I am aware of everything your saying but I still think its just a word used to give reference and it really depends on the person using the word and their intent. You keep mentioning how a true star seed is supposed to act but that just sounds ridiculous to me. Besides , keeping quit just isn't in my nature. Why do you think starseeds are being born here ?
Quoting: YOUCITY23 1554286 It is now how a SC is "supposed to act" -
your interpretations are incorrect, and that should tell you something.
I simply cannot explain any more clearly to you than I already have.
A person either is or is not . . .
Because we have a purpose to fulfill and no SC knows exactly what that is while on earth.
So how am I supposed to know that my interpretations are wrong , because you said so ? Are you the one who said how a starseed is supposed to act or was that another AC ?
I AM the one you are posting to . . . and again, no, I did not say anything about "how a SC is supposed to act" - there is no "supposed to" about it.
A true SC possesses the majority of traits on the lists you've posted, that much is established, well known.
So there is no script, nothing that dictates how a SC is "supposed" to act, not at all. It's just that SC here on earth possess those traits, and people who do not, are not SC.
Therefore, your interpretation IS wrong if you believe I have posted that SC are "supposed to act" a certain way.
I think your confusion came about when I stated that SC will not engage in outright debate with those who try to claim there is no such thing as star children/star seeds, because doing so is neither necessary nor worthwhile.
People who want to become enlightened, who want to learn, will . . . they open their minds to such. Those who do not want to learn, simply won't - they will keep their minds closed.
So, if in the course of a discussion, the open-minded learn by reading and asking questions, that's great. A SC is willing to provide information. But those who are defiant are going to be defiant no matter what anyone says or writes, so there's no point in debating the issue.
