| Users Online Now: 1,280 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 82,378 | |
| Pageviews Today: 153,751 | Threads Today: 65 | Posts Today: 1,124 |
| 02:08 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,280 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 82,378 | |
| Pageviews Today: 153,751 | Threads Today: 65 | Posts Today: 1,124 |
| 02:08 AM | ||
Wash Times: Ron Paul delegate strategy is perfectly legitimate - Awesome article | |
| calin Offer Upgrade  User ID: 1350324  United States05/03/2012 06:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| calin (OP) User ID: 1350324 United States05/03/2012 06:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to communities.washingtontimes.com] Often, voter ignorance of the candidates and issues is even worse. Ron Paul’s strategy takes advantage of the republican nature of the nomination process. That process does not rely purely on a popular vote to determine who will be the nominee. Instead, voters must go through a multi-tiered vetting process of successive elections in order to become a delegate to the RNC. This does not remove all of the dangers inherent in a pure democracy, but it helps. At least a delegate has been forced to hear the arguments of other candidates before blindly casting a vote. He also must have the commitment necessary to endure the long delegate selection process. .............................. When you judge another, you do not define them, you define yourself. .................................. THE SECOND AGREEMENT: "Don't take anything personally. When you are immune to the opinions and actions of others, you won't be the victim of needless suffering." ~ Don Miguel Ruiz, The Four Agreements |
| calin (OP) User ID: 1350324 United States05/03/2012 06:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Undermining democracy would be a good thing. If there is anything we have too much of in 21st century America; it’s democracy. The United States flourished as a free and prosperous society largely because it was founded as a republic. The reason for the bicameral legislature, the separation of powers, and the other so-called “checks and balances” was to protect us from democracy, which James Madison called “the most vile form of government.” [link to communities.washingtontimes.com] .............................. When you judge another, you do not define them, you define yourself. .................................. THE SECOND AGREEMENT: "Don't take anything personally. When you are immune to the opinions and actions of others, you won't be the victim of needless suffering." ~ Don Miguel Ruiz, The Four Agreements |
| calin (OP) User ID: 1350324 United States05/03/2012 06:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Go Ron Paul delegates! .............................. When you judge another, you do not define them, you define yourself. .................................. THE SECOND AGREEMENT: "Don't take anything personally. When you are immune to the opinions and actions of others, you won't be the victim of needless suffering." ~ Don Miguel Ruiz, The Four Agreements |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 15477723 United States05/03/2012 06:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 11988438 United States05/03/2012 06:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Matrix User ID: 1166681  Australia05/03/2012 06:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 15477723 United States05/03/2012 06:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1312616  Spain05/03/2012 06:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 15412737  United Kingdom05/03/2012 06:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And here we see the Ron Paul voters now supporting the MSM. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15477723 Shouldn't you wonder if you are being had? And you have been had all along? Who is supporting the MSM? No one, people just want fair coverage. Paul isn't a Bilderberg member, CFR, Trilateral, Knight of Malta, Club of Rome, Bohemian Grove member OR skull&bones. |
| zacksavage User ID: 1251196 United States05/03/2012 07:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ron Paul delegate strategy is perfectly legitimate Quoting: calin Thursday, May 3, 2012 - Reawakening Liberty by Thomas Mullen For at least a month, the media have been ignoring compelling evidence that Ron Paul is doing much better in the Republican nomination race than he did in the primary/caucus popular votes. In their hurry to write the general election narrative, the media have forgotten to perform their primary function: to report the facts. The facts are that Ron Paul has won at least two states and will likely win more. Now that Paul’s success is impossible to ignore, the media are writing a new narrative. Headlines like “Ron Paul’s stealth state convention takeover” and “Ron Paul People Playing Mischief with Delegates” indicate that instead of ignoring Paul’s victories, they now seek to imply that there is something sneaky or unfair about them. Some even suggest that his delegate success in