49 former NASA Scientists dispute claims of global warming!!

Lol.The Fruit Fly Scientist!

Yup. Hansen made wild predictions that never came true. He still does. It's always CO2, never others. I think he's suffering a mental disorder...

Nice that The Blaze picked up that story! I spend a lot of time at Wattsupwiththat website learning about climate stuff. Excellent website (plus websites on its blogroll).

Yes they will

Go to this aussie website - [link to joannenova.com.au]

CO2 is not the main driver plus Hansen fudged with raw data all the time to make it look like it's getting worse. [link to www.real-science.com]

Nope. [link to wattsupwiththat.com]

Thanks OP!

+5

Only idiots believe that man made emissions (which account for less than 1.7% of all carbon releases / volcanoes and under-water venting releases 40x more) are the cause for the earth going through one of it's 3K-10K year cycles.

these are former nasa employees, not current.

EVERY PLANET in our system is experiencing changes, MEASURABLE changes
even the sun.

so to say this global warming is mans fault is utter crap.
its a big fat lie.

so i say thank U to these former scientists who are speaking up.

this is all bullshit to make everyone on the planet pay a carbon tax and when a tax is foisted upon people it NEVER DIES>

that tax will never go away.
once born, thats it.its here to stay.

+1

How about showing how many NASA scientists actually believe in global warming, I bet A LOT more. 49 is almost a joke number really.

I believe in climate change AND Global Warming.

March, 2012 was the hottest march in USA history. Just sayin.

Of course. What evidence is there of global warming? And calling it now "climae change" makes the debate almost meaningless.

And wasn't last year one of the coldest on record?

Just sayin.

It's not a mental disorder, it's just a religion. Think about it. They believe in something they can't prove and have no honest evidence. It is obviously the most important thing in the world. That sounds like a religion to me.

[link to www.petitionproject.org]

You're not very well educated over weather history, are you?

March of 1910 was the warmest on record till this year.

It was very warm during January of 1846. It will warm and cool off. It is cyclical. [link to www.real-science.com]

We've had several warming periods over the past 10,000 years that were warmer than we are currently seeing. The little Ice Age was the coldest over the past 10,000 years. We may see a cooling off in a few years. How much it cools off, who knows? It depends on the Sun activity.

[link to nextgrandminimum.wordpress.com] - Map of warming and cooling periods.

[link to nextgrandminimum.wordpress.com] over solar cycles.

The scientists that are still working aren't willing to risk losing jobs over it. People's lives got ruined by warmist idiots if they announce that CO2 is not the main driver behind climate change or climate warming. It has happened before. The old ones are retired and have nothing to lose so that's why they are speaking out.

"Religion" is for the profane dumbed down ones. At the top it's only about the money.

It appears your comments prove what a dumbass you are!

It should not come as a surprise there's only one meteorologist on the list.
The rest are all engineers.
(Which doesn't surprise me.)

Hmm they seem to admit the Sun is causing this one year ago.
What or who changed their minds?

[link to www.rtcc.org]

[link to www.helium.com]

Thank you! People Should read that site more often.. Its my personal starting page. I used to watch nat geo and disc channel à lot but not anymore.. Just pure lies and propaganda ..

They believe it impacts their freedoms to drive a gas guzzling suv. 49 scientists plus a few thousand more who mostly work for the oil industry compared to over 100,000 scientist worldwide who believe climate change is real. The fact is that we really only hear about it from alternative media. Whenever msm covers it it is always spun with the word " debate" attached. Making the suggestion that it's not really a threat because it is not yet proven. If people would just think of all the billions of cars ,factories ,cow fields letting off co2 coupled with massive deforestation it becomes hard to really say that all of that has no effect on the ecosphere. I suppose it is a bit daunting and easier to believe climate change is politically motivated rather than scientifically. With that view one is relinquishing any personal responsibility as well. I guess we will wait and find out.

It seems we have a Getup / ( John Cook )Skeptical science / Crikey moron on the loose here on GLP.

As an Aussie, i apologize from the imbecile above.

Typo.

Apologise

Not convinced that having thousands of unmarked white KC-135 tankers (200,000lbs of aerosol each) spraying AIO2/Ba indefinitely is any answer. This will just create a catastrophe, but by another mechanism (classic kick the can down the road, just like the global financial manipulation is doing).

Instead of letting the earth do what it has always done (clean the slate and reset itself). The current approach will result in a much greater catastrophe by winding up earth's climate like a giant spring ready to snap/unleash unprecedented.
[link to www.youtube.com]

49 of 18,000 does not a majority make.

You are correct, but i see it as 49 of 18k with a set of nuts to call it like they see it!

so, you get your opinion from a single source. Thanks for clearing that up.

Those of us who are rational use a wealth of sources to form an opinion, and consider the opinions of those on BOTH sides before coming to a conclusion.

And considering the sheer weight of evidence for climate change, and the OVERWHELMING support in the scientific community, you have a ways to go before you are anywhere NEAR a consensus that it isnt real.

are you also with the tiny minorityy who claim the earth is flat? How about the tiny minority that claim the sun revolves around the earth?