Ron Paul MUST win TEXAS or CALIFORNIA or Paul will NOT be the Republican nominee!!! | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 992971 United States 04/29/2012 05:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Apocalypse Troll Trollicus Apocalyptus User ID: 14691709 United States 04/29/2012 05:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What numbers are you looking at FFS? [link to www.realclearpolitics.com] "Honor the Texas flag; I pledge allegiance to thee, Texas, one state under God, one and indivisible." [link to www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 12886926 United States 04/29/2012 05:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 15271254 United States 04/29/2012 05:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1271389 United States 04/29/2012 06:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | These are my own numbers, since you can't find real Ron Paul delegate totals anywhere. Including MSNBC! :b MSM puts Ron Paul at a projected total of 50-80 delegates -- pending who you look at. This is false, which is why I took my time to get the real totals. Ron Paul is going to dominate in every caucus. The state caucuses that have already begun have proven that -- Iowa; Minnesota; Washington; Alaska; Louisiana; Maine. Colorado and Nevada were the only caucus states in my research where Paul is in danger of not getting a large portion of delegates. When you run the real numbers, AS IT CURRENTLY STANDS, Ron Paul has 326-350 delegates. I also crunched Romney's figures. He's at 600-610. Because the system is too corrupt, Paul won't beat Romney in the remaining primaries. Unfortunately Paul only has a shot when the people can control the voting process in caucuses. The only remaining caucuses hold 50 delegates. My projections show Paul needs 197 to block an automatic nomination from Romney. That's why Paul needs to go all in with the Texas primary. Even if Paul lost but lost small, he'd be given a large portion. While losing Texas by small would still be a blow, it might be enough to pick up a few more delegates elsewhere to block Romney. If Paul gets a brokered convention he'll be the nominee. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1271389 United States 04/29/2012 06:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | These are my own numbers, since you can't find real Ron Paul delegate totals anywhere. Including MSNBC! :b MSM puts Ron Paul at a projected total of 50-80 delegates -- pending who you look at. This is false, which is why I took my time to get the real totals. Ron Paul is going to dominate in every caucus. The state caucuses that have already begun have proven that -- Iowa; Minnesota; Washington; Alaska; Louisiana; Maine. Colorado and Nevada were the only caucus states in my research where Paul is in danger of not getting a large portion of delegates. When you run the real numbers, AS IT CURRENTLY STANDS, Ron Paul has 326-350 delegates. I also crunched Romney's figures. He's at 600-610. Because the system is too corrupt, Paul won't beat Romney in the remaining primaries. Unfortunately Paul only has a shot when the people can control the voting process in caucuses. The only remaining caucuses hold 50 delegates. My projections show Paul needs 197 to block an automatic nomination from Romney. That's why Paul needs to go all in with the Texas primary. Even if Paul lost but lost small, he'd be given a large portion. While losing Texas by small would still be a blow, it might be enough to pick up a few more delegates elsewhere to block Romney. If Paul gets a brokered convention he'll be the nominee. This is a summary of my first post, so read it, it explains why Paul needs to win Texas. I've been a Ron Paul supporter since 2007 which is why I spent hours crunching these numbers. Paul needs a brokered convention or he's not going to be the nominee. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1271389 United States 04/29/2012 06:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Burt Gummer User ID: 7702124 United States 04/29/2012 06:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is a summary of my first post, so read it, it explains why Paul needs to win Texas. I've been a Ron Paul supporter since 2007 which is why I spent hours crunching these numbers. Paul needs a brokered convention or he's not going to be the nominee. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1271389 Ya think??? Derp! |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1271389 United States 04/29/2012 06:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is a summary of my first post, so read it, it explains why Paul needs to win Texas. I've been a Ron Paul supporter since 2007 which is why I spent hours crunching these numbers. Paul needs a brokered convention or he's not going to be the nominee. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1271389 Ya think??? Derp! Yeah, and he's not going to get a brokered convention if Romney wins both Texas and California. