Eunuchs would probably be servants or slaves who, because of their function, had been castrated, usually in order to make them reliable servants of a royal court where physical access to the ruler could wield great influence. Seemingly lowly domestic functions—such as making the ruler's bed, bathing him, cutting his hair, carrying him in his litter, or even relaying messages—could in theory give a eunuch "the ruler's ear" and impart de facto power on the formally humble but trusted servant
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15204317 eunuchs were temple boys/men, sex slaves of the priests, elites working for them in many ways.
you can find their existence everywhere on this planet, in each civilization where an elites of men (religious or not) where in charge of everything.
the only ones who were around women (harem for ex, they were placed here to watch after the women like guard dogs) since they were raised to be gay sex slave (for the priests guilty pleasure) and they were castrated young so no risk if they even touched a woman (no reproduction possible).
eunuchs were also well known in history for being tranvestite imitating women (theatre used them a lot), singers (many castrato = castrated men chosen when they were only boys because of their talent, their voice ex: farinelli) and of course they were always around the elites to entertain them (minions, servants etc).
since it became too obvious too litterally castrate men, the process changed: gay = eunuch
they are not attracted to women, they imitate them, they don't reproduce, buttsex and BDSM stuff are their background.
women too are suffering from this kind of crazyness, the actual nuns are nothing more than a new version of the temple virgins (see the history of greece, rome etc) working for an elite.
now ask yourself why these elites, priests did and are still doing this?
sex is a problem, especially sex between men and women.
why?
