BREAKING- The Planet X COVER-UP | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 13400281 United States 04/03/2012 05:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
The Fraud Buster User ID: 8361325 United States 04/03/2012 05:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 13728999 United Kingdom 04/03/2012 05:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thanks for that. Yes, the coverup is crumbling. All it takes is an old floppy disk inside to block enough of the sun's rays to see PX and/or its moons. This is the truth that the Astrofarts of the world don't want people to know. YOU CAN SEE IT RIGHT NOW!!! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 677020 So if I go outside right now, with a proper solar filter and take a picture of the sun with a proper camera, I'll see "planet X and/or its moons" next to the sun. Do I have that right? Yes it is. On the other hand, I wouldn't believe any picture you posted as valid. (Just returning the favor for all the decades of "debunkers" saying "any photo can be faked" as their last line of defense.) The bottom line, people, is to go look for yourself, then nothing that Astrosmut or anyone else says will make a bit of difference. Excellant Point! For me, the photos in the "Red Filter Revolution" were amazing, but seeing it for myself almost left me in shock. Hope everone has a plan because the government WON'T HELP YOU! Yeah, I've got a plan. My plan is to take the piss out of the idiots who believe this ridiculous nonsense. Continually. Mercilessly. It's hard to believe there really are people that gullible, but I guess the old "one born every minute" always applies... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 13400281 United States 04/03/2012 05:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 13728999 United Kingdom 04/03/2012 06:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Big Foot and Elvis still being alive are more real than Planet X....fact! Again, For the last fucking time Go look for yourself smartass! Funny, but I have looked at the sun, regularly, with a solar filter on my telescope. I have lots of pictures of the sun over several years, from when it was very quiet, to recently with some nice sunspots. And when using proper filters, and optical equipment designed not to give internal reflections, I haven't seen any sign of this magical object... |
The Fraud Buster User ID: 8361325 United States 04/03/2012 06:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 13400281 United States 04/03/2012 06:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Again, For the last fucking time Go look for yourself smartass! Funny, but I have looked at the sun, regularly, with a solar filter on my telescope. I have lots of pictures of the sun over several years, from when it was very quiet, to recently with some nice sunspots. And when using proper filters, and optical equipment designed not to give internal reflections, I haven't seen any sign of this magical object... Not everyone is a Winner! These people Won- [link to poleshift.ning.com] |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 922113 United States 04/03/2012 06:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thanks for that. Yes, the coverup is crumbling. All it takes is an old floppy disk inside to block enough of the sun's rays to see PX and/or its moons. This is the truth that the Astrofarts of the world don't want people to know. YOU CAN SEE IT RIGHT NOW!!! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 677020 So if I go outside right now, with a proper solar filter and take a picture of the sun with a proper camera, I'll see "planet X and/or its moons" next to the sun. Do I have that right? Yes it is. On the other hand, I wouldn't believe any picture you posted as valid. Then you're a bigot. Either show where I've lied about ANY picture I've EVER presented, or you have no valid basis to automatically disregard any picture I post. Last Edited by Astromut on 04/03/2012 06:17 PM |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 922113 United States 04/03/2012 06:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Took a photo of the sun with my solar filter, no sign of "planet X." [link to i319.photobucket.com] With a little work though I can make some very interesting lens flares appear. OMG, Nibiru is a penis! We're fucked! [link to i319.photobucket.com] No photo manipulations of any kind, this was just a raw single exposure with the camera. Simply by dramatically over-exposing the sun and moving the camera around you can not only create Nibiru, but a whole variety of shapes depending on your optical train. What is actually up there? Just the sun. [link to i319.photobucket.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 13728999 United Kingdom 04/03/2012 06:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: The Fraud Buster Big Foot and Elvis still being alive are more real than Planet X....fact! Again, For the last fucking time Go look for yourself smartass! Funny, but I have looked at the sun, regularly, with a solar filter on my telescope. I have lots of pictures of the sun over several years, from when it was very quiet, to recently with some nice sunspots. And when using proper filters, and optical equipment designed not to give internal reflections, I haven't seen any sign of this magical object... Not everyone is a Winner! These people Won- [link to poleshift.ning.com] No, those people are idiots who can't recognise a lens flare when they see it... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 13463022 United States 04/03/2012 07:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13400281 Again, For the last fucking time Go look for yourself smartass! Funny, but I have looked at the sun, regularly, with a solar filter on my telescope. I have lots of pictures of the sun over several years, from when it was very quiet, to recently with some nice sunspots. And when using proper filters, and optical equipment designed not to give internal reflections, I haven't seen any sign of this magical object... Not everyone is a Winner! These people Won- [link to poleshift.ning.com] No, those people are idiots who can't recognise a lens flare when they see it... No, you are a Fucking Idiot who can't spell. Anyway you are getting of topic. If you can read, it says the Council of worlds will break the cover-up! Not You! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 12064276 United States 04/03/2012 08:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Anyway you are getting of topic. If you can read, it says the Council of worlds will break the cover-up! shouldn't the people in southeast asia be swimming /floating in the pacific ocean by now ? and if china knows about it as your '' dear leader'' stated why are they investing so much money and time , buying land to develop -- agriculture and building industries --in cambodia which is supposed to be under the ocean soon ? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74444 United States 04/03/2012 08:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 13757593 Australia 04/03/2012 08:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
GodIsGood User ID: 7111119 United States 04/03/2012 09:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | On march 3 2012, the Councle of Worlds Declared War on the Planet X Cover-up. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13061588 Cover-up Battle Two weeks ago we announced that the Council of Worlds was going to battle over the cover-up, as this is interfering with the Earth as a schoolhouse. People have a right to know what is pending, so they can make spiritual decisions. For this reason, the Council allowed the pace of the 7 of 10 scenarios to be held back (although the ultimate timeline does not change), and are using such devices as humming and glowing boxes along fault lines to hold back the plate movements, as reported on February 26, 2012 in Issue282 of this newsletter. In response, the establishment tried to take down the ZetaTalk website along with all its Mirror Sites, as detailed on March 18, 2012 in Issue285 of this newsletter. ZetaTalk Announcement 3/3/2012: What is likely to shock the world is the drama being contemplated by the Council of Worlds, in their current battle with the cover-up. This will be something that the establishment has not guarded against, not even contemplated. This will be a series of signs to mankind that even the common man has not contemplated. [link to zetatalk.com] What does this mean to the common man? It means if you want your retirement and life savings to get it out of the bank now!!! There is only enough cash for the FIRST IN LINE! The Banks DON'T HAVE ENOUGH CASH FOR EVERYBODY! If you wait, you will be fucked & lose EVERYTHING. You may also want to reconsider paying taxes this year. They government is using YOUR MONEY to prepair for themselves. Leaving you out in the Cold & Starving while they hide like fucking cowards in their seceret underground bases. DOCUMENTARY ON PHIL SCHNEIDER & UNDERGROUND BASES [link to www.youtube.com] There is still time to get your money & prepare! Good Luck to you ALL Then the kings of the earth, the rulers and the military chiefs, the rich and the powerful, and all other people, slave and free, hid themselves in caves and under rocks on the mountains. They called out to the mountains and to the rocks, "Fall on us and hide us from the eyes of the one who sits on the throne and from the anger of the Lamb! The terrible day of their anger is here, and who can stand up against it?" (Rev 6:15-17) |
Volar User ID: 12149525 United States 04/03/2012 09:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Took a photo of the sun with my solar filter, no sign of "planet X." Quoting: Astromut [link to i319.photobucket.com] With a little work though I can make some very interesting lens flares appear. OMG, Nibiru is a penis! We're fucked! [link to i319.photobucket.com] No photo manipulations of any kind, this was just a raw single exposure with the camera. Simply by dramatically over-exposing the sun and moving the camera around you can not only create Nibiru, but a whole variety of shapes depending on your optical train. What is actually up there? Just the sun. [link to i319.photobucket.com] You are right, Astromut!....no Planet X! As I have stated before, heavy "Solar filters" tend to filter out most everything orbiting the Sun. There will be no Venus, Mercury, Mars, Jupiter, or any other planet to speak of, since the "Sun" overexposes any chance of seeing any other visible object. Do you remember when you tried to explain why the Astronauts on the Moon could not see any stars? Well, this same principle applies, seeing you obviously know why viewing Planet X, in this respect, could never happen. A typical shill response, on your part. We are all wise to your attempt to discredit any, and every video, or photo of Planet X that may be presented....even to the point of being dishonest. |
