|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
NIBIRU/ PLANET X CONFIRMATION---putting the pieces together
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Astromut |
|
Post Content
|
...
Volar, reducing the resolution, light gathering ability, and optical quality by using a small aperture shitty cell phone camera does not help you see "objects near the bulb." In fact, I showed Venus in broad daylight through my solar filter, as well as the fact that the floppy disc filtered cell phone image was only showing a filter flare, not a real object. The telescope out-performed the cell phone camera in every respect, including, and most importantly, in the ability to detect planets in the middle of the day.
Quoting: Astromut Astromut, maybe I have given you much more credit than you have deserved, however, this is one of the few times I have my doubts. The only reason you could see Venus in broad daylight is, for the simple reason, that Planet is very heavy in cloud cover, and its clouds are very reflective of the Sun's rays....especially when it is that close to the Sun. Then you should feel really stupid that all your cell-phone-floppy-disc pictures can't even detect Venus in broad daylight like my telescope can. If the cell-phone-floppy-disc technique were viable for detecting planets far more difficult to detect than Venus as you imply, Venus should stand out like a blowtorch. It doesn't. The only thing it shows are filter flares, no real planets. Good job, you just shot down your own technique. Thanks for disproving yourself! The only reliable way, whether you believe it or not, is to forget about the useless telescope, and take snap shots around dusk, or dawn, when Planet X is very close to the Sun. No, you're wrong, I've already proven that my technique is superior for detecting planets during the day and you have utterly failed to address your cult's failure of a technique which I have already exposed.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
