Daniel the biblical prophet was a eunuch and more than likely gay

You need to see a shrink.......is it due to the past inbreeding that you Britt's act so foolish?

Dan the Fag?

Matthew 19:12

For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.

i think jesus here is saying some people are born gay whereas daniel was made gay

^^THIS^^



There is something wrong with many of them, I know I am going to piss people off but before you give me negative karma take me up on this.
In another thread a while back I noticed this & I said it before.
Check out the responses over a few weeks from the Brits, never mind the subject, this will work across topics!

See if MOST are consistently demeaning, weird, hateful, naive, or bigoted... just do it.

I bet you will be surprised, we need to help these poor people, someone did something very bad to them.

Daniel was a Torah keeping man, not a homo, which is FORBIDDEN
dummy

How about addressing the points made (whether wrong or not----you decide) instead of engaging in ad hominems------------huh??????????????????????

Even MORE likely........Daniel never existed at all....!!!!

Time to grow up.

oh yeah so the jewish hitorian josephus lied in his account ?

"But now Nebuchadnezzar, King of Babylon, took some of the most noble of the jewish people that were children, and the kinsmen of Zedekiah their king, such as were remarkable for the beauty of their bodies, and the comeliness of their countenances, and delivered them into the hands of tutors, and to the improvement to be made by them. He also made some of them to be eunuchs . . . Now among these there were four of the family of Zedekiah, of most excellent dispositions, one of whom was called Daniel, another was called Ananias, another Misael, and the fourth Azarias; and the King of Babylon changed their names, and commanded that they should make use of other names.

Josephus, Antiquities of the jewish people, Book 10, Chapter 10, first paragraph

I do not believe that Daniel was gay. You are of the Antichrist.

facts are facts regardless of who believes in them


A second evidence where the Bible shows that eunuchs are gay men is in (Daniel 14:2 NAB), which says: "Daniel was the king's favorite and was held in higher esteem than any of the friends of the king." In the Aramaic Old Testament, the word friends is replaced with the Aramaic word rakh-maw-hi, which means lovers. Rakh-maw-hi is from the singular Aramaic word rakh-ma, which means love.

I specifically said up front I might piss people off and issued a challenge, which if you engage upon will surprise you.
You however chose to ignore that part.

Anyway...

I honestly think he is probably onto something if you must know. It's a strange book, and it's been translated poorly and has many parts omitted.

The thing about the eunuchs always did make me a bit confused, same with the part about cutting off an offending body part.

Daniel 14:2 NAB
There is not a chapter 14 in the book of Daniel. Only has 12 chapters.

YOU FAIL!

never trust the prophecies of a buttfucked homo eunuch

Chapters 13-14 are in the Catholic canon of scripture. The Aramaic Old Testament contains fourteen chapters of Daniel. The Aramaic text of Daniel also has “the song of the three children”

WOW! Thanks for sharing OP. I didn't know that.

Eunuchs would probably be servants or slaves who, because of their function, had been castrated, usually in order to make them reliable servants of a royal court where physical access to the ruler could wield great influence. Seemingly lowly domestic functions—such as making the ruler's bed, bathing him, cutting his hair, carrying him in his litter, or even relaying messages—could in theory give a eunuch "the ruler's ear" and impart de facto power on the formally humble but trusted servant

OP the only gay here is you..

Since according to all Old Testament Law sodomy was considered a crime against the creator, I seriously doubt your perverse conjecture.

You have taken that out of context .

"But now Nebuchadnezzar, King of Babylon, took some of the most noble of the jewish people that were children, and the kinsmen of Zedekiah their king, such as were remarkable for the beauty of their bodies, and the comeliness of their countenances, and delivered them into the hands of tutors, and to the improvement to be made by them. He also made some of them to be eunuchs . . . Now among these there were four of the family of Zedekiah, of most excellent dispositions, one of whom was called Daniel, another was called Ananias, another Misael, and the fourth Azarias; and the King of Babylon changed their names, and commanded that they should make use of other names.

Let me fix that for you . It does not say that Daniel was a Eunuch but some that were of the noble Jewish people .

And openly gay ? You have slandered the Word and will account for it when you die and are judged . God would not have dealt with Daniel if he was gay .

OP is projecting.

eunuchs were temple boys/men, sex slaves of the priests, elites working for them in many ways.
you can find their existence everywhere on this planet, in each civilization where an elites of men (religious or not) where in charge of everything.

the only ones who were around women (harem for ex, they were placed here to watch after the women like guard dogs) since they were raised to be gay sex slave (for the priests guilty pleasure) and they were castrated young so no risk if they even touched a woman (no reproduction possible).


eunuchs were also well known in history for being tranvestite imitating women (theatre used them a lot), singers (many castrato = castrated men chosen when they were only boys because of their talent, their voice ex: farinelli) and of course they were always around the elites to entertain them (minions, servants etc).

since it became too obvious too litterally castrate men, the process changed: gay = eunuch
they are not attracted to women, they imitate them, they don't reproduce, buttsex and BDSM stuff are their background.

women too are suffering from this kind of crazyness, the actual nuns are nothing more than a new version of the temple virgins (see the history of greece, rome etc) working for an elite.


now ask yourself why these elites, priests did and are still doing this?
sex is a problem, especially sex between men and women.

why?

Silly fags. 2% now.
.0002% then.
Making EVERYBODY gay in your minds does not excuse your perversion.

good post

Qadishtu/Qedshtu were also male transvestites as in jospeh with his coat of many colours

Great thread, Daniel

The Hebrew Bible tells us that at the Temple of Jerusalem there existed cult prostitutes both male (Hebrew: qadesh) and female (qadeshah), and we are informed that Israel engaged in fornification rites "under every green tree" (cf. De 23:17-18; Lev 18:22-23; 1 Ki 14:23-24,15:12-13, 23:7). The word qadesh means "holy" and it was applied to cult prostitutes because they had been "religiously set aside or dedicated" to serve a god or goddess of a shrine or temple, their sexual favors bringing in revenues for the temple's upkeep.

this is totally possible OP.


Do something more useful with your faith in Christ.

This thread helps no one.

If Daniel of the Bible was real then how can we ever prove it anyway/ that he was gay that is?

let it go, move on, go help someone in need.