BREAKING- The Planet X COVER-UP | |
Menow User ID: 739667 United States 04/23/2012 11:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Menow 14777574 I don't believe you did- I watched for a specific answer to that question. I think you just went on about why cheap cameras were better. Refresh my memory, please. What happened when you imaged the sun with your telescope and camera? I no longer believe in using a telescope with very heavy Solar filtering. Much better to use a camera that has a very small aperture, with a lighter filter. This is why you will not see a video of Planet X using a useless amateur scope, and why "Amateur astronomers" are not trying to find it. I don't see an answer to my question there. Repeat: What happened when you imaged the sun with your telescope and camera? It is not my fault you cannot see it. Have you tried getting a pair of reading glasses? I hear they work really well with people who have impaired vision. Why are you dodging the question? Repeat: What happened when you imaged the sun with your telescope and camera? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 14894027 United States 04/23/2012 12:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | These videos prove the charged tail of Planet X is affecting Earth by the author predicting EXACTLY when charged particles would hit Earth (cause magnetosphere pressure, auroras, geomagnetic storm) BEFORE any "solar eruption" and BEFORE any forecast from NOAA/NASA twice in a row! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7931720 Can't BLAME the SUN when the author predicts when Earth would get hit before any solar activity.. that's because Planet X is sending influx of particles at Earth. Solar Flare DISINFO EXPOSED! Planet X blasting Earth with charged particles.. Documented PROOF! NICT Space Weather Simulation DOWN.. EXPOSED! SUN Disinfo lies royally EXPOSED again! Zetatalk has said Planet X DOES cause magnetosphere pressure and auroras! "That a wafting of the tail of Planet X occurred, Planet X hosing its charged tail from its magnetic N Pole in the direction of Earth, is clear from the graphs on the Magnetic Simulator during the aurora display on the night of October 24-25, 2011. The warping of the Earth's magnetic field is nothing new, as it has been going on since the Fall of 2009 and has been well documented to not be in synch with activity in the Sun. What does cause the warping of the Earth's magnetic field is the near presence of Planet X, which is a giant magnet.... Since this dance comes and goes, Earthlings may have such aurora displays more frequently, and they are likely to be red!" [link to zetatalk.com] "effects of electrical outages, something the charged tail of Planet X is expected to bring to the Earth during the hour of the pole shift, and increasingly as we approach the pole shift. " "NASA intends to have the electromagnetic bombardment from the tail of Planet X blamed on the Sun, is this article relating this effect to 2012" [link to www.zetatalk.com] Shills are gonna because the author made predictions BEFORE NASA AND NOAA.. plus before Solar eruptions AND gave credit to Nancy and Zetatalk! Bbye shills! |
Menow User ID: 739667 United States 04/23/2012 03:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2143478 United States 04/23/2012 08:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
WindyMind User ID: 7244814 United States 04/23/2012 08:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you can't see it then it isn't real except for radiation but ir seems from the above that the solar flares cause the same thing as Planet X causes so part of the solar flare effect might actually be the Planet X effect also. I got all that from the above post. It's great. Since the flares are getting worse there is no way to tell if X is closer. I have Niburu back on my curiosity list. More posts please. |
Menow User ID: 14777574 United States 04/23/2012 09:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Menow User ID: 14777574 United States 04/23/2012 09:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you can't see it then it isn't real except for radiation but ir seems from the above that the solar flares cause the same thing as Planet X causes so part of the solar flare effect might actually be the Planet X effect also. I got all that from the above post. It's great. Since the flares are getting worse there is no way to tell if X is closer. I have Niburu back on my curiosity list. More posts please. Quoting: WindyMind You think Nibiru has some magical properties which make it not reflect normal sunlight like every other planet? |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 922113 United States 04/23/2012 09:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Mordier L'eft User ID: 13691144 Canada 04/23/2012 09:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | all i can say about this one is, YES there are lens flares, and they are rather obvious, and move with the motion of the camera. that being said....What is this? --"In this era of great big brains anything that can happen will. So hunker down." -- Kurt Vonnegut, JR. -- Galapagos. |