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1086642 United States 04/29/2012 06:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1271389 United States 04/29/2012 06:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The fanatical Paul zealots have really scared me, their blind worship has gone beyond rational at this point. I like Paul and would vote for him under normal circumstances, but not now, not anymore. I would have to vote anyone but Paul at this point and hope the scotus and house can keep the damage of the next 4 years minimal Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1086642 What's normal circumstances? The "choice" of either Cookie Cutter President A or Cookie Cutter President B? To get a realistic, libertarian, and man of the people in office...can't be done under normal circumstances. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7052470 United States 04/29/2012 06:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2899897 United States 04/30/2012 04:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 9443724 United States 04/30/2012 04:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 4079433 United States 04/30/2012 08:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 14426697 United States 04/30/2012 08:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ron Paul is not going to win the Republican nominee if he wins them anyways.. its over.. Romney is gona get the nominee.. Thank god too.. Puting Ron Paul in it would be like puts a bull with tits on it.. WORTHLESS |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1217540 United States 04/30/2012 12:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | At this point, Ron Paul winning the nomination at a brokered convention by delegates while Romney has such a massive advantage in number of general population votes around the country would not only solidify another 4 years of Obama, but it would be the death nail in our republic. It would make the 2000 election look like child's play. Both parties would put aside differences on one issue, i.e. Constitutional Ammendment to remove the Electoral College and both parties would redefine the delegate system for primaries to be sure it never happened again. At this point, RP willing would be a total disaster. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 11988438 United States 04/30/2012 12:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The fanatical Paul zealots have really scared me, their blind worship has gone beyond rational at this point. I like Paul and would vote for him under normal circumstances, but not now, not anymore. I would have to vote anyone but Paul at this point and hope the scotus and house can keep the damage of the next 4 years minimal Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1086642 What's normal circumstances? The "choice" of either Cookie Cutter President A or Cookie Cutter President B? To get a realistic, libertarian, and man of the people in office...can't be done under normal circumstances. That part of AC's post stood out. FEAR. Like anything in this country is rational anymore, there's no logic anywhere. People flock to Paul for one reason... he has common sense and isn't afraid to say hard truth. He has enough respect not to lie to himself or to the public. He scares them because he's honest. It says a lot about this Bizarro World we're living in, I think. Vote for him, don't vote for him, but don't listen to his supporters, listen to the man himself. There's a lot of us who do who don't qualify as skerry Paulbottards. Don't let the zealots put you off, they're everywhere in every group. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 15292967 United States 04/30/2012 05:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1155690 United States 04/30/2012 05:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | These are my own numbers, since you can't find real Ron Paul delegate totals anywhere. Including MSNBC! :b MSM puts Ron Paul at a projected total of 50-80 delegates -- pending who you look at. This is false, which is why I took my time to get the real totals. Ron Paul is going to dominate in every caucus. The state caucuses that have already begun have proven that -- Iowa; Minnesota; Washington; Alaska; Louisiana; Maine. Colorado and Nevada were the only caucus states in my research where Paul is in danger of not getting a large portion of delegates. When you run the real numbers, AS IT CURRENTLY STANDS, Ron Paul has 326-350 delegates. I also crunched Romney's figures. He's at 600-610. Because the system is too corrupt, Paul won't beat Romney in the remaining primaries. Unfortunately Paul only has a shot when the people can control the voting process in caucuses. The only remaining caucuses hold 50 delegates. My projections show Paul needs 197 to block an automatic nomination from Romney. That's why Paul needs to go all in with the Texas primary. Even if Paul lost but lost small, he'd be given a large portion. While losing Texas by small would still be a blow, it might be enough to pick up a few more delegates elsewhere to block Romney. If Paul gets a brokered convention he'll be the nominee. Actually some sources are indicating that Ron paul may also take the majority of the delegates from iowa and washingotn, though I am unsure if these are accurate reports. |
