BLAZAR IS COMING !!!!!!!!!!!
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14335126 This name reminds me of Blazers as per Mega Star Explosions .... coincidence ?
Please consider from the UPN that Gravity doesn't Act in Straight line but in a spiral , so planet or stars alignemnet will actually dimish the total Gravity vector .
[
link to UPNtheory.WordPress.com]
There is an experiment here involving a Pendulum with measuraments taken during a total sun eclipse .
What is Your interpretation of the Graph showing the data ?
[
link to home.netcom.com]
I am bringing this in because in my mind the connection between Gravity and Tectonics is solid .
More interesting Gravity thoughts : the Moon receids away from Earth at one centimeter a year ! What ... pulls ??
Or are short periods every month when the Moon gets an extra pul ? No detail observations on that one but the UPN predicts a periodicity in the way the Moon moves over that one centimeter a year distance .
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14803727 But also stgrong magnetic fields deflect radiation ...
Here is the problem though , read the details on site because the Ambassador is back telling us that the radiation is breaking up the concreate foundation ! :
[
link to fukushima-diary.com]
4 reasons why we must be worried about reactor4 “other than earthquake”
Posted by Mochizuki on December 11th, 2012
Now the biggest risk of Japan is reactor4. However, we are only supposed to be worried about an “earthquake” to seriously damage the SFP of reactor4. Is this true ? No, it is not enough. We are missing 4 important facts. 1. It’s already deteriorating. About one hour ago, Fukushima Diary reported the coolant .....
Murata ex JP ambassador, “Coolant system of reactor4 was broken 12/8~12/11, concrete base is terribly deteriorating.”
Posted by Mochizuki on December 11th, 2012
According to Mr. Murata, former Japanese ambassador in Switzerland, the coolant system of SFP of reactor4 was stopped from 12/8 to 12/11, and the concrete base is terribly damaged already.
Knowing this trouble, mass media did not report it at all. On 12/11/2012, Mr. Iwakami Yasumi, Japanese journalist received this email from Mr. Murata. ....
Quoting: Inn Decent 29645941 because damaged concrete by Both radiation and temperature :
/.... One of the most common concerns in the study of the effects of radiation in concrete involves discerning
between temperature- and radiation- related deterioration.
To date, it has been difficult to determine
whether the deterioration of biological shield in a nuclear reactor facility comes from the radiation itself
or the high temperatures in the reactor vessel.
Yevick noted that temperatures of 150°F (~66°C) are the
threshold in which the hydrated-water molecule bond begins breaking [17].
Sakr and EL-Hakim [30]
studied the effects of temperature on heavyweight concrete; temperature of 100°C starts decreasing the
strength of the concrete.
Furthermore, if the temperature increases beyond 500°C the strength drops sharply [18].
Sakr and EL-Hakim [18] also noted that magnetite and silica fume have high residual
compressive strength after high temperature exposures. Based on the information presented above, the
high temperatures are very detrimental to concrete. However, the concrete in the biological shield
suffered from the breaking of the hydrated-water molecule and decrease in strength as depicted above.
El-Sayed Abdo and Amin [17] conducted a study that dealt with the temperatures caused by slow
(thermal) neutrons of the order of 109 neutrons/cm2 and their effects on concrete and found that the heat
generation by thermal neutrons occurs in the first layer of the concrete (10 – 50cm) with values of 0.2
mW/ cm3 (rise of 1.7°C) and 6.6E-3 mW/ cm3 (rise of 0.125 °C), respectively.
As denoted by the latter, the heat generated by the thermal neutrons is quite insignificant in comparison to the temperature generated by the reactor vessel as a whole ....
[
link to www.wmsym.org]