states where he did not win the popular vote may even (gasp!) “undermine democracy.” .................. Neither is Paul’s strategy underhanded or “sneaky.” He has made it clear since the beginning of his campaign that he was going to concentrate on the caucus states where he believed that his strong grassroots organization and more devoted following would win him delegates. He predicted his delegate victories in states where he did not win the popular vote months in advance and now those predictions are coming true. How can anyone say that they didn’t know what was going on? Early in this election cycle, the media repeated ad nauseum that Ron Paul could not win the nomination. That affected his performance in popular votes. They never suggested this about any of the other nine candidates, eight of which are now out. Then, they repeated ad nauseum that Ron Paul had not won any states, even though he had. Now, they attempt to cast aspersions on those wins with spurious arguments about their legitimacy. Methinks the media doth protest too much. What about Ron Paul are they so afraid of? [link to communities.washingtontimes.com] Proves Paul is a savvy, smart, worthy leader to me. All the all-so-ran's are out,...Robme is biting his nails. Sweet! Z Free your mind,...your ass will follow. --- parliament funkadelic |
| Matrix User ID: 1166681 Australia05/03/2012 07:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 15477723 United States05/03/2012 07:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And here we see the Ron Paul voters now supporting the MSM. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15477723 Shouldn't you wonder if you are being had? And you have been had all along? Who is supporting the MSM? No one, people just want fair coverage. Paul isn't a Bilderberg member, CFR, Trilateral, Knight of Malta, Club of Rome, Bohemian Grove member OR skull&bones. MSM is never to be trusted. Unless is says what Paultards wants them to say (even if only selectively so). This is how blind and moronic the Paultards are. They show they really don't give a damn about goodness or truth, but only the show |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 11988438 United States05/03/2012 07:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I like this site. It keeps a photo timeline of Dr. Paul's crowds... for those that think no one wants to hear it. [link to rpcrowds.tumblr.com] |
| zacksavage User ID: 1251196 United States05/03/2012 07:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And here we see the Ron Paul voters now supporting the MSM. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15477723 Shouldn't you wonder if you are being had? And you have been had all along? Who is supporting the MSM? No one, people just want fair coverage. Paul isn't a Bilderberg member, CFR, Trilateral, Knight of Malta, Club of Rome, Bohemian Grove member OR skull&bones. MSM is never to be trusted. Unless is says what Paultards wants them to say (even if only selectively so). This is how blind and moronic the Paultards are. They show they really don't give a damn about goodness or truth, but only the show Oh no,...you've gone and done it now.   Z Free your mind,...your ass will follow. --- parliament funkadelic |
| calin (OP) User ID: 1350324 United States05/03/2012 07:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ron Paul delegate strategy is perfectly legitimate Quoting: calin Thursday, May 3, 2012 - Reawakening Liberty by Thomas Mullen For at least a month, the media have been ignoring compelling evidence that Ron Paul is doing much better in the Republican nomination race than he did in the primary/caucus popular votes. In their hurry to write the general election narrative, the media have forgotten to perform their primary function: to report the facts. The facts are that Ron Paul has won at least two states and will likely win more. Now that Paul’s success is impossible to ignore, the media are writing a new narrative. Headlines like “Ron Paul’s stealth state convention takeover” and “Ron Paul People Playing Mischief with Delegates” indicate that instead of ignoring Paul’s victories, they now seek to imply that there is something sneaky or unfair about them. Some even suggest that his delegate success in states where he did not win the popular vote may even (gasp!) “undermine democracy.” .................. Neither is Paul’s strategy underhanded or “sneaky.” He has made it clear since the beginning of his campaign that he was going to concentrate on the caucus states where he believed that his strong grassroots organization and more devoted following would win him delegates. He predicted his delegate victories in states where he did not win the popular vote months in advance and now those predictions are coming true. How can anyone say that they didn’t know what was going on? Early in this election cycle, the media repeated ad nauseum that Ron Paul could not win the nomination. That affected his performance in popular votes. They never suggested this about any of the other nine candidates, eight of which are now out. Then, they