Burt Gummer User ID: 7702124 United States 04/30/2012 05:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | LET THIS BE AN OFFICIAL COMPLAINT TO THE ELECTION ETHICS COMMISSION: MITT ROMNEY'S SUPPORTERS ARE ENGAGING IN VOTE FRAUD Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15292967 You know what......at this point I say GOOD. Why??? You need to fight fire with fire to win this election. You KNOW Obama and his ACORN nuts are going to be doing it. Last Edited by Useless Cookie Eater on 04/30/2012 05:33 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 15319140 United States 04/30/2012 05:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The fanatical Paul zealots have really scared me, their blind worship has gone beyond rational at this point. I like Paul and would vote for him under normal circumstances, but not now, not anymore. I would have to vote anyone but Paul at this point and hope the scotus and house can keep the damage of the next 4 years minimal Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1086642 Honestly. FUCK OFF. If you don't vote for the man based on HIM and not his supporters you are nothing but a total dickhead. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 13744385 United Kingdom 04/30/2012 05:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Critical Limit User ID: 8568151 Ireland 05/01/2012 06:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
smokahontas User ID: 15382161 United States 05/01/2012 06:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Let me belay your worries.... Ron Paul will NOT be the republican Nominee "I may not agree with what you say, but I would defend to the death your right to say it." Voltaire "Facts do not cease to exist just because they are ignored." Aldous Huxley |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1660185 United States 05/01/2012 06:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | MASSIVE DISSINFORMATION! SPREAD THE WORD! PAUL IS GOING TO TAKE IT LIKE WARREN HARDING DID! MSM MSNBC 7 DAYS AGO REVEALS PAUL LIKELY TO UPSET ROMNEY WITH BROKERED CON. AFTER ALL!!! MSM has ben trying to avoid this story, but it got out....Paul is looking like he WILL get the nomination. MSM WORDS! Proof links here: PLEASE GO HERE: [link to www.imackgroup.com] AND GO HERE [link to www.whiteoutpress.com] AND THEN SPREAD THE WORD VIRAL AND BUMP THESE LINKS TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW..... We are not dead yet!!!! Save America one email at A TIME! |
Everyone is missing User ID: 12342850 United States 05/09/2012 12:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | the big picture here. Open your eyes. A brokered convention stacked with Paul supporters would be able to do much much more than just nominate Paul. They could vote to suspend the rules and sweep from power the entire senior national party leadership and replace the entire RNC with Paul supporters! The implications of this go much much further than the question of a Paul nomination or even a Paul presidency. This is nothing less than an opportunity for the grass roots to reclaim control of the party. Imagine the implications for 2014 and 2016 of an RNC dominated by Paul supporters... These folks would be in a position to funnel money and support to real patriots instead of CFR approved shills. They would be in a position to deny party support to those pols who have long ago sold out. Let's stop thinking small here...a real revolution is in the offing if Paul can pull this off. This is why you should expect the party leadership to do everything in their power to prevent these pro-Paul delegates from being seated in August. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 15775176 United States 05/09/2012 12:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 15738519 United States 05/09/2012 12:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 15738519 United States 05/09/2012 12:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | the big picture here. Open your eyes. A brokered convention stacked with Paul supporters would be able to do much much more than just nominate Paul. They could vote to suspend the rules and sweep from power the entire senior national party leadership and replace the entire RNC with Paul supporters! Quoting: Everyone is missing 12342850 The implications of this go much much further than the question of a Paul nomination or even a Paul presidency. This is nothing less than an opportunity for the grass roots to reclaim control of the party. Imagine the implications for 2014 and 2016 of an RNC dominated by Paul supporters... These folks would be in a position to funnel money and support to real patriots instead of CFR approved shills. They would be in a position to deny party support to those pols who have long ago sold out. Let's stop thinking small here...a real revolution is in the offing if Paul can pull this off. This is why you should expect the party leadership to do everything in their power to prevent these pro-Paul delegates from being seated in August. Brilliant !!! Can they really do that ? That's like a dream come true. I would laugh my a** off if they could do that. |