The Fraud Buster User ID: 8361325 United States 04/03/2012 09:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Volar User ID: 12149525 United States 04/03/2012 09:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 922113 United States 04/03/2012 10:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Took a photo of the sun with my solar filter, no sign of "planet X." Quoting: Astromut [link to i319.photobucket.com] With a little work though I can make some very interesting lens flares appear. OMG, Nibiru is a penis! We're fucked! [link to i319.photobucket.com] No photo manipulations of any kind, this was just a raw single exposure with the camera. Simply by dramatically over-exposing the sun and moving the camera around you can not only create Nibiru, but a whole variety of shapes depending on your optical train. What is actually up there? Just the sun. [link to i319.photobucket.com] You are right, Astromut!....no Planet X! As I have stated before, heavy "Solar filters" tend to filter out most everything orbiting the Sun. Oh really? Then why is it I can take a picture of Venus through my solar filter just fine, but I can't see any kind of "planet X?" [link to i319.photobucket.com] There will be no Venus, Mercury, Mars, Jupiter, or any other planet to speak of, since the "Sun" overexposes any chance of seeing any other visible object. Quoting: VolarIf the sun were preventing it from being seen, then filtering it with a floppy disc wouldn't help either. You can't make that claim and simultaneously claim people are seeing it with their camera phone through a floppy disc. Furthermore, it wouldn't remain too close to the sun to be seen for very long, let alone forever as according to your cult. Do you remember when you tried to explain why the Astronauts on the Moon could not see any stars? Well, this same principle applies, seeing you obviously know why viewing Planet X, in this respect, could never happen. Quoting: VolarStars are not seen in Apollo photos nor in daylit photos of ISS because the exposure is too short. Planets in our solar system, particularly planets close to earth as claimed by your cult, do not require such long exposures. Indeed, Venus can be seen in AS14-64-9189, AS14-64-9190, AS14-64-9191, AS14-64-9192, AS14-64-9193, AS14-64-9194, AS14-64-9195, AS14-64-9196, and AS14-64-9197. A typical shill response, on your part. Quoting: VolarStill waiting on you to prove I lied about the position of polaris relative to our axial tilt and axis of rotation. [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] Oh right, you can't because I'm not lying, you are. We are all wise to your attempt to discredit any, and every video, or photo of Planet X that may be presented....even to the point of being dishonest. Quoting: VolarThat's ironic coming from a known liar (what balancing issue presents itself the moment you try to polar align that telescope of yours - you still can't properly answer this). Furthermore, you just said that you can't take pictures of Planet X because the sun "overexposes any chance of seeing any other visible object" - your words. Of course, what you really meant is that you'll ignore any photos that show that there is no planet X actually there but you'll gladly accept any photos showing lens flares claiming to be planet X. |
Volar User ID: 12149525 United States 04/03/2012 10:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Took a photo of the sun with my solar filter, no sign of "planet X." Quoting: Astromut [link to i319.photobucket.com] With a little work though I can make some very interesting lens flares appear. OMG, Nibiru is a penis! We're fucked! [link to i319.photobucket.com] No photo manipulations of any kind, this was just a raw single exposure with the camera. Simply by dramatically over-exposing the sun and moving the camera around you can not only create Nibiru, but a whole variety of shapes depending on your optical train. What is actually up there? Just the sun. [link to i319.photobucket.com] You are right, Astromut!....no Planet X! As I have stated before, heavy "Solar filters" tend to filter out most everything orbiting the Sun. Oh really? Then why is it I can take a picture of Venus through my solar filter just fine, but I can't see any kind of "planet X?" [link to i319.photobucket.com] There will be no Venus, Mercury, Mars, Jupiter, or any other planet to speak of, since the "Sun" overexposes any chance of seeing any other visible object. Quoting: VolarIf the sun were preventing it from being seen, then filtering it with a floppy disc wouldn't help either. You can't make that claim and simultaneously claim people are seeing it with their camera phone through a floppy disc. Furthermore, it wouldn't remain too close to the sun to be seen for very long, let alone forever as according to your cult. Do you remember when you tried to explain why the Astronauts on the Moon could not see any stars? Well, this same principle applies, seeing you obviously know why viewing Planet X, in this respect, could never happen. Quoting: VolarStars are not seen in Apollo photos nor in daylit photos of ISS because the exposure is too short. Planets in our solar system, particularly planets close to earth as claimed by your cult, do not require such long exposures. Indeed, Venus can be seen in AS14-64-9189, AS14-64-9190, AS14-64-9191, AS14-64-9192, AS14-64-9193, AS14-64-9194, AS14-64-9195, AS14-64-9196, and AS14-64-9197. A typical shill response, on your part. Quoting: VolarStill waiting on you to prove I lied about the position of polaris relative to our axial tilt and axis of rotation. [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] Oh right, you can't because I'm not lying, you are. We are all wise to your attempt to discredit any, and every video, or photo of Planet X that may be presented....even to the point of being dishonest. Quoting: VolarThat's ironic coming from a known liar (what balancing issue presents itself the moment you try to polar align that telescope of yours - you still can't properly answer this). Furthermore, you just said that you can't take pictures of Planet X because the sun "overexposes any chance of seeing any other visible object" - your words. Of course, what you really meant is that you'll ignore any photos that show that there is no planet X actually there but you'll gladly accept any photos showing lens flares claiming to be planet X. Well, there is one possibility of seeing another Planet with heavy solar filtering. It must be very close to the