Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,087 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,168,927
Pageviews Today: 1,543,958Threads Today: 347Posts Today: 5,992
01:52 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Another Executive Order!!! Compromising the First & Second Amendment & Ceding U.S. Sovereignty

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1211168
United States
05/05/2012 03:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Another Executive Order!!! Compromising the First & Second Amendment & Ceding U.S. Sovereignty
Making the U.S. subservient to international law is what Obama means by moving “Forward” and it is what Obama will do when he has “more flexibility.” I will be posting more on this, but for now you need to know about the latest EO.

WhiteHouse.gov has published Obama’s new Executive Order “Promoting International Regulatory Cooperation.” Cooperation is good and promoting it throughout the world sounds good too, but you have to read this thing.

Obama is using this EO to standardize our laws with international law. Remember the Constitution? If we follow international law, it will supercede our laws and our Constitution and not one Senator will ever have to approve it.

The laws we will cooperate with have not been legislated by our Congress. Obama, the Clintons, Harold Koh, et al have clearly promoted international law over our sovereign laws.

Think about the international laws we would have to abide by that would eliminate our right to go to war, bear arms, speak freely; think about the insane “green agenda” of the international community that demands we fork over at least 25% of our profits from oil, as just one example; think about the armed raids on companies like Gibson Guitars for violating foreign laws even though they didn’t or the people who have been arrested for international laws they violated when they didn’t even know they were laws.

How is every international business person supposed to know every international law? Obama thinks this “cooperation” will stir competition? Is he insane. It will do the opposite.

His EO talks about enacting legislation to cooperate with international laws and there is a section about information exchange and regulatory tools. Just what we need, China can’t steal our technology fast enough, now we can give it away. The regulatory part will stifle U.S. trade if the international community has any say.

Obama ties EO 13563 into EO 12866. Remember Obama’s actions are all connected. EO 12866 talks about regulations, endless regulations, within the law, but here’s the rub, he emphasizes RULEMAKING, which requires no legislative action. Look at what is happening with the HHS rule to force religious institutions into a subservient position to the government.

The following is one section that particularly concerns me because, when taken in conjunction with EO 12866, the government can pass “rules” to put us in sync with our foreign trading partners. The second amendment will be on the hit list and it certainly comprises our sovereignty.

Also on the hit list will be free speech and we will be hearing more about limited free speech and copyright infringement with our companies and people facing international tribunals. Make no mistake, this is the next step towards the International Criminal Court treaty or agreement. -

(i) reforms to existing significant regulations that address unnecessary differences in regulatory requirements between the United States and its major trading partners, consistent with section 1 of this order, when stakeholders provide adequate information to the agency establishing that the differences are unnecessary; and

(ii) such reforms in other circumstances as the agency deems appropriate; and

(d) for significant regulations that the agency identifies as having significant international impacts, consider, to the extent feasible, appropriate, and consistent with law, any regulatory approaches by a foreign government that the United States has agreed to consider under a regulatory cooperation council work plan.

[link to www.independentsentinel.com]
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1211168
United States
05/05/2012 03:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another Executive Order!!! Compromising the First & Second Amendment & Ceding U.S. Sovereignty
EXECUTIVE ORDER
- – - – - – -
PROMOTING INTERNATIONAL REGULATORY COOPERATION

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to promote international regulatory cooperation, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. Policy. Executive Order 13563 of January 18, 2011 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review), states that our regulatory system must protect public health, welfare, safety, and our environment while promoting economic growth, innovation, competitiveness, and job creation. In an increasingly global economy, international regulatory cooperation, consistent with domestic law and prerogatives and U.S. trade policy, can be an important means of promoting the goals of Executive Order 13563.

The regulatory approaches taken by foreign governments may differ from those taken by U.S. regulatory agencies to address similar issues. In some cases, the differences between the regulatory approaches of U.S. agencies and those of their foreign counterparts might not be necessary and might impair the ability of American businesses to export and compete internationally. In meeting shared challenges involving health, safety, labor, security, environmental, and other issues, international regulatory cooperation can identify approaches that are at least as protective as those that are or would be adopted in the absence of such cooperation. International regulatory cooperation can also reduce, eliminate, or prevent unnecessary differences in regulatory requirements.

Sec. 2. Coordination of International Regulatory Cooperation. (a) The Regulatory Working Group (Working Group) established by Executive Order 12866 of September 30, 1993 (Regulatory Planning and Review), which was reaffirmed by Executive Order 13563, shall, as appropriate:
(i) serve as a forum to discuss, coordinate, and develop a common understanding among agencies of U.S. Government positions and priorities with respect to:
(A) international regulatory cooperation activities that are reasonably anticipated to lead to significant regulatory actions;
(B) efforts across the Federal Government to support significant, cross-cutting international regulatory cooperation activities, such as the work of regulatory cooperation councils; and

(C) the promotion of good regulatory practices internationally, as well as the promotion of U.S. regulatory approaches, as appropriate; and

(ii) examine, among other things:

(A) appropriate strategies for engaging in the development of regulatory approaches through international regulatory cooperation, particularly in emerging technology areas, when consistent with section 1 of this order;

(B) best practices for international regulatory cooperation with respect to regulatory development, and, where appropriate, information exchange and other regulatory tools; and

(C) factors that agencies should take into account when determining whether and how to consider other regulatory approaches under section 3(d) of this order.

(b) As Chair of the Working Group, the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) shall convene the Working Group as necessary to discuss international regulatory cooperation issues as described above, and the Working Group shall include a representative from the Office of the United States Trade Representative and, as appropriate, representatives from other agencies and offices.

(c) The activities of the Working Group, consistent with law, shall not duplicate the efforts of existing interagency bodies and coordination mechanisms. The Working Group shall consult with existing interagency bodies when appropriate.

(d) To inform its discussions, and pursuant to section 4 of Executive Order 12866, the Working Group may commission analytical reports and studies by OIRA, the Administrative Conference of the United States, or any other relevant agency, and the Administrator of OIRA may solicit input, from time to time, from representatives of business, nongovernmental organizations, and the public.

(e) The Working Group shall develop and issue guidelines on the applicability and implementation of sections 2 through 4 of this order.

(f) For purposes of this order, the Working Group shall operate by consensus.

Sec. 3. Responsibilities of Federal Agencies. To the extent permitted by law, and consistent with the principles and requirements of Executive Order 13563 and Executive Order 12866, each agency shall:

(a) if required to submit a Regulatory Plan pursuant to Executive Order 12866, include in that plan a summary of its international regulatory cooperation activities that are reasonably anticipated to lead to significant regulations, with an explanation of how these activities advance the purposes of Executive Order 13563 and this order;

(b) ensure that significant regulations that the agency identifies as having significant international impacts are designated as such in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions, on RegInfo.gov, and on Regulations.gov;

(c) in selecting which regulations to include in its retrospective review plan, as required by Executive Order 13563, consider:

(i) reforms to existing significant regulations that address unnecessary differences in regulatory requirements between the United States and its major trading partners, consistent with section 1 of this order, when stakeholders provide adequate information to the agency establishing that the differences are unnecessary; and

(ii) such reforms in other circumstances as the agency deems appropriate; and

(d) for significant regulations that the agency identifies as having significant international impacts, consider, to the extent feasible, appropriate, and consistent with law, any regulatory approaches by a foreign government that the United States has agreed to consider under a regulatory cooperation council work plan.

Sec. 4. Definitions. For purposes of this order:

(a) “Agency” means any authority of the United States that is an “agency” under 44 U.S.C. 3502(1), other than those considered to be independent regulatory agencies, as defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(5).

(b) “International impact” is a direct effect that a proposed or final regulation is expected to have on international trade and investment, or that otherwise may be of significant interest to the trading partners of the United States.

(c) “International regulatory cooperation” refers to a bilateral, regional, or multilateral process, other than processes that are covered by section 6(a)(ii), (iii), and (v) of this order, in which national governments engage in various forms of collaboration and communication with respect to regulations, in particular a process that is reasonably anticipated to lead to the development of significant regulations.

(d) “Regulation” shall have the same meaning as “regulation” or “rule” in section 3(d) of Executive Order 12866.

(e) “Significant regulation” is a proposed or final regulation that constitutes a significant regulatory action.

(f) “Significant regulatory action” shall have the same meaning as in section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866.

Sec. 5. Independent Agencies. Independent regulatory agencies are encouraged to comply with the provisions of this order.

