[Stanley Kubrick]=|=[TRIED TO WARN US]

The more you delve into Kubrick's movies, the more you find...it's a neverending source of knowledge. I'm not even sure he knew what he was tapping into to the full extent. He seems like an ordinary guy in documentaries!

in response to the person earlier who liked the hot girls and "who doesn't like anonymous sex?".

okay that sounds great from a male perspective, but what about how those girls felt,

that is where the real horror is, them having to submit, slave-like to the abuses or whatnot of these elite men.

you are obviously not a women, and couldn't perceive the control, fear and horror that was going on.

believe me when i tell you, those women don't want to be there or fuck those men cuz it's hot, no they are slaves and make no mistake,

THEY DO NOT WANT TO BE THERE!!!

AND I WILL ADD THAT I'M NO GOODY GOODY...i've enjoyed 3-somes, 4-somes and even an orgy, i wanted to be there w/ my peers enjoying myself in a healthy way. that is NOT the same as what we saw expressed in "eyes wide shut".

i was sickened for days after seeing it becuz i knew these groups really exist and are doing that to women/men.

Ever heard of Sharon Tate – and 13 chairs?

From reading this thread, and following many links, I have come to learn that a major "hatchet job" was done on the film so perhaps much was lost.

what about it?

just a strange old brit comedy film, or is it?

What was removed from "Eyes Wide Shut" were sexual scenes involving children, as well as human sacrifice.

This was a deliberate tactic. By removing these scenes, it leads everyone to subconsciously conclude, "Well, the elites aren't really doing anything morally wrong, they're just doing what I would do if I were rich, having wild sex parties etc."

They removed all the elements of something much darker, and Kubrick paid the price for his attempt to disclose this information with his life.

What evidence do you have of this? What is your source for the missing footage claim? From everything I've been able to find, there is no missing footage. Where are you reading differently?

What evidence do you have of this? What is your source for the missing footage claim? From everything I've been able to find, there is no missing footage. Where are you reading differently?

bump after being banned for over a week for no reason

bump after being banned for over a week for no reason

At least you’ve got some sort of reason for not giving a fuck about your own thread.

Another interesting thing to note is that he refused to put his name on Arthur Clarke's version of 2001, in order to preserve the originality of his interpretation as expressed in the movie.

stanley kubrick died on the 66th day (march 7th) of 1999 (666).

The more you delve into Kubrick's movies, the more you find...it's a neverending source of knowledge. I'm not even sure he knew what he was tapping into to the full extent. He seems like an ordinary guy in documentaries!