Sun where it can reflect the Sun's light; otherwise the filters make visibility extremely dark. Oh, yes....when I do polar alignment, I have my eyepiece and diagonal in, and it has a certain balance point. Then, after all aligned and running well, I want to add my camera, which adds significant weight on the back end, and changes the balance significantly, which forces me to move weight around. However, since I'm already aligned, I can't test the balance. I also notice that it actually changes where the scope points significantly. I assume this is because of flex in the mount. The only remedy I know is to polar align, with the camera attached, and only use the finder scope. Also, on polar alignment, with the wedge, I have seen that there is a process used on my GOTO scope that doesn't require drift method. But it does this "sync" after moving the wedge around to center both objects in the east and on the meridian. I don't know how to do a sync. I've searched the manual, however, it's unclear this is possible on the LX90. Am I then left to the drift method? |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 922113 United States 04/03/2012 11:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well, there is one possibility of seeing another Planet with heavy solar filtering. It must be very close to the Sun where it can reflect the Sun's light; otherwise the filters make visibility extremely dark. Quoting: Volar 12149525 It's amazing how clueless you are. I guess you thought that this would pass for a rational, lucid response after I bitch slapped your claim that planets couldn't be seen if you had a solar filter on the scope. Oh, yes....when I do polar alignment, I have my eyepiece and diagonal in, and it has a certain balance point. Then, after all aligned and running well, I want to add my camera, which adds significant weight on the back end, and changes the balance significantly, which forces me to move weight around. However, since I'm already aligned, I can't test the balance. I also notice that it actually changes where the scope points significantly. I assume this is because of flex in the mount. The only remedy I know is to polar align, with the camera attached, and only use the finder scope. Quoting: VolarWrong, that is not a balance issue unique to polar alignment; adding or subtracting weight to the scope affects it regardless of whether it's polar aligned or not, nor is it the balance issue specific to that kind of telescope which is why I asked you the question. Also, on polar alignment, with the wedge, I have seen that there is a process used on my GOTO scope that doesn't require drift method. But it does this "sync" after moving the wedge around to center both objects in the east and on the meridian. I don't know how to do a sync. I've searched the manual, however, it's unclear this is possible on the LX90. Am I then left to the drift method? Quoting: VolarKeep reading the manual, it does tell you how to sync it. One day when you actually own the telescope and need to deal with the balance issue I asked you about which is NOT covered in the manual, you'll have to learn how to deal with it on your own. Last Edited by Astromut on 04/03/2012 11:03 PM |
Volar User ID: 12149525 United States 04/03/2012 11:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well, there is one possibility of seeing another Planet with heavy solar filtering. It must be very close to the Sun where it can reflect the Sun's light; otherwise the filters make visibility extremely dark. Quoting: Volar 12149525 It's amazing how clueless you are. I guess you thought that this would pass for a rational, lucid response after I bitch slapped your claim that planets couldn't be seen if you had a solar filter on the scope. Oh, yes....when I do polar alignment, I have my eyepiece and diagonal in, and it has a certain balance point. Then, after all aligned and running well, I want to add my camera, which adds significant weight on the back end, and changes the balance significantly, which forces me to move weight around. However, since I'm already aligned, I can't test the balance. I also notice that it actually changes where the scope points significantly. I assume this is because of flex in the mount. The only remedy I know is to polar align, with the camera attached, and only use the finder scope. Quoting: VolarWrong, that is not a balance issue unique to polar alignment; adding or subtracting weight to the scope affects it regardless of whether it's polar aligned or not, nor is it the balance issue specific to that kind of telescope which is why I asked you the question. Also, on polar alignment, with the wedge, I have seen that there is a process used on my GOTO scope that doesn't require drift method. But it does this "sync" after moving the wedge around to center both objects in the east and on the meridian. I don't know how to do a sync. I've searched the manual, however, it's unclear this is possible on the LX90. Am I then left to the drift method? Quoting: VolarKeep reading the manual, it does tell you how to sync it. One day when you actually own the telescope and need to deal with the balance issue I asked you about which is NOT covered in the manual, you'll have to learn how to deal with it on your own. I might as well not own a scope, since I have lost interest in it a while back. Right now, it is stashed away in my closet, where it will probably remain buried with a lot of other junk. |