Sec. 6. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to a department or agency, or the head thereof;

(ii) the coordination and development of international trade policy and negotiations pursuant to section 411 of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (19 U.S.C. 2451) and section 141 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2171);

(iii) international trade activities undertaken pursuant to section 3 of the Act of February 14, 1903 (15 U.S.C. 1512), subtitle C of the Export Enhancement Act of 1988, as amended (15 U.S.C. 4721 et seq.), and Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1979 (19 U.S.C. 2171 note);

(iv) the authorization process for the negotiation and conclusion of international agreements pursuant to 1 U.S.C. 112b(c) and its implementing regulations (22 C.F.R. 181.4) and implementing procedures (11 FAM 720);

(v) activities in connection with subchapter II of chapter 53 of title 31 of the United States Code, title 26 of the United States Code, or Public Law 111-203 and other laws relating to financial regulation; or

(vi) the functions of the Director of OMB relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

BARACK OBAMA
Anonymous Cowherder
FEMA Region IX.

User ID: 2245483
United States
05/05/2012 03:42 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another Executive Order!!! Compromising the First & Second Amendment & Ceding U.S. Sovereignty
bump
I'm a Libertarian Constitutionalist.

I don't give a shit what you do with your own life, whether you make it a success or a failure, that is the outcome of the choices you make, but please take responsibility for yourself and don't make ME pay for YOUR choices and we're all good.

Repeal the 17th Amendment and the Apportionment Act of 1911!

Thread: First steps down the road to a return to the Constitutional Republic that we were intended to be.

Restore the Republic.

It's a flower, not something to be feared.

cow - Moo!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 15550729
United States
05/05/2012 04:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another Executive Order!!! Compromising the First & Second Amendment & Ceding U.S. Sovereignty
You know, Congress can override these EO's up to 60-90? days after it comes out.

Why hasn't Congrees struck down these EO's?

They're in on it too.

Crooks, all of them. They're all no good
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1211168
United States
05/05/2012 04:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another Executive Order!!! Compromising the First & Second Amendment & Ceding U.S. Sovereignty
You know, Congress can override these EO's up to 60-90? days after it comes out.

Why hasn't Congrees struck down these EO's?

They're in on it too.

Crooks, all of them. They're all no good
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15550729


What Congress? They will not do anything.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 6685296
United States
05/05/2012 04:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another Executive Order!!! Compromising the First & Second Amendment & Ceding U.S. Sovereignty
wtfbsflag
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1211168
United States
05/05/2012 04:48 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another Executive Order!!! Compromising the First & Second Amendment & Ceding U.S. Sovereignty
wtfbsflag
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6685296

ohappysheeplebahwhatever
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 15053320
United States
05/05/2012 05:05 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another Executive Order!!! Compromising the First & Second Amendment & Ceding U.S. Sovereignty
You know, Congress can override these EO's up to 60-90? days after it comes out.

Why hasn't Congrees struck down these EO's?

They're in on it too.

Crooks, all of them. They're all no good
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15550729


What Congress? They will not do anything.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1211168


The people wont do anything either- and its THEIR country and responsibility.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1337441
United States
05/05/2012 05:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another Executive Order!!! Compromising the First & Second Amendment & Ceding U.S. Sovereignty
THIS is real DOOM -- the worse that could happen to the USA.

.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 2926765
United States
05/05/2012 05:22 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another Executive Order!!! Compromising the First & Second Amendment & Ceding U.S. Sovereignty
the 2nd will be toast after the election....
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 1211168
United States
05/05/2012 12:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another Executive Order!!! Compromising the First & Second Amendment & Ceding U.S. Sovereignty
bump
cRoSS FiRe

User ID: 13455573
United States
05/05/2012 12:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another Executive Order!!! Compromising the First & Second Amendment & Ceding U.S. Sovereignty
THIS is real DOOM -- the worse that could happen to the USA.

.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1337441


Yes, it is.

Thread: WHERE is the frickin' media on the new "ATROCITIES PREVENTION BOARD?" (updated)

Thread: UN EXPERT calls for U.S. return of native lands after 12-day "tour" - AGENDA 21?
"Nothing is as far away as one minute ago." --Jim Bishop

:gameizovar:

It's DO:OM o'clock. WAKE UP!
ColKlink
User ID: 16548797
United States
07/16/2012 05:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another Executive Order!!! Compromising the First & Second Amendment & Ceding U.S. Sovereignty
the 2nd will be toast after the election....
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2926765


You dont know anything so STFHU asshat.

News