WTF are you talking about? Pepsis? What does anything you just said have to do with what I just said?

There is no place within that law that states that RFID implants will be mandatory. It simply states that anyone who *does* have an RFID implant, will be included in the registry.

Two points:

1) It's ridiculous that they don't already have such a registry. I would have thought it would be common sense that where an implant has gone and it's statistical effectiveness would have been kept track of from the get go.

2) If mandatory RFID chips ever did happen, did anyone think there *wouldn't* be a registry to keep track of them? It doesn't make much sense to chip a population if you don't actually track them.


So in summary, nowhere in this law does it say anyone is getting mandatory RFID chips, and we already know if they ever did have the balls to try to chip us, there would be a registry keeping track of it, so this is an absolute NON STORY. There is nothing of remote interest in that law, or in this thread.