The Fraud Buster User ID: 13098774 United States 04/03/2012 11:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 922113 United States 04/03/2012 11:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well, there is one possibility of seeing another Planet with heavy solar filtering. It must be very close to the Sun where it can reflect the Sun's light; otherwise the filters make visibility extremely dark. Quoting: Volar 12149525 It's amazing how clueless you are. I guess you thought that this would pass for a rational, lucid response after I bitch slapped your claim that planets couldn't be seen if you had a solar filter on the scope. Oh, yes....when I do polar alignment, I have my eyepiece and diagonal in, and it has a certain balance point. Then, after all aligned and running well, I want to add my camera, which adds significant weight on the back end, and changes the balance significantly, which forces me to move weight around. However, since I'm already aligned, I can't test the balance. I also notice that it actually changes where the scope points significantly. I assume this is because of flex in the mount. The only remedy I know is to polar align, with the camera attached, and only use the finder scope. Quoting: VolarWrong, that is not a balance issue unique to polar alignment; adding or subtracting weight to the scope affects it regardless of whether it's polar aligned or not, nor is it the balance issue specific to that kind of telescope which is why I asked you the question. Also, on polar alignment, with the wedge, I have seen that there is a process used on my GOTO scope that doesn't require drift method. But it does this "sync" after moving the wedge around to center both objects in the east and on the meridian. I don't know how to do a sync. I've searched the manual, however, it's unclear this is possible on the LX90. Am I then left to the drift method? Quoting: VolarKeep reading the manual, it does tell you how to sync it. One day when you actually own the telescope and need to deal with the balance issue I asked you about which is NOT covered in the manual, you'll have to learn how to deal with it on your own. I might as well not own a scope, since I have lost interest in it a while back. Right now, it is stashed away in my closet, where it will probably remain buried with a lot of other junk. Right next to your invisible imaginary dinosaur friend, I'm sure. |
Volar User ID: 12149525 United States 04/03/2012 11:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
The Fraud Buster User ID: 13098774 United States 04/03/2012 11:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Planet X was supposed to have killed us like 1000 times now hasent it...... Quoting: The Fraud Buster Typical debunker, you are. You really DO NOT have a clue....do you? You obviously have no clue.....you still grasp on to an obviously BOGUS theory that has ran the course a bunch of times already. |
The Fraud Buster User ID: 13098774 United States 04/03/2012 11:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 12837437 United States 04/04/2012 01:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So the elites are collecting from all over the world, so that's why everybody is bankrupt so they can build and prepare for cataclysm event? So everything is basically a farce? The aliens are helping to delay this event by using some kind of technology? I'm confused. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7050056 United States 04/04/2012 10:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well, there is one possibility of seeing another Planet with heavy solar filtering. It must be very close to the Sun where it can reflect the Sun's light; otherwise the filters make visibility extremely dark. Quoting: Volar 12149525 It's amazing how clueless you are. I guess you thought that this would pass for a rational, lucid response after I bitch slapped your claim that planets couldn't be seen if you had a solar filter on the scope. Oh, yes....when I do polar alignment, I have my eyepiece and diagonal in, and it has a certain balance point. Then, after all aligned and running well, I want to add my camera, which adds significant weight on the back end, and changes the balance significantly, which forces me to move weight around. However, since I'm already aligned, I can't test the balance. I also notice that it actually changes where the scope points significantly. I assume this is because of flex in the mount. The only remedy I know is to polar align, with the camera attached, and only use the finder scope. Quoting: VolarWrong, that is not a balance issue unique to polar alignment; adding or subtracting weight to the scope affects it regardless of whether it's polar aligned or not, nor is it the balance issue specific to that kind of telescope which is why I asked you the question. Also, on polar alignment, with the wedge, I have seen that there is a process used on my GOTO scope that doesn't require drift method. But it does this "sync" after moving the wedge around to center both objects in the east and on the meridian. I don't know how to do a sync. I've searched the manual, however, it's unclear this is possible on the LX90. Am I then left to the drift method? Quoting: VolarKeep reading the manual, it does tell you how to sync it. One day when you actually own the telescope and need to deal with the balance issue I asked you about which is NOT covered in the manual, you'll have to learn how to deal with it on your own. I might as well not own a scope, since I have lost interest in it a while back. Right now, it is stashed away in my closet, where it will probably remain buried with a lot of other junk. Right next to your invisible imaginary dinosaur friend, I'm sure. It is so OBVIOUS that you are only on this board to debunk the arrival of Nibiru, astronut. You think we forgot about your shady history here, boy? You are a fucking liar & have NO CREDIBILTY! People know this! You try too hard! Now son, go take your fucking telescope and see if you can locate your cervix with it, you fucking government pussy! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 13796360 Canada 04/04/2012 10:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |