The reason why Einstein Rosen-Bridge and relativity theories are wrong. (wormholes and space travel)

ok, the reason why Einstein's rosen bridge theory doesn't work (existence of wormholes and why they are so unstable) is because one cannot bend/fold space and then travel thru from A to B. moving space and then travel in a linear fashion is the wrong idea. if you want to walk thru walls or travel to far reaches of space you must accomplish sub-atomic super-positioning and then one can be in A and B (an in neither place) all at the same time. this offers both the abiloity to "travel" and stabilize the destination and the time it is when you are positioned there and then re-positioned back here. time, in this scenario, is completely irrelevant.

yeah, i have thoughts like this. no, i'm not insane.

[link to www.krioma.net]

[link to www.physicsoftheuniverse.com]

Hi OP,

The problem you are talking about has been solved by a book - A MUST-READ - The Science of Extraterrestrials :

IT'S FREE TO READ AND DOWNLOAD IN ENGLISH :

[link to www.scribd.com]

There is a thread about it (read it until the end):

Thread: THE SCIENCE OF EXTRATERRESTRIALS: UFO's EXPLAINED AT LAST - FREE EBOOKS IN FRENCH, SPANISH & CHINESE/FREE ARTICLES AND BOOKS BY AUTHORS

Quantum entanglement is just about ONE PARTICLE SEEN FROM ANOTHER SPACE-TIME FRACTAL. Hence, two particles observed, or more.

Here is the content :

INTRODUCTION

PART 1: TIME FOR REFLECTION

Introduction to the time phenomenon
Experiments that raise questions
Ufology: an ambivalent world
The non-debate
Our blind spots
Progress means a better perception of reality
Scientific culture or the cause of errors
Time versus materialism
The instruments that shape us
Science or stage?
Tomorrow is another day
Science without consciousness is the ruin of the soul
Seeing is not foreseeing
Representation and reality
Free at last?
The proof or the inferno of error
The market of theories
Time, an answer to space
To unite or to separate?
Reality put to the test
Mathematician or creator of the universe
Let us take time to think about it
Time for theories
Parmenides or Heraclitus?
The time of infinities
Is the beauty of the world symmetrical?
Eternity or motion? Causality put to the test
What do the stars tell us about time?
The metaphysics of space-times
Time quakes in space
Alice in fractal land
The axioms of 3D time


PART 2: TIME FOR EXPLANATIONS

Personal growth through understanding
Infinite piano symphony
Space and time: beneath the cobblestones lies freedom
Absolute relativity, or the end of the quest
Time is energy
Towards a new formalism
Constraint and freedom: from separation to oneness . .
3D time: unreal
We are God!
God is very discrete, and so are ETs
Shedding new light on science
The secret life of atoms
The soft sciences: weightier than billions of suns
The holographic universe or the reality of dreams
ST or divine millefeuilles
Consciousness creates the world
All is one and one is all
No, it is not a dream
The ones we call ETs
The causal function: the future of science
The source of disinformation

CONCLUSION

ENDNOTES


Have a good reading.

Science can lead us to many conclusions, some more significant than others and some that will remain forever theory. Ask a mathematician what the last decimal place in pi is and they will have no answer, yet we use mathematics to offer proofs in all of science. The infinite surrounds us, but sometimes logic confuses that fact. We will continue to search, it is our nature. I don't think we are meant to know all the answers in this life, but rather to seek and learn, to make choices, to grow both spiritually and intellectually. We are energy yet to be observed by ourselves or the universe and all possibilities remain open.

To answer your question, just something I felt you might need reminded of as you seek your truth.

Mutliverse and M theory...2nd law of thermodynamics...it explains it all...all of it.we're almost there. But don't crap on Einstien, look what he was working with....hell, even Hawking has light-years more computing at his hands (head, no pun intended)...not bad for a dude with some crazy effin hair ehh?

So assume we find the higgs boson...figure a bit more out...I'd like to see the fractal then focused on...then we can start to put it all together and start teaching the masses the correct versions......

And damn dude...dino egg thread went evolution vs. creationism mad quick.....lol...hope this doesn't go there....peace out, love all...Masshole out!

Ah but we have seen space bend - around strong gravity wells we witness the 'bending' of space and time.

Just because humans haven't figured out a way to create gravity without mass doesn't mean it isn't impossible to bend space.

super thread!

When you think about it
Time is the limiting factor to any objects speed
it would also mean if you wernt in space/time you wouldnt have to comtend with the g forces either

What if you could remove yourself from time
speed would = distance

without the need for quantum whatever
how to free yourself from time?
Supose you could create a magnetic bubble to sheild yourself from space/time

lol
you awoke clever this morning

awesome! thanks!

baby, i was born clever. lmao

relevant:


[link to en.wikipedia.org]

think about it, what does spin tell us
variable velocity
thus if you increase coherently your velocity of thought (altered state) you "get" the faster than light information that forms and sustains our light speed material environment

in doing so you by default respond to the information you are receiving thus in practice you are responding to that which has yet to occur in our light speed environment

one way or another you alter the light speed environment by your interaction which manifests in your either preparing before it occurs, because you adhere to what is to occur or, you in faster than light velocity, deal with what is occurring (on the spot) because you do not desire that which is to occur in your light speed material environment

your ability to do either is governed by your ability to do it in the first place as in:
you can only do it in co operation with our intelligent environment thus how far you go with it is always dependent on your current relationship with all that is not you

well said...

Salt did you get a chance to view the vid I linked?

i'm sorry, but i haven't been able to get thru it yet. i have some time tonight and will give it a view. (i am a student working on a double major....ugh.... makes for an enormous reading and viewing list.

I am not sure the electron changed its behavior, but rather the act of observation forced it to change its course, taking it out of the realm of all possibilities and into the possible.

If you have time, take a look at this video and tell me what you think. (warning it is about an hour long).

[link to www.youtube.com]

if you really think about it, traveling distances that are so vast that math can't even calculate it, why would one want to travel in a linear fashion? why would one want to bend the universe, or how could you do it without interrupting other important universal activity? not to mention the fact that the energy needed to bend space, punch a hole through it and then pass through the hole would equate to more energy than what is now in the entire universe.