Why I dont think 911 was a inside job | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 3991075 05/07/2012 10:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 11735110 05/07/2012 10:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So where them terrorist get the money to do so, living in mud huts? Second off, maybe not so much really died that day. Furthermore, wtf happened to building 7? I think people just don't want to fall down the rabbit hole, and are happy being blind. The recourse of doing so will allow this to happen again, whether gov. terrorist or gov sponsored terrorist. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 11735110 05/07/2012 10:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 11735110 05/07/2012 10:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 15332927 05/07/2012 11:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 15531531 05/07/2012 11:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I was just wondering why people think the goverment could have such an easy job of covering up 911? First i'm going to ask how much money would it take for you to be directly or indirectly involved involved in 911? Here is why I really doubt 911 was an inside job first do you know how hard it would be too set up demolition on the world trade center? They couldn't work durning office hours and a building half the size of the WTC took 4,000 different chargers and 7 months of prep work and they didn't need to hide their work. After that they would need the crew to repair the walls every night after they set up the chargers to avoid detection, and they would also need to find a huge demolition crew who don't care about killing americans. They would also have to avoid drawing attention from the clean up crew,random eyewitnesses,security, bomb-sniffing dogs, and maintenance workers. The goverment would also need to pay off alot of researchers, government employees, thousands of civil engineers and structural engineers, and emergency worker. That is just the half of it and it already seems pretty much impossible. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12851951 Who was head of security at the WTC up until 9/11/2001? Marvin Bush GWB's brother... FACT. Thread: Marvin BUSH was head of the Twin Towers Security on 9/11. Did you know the towers were shut down a week before 9/11? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 10883508 05/07/2012 11:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Building 7. If you can explain its collapse I'd say 9/11 was not an inside job. This is the impossibly unexplainable FACT - how did it just collapse when no plane hit it? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3991075 yeah, please explain you point of view on this op in detail how this happened to building 7! After they crashed the planes into the towers, those wiley terrorists snuck into the WTC7 bldg when nobody was looking wired it for a controlled collapse, then boom. And even though our own military was running an exercise while all those planes were being hijacked, even though the exercise was exactly the scenario being played out in reality, they were so cornfused they couldn't scramble our fighters to the right areas to stop them. And even though our pentagon had all kinds of defenses in place, a commercial jet liner was still able to do a near circle around it, dive to a few feet off the ground, level out and fly straight into the only empty section, without skidding across the lawn, and somehow without leaving wings, tail section, jet engines, fuselage, the passengers, their luggage, or their bloody broken bodies anywhere. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 10883508 05/07/2012 11:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I was just wondering why people think the goverment could have such an easy job of covering up 911? First i'm going to ask how much money would it take for you to be directly or indirectly involved involved in 911? Here is why I really doubt 911 was an inside job first do you know how hard it would be too set up demolition on the world trade center? They couldn't work durning office hours and a building half the size of the WTC took 4,000 different chargers and 7 months of prep work and they didn't need to hide their work. After that they would need the crew to repair the walls every night after they set up the chargers to avoid detection, and they would also need to find a huge demolition crew who don't care about killing americans. They would also have to avoid drawing attention from the clean up crew,random eyewitnesses,security, bomb-sniffing dogs, and maintenance workers. The goverment would also need to pay off alot of researchers, government employees, thousands of civil engineers and structural engineers, and emergency worker. That is just the half of it and it already seems pretty much impossible. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12851951 Who was head of security at the WTC up until 9/11/2001? Marvin Bush GWB's brother... FACT. Thread: Marvin BUSH was head of the Twin Towers Security on 9/11. Did you know the towers were shut down a week before 9/11? And another Bush relative ran security for Dulles Airport. Apparently security is not a Bush forte. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 15704040 05/08/2012 12:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 15541978 05/08/2012 12:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I was just wondering why people think the goverment could have such an easy job of covering up 911? First i'm going to ask how much money would it take for you to be directly or indirectly involved involved in 911? Here is why I really doubt 911 was an inside job first do you know how hard it would be too set up demolition on the world trade center? They couldn't work durning office hours and a building half the size of the WTC took 4,000 different chargers and 7 months of prep work and they didn't need to hide their work. After that they would need the crew to repair the walls every night after they set up the chargers to avoid detection, and they would also need to find a huge demolition crew who don't care about killing americans. They would also have to avoid drawing attention from the clean up crew,random eyewitnesses,security, bomb-sniffing dogs, and maintenance workers. The goverment would also need to pay off alot of researchers, government employees, thousands of civil engineers and structural engineers, and emergency worker. That is just the half of it and it already seems pretty much impossible. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12851951 Where have you been the last 10 years? Did you just hear about it? It's all been well estabilished that the govt version is a lie. Talking to you, 10 years after the fact, is like explaining to a HS senior what he should have learned in the 2nd grade. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 15705394 05/08/2012 12:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I was just wondering why people think the goverment could have such an easy job of covering up 911? First i'm going to ask how much money would it take for you to be directly or indirectly involved involved in 911? Here is why I really doubt 911 was an inside job first do you know how hard it would be too set up demolition on the world trade center? They couldn't work durning office hours and a building half the size of the WTC took 4,000 different chargers and 7 months of prep work and they didn't need to hide their work. After that they would need the crew to repair the walls every night after they set up the chargers to avoid detection, and they would also need to find a huge demolition crew who don't care about killing americans. They would also have to avoid drawing attention from the clean up crew,random eyewitnesses,security, bomb-sniffing dogs, and maintenance workers. The goverment would also need to pay off alot of researchers, government employees, thousands of civil engineers and structural engineers, and emergency worker. That is just the half of it and it already seems pretty much impossible. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12851951 Where have you been the last 10 years? Did you just hear about it? It's all been well estabilished that the govt version is a lie. Talking to you, 10 years after the fact, is like explaining to a HS senior what he should have learned in the 2nd grade. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 13422784 05/08/2012 12:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Building 7. If you can explain its collapse I'd say 9/11 was not an inside job. This is the impossibly unexplainable FACT - how did it just collapse when no plane hit it? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3991075 Captain Chris Boyle Engine 94 - 18 years Boyle: ...on the north and east side of 7 it didn’t look like there was any damage at all, but then you looked on the south side of 7 there had to be a hole 20 stories tall in the building, with fire on several floors. Debris was falling down on the building and it didn’t look good. Firehouse: When you looked at the south side, how close were you to the base of that side? Boyle: I was standing right next to the building, probably right next to it. Firehouse: When you had fire on the 20 floors, was it in one window or many? Boyle: There was a huge gaping hole and it was scattered throughout there. It was a huge hole. I would say it was probably about a third of it, right in the middle of it. And so after Visconti came down and said nobody goes in 7, we said all right, we’ll head back to the command post. We lost touch with him. I never saw him again that day. [link to www.firehouse.com] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 13422784 05/08/2012 12:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Building 7. If you can explain its collapse I'd say 9/11 was not an inside job. This is the impossibly unexplainable FACT - how did it just collapse when no plane hit it? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3991075 Deputy Chief Peter Hayden Division 1 - 33 years ...also we were pretty sure that 7 World Trade Center would collapse. Early on, we saw a bulge in the southwest corner between floors 10 and 13, and we had put a transit on that and we were pretty sure she was going to collapse. You actually could see there was a visible bulge, it ran up about three floors. It came down about 5 o’clock in the afternoon, but by about 2 o’clock in the afternoon we realized this thing was going to collapse. Firehouse: Was there heavy fire in there right away? Hayden: No, not right away, and that’s probably why it stood for so long because it took a while for that fire to develop. It was a heavy body of fire in there and then we didn’t make any attempt to fight it. That was just one of those wars we were just going to lose. We were concerned about the collapse of a 47-story building there. We were worried about additional collapse there of what was remaining standing of the towers and the Marriott, so we started pulling the people back after a couple of hours of surface removal and searches along the surface of the debris. We started to pull guys back because we were concerned for their safety. [link to www.firehouse.com] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 2681071 05/08/2012 12:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 3421219 05/08/2012 12:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 7314441 05/08/2012 12:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm just wondering why people still insist on making it into something much more elaborate than it was. Thing is, EVEN IF, it was an inside job, there would be no need for complex holographic planes and nuclear detonations underground etc. Nonsense. If they wanted to do it, they would have just done it, the way we all saw it go down. No fancy foolishness, they would've just had a dedicated expert pilot fly the sucker in. As for building 7, I was there, I saw what the 2 towers coming down did to its broadside... I'm shocked it stayed up as long as it did honestly. You gonna tell me the Marriot was a controlled demo next? Fact is, those two towers had such a combined impact on the ground coming down, they lifted ALL the surrounding buildings fractionally. Combined with the debris and the missing floors, building 7 was doomed from the moment the first tower fell. Now, I'll entertain theories on workers secretly removing the fireproofing on WTC's supports before hand, but anything more complicated than that is just begging for exposure, something they wouldn't have risked. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 15716871 05/08/2012 07:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 15302096 05/08/2012 07:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 15708380 05/08/2012 08:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 15703087 05/08/2012 08:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I was just wondering why people think the goverment could have such an easy job of covering up 911? First i'm going to ask how much money would it take for you to be directly or indirectly involved involved in 911? Here is why I really doubt 911 was an inside job first do you know how hard it would be too set up demolition on the world trade center? They couldn't work durning office hours and a building half the size of the WTC took 4,000 different chargers and 7 months of prep work and they didn't need to hide their work. After that they would need the crew to repair the walls every night after they set up the chargers to avoid detection, and they would also need to find a huge demolition crew who don't care about killing americans. They would also have to avoid drawing attention from the clean up crew,random eyewitnesses,security, bomb-sniffing dogs, and maintenance workers. The goverment would also need to pay off alot of researchers, government employees, thousands of civil engineers and structural engineers, and emergency worker. That is just the half of it and it already seems pretty much impossible. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12851951 Then you need to investigate how Securacom, a company headed by George Bush's cousin and one which Marvin Bush was on the board... who ran security at the WTC and the airport the planes that hit the towers flew out of... was awarded a $8.5 million contract to install a new security system in the WTC, which took 4 years to install 1996-2000... I think that just about answers your question.... |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 15703087 05/08/2012 08:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I was just wondering why people think the goverment could have such an easy job of covering up 911? First i'm going to ask how much money would it take for you to be directly or indirectly involved involved in 911? Here is why I really doubt 911 was an inside job first do you know how hard it would be too set up demolition on the world trade center? They couldn't work durning office hours and a building half the size of the WTC took 4,000 different chargers and 7 months of prep work and they didn't need to hide their work. After that they would need the crew to repair the walls every night after they set up the chargers to avoid detection, and they would also need to find a huge demolition crew who don't care about killing americans. They would also have to avoid drawing attention from the clean up crew,random eyewitnesses,security, bomb-sniffing dogs, and maintenance workers. The goverment would also need to pay off alot of researchers, government employees, thousands of civil engineers and structural engineers, and emergency worker. That is just the half of it and it already seems pretty much impossible. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12851951 Then you need to investigate how Securacom, a company headed by George Bush's cousin and one which Marvin Bush was on the board... who ran security at the WTC and the airport the planes that hit the towers flew out of... was awarded a $8.5 million contract to install a new security system in the WTC, which took 4 years to install 1996-2000... I think that just about answers your question.... |
| russwg1970 User ID: 2075492 05/08/2012 08:09 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I was just wondering why people think the goverment could have such an easy job of covering up 911? First i'm going to ask how much money would it take for you to be directly or indirectly involved involved in 911? Here is why I really doubt 911 was an inside job first do you know how hard it would be too set up demolition on the world trade center? They couldn't work durning office hours and a building half the size of the WTC took 4,000 different chargers and 7 months of prep work and they didn't need to hide their work. After that they would need the crew to repair the walls every night after they set up the chargers to avoid detection, and they would also need to find a huge demolition crew who don't care about killing americans. They would also have to avoid drawing attention from the clean up crew,random eyewitnesses,security, bomb-sniffing dogs, and maintenance workers. The goverment would also need to pay off alot of researchers, government employees, thousands of civil engineers and structural engineers, and emergency worker. That is just the half of it and it already seems pretty much impossible. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12851951 You're never going to wake up... are you? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1507763 05/08/2012 08:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I was just wondering why people think the goverment could have such an easy job of covering up 911? First i'm going to ask how much money would it take for you to be directly or indirectly involved involved in 911? Here is why I really doubt 911 was an inside job first do you know how hard it would be too set up demolition on the world trade center? They couldn't work durning office hours and a building half the size of the WTC took 4,000 different chargers and 7 months of prep work and they didn't need to hide their work. After that they would need the crew to repair the walls every night after they set up the chargers to avoid detection, and they would also need to find a huge demolition crew who don't care about killing americans. They would also have to avoid drawing attention from the clean up crew,random eyewitnesses,security, bomb-sniffing dogs, and maintenance workers. The goverment would also need to pay off alot of researchers, government employees, thousands of civil engineers and structural engineers, and emergency worker. That is just the half of it and it already seems pretty much impossible. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12851951 Money is no object to the conspirators. Most of the work was probably done at night. People who worked in the buildings reported seeing and hearing construction work going on, but no one knew what it was for. Yep, it probably took months of prep work. Who says the demo crew were Americans? I'm guessing wall repair wasn't necessary because of the way the building was constructed. Namely, ready access to internal framework outside the internal walls. Bomb sniffing dogs were pulled from the building before it came down. Can the dogs detect the type of charges used? Don't know. Government workers can be silenced in a number of ways. Loss of income, "classified" information, threats... Also, there are thousands of engineers and pilots have publicly raised the bullshit flag. I'd say the scenario they want us to believe is pretty much impossible, and ridiculous on it's face. Inexperienced Arabs piloting those aircraft in the manner they were thought to do? Really? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 15684685 05/08/2012 08:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This OP is deeply sad and laughable. Ot demoonstates the stupidity that the "Truth Movement" is up against. >>> why people think the goverment could have such an easy job of covering up 911? An "Inside Job" does NOT mean the US Governemtn did it. "Inside Job" means that SOMEONE, possibly just ONE PERSON was involved. Indeed, one of the most classic "INSIDE JOBS" of all time was the Brinks Matt bullion heist in which only ONE GUARD was feeding info to the robbers. >>>First i'm going to ask how much money would it take for you to be directly or indirectly involved involved in 911? Actually ZERO as it would have actually been possible to have "made a profit" on it by establishing trading positions on the options market. >>> do you know how hard it would be too set up demolition on the world trade center? YES I DO. Absolutely NONE WHATSOEVER. The type of explosive of which traces have been found is one that can be applied like paint or even be mixed with paint. Additionally, t >>> They couldn't work durning office hours and a building half the size of the WTC took 4,000 different chargers and 7 months of prep work and they didn't need to hide their work. Nope, not at all. There was a "shutdown" for which there are witnesses which would have allowed access, plus there were reports of mysterious elevator engineers 6 months before, the elevator shafts being right next to the trusses that collapsed. Indeed, the construction company now says that it does nto know what all the work it did on the WTC was before 9/11 as all the records were destroyed in 9/11. >>> After that they would need the crew to repair the walls every night after they set up the chargers to avoid detection, Not at all. As the bulk of the explosives were applied as paint, they could have been doing it in braod daylight. >>>and they would also need to find a huge demolition crew who don't care about killing americans. Nope, not at all. You tell a construction worker to paint a wall, how is he to know that the paint is corrupted with high explosive? >>>They would also have to avoid drawing attention from the clean up crew,random eyewitnesses,security, bomb-sniffing dogs, and maintenance workers. ....Nope, not at all. Furthermore, there were no bomb-sniffing dogs there. >>> The goverment ...Not if it were not the Governemet per se who did it . >>> would also need to pay off alot of researchers, government employees, thousands of civil engineers and structural engineers, and emergency worker. Nope, not at all. They just needed to invite the WTC 1 and 2 teams to a meeting in WTC 7 on the day and BOOM, no need to pay off dead pions who you just liquidated! |
| Second Best User ID: 1681264 05/08/2012 08:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Oh and who asked you? 9/11 was clearly well orchestrated, by a faction of the US government and other foreign governments. There is no way bldg 7 collapsed due to "fire". It was further from the twin towers than other buildings that stood almost intact when all was said and done. Therefore, bldg 7 was demolished for a purpose. Pentagon plane? No credible images, or proof has come forth showing an actual plane hitting the heavily protected command centre. The gov has released a set of 3-4 freeze frames , all of which DO NOT show a plane. On the contrary, we are led to believe a white streak of smoke at about 5-6 feet off the ground is a plane, then boom a big freeze frame of an explosion. The facts are there, no plane is shown and they will not produce such proof as there was no plane that hit the pentagon that morning. NORAD.....stands down? Because of "war games" happening the very same morning?!?! Paaaaallllllllleeeeeeeeeezzzzzzzzzzzz, what do they think we are? Stupid. They mean to tell us that the entire air defense system of North America was on stand down ? These quickly elborated remarks are why I think 911 was an inside job and why you're a pinhead. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 11158958 05/09/2012 05:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I was just wondering why people think the goverment could have such an easy job of covering up 911? First i'm going to ask how much money would it take for you to be directly or indirectly involved involved in 911? Here is why I really doubt 911 was an inside job first do you know how hard it would be too set up demolition on the world trade center? They couldn't work durning office hours and a building half the size of the WTC took 4,000 different chargers and 7 months of prep work and they didn't need to hide their work. After that they would need the crew to repair the walls every night after they set up the chargers to avoid detection, and they would also need to find a huge demolition crew who don't care about killing americans. They would also have to avoid drawing attention from the clean up crew,random eyewitnesses,security, bomb-sniffing dogs, and maintenance workers. The goverment would also need to pay off alot of researchers, government employees, thousands of civil engineers and structural engineers, and emergency worker. That is just the half of it and it already seems pretty much impossible. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12851951 The wtc buildings were nuked. fyi The damage of the 'wtc planes' compared to damage of 'pentagon plane' is as different as 0 is different from 10000. Oh and alluminum planes dont penetrate +5 layers of steel. Be it the wtc structures and/or the pentagon. It's an impossibility. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 15740069 05/09/2012 05:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I was just wondering why people think the goverment could have such an easy job of covering up 911? First i'm going to ask how much money would it take for you to be directly or indirectly involved involved in 911? Here is why I really doubt 911 was an inside job first do you know how hard it would be too set up demolition on the world trade center? They couldn't work durning office hours and a building half the size of the WTC took 4,000 different chargers and 7 months of prep work and they didn't need to hide their work. After that they would need the crew to repair the walls every night after they set up the chargers to avoid detection, and they would also need to find a huge demolition crew who don't care about killing americans. They would also have to avoid drawing attention from the clean up crew,random eyewitnesses,security, bomb-sniffing dogs, and maintenance workers. The goverment would also need to pay off alot of researchers, government employees, thousands of civil engineers and structural engineers, and emergency worker. That is just the half of it and it already seems pretty much impossible. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12851951 The people who did 9-11 dont have an allegiance to America and its ideals. They have their own Philosophy and it goes against what America stands for. So in their mind they had to attack Americans and America herself. And they did it in a way that would continue to weaken our country. They are here in the government and alot of them work together because they all have a common goal. Every government has these problems. But we are dealing with Extremism. And its not religious. Its Philosophical. That is what trips people up. They are not dealing with Fanatics. They are dealing with Sages. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 15411618 05/09/2012 05:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Dr.DoomLittle User ID: 6231580 06/17/2012 08:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I was just wondering why people think the goverment could have such an easy job of covering up 911? First i'm going to ask how much money would it take for you to be directly or indirectly involved involved in 911? Here is why I really doubt 911 was an inside job first do you know how hard it would be too set up demolition on the world trade center? They couldn't work durning office hours and a building half the size of the WTC took 4,000 different chargers and 7 months of prep work and they didn't need to hide their work. After that they would need the crew to repair the walls every night after they set up the chargers to avoid detection, and they would also need to find a huge demolition crew who don't care about killing americans. They would also have to avoid drawing attention from the clean up crew,random eyewitnesses,security, bomb-sniffing dogs, and maintenance workers. The goverment would also need to pay off alot of researchers, government employees, thousands of civil engineers and structural engineers, and emergency worker. That is just the half of it and it already seems pretty much impossible. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12851951 WTC towers were doomed before they were even built. |
| Dr.DoomLittle User ID: 6231580 06/17/2012 08:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Oh and who asked you? Quoting: Second Best 1681264 9/11 was clearly well orchestrated, by a faction of the US government and other foreign governments. There is no way bldg 7 collapsed due to "fire". It was further from the twin towers than other buildings that stood almost intact when all was said and done. Therefore, bldg 7 was demolished for a purpose. Pentagon plane? No credible images, or proof has come forth showing an actual plane hitting the heavily protected command centre. The gov has released a set of 3-4 freeze frames , all of which DO NOT show a plane. On the contrary, we are led to believe a white streak of smoke at about 5-6 feet off the ground is a plane, then boom a big freeze frame of an explosion. The facts are there, no plane is shown and they will not produce such proof as there was no plane that hit the pentagon that morning. NORAD.....stands down? Because of "war games" happening the very same morning?!?! Paaaaallllllllleeeeeeeeeezzzzzzzzzzzz, what do they think we are? Stupid. They mean to tell us that the entire air defense system of North America was on stand down ? These quickly elborated remarks are why I think 911 was an inside job and why you're a pinhead. They WANT us to know, it was them. |