repeated ad nauseum that Ron Paul had not won any states, even though he had. Now, they attempt to cast aspersions on those wins with spurious arguments about their legitimacy. Methinks the media doth protest too much. What about Ron Paul are they so afraid of? [link to communities.washingtontimes.com] Proves Paul is a savvy, smart, worthy leader to me. All the all-so-ran's are out,...Robme is biting his nails. Sweet! Z haha - "Robme" - funny .............................. When you judge another, you do not define them, you define yourself. .................................. THE SECOND AGREEMENT: "Don't take anything personally. When you are immune to the opinions and actions of others, you won't be the victim of needless suffering." ~ Don Miguel Ruiz, The Four Agreements |
| calin (OP) User ID: 1350324 United States05/03/2012 07:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I like this site. It keeps a photo timeline of Dr. Paul's crowds... for those that think no one wants to hear it. Quoting: Joule Thief [link to rpcrowds.tumblr.com] Wow Joule Thief! Cool! .............................. When you judge another, you do not define them, you define yourself. .................................. THE SECOND AGREEMENT: "Don't take anything personally. When you are immune to the opinions and actions of others, you won't be the victim of needless suffering." ~ Don Miguel Ruiz, The Four Agreements |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 9994281  Ireland05/03/2012 07:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ron Paul delegate strategy is perfectly legitimate Quoting: calin Thursday, May 3, 2012 - Reawakening Liberty by Thomas Mullen For at least a month, the media have been ignoring compelling evidence that Ron Paul is doing much better in the Republican nomination race than he did in the primary/caucus popular votes. In their hurry to write the general election narrative, the media have forgotten to perform their primary function: to report the facts. The facts are that Ron Paul has won at least two states and will likely win more. Now that Paul’s success is impossible to ignore, the media are writing a new narrative. Headlines like “Ron Paul’s stealth state convention takeover” and “Ron Paul People Playing Mischief with Delegates” indicate that instead of ignoring Paul’s victories, they now seek to imply that there is something sneaky or unfair about them. Some even suggest that his delegate success in states where he did not win the popular vote may even (gasp!) “undermine democracy.” .................. Neither is Paul’s strategy underhanded or “sneaky.” He has made it clear since the beginning of his campaign that he was going to concentrate on the caucus states where he believed that his strong grassroots organization and more devoted following would win him delegates. He predicted his delegate victories in states where he did not win the popular vote months in advance and now those predictions are coming true. How can anyone say that they didn’t know what was going on? Early in this election cycle, the media repeated ad nauseum that Ron Paul could not win the nomination. That affected his performance in popular votes. They never suggested this about any of the other nine candidates, eight of which are now out. Then, they repeated ad nauseum that Ron Paul had not won any states, even though he had. Now, they attempt to cast aspersions on those wins with spurious arguments about their legitimacy. Methinks the media doth protest too much. What about Ron Paul are they so afraid of? [link to communities.washingtontimes.com] LOL. Breaking News! Major Ron Paul supporter writes pro-Paul article! Gasp! About the author: Tom Mullen is the author of A Return to Common Sense: Reawakening Liberty in the Inhabitants of America. He writes weekly columns on his blog and has been featured on The Daily Caller, Daily Paul, American Breaking Point, LewRockwell.com, 321 Gold! and Peter Schiff’s EuroPac.net. Tom has been a guest on Fox’s Freedom Watch with Judge Andrew Napolitano, Adam Vs. the Man, Free Talk Live, and numerous other programs. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1281623 United States05/03/2012 07:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And here we see the Ron Paul voters now supporting the MSM. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15477723 Shouldn't you wonder if you are being had? And you have been had all along? Who is supporting the MSM? No one, people just want fair coverage. Paul isn't a Bilderberg member, CFR, Trilateral, Knight of Malta, Club of Rome, Bohemian Grove member OR skull&bones. MSM is never to be trusted. Unless is says what Paultards wants them to say (even if only selectively so). This is how blind and moronic the Paultards are. They show they really don't give a damn about goodness or truth, but only the show Let's take that a step further... By your logic, all the Ron Paul Detractorbots who now ignore what the MSM is saying when they were linking left and right to those delegate ESTIMATES are moronic as well. I'm sure you never used any of the numbers that the MSM was trotting out - LYING ABOUT - before, right? And if you were, I'm sure you wouldn't start discounting what they have to say now that it looks bad for your boy Obamney. Right?? Oh and please forgive me if you're not an Obamney supporter... you sure sound like one. |
