Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,821 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,063,832
Pageviews Today: 1,779,153Threads Today: 726Posts Today: 12,053
06:12 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject BREAKING: US Senator issues press release on No. 4 Spent Fuel Pool — Warns situation worse than reported after tour of Fukushima plant
Poster Handle Anonymous Coward
Post Content
...


The 9.0 last March will be nothing....
...compared to the devastation of that MASSIVE spent fuel pool going critical. :hide:

No one ever answered this question....

Would a nuke explosion set off at the Fukushima plant consume a great deal of the radioactive fuel and convert it into lesser isotopes? ...or would it just scatter the radioactivity???
Still looking for legit answers from those who know the process.


Also.....wouldn't turning Fukushima into a seawater filled crater be a better solution than leaving it as is??


1dunno1
 Quoting: Burt Gummer


yeah mate, i postulated and researched that one back in may last year...... bit late now tho i suppose.. they did seriously consider it....


[link to www.fukushimaemergencywhatcanwedo.blogspot.com.au]
 Quoting: citizenperth


"4. It will vapourize the problem including the Plutonium."



THAT is what I wanted to know.
Thank you. thumbs


So a tactical nuke WOULD eliminate much of the problem. hmm
That is truly fighting fire with fire.

:atomicbm:
 Quoting: Burt Gummer


BS. A tactical nuke wouldn't work. What you read was a blog of someones opinion that is very wrong. Nuking Fukushima is the worst idea ever.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 10957384


It was considered as an option by the military as soon as the gravity of the situation became apparent. Since it was not done, one can assume that it was determined to be a bad idea.

Don't forget that this is an unprecedented situation and the answers are not evident to anyone, even those with scientific expertise.

It may have worked if done immediately. It may have merely made the contamination worse. Better to err on the side of caution; which is ironic considering nuke power is inherently dangerous to start with.

I sincerely hope we never find out what happens when you nuke thousands of tons of nuclear reactor fuel..

~
wb
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:







GLP