Menow User ID: 14777574 United States 04/23/2012 09:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | all i can say about this one is, YES there are lens flares, and they are rather obvious, and move with the motion of the camera. that being said....What is this? They don't ALWAYS move with the camera. It depends on how they are being produced. Nancy has just ignored the test for lens flares on her own ning. Their test says that if the "object" appears in front of an object here on Earth, IT'S A FLARE... Except when Nancy goofs and declares a "hit" before she sees that it appears in front of a building. Then she has to invent some new "science" to "explain" it to her flock... and they BELIEVE IT!!!!!!!! |
Mordier L'eft User ID: 13691144 Canada 04/23/2012 09:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | all i can say about this one is, YES there are lens flares, and they are rather obvious, and move with the motion of the camera. that being said....What is this? They don't ALWAYS move with the camera. It depends on how they are being produced. Nancy has just ignored the test for lens flares on her own ning. Their test says that if the "object" appears in front of an object here on Earth, IT'S A FLARE... Except when Nancy goofs and declares a "hit" before she sees that it appears in front of a building. Then she has to invent some new "science" to "explain" it to her flock... and they BELIEVE IT!!!!!!!! like i've said, i don't care about what nancy says. never met the guy. the flares in the video have a translucent quality to them, while this object seems solid, and luminous. i'm not calling Nibiru on this, this is someone else's video. but it is.......curious. --"In this era of great big brains anything that can happen will. So hunker down." -- Kurt Vonnegut, JR. -- Galapagos. |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 922113 United States 04/23/2012 09:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | all i can say about this one is, YES there are lens flares, and they are rather obvious, and move with the motion of the camera. that being said....What is this? Another flare, most likely a filter flare. The same thing is seen with a floppy disk filter: [link to www.youtube.com] Yet, there's nothing actually there, it's just a filter flare: [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] Notice, you never see anyone obscure JUST the sun in the video (though if you watch carefully at 52 seconds in the video I posted above, you'll notice the building partially obscures the sun, should not obscure the flare, yet the flare dims at the same time that the windows of the building partially attenuate the sun's light), if you did, you'd see the flare vanish as well. Last Edited by Astromut on 04/23/2012 09:28 PM |
Menow User ID: 14777574 United States 04/23/2012 09:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | all i can say about this one is, YES there are lens flares, and they are rather obvious, and move with the motion of the camera. that being said....What is this? Why would an object like that not be visible ANYTIME to ANYONE WHO GLANCED AT THE SUN or ANY TELESCOPE with a normal solar filter? Answer: IT'S NOT A REAL OBJECT! |
Menow User ID: 14777574 United States 04/23/2012 09:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | all i can say about this one is, YES there are lens flares, and they are rather obvious, and move with the motion of the camera. that being said....What is this? They don't ALWAYS move with the camera. It depends on how they are being produced. Nancy has just ignored the test for lens flares on her own ning. Their test says that if the "object" appears in front of an object here on Earth, IT'S A FLARE... Except when Nancy goofs and declares a "hit" before she sees that it appears in front of a building. Then she has to invent some new "science" to "explain" it to her flock... and they BELIEVE IT!!!!!!!! like i've said, i don't care about what nancy says. never met the guy. the flares in the video have a translucent quality to them, while this object seems solid, and luminous. i'm not calling Nibiru on this, this is someone else's video. but it is.......curious. Ti doesn't matter that you "haven't met the guy". Who do you think originated the idea that PX is hiding near the sun? NANCY LIEDER! You have been HAD! |
Mordier L'eft User ID: 13691144 Canada 04/23/2012 09:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | all i can say about this one is, YES there are lens flares, and they are rather obvious, and move with the motion of the camera. that being said....What is this? They don't ALWAYS move with the camera. It depends on how they are being produced. Nancy has just ignored the test for lens flares on her own ning. Their test says that if the "object" appears in front of an object here on Earth, IT'S A FLARE... Except when Nancy goofs and declares a "hit" before she sees that it appears in front of a building. Then she has to invent some new "science" to "explain" it to her flock... and they BELIEVE IT!!!!!!!! like i've said, i don't care about what nancy says. never met the guy. the flares in the video have a translucent quality to them, while this object seems solid, and luminous. i'm not calling Nibiru on this, this is someone else's video. but it is.......curious. Ti doesn't matter that you "haven't met the guy". Who do you think originated the idea that PX is hiding near the sun? NANCY LIEDER! You have been HAD! so this nancy guy was posting these things on his site back in the 60's? cuz that talk had entered popular belief in occult circles, even long before then. --"In this era of great big brains anything that can happen will. So hunker down." -- Kurt Vonnegut, JR. -- Galapagos. |
Mordier L'eft User ID: 13691144 Canada 04/23/2012 09:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | all i can say about this one is, YES there are lens flares, and they are rather obvious, and move with the motion of the camera. that being said....What is this? Another flare, most likely a filter flare. The same thing is seen with a floppy disk filter: [link to www.youtube.com] Yet, there's nothing actually there, it's just a filter flare: [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] Notice, you never see anyone obscure JUST the sun in the video (though if you watch carefully at 52 seconds in the video I posted above, you'll notice the building partially obscures the sun, should not obscure the flare, yet the flare dims at the same time that the windows of the building partially attenuate the sun's light), if you did, you'd see the flare vanish as well. it's nice when someone has actual information to rebut with. thank you --"In this era of great big brains anything that can happen will. So hunker down." -- Kurt Vonnegut, JR. -- Galapagos. |
Menow User ID: 14947171 United States 04/23/2012 10:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Menow 14777574 They don't ALWAYS move with the camera. It depends on how they are being produced. Nancy has just ignored the test for lens flares on her own ning. Their test says that if the "object" appears in front of an object here on Earth, IT'S A FLARE... Except when Nancy goofs and declares a "hit" before she sees that it appears in front of a building. Then she has to invent some new "science" to "explain" it to her flock... and they BELIEVE IT!!!!!!!! like i've said, i don't care about what nancy says. never met the guy. the flares in the video have a translucent quality to them, while this object seems solid, and luminous. i'm not calling Nibiru on this, this is someone else's video. but it is.......curious. Ti doesn't matter that you "haven't met the guy". Who do you think originated the idea that PX is hiding near the sun? NANCY LIEDER! You have been HAD! so this nancy guy was posting these things on his site back in the 60's? cuz that talk had entered popular belief in occult circles, even long before then. What "talk", that there is a rogue planet hiding near the sun? Nancy says it has been there since about 2004. YOU say it's been there since the 60s or before??? How rational or likely is that? There certainly have been movies and stories about such things back then, but they were SCIENCE FICTION, you know? |
Menow User ID: 14947171 United States 04/23/2012 10:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | all i can say about this one is, YES there are lens flares, and they are rather obvious, and move with the motion of the camera. that being said....What is this? Another flare, most likely a filter flare. The same thing is seen with a floppy disk filter: [link to www.youtube.com] Yet, there's nothing actually there, it's just a filter flare: [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] Notice, you never see anyone obscure JUST the sun in the video (though if you watch carefully at 52 seconds in the video I posted above, you'll notice the building partially obscures the sun, should not obscure the flare, yet the flare dims at the same time that the windows of the building partially attenuate the sun's light), if you did, you'd see the flare vanish as well. it's nice when someone has actual information to rebut with. thank you Any particular reason you didn't respond to this: Why would an object like that not be visible ANYTIME to ANYONE WHO GLANCED AT THE SUN or ANY TELESCOPE with a normal solar filter? Answer: IT'S NOT A REAL OBJECT! It really says it all. The only thing you can say get around that issue is to start endowing this alleged planet with magical properties. |