| Bluepill User ID: 1367264 United States05/03/2012 07:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Awesome article. Thanks so much for posting. By the way, thanks so much to the GLP mods. You guys have done a kick ass job and have been more than fair on your Ron Paul coverage. I really love you guys...all of you..yes, even Jarhead..you guys are great! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 15485723  Argentina05/03/2012 07:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Do you want it clearer? |
| calin (OP) User ID: 1350324 United States05/03/2012 07:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ron Paul delegate strategy is perfectly legitimate Quoting: calin Thursday, May 3, 2012 - Reawakening Liberty by Thomas Mullen For at least a month, the media have been ignoring compelling evidence that Ron Paul is doing much better in the Republican nomination race than he did in the primary/caucus popular votes. In their hurry to write the general election narrative, the media have forgotten to perform their primary function: to report the facts. The facts are that Ron Paul has won at least two states and will likely win more. Now that Paul’s success is impossible to ignore, the media are writing a new narrative. Headlines like “Ron Paul’s stealth state convention takeover” and “Ron Paul People Playing Mischief with Delegates” indicate that instead of ignoring Paul’s victories, they now seek to imply that there is something sneaky or unfair about them. Some even suggest that his delegate success in states where he did not win the popular vote may even (gasp!) “undermine democracy.” .................. Neither is Paul’s strategy underhanded or “sneaky.” He has made it clear since the beginning of his campaign that he was going to concentrate on the caucus states where he believed that his strong grassroots organization and more devoted following would win him delegates. He predicted his delegate victories in states where he did not win the popular vote months in advance and now those predictions are coming true. How can anyone say that they didn’t know what was going on? Early in this election cycle, the media repeated ad nauseum that Ron Paul could not win the nomination. That affected his performance in popular votes. They never suggested this about any of the other nine candidates, eight of which are now out. Then, they repeated ad nauseum that Ron Paul had not won any states, even though he had. Now, they attempt to cast aspersions on those wins with spurious arguments about their legitimacy. Methinks the media doth protest too much. What about Ron Paul are they so afraid of? [link to communities.washingtontimes.com] LOL. Breaking News! Major Ron Paul supporter writes pro-Paul article! Gasp! About the author: Tom Mullen is the author of A Return to Common Sense: Reawakening Liberty in the Inhabitants of America. He writes weekly columns on his blog and has been featured on The Daily Caller, Daily Paul, American Breaking Point, LewRockwell.com, 321 Gold! and Peter Schiff’s EuroPac.net. Tom has been a guest on Fox’s Freedom Watch with Judge Andrew Napolitano, Adam Vs. the Man, Free Talk Live, and numerous other programs. and...?????? He is a liberty supporter. Washington Times allows him to write articles like this and have it published. Most MSM publications would stifle such articles. .............................. When you judge another, you do not define them, you define yourself. .................................. THE SECOND AGREEMENT: "Don't take anything personally. When you are immune to the opinions and actions of others, you won't be the victim of needless suffering." ~ Don Miguel Ruiz, The Four Agreements |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 9994281 Ireland05/03/2012 07:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ron Paul delegate strategy is perfectly legitimate Quoting: calin Thursday, May 3, 2012 - Reawakening Liberty by Thomas Mullen For at least a month, the media have been ignoring compelling evidence that Ron Paul is doing much better in the Republican nomination race than he did in the primary/caucus popular votes. In their hurry to write the general election narrative, the media have forgotten to perform their primary function: to report the facts. The facts are that Ron Paul has won at least two states and will likely win more. Now that Paul’s success is impossible to ignore, the media are writing a new narrative. Headlines like “Ron Paul’s stealth state convention takeover” and “Ron Paul People Playing Mischief with Delegates” indicate that instead of ignoring Paul’s victories, they now seek to imply that there is something sneaky or unfair about them. Some even suggest that his delegate success in states where he did not win the popular vote may even (gasp!) “undermine democracy.” .................. Neither