Christians: We are not under the law of the Old Testament....................

dang hun, your gonna make people sin, LOL!

tbh its only something ive heard many times over, and think ibwatched a documentery about it a while ago. ill try n see if i can find something on it.
Hades=Greek god hell.
hell=hell.

Salt:
there are alot, and my posting of sites hasnt been working well lately.
but you can google "Apocrypha of Jesus going to hell" and you'll come up with alot, some say Hades some say hell.
but you'd have to imagine the Greeks would have likely used the term Hades to represent hell given their Greek background.

nah... the Greeks would never confuse the two

is that sarcasm? or are you serious?
if serious, please do explain?

during the Hellenistic period, the hellenistic je w s were meticulous in their translations of ancient Hebrew and Aramaic

you mean like Yahuwah to Iesus? LOL. j/k i understand what your saying however, was there a Hebrew word for hell?
ill check the Strongs on that.

Blue letter bible says Hebrew for hell is shoel, also defined in part as Hades. ill see if i can post this site, but forgive me if it doesnt work:

[link to blueletterbible.org]

correct. shoel and hades were used metaphorically in certain scriptures.

FFS, LOL, see?
*SIGH*
just type in "hell" in the search box, and passages will come up, then click the number (footnote) next to the word "hell" and it should come up.

so Jesus going to hell (hades) after crusifiction, your arguement is?

Jesus was completely separated from God. that does not mean he went to hell.

but can you prove that?
dont get me wrong, im not saying He did or didnt, tbh i dont know, but tbh, if He did, it would go quite well with the "why have you forsaken me" part.

also, Salt are you familure with Jewish law?

i guess i'm not interested in proving it. not my responsibility. i am merely going by what the scriptures say collectively.

sorry if i offended.
collectively as in bible not Apocrypha?
whats the difference really? because the books/gospels were cannonized?

Collier’s Encyclopedia (1986, Vol. 12, p. 28) says concerning “Hell”: “First it stands for the Hebrew Sheol of the Old Testament and the Greek Hades of the Septuagint and New Testament. Since Sheol in Old Testament times referred simply to the abode of the dead and suggested no moral distinctions, the word ‘hell,’ as understood today, is not a happy translation.”
It is, in fact, because of the way that the word “hell” is understood today that it is such an unsatisfactory translation of these original Bible words. Webster’s Third New International Dictionary, unabridged, under “Hell” says: “fr[om] . . . helan to conceal.” The word “hell” thus originally conveyed no thought of heat or torment but simply of a ‘covered over or concealed place.’ In the old English dialect the expression “helling potatoes” meant, not to roast them, but simply to place the potatoes in the ground or in a cellar

Collier’s Encyclopedia (1986, Vol. 12, p. 28) says concerning “Hell”: “First it stands for the Hebrew Sheol of the Old Testament and the Greek Hades of the Septuagint and New Testament. Since Sheol in Old Testament times referred simply to the abode of the dead and suggested no moral distinctions, the word ‘hell,’ as understood today, is not a happy translation.”
It is, in fact, because of the way that the word “hell” is understood today that it is such an unsatisfactory translation of these original Bible words. Webster’s Third New International Dictionary, unabridged, under “Hell” says: “fr[om] . . . helan to conceal.” The word “hell” thus originally conveyed no thought of heat or torment but simply of a ‘covered over or concealed place.’ In the old English dialect the expression “helling potatoes” meant, not to roast them, but simply to place the potatoes in the ground or in a cellar

I fixed that for you.

THERE IS ALSO THIS
Chapter Five: Heaven and Hell (Part 2)

Hell is termed “Gehenom” in Hebrew and is sometimes known as “The Netherworld”. It’s the unholy realm in which we bear the consequences of our bad ethical choices. But something needs to be emphasized here; for as Ramchal puts it, Gehenom is the place where “the soul is punished”, not the body. That’s to say, the sort of recompense and punishment we’re speaking of here is an immaterial kind. Hence the idea that Hell is a black and fiery place of eternal torment for the damned, as it’s usually taken to be, is absurd by our reckoning.

After all, if it was our bodies that experienced Gehenom, then we could conceivably be said to suffer the kind of hell-fire and brimstone that’s associated with Hell. But that’s not the case.

So some offered that the punishments depicted were metaphorical; they said that they stood for a sort of mental and emotional anguish of the soul. But while elevating the suffering to a non-material level of abstract anguish certainly separates it from the body, that’s still only one step beyond an out-and-out a material understanding of it.

Yet the tradition is clear about the existence of Gehenom, and it certainly insists upon the reality of recompense for wrongdoing just as much as it’s resolute about reward for goodness (which is why Ramchal equated the two when he said that “just as there are different degrees of punishment” in Gehenom, “there are likewise different degrees delight” in Gan Eden). So what is Gehenom all about after all?

It comes to this: the otherworldly suffering undergone in Gehenom is of a wholly spiritual kind that’s set-off by what’s termed elsewhere a "subtle, ethereal fire” (see Ramban’s Sha’ar HaGemul) that’s totally out of our experience -- just as out of our experience, by the way, as the immaterial mechanism that allows for the sort of otherworldly delight enjoyed in Gan Eden.


[link to www.torah.org]


and there is this


[link to godssecret.wordpress.com]