|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
NIBIRU/ PLANET X CONFIRMATION---putting the pieces together
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Volar |
|
Post Content
|
...
...
You have no idea what you are talking about. I will try to explain in simple terms, so you can understand.
Let us take, for example, a thousand watt bulb shinning very bright, and there are objects next to it you are unable to see, because of the glare of the light. To be able to see the objects near the bulb this is what your "astronomy" freaks are advocating. "Why don't we just take a huge magnifier, and make the bulb several times larger, while allowing as much light to enter the eye as possible (equivalent to a 100,000 watt light bulb)? Now, we will cut down the light to a mere 10 watts, by adding a very heavy dark filter over the magnifier.” The result is everything close to this very dim, chocked down light cannot be seen because everything else has been filtered down to absolutely no visibility whatsoever.
Get the point? If not, it is not my fault.
Quoting: Volar 14736585 Volar, reducing the resolution, light gathering ability, and optical quality by using a small aperture shitty cell phone camera does not help you see "objects near the bulb." In fact, I showed Venus in broad daylight through my solar filter, as well as the fact that the floppy disc filtered cell phone image was only showing a filter flare, not a real object. The telescope out-performed the cell phone camera in every respect, including, and most importantly, in the ability to detect planets in the middle of the day. Astromut, maybe I have given you much more credit than you have deserved, however, this is one of the few times I have my doubts. The only reason you could see Venus in broad daylight is, for the simple reason, that Planet is very heavy in cloud cover, and its clouds are very reflective of the Sun's rays....especially when it is that close to the Sun. Then you should feel really stupid that all your cell-phone-floppy-disc pictures can't even detect Venus in broad daylight like my telescope can. If the cell-phone-floppy-disc technique were viable for detecting planets far more difficult to detect than Venus as you imply, Venus should stand out like a blowtorch. It doesn't. The only thing it shows are filter flares, no real planets. Good job, you just shot down your own technique. Thanks for disproving yourself! So you took a telescopic picture of Venus, without an Elongation. Why am I not impressed? As I said before....because "Venus" is the brightest Planet in the Solar system, it should be obvious it would appear near the Sun as a burning hot piece of coal. And....due to its reflective intensity, it would not be hard to discern the fact dampening the intensity of the Sun would still not inhibit this extremely bright object to not be viewed. Not so, with all the other Planets....especially Planet X. The Sun makes your telescope with a large aperture virtually USELESS.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