is Paul’s strategy underhanded or “sneaky.” He has made it clear since the beginning of his campaign that he was going to concentrate on the caucus states where he believed that his strong grassroots organization and more devoted following would win him delegates. He predicted his delegate victories in states where he did not win the popular vote months in advance and now those predictions are coming true. How can anyone say that they didn’t know what was going on? Early in this election cycle, the media repeated ad nauseum that Ron Paul could not win the nomination. That affected his performance in popular votes. They never suggested this about any of the other nine candidates, eight of which are now out. Then, they repeated ad nauseum that Ron Paul had not won any states, even though he had. Now, they attempt to cast aspersions on those wins with spurious arguments about their legitimacy. Methinks the media doth protest too much. What about Ron Paul are they so afraid of? [link to communities.washingtontimes.com] LOL. Breaking News! Major Ron Paul supporter writes pro-Paul article! Gasp! About the author: Tom Mullen is the author of A Return to Common Sense: Reawakening Liberty in the Inhabitants of America. He writes weekly columns on his blog and has been featured on The Daily Caller, Daily Paul, American Breaking Point, LewRockwell.com, 321 Gold! and Peter Schiff’s EuroPac.net. Tom has been a guest on Fox’s Freedom Watch with Judge Andrew Napolitano, Adam Vs. the Man, Free Talk Live, and numerous other programs. and...?????? He is a liberty supporter. Washington Times allows him to write articles like this and have it published. Most MSM publications would stifle such articles. First the Washington Times is hardly mainstream. At all. Maybe you're confusing it with the Post...? Second, it's on their blog. Big whoop. Third, this guy pretty much only writes Paul blather, everywhere. Including multiple pro-Paul pieces on the WT blog. This isn't journalism and is about as important as the iReporter shit on CNN. |
| calin (OP) User ID: 1350324 United States05/03/2012 07:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Got to see this one. Listen to the robo-call about Paul Supporters .............................. When you judge another, you do not define them, you define yourself. .................................. THE SECOND AGREEMENT: "Don't take anything personally. When you are immune to the opinions and actions of others, you won't be the victim of needless suffering." ~ Don Miguel Ruiz, The Four Agreements |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 11239964 United States05/03/2012 07:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | First they ignore you, then they make fun of you, then they fight you with deceitful words and then you win.... Quoting: Matrix 1166681    to vote So that's what Ron Paul cultists are trying to do?  A republic = soap box, ballot box, bullet box, read a history book Name a better form of government that has functioned in history successfully ? But America as a true republic started slowly dying post civilwar and 1913 when states lost their rights and the Fed took over |
| calin (OP) User ID: 1350324 United States05/03/2012 07:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ron Paul delegate strategy is perfectly legitimate Quoting: calin Thursday, May 3, 2012 - Reawakening Liberty by Thomas Mullen For at least a month, the media have been ignoring compelling evidence that Ron Paul is doing much better in the Republican nomination race than he did in the primary/caucus popular votes. In their hurry to write the general election narrative, the media have forgotten to perform their primary function: to report the facts. The facts are that Ron Paul has won at least two states and will likely win more. Now that Paul’s success is impossible to ignore, the media are writing a new narrative. Headlines like “Ron Paul’s stealth state convention takeover” and “Ron Paul People Playing Mischief with Delegates” indicate that instead of ignoring Paul’s victories, they now seek to imply that there is something sneaky or unfair about them. Some even suggest that his delegate success in states where he did not win the popular vote may even (gasp!) “undermine democracy.” .................. Neither is Paul’s strategy underhanded or “sneaky.” He has made it clear since the beginning of his campaign that he was going to concentrate on the caucus states where he believed that his strong grassroots organization and more devoted following would win him delegates. He predicted his delegate victories in states where he did not win the popular vote months in advance and now those predictions are coming true. How can anyone say that they didn’t know what was going on? Early in this election cycle, the media repeated ad nauseum that Ron Paul could not win the nomination. That affected his performance in popular votes. They never suggested this about any of the other nine candidates, eight of which are now out. Then, they repeated ad nauseum that Ron Paul had not won any states, even though he had. Now, they attempt to cast aspersions on those wins with spurious arguments about their legitimacy. Methinks the media doth protest too much. What about Ron Paul are they so afraid of? [link to communities.washingtontimes.com] LOL. Breaking News! Major Ron Paul supporter writes pro-Paul article! Gasp! About the author: Tom Mullen is the author of A Return to Common Sense: Reawakening Liberty in the Inhabitants of America. He writes weekly columns on his blog and has been featured on The Daily Caller, Daily Paul, American Breaking Point, LewRockwell.com, 321 Gold! and Peter Schiff’s EuroPac.net. Tom has been a guest on Fox’s Freedom Watch with Judge Andrew Napolitano, Adam Vs. the Man, Free Talk Live, and numerous other programs. and...?????? He is a liberty supporter. Washington Times allows him to write articles like this and have it published. Most MSM publications would stifle such articles. First the Washington Times is hardly mainstream. At all. Maybe you're confusing it with the Post...? Second, it's on their blog. Big whoop. Third, this guy pretty much only writes Paul blather, everywhere. Including multiple pro-Paul pieces on the WT blog. This isn't journalism and is about as important as the iReporter shit on CNN. Why do you care anyway? .............................. When you judge another, you do not define them, you define yourself. .................................. THE SECOND AGREEMENT: "Don't take anything personally. When you are immune to the opinions and actions of others, you won't be the victim of needless suffering." ~ Don Miguel Ruiz, The Four Agreements |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1281623 United States05/03/2012 07:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The only reason these Detractorbots come in to these threads is to spread disinformation and try to derail threads. They are scared and growing more scared with each day. They know that Dr. Paul is not losing momentum at all and it scares the crap out of them. Although some of them are just willfully ignorant Obamney supporters. So there's that. |
| ADEND User ID: 1358673 United States05/03/2012 07:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ron Paul delegate strategy is perfectly legitimate Quoting: calin Thursday, May 3, 2012 - Reawakening Liberty by Thomas Mullen For at least a month, the media have been ignoring compelling evidence that Ron Paul is doing much better in the Republican nomination race than he did in the primary/caucus popular votes. In their hurry to write the general election narrative, the media have forgotten to perform their primary function: to report the facts. The facts are that Ron Paul has won at least two states and will likely win more. Now that Paul’s success is impossible to ignore, the media are writing a new narrative. Headlines like “Ron Paul’s stealth state convention takeover” and “Ron Paul People Playing Mischief with Delegates” indicate that instead of ignoring Paul’s victories, they now seek to imply that there is something sneaky or unfair about them. Some even suggest that his delegate success in states where he did not win the popular vote may even (gasp!) “undermine democracy.” .................. Neither is Paul’s strategy underhanded or “sneaky.” He has made it clear since the beginning of his campaign that he was going to concentrate on the caucus states where he believed that his strong grassroots organization and more devoted following would win him delegates. He predicted his delegate victories in states where he did not win the popular vote months in advance and now those predictions are coming true. How can anyone say that they didn’t know what was going on? Early in this election cycle, the media repeated ad nauseum that Ron Paul could not win the nomination. That affected his performance in popular votes. They never suggested this about any of the other nine candidates, eight of which are now out. Then, they repeated ad nauseum that Ron Paul had not won any states, even though he had. Now, they attempt to cast aspersions on those wins with spurious arguments about their legitimacy. Methinks the media doth protest too much. What about Ron Paul are they so afraid of? [link to communities.washingtontimes.com] I have to disagree wholeheartedly with the bolded text. There is no way reporting facts is a primary function of the media. Their primary function is to sell things and there secondary function is propaganda. They only occasionally report facts when they find it helps with one of the above or becomes necessary to gain viewers/listeners/readers. |
| Bazingaaa User ID: 13430100 United States05/03/2012 07:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| zacksavage User ID: 1251196 United States05/03/2012 07:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's their paid job to degrade any positive Paul info????? Z Last Edited by zacksavage on 05/03/2012 09:25 PM Free your mind,...your ass will follow. --- parliament funkadelic |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 15486518  Puerto Rico05/03/2012 07:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