WindyMind User ID: 7244814 United States 04/24/2012 12:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
LOCUTUS - UNPLUGGED User ID: 14955569 United States 04/24/2012 01:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wouldn't the mass of said object create gravitational lensing and distort almost everything we see in that 'direction'? Mass like that 'proposed' cannot simply float by with simply some geographical effects. It would distort orbits, revolutions and distance lensed vision.... No? I am no Astromut...but makes sense. LO-UP Last Edited by LOCUTUS - UNPLUGGED on 04/24/2012 01:51 AM If you placed yourself inside a knot it wouldn't be a knot anymore ~ only strands in seemingly ordered placement (or) you might view them as random depending on your state-of-mind. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8314124 South Africa 04/24/2012 02:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Volar User ID: 14736585 United States 04/24/2012 10:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Man planet-x tards are stupid. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8314124 They belief in something when no physical proof of its existence exists, yet they all seem to have a problem believing in God. hahahahaha It all depends on what you mean by "belief in God". For example, "murder" exists, however, I do not believe in murder. The same could be said with a god. If this god of your choice has "unconditional" love, then why would he in comparison "hold a gun to hour head" by saying, "If you do not love me, you are going to hell." Could you say that to any one in your family?....Of course you couldn't. The whole idea of a "god" is very silly, and unreasonable. |
Menow User ID: 8548727 United States 04/24/2012 10:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wouldn't the mass of said object create gravitational lensing and distort almost everything we see in that 'direction'? Mass like that 'proposed' cannot simply float by with simply some geographical effects. It would distort orbits, revolutions and distance lensed vision.... No? Quoting: LOCUTUS - UNPLUGGED I am no Astromut...but makes sense. LO-UP That has been pointed out about a billion times, but is ignored. Zetatards don't believe that anyone knows how to figure normal planetary orbits(since they cab't). |
Menow User ID: 8548727 United States 04/24/2012 10:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Man planet-x tards are stupid. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8314124 They belief in something when no physical proof of its existence exists, yet they all seem to have a problem believing in God. hahahahaha It all depends on what you mean by "belief in God". For example, "murder" exists, however, I do not believe in murder. The same could be said with a god. If this god of your choice has "unconditional" loave, then why would he in comparison "hold a gun to hour head" by saying, "If you do not love me, you are going to hell." Could you say that to any one in your family?....Of course you couldn't. The whole idea of a "god" is very silly, and unreasonable. "Silly and unreasonable"? I think that perfectly describes your refusal to say what happened when you imaged the sun with your scope and camera. Why won't you say? What are you hiding? |
Volar User ID: 14736585 United States 04/24/2012 10:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wouldn't the mass of said object create gravitational lensing and distort almost everything we see in that 'direction'? Mass like that 'proposed' cannot simply float by with simply some geographical effects. It would distort orbits, revolutions and distance lensed vision.... No? Quoting: LOCUTUS - UNPLUGGED I am no Astromut...but makes sense. LO-UP That has been pointed out about a billion times, but is ignored. Zetatards don't believe that anyone knows how to figure normal planetary orbits(since they cab't). Not necessary. In fact, your scientists say most Suns have a Dual companion. This was just recently discovered to be factual knowledge. I would venture to guess there is more to be learned that even YOU might not know, "kitty kat". |
