
User ID: 8548727
United States
04/24/2012 10:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING- The Planet X COVER-UP
Man planet-x tards are stupid.

They belief in something when no physical proof of its existence exists, yet they all seem to have a problem believing in God.

hahahahaha
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8314124


It all depends on what you mean by "belief in God". For example, "murder" exists, however, I do not believe in murder. The same could be said with a god. If this god of your choice has "unconditional" loave, then why would he in comparison "hold a gun to hour head" by saying, "If you do not love me, you are going to hell." Could you say that to any one in your family?....Of course you couldn't.

The whole idea of a "god" is very silly, and unreasonable.
 Quoting: Volar 14736585


"Silly and unreasonable"? I think that perfectly describes your refusal to say what happened when you imaged the sun with your scope and camera. Why won't you say? What are you hiding?
Volar
User ID: 14736585
United States
04/24/2012 10:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING- The Planet X COVER-UP
Wouldn't the mass of said object create gravitational lensing and distort almost everything we see in that 'direction'? Mass like that 'proposed' cannot simply float by with simply some geographical effects. It would distort orbits, revolutions and distance lensed vision.... No?

I am no Astromut...but makes sense.

LO-UP
 Quoting: LOCUTUS - UNPLUGGED


That has been pointed out about a billion times, but is ignored. Zetatards don't believe that anyone knows how to figure normal planetary orbits(since they cab't).
 Quoting: Menow 8548727


Not necessary. In fact, your scientists say most Suns have a Dual companion. This was just recently discovered to be factual knowledge. I would venture to guess there is more to be learned that even YOU might not know, "kitty kat".

News