Halcyon Dayz, FCD User ID: 11757475 Netherlands 04/24/2012 11:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wouldn't the mass of said object create gravitational lensing and distort almost everything we see in that 'direction'? Mass like that 'proposed' cannot simply float by with simply some geographical effects. It would distort orbits, revolutions and distance lensed vision.... No? Quoting: LOCUTUS - UNPLUGGED I am no Astromut...but makes sense. LO-UP That has been pointed out about a billion times, but is ignored. Zetatards don't believe that anyone knows how to figure normal planetary orbits(since they can't). Not necessary. Yes, necessarily. Newton's Laws are hardly a mystery, unless you're a Zeta. The Zetas actually don't seem to know any real world science at all. Apart from not being true*, how is that relevant. If the solar system is a binary the companion is small and far out. If it weren't we would know it exists, because anything bigger or closer would effect the orbits of the planets to an noticeable degree. We'd have pictures of it by now, and possibly a space-probe en route. Are you sure you're a native English speaker? I would venture to guess there is more to be learned that even YOU might not know, "kitty kat". Quoting: Volar 14736585 Science doesn't know everything? Science knows it doesn't know everything, otherwise it'd stop. — Dara Ó Briain However saying "You don't know everything so you don't know anything" is indistinguishable from a brain fart. We do know many things with great certainty. We DO know how gravity changes the motion of bodies. We can fire a space-probe, do twenty fly-bys and arrive on target, billions of kilometres away, 12 years later, within a margin of error of a few seconds. * [link to www.space.com] Reaching for the sky makes you taller. Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans. |
Menow User ID: 8548727 United States 04/24/2012 12:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wouldn't the mass of said object create gravitational lensing and distort almost everything we see in that 'direction'? Mass like that 'proposed' cannot simply float by with simply some geographical effects. It would distort orbits, revolutions and distance lensed vision.... No? Quoting: LOCUTUS - UNPLUGGED I am no Astromut...but makes sense. LO-UP That has been pointed out about a billion times, but is ignored. Zetatards don't believe that anyone knows how to figure normal planetary orbits(since they cab't). Not necessary. In fact, your scientists say most Suns have a Dual companion. This was just recently discovered to be factual knowledge. I would venture to guess there is more to be learned that even YOU might not know, "kitty kat". You respond to questions like a politician. You dodge the point and make a left turn, expounding on some unrelated issue. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 13806508 United States 04/24/2012 12:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Mordier L'eft User ID: 13691144 Canada 04/24/2012 06:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Mordier L'eft like i've said, i don't care about what nancy says. never met the guy. the flares in the video have a translucent quality to them, while this object seems solid, and luminous. i'm not calling Nibiru on this, this is someone else's video. but it is.......curious. Ti doesn't matter that you "haven't met the guy". Who do you think originated the idea that PX is hiding near the sun? NANCY LIEDER! You have been HAD! so this nancy guy was posting these things on his site back in the 60's? cuz that talk had entered popular belief in occult circles, even long before then. What "talk", that there is a rogue planet hiding near the sun? Nancy says it has been there since about 2004. YOU say it's been there since the 60s or before??? How rational or likely is that? There certainly have been movies and stories about such things back then, but they were SCIENCE FICTION, you know? god you're an idiot. the idea that the sun has a binary twin, which periodically invades is an idea CENTURIES old. what i was refering to by mentioning the 60's is a book i was reading that mentions it which was published in '65. like i said... if Nancy Lieder is YOUR ONLY CITABLE REFERENCE, then shut the fuck up. you're ignorant. go do some reading. go shill someon else's thread. go learn something useful. what else can i say? get your head outta your ass. this topic is a lot older than the internet, dunce. i wonder...was sitchin a shill for lieder? was HE taken in by Nancy's imagination? is that how he started writing in the 70's AFTER DOING 30 YEARS OF RESEARCH? Last Edited by Mordier L'eft on 04/24/2012 06:38 PM --"In this era of great big brains anything that can happen will. So hunker down." -- Kurt Vonnegut, JR. -- Galapagos. |
WindyMind User ID: 7244814 United States 04/24/2012 06:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Nibiruan Council is a multidimensional off world council whose members are connected to the planet Nibiru, also known as Planet X. The Nibiruans are dedicated to the training and successful fullfillment of star seed and walk-in missions. Mission The Nibiruan Council's mission is to help prepare humanity for 2012 so that we can take our rightful place in the galactic community. Company Overview Established in 1996 by Jelaila Starr, the Nibiruan Council in the US is representative of it's off-world counterpart on the planet Nibiru/Planet X. The Nibiruan Council organization provides a vehicle to diseminate the Nibiruans' messages to our world. |